Citations

Importance In patients with severe aortic valve stenosis at intermediate surgical risk, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a self-expanding supra-annular valve was noninferior to surgery for all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at 2 years. Comparisons of longer-term clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in these patients are limited. Objective To report prespecified secondary 5-year outcomes from the Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis in Intermediate Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement (SURTAVI) randomized clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants SURTAVI is a prospective randomized, unblinded clinical trial. Randomization was stratified by investigational site and need for revascularization determined by the local heart teams. Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis deemed to be at intermediate risk of 30-day surgical mortality were enrolled at 87 centers from June 19, 2012, to June 30, 2016, in Europe and North America. Analysis took place between August and October 2021. Intervention Patients were randomized to TAVR with a self-expanding, supra-annular transcatheter or a surgical bioprosthesis. Main Outcomes and Measures The prespecified secondary end points of death or disabling stroke and other adverse events and hemodynamic findings at 5 years. An independent clinical event committee adjudicated all serious adverse events and an independent echocardiographic core laboratory evaluated all echocardiograms at 5 years. Results A total of 1660 individuals underwent an attempted TAVR (n = 864) or surgical (n = 796) procedure. The mean (SD) age was 79.8 (6.2) years, 724 (43.6%) were female, and the mean (SD) Society of Thoracic Surgery Predicted Risk of Mortality score was 4.5% (1.6%). At 5 years, the rates of death or disabling stroke were similar (TAVR, 31.3% vs surgery, 30.8%; hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.85-1.22]; P = .85). Transprosthetic gradients remained lower (mean [SD], 8.6 [5.5] mm Hg vs 11.2 [6.0] mm Hg; P < .001) and aortic valve areas were higher (mean [SD], 2.2 [0.7] cm 2 vs 1.8 [0.6] cm 2 ; P < .001) with TAVR vs surgery. More patients had moderate/severe paravalvular leak with TAVR than surgery (11 [3.0%] vs 2 [0.7%]; risk difference, 2.37% [95% CI, 0.17%- 4.85%]; P = .05). New pacemaker implantation rates were higher for TAVR than surgery at 5 years (289 [39.1%] vs 94 [15.1%]; hazard ratio, 3.30 [95% CI, 2.61-4.17]; log-rank P < .001), as were valve reintervention rates (27 [3.5%] vs 11 [1.9%]; hazard ratio, 2.21 [95% CI, 1.10-4.45]; log-rank P = .02), although between 2 and 5 years only 6 patients who underwent TAVR and 7 who underwent surgery required a reintervention. Conclusions and Relevance Among intermediate-risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, major clinical outcomes at 5 years were similar for TAVR and surgery. TAVR was associated with superior hemodynamic valve performance but also with more paravalvular leak and valve reinterventions.

Importance Laser-assisted drug delivery (LADD) is used for various medical and cosmetic applications. However, there is insufficient evidence-based guidance to assist clinicians performing LADD. Objective To develop recommendations for the safe and effective use of LADD. Evidence Review A systematic literature review of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and MEDLINE was conducted in December 2019 to identify publications reporting research on LADD. A multidisciplinary panel was convened to draft recommendations informed by the systematic review; they were refined through 2 rounds of Delphi survey, 2 consensus meetings, and iterative review by all panelists until unanimous consensus was achieved. Findings Of the 48 published studies of ablative fractional LADD that met inclusion criteria, 4 were cosmetic studies; 21, oncologic; and 23, medical (not cosmetic/oncologic), and 6 publications of nonablative fractional LADD were included at the request of the expert panel, producing a total of 54 studies. Thirty-four studies (63.0%) were deemed to have low risk of bias, 17 studies (31.5%) had moderate risk, and 3 (5.5%) had serious risk. The key findings that informed the guidelines developed by the expert panel were as follows: LADD is safe in adults and adolescents (≥12 years) with all Fitzpatrick skin types and in patients with immunosuppression; it is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ, actinic cheilitis, hypertrophic scars, and keloids; it is useful for epidermal and dermal analgesia; drug delivery may be increased through the application of heat, pressure, or occlusion, or by using an aqueous drug solution; laser settings should be selected to ensure that channel diameter is greater than the delivered molecule; antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended, except with impaired wound healing; antiviral prophylaxis is recommended when treating the face and genitalia; and antifungal prophylaxis is not recommended. The guideline’s 15 recommendations address 5 areas of LADD use: (I) indications and contraindications; (II) parameters to report; (III) optimization of drug delivery; (IV) safety considerations; and (V) prophylaxis for bacterial, viral, and fungal infections. Conclusions and Relevance This systematic review and Delphi consensus approach culminated in an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for safe and effective use of LADD in a variety of applications. Future research will further improve our understanding of this novel treatment technique.

