Sangha, Navdeep

Importance Cerebral hemodynamic impairment in patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis is associated with reduced cognition. It is uncertain whether revascularization might be an effective treatment for cognitive impairment in these patients. Objective To test whether any cognitive benefit from revascularization of high-grade, asymptomatic ICA stenosis varies based on the degree of baseline cerebral hemodynamic impairment. Design, Setting, and Participants This substudy was conducted within a multicenter phase 3 randomized clinical trial. Adults (aged 35-86 years) without dementia with eighth-grade education or higher and unilateral asymptomatic ICA stenosis greater than or equal to 70% were enrolled from January 2018 to July 2024 at 61 sites in North America (last follow-up in July 2025). Of 607 participants screened from 2485 in CREST-2, 392 were enrolled. Magnetic resonance or computed tomographic perfusion imaging tested for baseline hemodynamic impairment defined by delayed time-to-peak (TTP) arrival of intravenous contrast in the hemisphere ipsilateral minus contralateral to the stenotic artery. Intervention Carotid revascularization (endarterectomy or stenting) plus intensive medical management (IMM) vs IMM alone. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the difference in composite cognitive z score over 1 year based on 5 cognitive tests. The primary analysis tested for an interaction between treatment group (revascularization vs IMM alone) and degree of baseline hemodynamic impairment among those with reduced baseline cognition (cognitive z score ≤−1.0 SD). Results Of 392 participants enrolled (mean age, 71 years; 125 [32%] females), 61 were excluded for missing baseline imaging and 40 for missing cognitive examinations or other covariates, leaving 291 with complete data. Fifty-one had reduced cognition at baseline (25 in the revascularization group and 26 in the IMM alone group). TTP ranged from no interhemispheric TTP delay to a more-than-2-second delay. Mean (SD) cognitive z scores were −1.36 (0.51) at baseline and −1.17 (0.47) at 1 year in the revascularization group and −1.34 (0.83) at baseline and −1.01 (0.97) at 1 year in the IMM alone group. The primary analysis showed no difference in cognition by treatment group over 1 year, adjusting for treatment group × hemodynamic status interaction and other covariates (adjusted difference in cognitive z score, −0.15 SD [95% CI, −0.54 to 0.24]). The interaction was not significant (β estimate = 0.018 [95% CI, −0.025 to 0.061]; P = .40). Conclusions and Relevance In this substudy of a randomized clinical trial, there was no differential effect of revascularization vs IMM alone on cognition over 1 year by cerebral hemodynamic status among those with baseline reduced cognition, suggesting that revascularization does not improve cognitive dysfunction by restoring flow to the brain in chronic asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03121209

Objectives: Cerebral hemodynamic impairment in patients with asymptomatic high-grade internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis confers a risk of stroke and cognitive decline, but correlations between degree of stenosis and hemodynamic impairment are derived from small case series only. Using baseline data from 282 participants in the Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis – Hemodynamics (CREST-H) study, we hypothesized that degree of stenosis, measured by peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end diastolic velocity (EDV) in the ipsilateral ICA, would correlate with time-to-peak (TTP) delay using MR (n=275) or CT (n=7) perfusion scans, adjusting for demographic and cardiovascular risk variables. Methods: Using a 7-10MHz Doppler probe, ICA PSV and EDV were assessed. Doppler results were adjudicated centrally. Dynamic contrast perfusion imaging was standardized across 61 CREST-H sites, using sequential T2*-weighted time-sequence scanning (e.g. TR=1500, TE=25ms, flip angle=60deg, phase=128, slice thickness=5mm for GE 3T magnet). CTP was acquired with standard clinical protocols. TTP delay was calculated in the ipsilateral versus contralateral MCA/ACA territories using OLEA software. Linear regression used TTP delay as the outcome variable and PSV and EDV as predictor variables, adjusting for covariates.The 282 with complete data for all variables were included in the analysis. Results: Among 392 CREST-H participants, 63% were men, 7% Black, 3% Hispanic, 33% with less than college education. Tables 1a/b show the regression results for PSV and EDV as main predictor variables. PSV and EDV on the index side significantly correlated with TTP delay (p=0.004, p=0.002 respectively). Neither PSV nor EDV on the non-index side correlated with TTP delay (p=0.49, p=0.82). Compared with moderate exercise, vigorous exercise correlated with lower TTP delay