10009 Background: The NCI-Children’s Oncology Group (COG) Pediatric Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (MATCH) trial assigns patients, age 1-21 years, with relapsed or refractory solid tumors, lymphomas, and histiocytic disorders to phase 2 treatment arms based on genetic alterations detected in their tumor. Arm C evaluated the EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat in patients whose tumors harbored EZH2 hotspot mutations or SMARCB1 or SMARCA4 loss by immunohistochemistry. Methods: Tazemetostat 1200 mg/m2/dose PO BID was administered to the first 13 patients; after study amendment due to second malignancy noted in the pediatric phase 1 trial, the dose for patients with non-CNS tumors was reduced to 520 mg/m2/dose PO BID. Patients were treated for 28-day cycles until PD or intolerable toxicity (max 26 cycles); response assessments occurred every 2-3 cycles. Primary and secondary endpoints were ORR and PFS, respectively. Results: Twenty eligible and evaluable patients (median age 5 years; range 1-21) were enrolled between Nov 2017 and Sept 2020. SMARCB1 loss was detected in 16/20 (80%) tumors: atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT, n = 8), malignant rhabdoid tumor (MRT, n = 4), epithelioid sarcoma (ES, n = 2), renal medullary carcinoma (RMC, n = 1) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, n = 1). EZH2 mutations were identified in 3/20 (15%) tumors: Ewing sarcoma (n = 2), ependymoma (n = 1). One patient with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) had SMARCA4 loss. Centrally reviewed, one objective response (PR) was observed (LCH [SMARCA4], 26 cycles at 1200 mg/m2/dose BID). Five other patients had a best response of stable disease (ES [SMARCB1], 26 cycles, 520 mg/m2/dose BID; ATRT [SMARCB1], 13 cycles,1200 mg/m2/dose BID; RMC [SMARCB1], 12 cycles, 520 mg/m2/dose BID; ES [SMARCB1], 9 cycles,1200 mg/m2/dose BID; ATRT [SMARCB1], 6 cycles, 1200 mg/m2/dose BID). No other patients received > 2 cycles. Six-month PFS was 35% (95% CI 15.7%, 55.2%); OS was 45% (95% CI 23.1%, 64.7%). Treatment-related adverse events were consistent with AEs previously reported with tazemetostat, including anemia, thrombocytopenia, elevated LFTs, abdominal pain, dyspnea, infection, and intracranial hemorrhage. Three patients had bromide elevations. Conclusions: In this cohort of children with relapsed tumors harboring EZH2 mutations or loss of SMARCB1 or SMARCA4, tazemetostat did not produce significant objective responses (ORR: 5%, 90% CI 1%, 20%). However, we observed prolonged stable disease of > 6 months (range: 6-26 cycles) in 33% of patients across different histologic diagnoses, including two patients who received the full two years of study therapysuggesting a potential effect of tazemetostat on disease stabilization. Future studies will incorporate tazemetostat in combination with chemotherapy or immunologic agents for patients with these aggressive and difficult to treat tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT03213665.

TPS1107 Background: ALP (α-selective PI3K inhibitor and degrader) is approved with FUL for pts with PIK3CA-mut HR+, HER2− ABC. HG is a known on-target effect of PI3K inhibition, manageable with oral anti-HG agents such as MET and dose interruptions/modifications of ALP and reversible upon discontinuation of ALP. Although HG management guidelines were refined throughout the SOLAR-1 and BYLieve studies evaluating ALP + FUL/letrozole, there remains a need for optimized strategies beyond initial MET therapy that offers earlier and more sustained improvement of HG, particularly for pts at an increased risk for severe HG. In preclinical models, the addition of a SGLT2 inhibitor to ALP (+/− MET) reduced HG while maintaining ALP efficacy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prophylactic MET XR +/− the SGLT2 inhibitor DAPA in reducing severe HG in pts with PIK3CA-mut HR+, HER2− ABC on ALP + FUL with an increased risk for severe HG (grade ≥ 3) on ALP. Methods: EPIK-B4 is a Phase II, randomized (1:1), open-label, active-controlled study assessing the efficacy and safety of MET XR +/− DAPA (starting at Cycle 1 Day 1 [C1D1]) with ALP (300 mg orally [PO], once daily [QD], starting at C1D8) + FUL (500 mg intramuscularly on C1D1, C1D15, and D1 of subsequent cycles) in pts (N ≈ 132) with HR+, HER2–, PIK3CA-mut ABC after progression on/after endocrine-based treatment (Tx). MET XR is administered PO starting at 500 mg QD (titrated up to 2 g QD) and MET XR + DAPA starting at 500 mg and 5 mg QD (titrated up to 2 g and 10 mg QD), respectively. Eligible pts include adult men or postmenopausal women with confirmed HR+, HER2–, PIK3CA-mut ABC and ≥ 1 risk factor for severe HG (diabetes [fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 126 mg/dL and/or HbA1c ≥ 6.5%], prediabetes [FPG ≥ 100 to < 126 mg/dL and/or HbA1c 5.7% to < 6.5%], obesity [BMI ≥ 30], age ≥ 75 years); prior endocrine-based Tx (eg, FUL or oral SERD) was permitted. Randomization is stratified by baseline diabetes status. Key exclusion criteria include > 1 line of Tx in the metastatic setting; prior chemotherapy (metastatic setting) or PI3K, mTOR, or AKT inhibitor; type I or II diabetes requiring Tx; or antecedent of pancreatitis or severe cutaneous reaction. The primary endpoint is the occurrence of severe HG (grade ≥ 3 [glucose > 250 mg/dL] based on laboratory assessments) over the first 8 weeks of ALP + FUL. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall response and clinical benefit rates with confirmed response, safety, and tolerability. A biomarker analysis is planned as an exploratory objective. Recruitment is ongoing with enrollment planned in 56 sites across 8 countries; completion of primary data collection is anticipated in 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT04899349; EUDRACT#2021-001908-15.

3134 Background: Mucinous breast cancer (MuBC) is a rare subtype of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) that accounts for less than 2% of all breast cancers and is associated with a favorable prognosis. Since MuBCs are rare in clinical trials, current treatment guidelines are extrapolated from IDC-no special type (IDC-NST). To provide better understanding of MuBCs and factors contributing to their clinical behavior, we examined the transcriptomic profiles of MuBCs in our FLEX study. Methods: The prospective, observational FLEX Study (NCT03053193) includes stage I-III breast cancer patients who receive MammaPrint (MP)/BluePrint (BP) testing and consent to full transcriptome and clinical data collection. For this study, histologically confirmed MuBCs (n = 102) in the FLEX database were included. All patients examined were ER+/HER2- by immunohistochemistry and Luminal by BP. MuBC was compared with IDC matched for Age, MP, and BP index (n = 97). Differential gene expression analyses (DGEA) were performed with R package ‘limma’ and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were considered significant if they had an adjusted p < 0.05 and fold change ≥ 2. Results: DGEA comparing MuBC (n = 102) with IDC (n = 97) revealed 60 DEGs, regardless of the genomic risk, of which 42 genes were upregulated and 18 were downregulated in MuBC relative to IDC. Genes associated with MuBC, such as MUC2, TFF1, CARTPT were among the upregulated genes. Of the 102 MuBC patients, 56 were Luminal A (MP Low Risk-LR) and 46 were Luminal B (MP High Risk-HR) by MammaPrint and BluePrint. Comparison of LR MuBC with LR IDC revealed 111 DEGs. Functional enrichment showed upregulation of pathways involved in estrogen response (early & late) and androgen response and a downregulation of the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and E2F pathways in LR MuBC compared to LR IDC. DGEA between HR MuBC and HR IDC revealed only 22 DEGs with immune pathways being downregulated in HR MuBC. DGEA comparing LR MuBC with HR MuBC resulted in 63 DEGs, indicating LR and HR MuBC are biologically distinct types. Interestingly in LR MuBC, the tumor suppressor marker SCUBE2 is upregulated. Over expression of SCUBE2 is associated with better prognosis. Conclusions: Although MuBCs are often expected to have low clinical risk, MP revealed that half of the MuBCs examined in this study were MP High Risk (Luminal B). MP low risk MuBC is biologically different from MP low risk IDC, and downregulation of E2F and EMT pathways might lead to favorable prognoses in MP low risk MuBC. MP high risk MuBC showed limited DEGs compared to high-risk IDCs indicating these tumor types are highly genomically similar and likely to benefit from chemotherapy. The downregulation of immune pathways in MP high risk MuBC may lead to immune surveillance escape resulting in metastasis and further investigation is needed. Clinical trial information: NCT03053193.

INTRODUCTION: Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is a common cause of hospitalization worldwide. We assessed temporal trends in hospitalization for PUD in 36 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries since the turn of the 21st century. METHODS: The OECD database contains data on PUD-related hospital discharges and mortality for 36 countries between 2000 and 2019. Hospitalization rates for PUD were expressed as annual rates per 100,000 persons. Joinpoint regression models were used to calculate the average annual percent change (AAPC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each country, which were pooled using meta-analyses. The incidence of PUD was forecasted to 2021 using autoregressive integrated moving average and Poisson regression models. RESULTS: The overall median hospitalization rate was 42.4 with an interquartile range of 29.7–60.6 per 100,000 person-years. On average, hospitalization rates (AAPC = −3.9%; 95% CI: −4.4, −3.3) and morality rates (AAPC = −4.7%; 95% CI: −5.6, −3.8) for PUD have decreased from 2000 to 2019 globally. The forecasted incidence of PUD hospitalizations in 2021 ranged from 3.5 per 100,000 in Mexico to 92.1 per 100,000 in Lithuania. Across 36 countries in the OECD, 329,000 people are estimated to be hospitalized for PUD in 2021. DISCUSSION: PUD remains an important cause of hospitalization worldwide. Reassuringly, hospitalizations and mortality for PUD have consistently been falling in OECD countries in North America, Latin America, Europe, Asia, and Oceania. Identifying underlying factors driving these trends is essential to sustaining this downward momentum.

Abstract Introduction The objective of this study is to assess the validity of the REM Sleep Behavior Disorder (RBD) symptom severity scale (RBDSSS) and its correlation to the clinical global impression of severity (CGI-S) in a cohort of participants enrolled in the North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy (NAPS) study. RBD is a prodromal marker of α-synucleinopathies with no standardized tool for assessing severity in clinical or research practice. Development of a reliable scale is essential to understand risk of phenoconversion and to monitor response to treatments, particularly in future neuroprotective clinical trials. Methods Participants and their bedpartners enrolled in the NAPS cohort filled out an 8-item questionnaire, developed by the International RBD Study Group, assessing frequency and severity of dreams, vocalizations, movements, and injuries associated with RBD, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The CGI-S is a 7-point scale ranging from normal (1) to most severely ill (7) and was completed by a clinician based on an independent interview with the participant ± their bedpartners. Data was included when patient (RBDSSS-PT) and bedpartner (RBDSSS-BP) responses were both available. Total scores were derived by multiplying assigned point values for frequency and severity (for each question) and summing them for individual RBDSSS-PT scores (total possible=54) and RBDSSS-BP scores (total possible=38). Results This cohort (n=212) included in this analysis was predominantly male (n=175) with a mean ± SE age of 65.16 ± 1.46 years. The median (interquartile range) for RBDSSS-PT, RBDSSS-BP and CGI-S was 11 (4-17), 8 (4-14.3) and 3 (3-4), respectively. Non-parametric Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (rs) for each variable pair are as follows: RBDSSS-PT vs. RBDSSS-BP, rs=0.575; RBDSSS-PT vs. CGI-S, rs=0.641; RBDSSS-BP vs. CGI-S, rs=0.463 (P&lt;0.0001). Conclusion A moderate correlation was observed between RBDSSS-PT and RBDSSS-BP suggesting good construct validity for the scale. CGI-S correlated moderately with RBDSSS-PT and weakly with RBDSSS-BP. Future, larger studies are needed to explore this as a possible universal and clinically applicable scale for designation of RBD disease burden and prognostication. Support (If Any)

Abstract Introduction Non-REM hypertonia (NRH) was recently reported to be independently associated with the synucleinopathy-mediated neurodegenerative disorders: dementia with Lewy Bodies/Parkinson Disease Dementia (DLB/PDD), Parkinson Disease (PD), and isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD). In this NRH investigation, we included progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), a Parkinsonian-spectrum disorder caused by tau pathology. Methods In this multicenter study, patients broadly characterized as presumed Parkinsonian-spectrum disorders (PSD) included DLB/PDD (n=16), PD (n=16), iRBD (n=19), and PSP (n=13). Presumed non-PSD subjects included Alzheimer’s Disease dementia (AD=22), mild cognitive impairment (MCI=35), and normal cognition (NC=61). Sleep Profiler studies were acquired in all participants. NRH, auto-detected based on persistently elevated electromyographic (EMG) power relative to delta, theta, and sigma bands in the differential Af7-Af8 signal, was measured as a percentage of sleep time and then weight-averaged in the 75% of in-home studies with two-nights of data. A &gt;5% threshold characterized abnormal-NRH. Twenty-nine NC were longitudinally retested after 364- to 563-days. Statistical analyses included inter-class correlations (ICC), Bland-Altman plots, multiple logistic regression, and receiver-operating-characteristic curves (ROC). Results In the PSD=41 and non-PSD=95 records with two-nights of data, NRH-severity demonstrated moderate consistency (ICC=0.78, bias=0.6+/-6.2%, P&lt;0.0001). Across the two-nights, NRH was classified consistently as normal or abnormal in 59.6% and 27.2% of the records, vs. normal/abnormal=4.4% or abnormal/normal=8.8%. The test-retest reliability of NRH-severity was good (ICC=0.84, bias=0.06+/-3.8%, P&lt;0.0001), with all retest comparisons repeating as normal (73%) or abnormal (27%). The frequency of abnormal-NRH in PSP=92% was significantly greater than MCI=26%, AD=14%, and NC=16% (all P&lt;0.0001) and PD=56% (P&lt;0.05), but not DLB/PDD=81% and iRBD=74%. Abnormal-NRH was significantly associated with the PSD group (P&lt;0.0001) and it differentiated PSD versus non-PSD group with an area under the curve of 0.78 (95%CI: 0.72-0.85) based on a sensitivity of 0.75 (95%CI: 0.63-0.84) and a specificity of 0.81 (85%CI: 0.73-0.87). Conclusion NRH independently discriminated PSD patients from age-sex similar non-PSD subjects, suggesting that NRH is a common sleep motor signature across clinical PSD phenotypes. We speculate that NRH could be related to pathological changes within the key non-REM sleep motor modulating center in synucleinopathies and PSP. Support (If Any) NIA grants: R44AG050326, R44AG054256, P30AG62677 and R34AG56639.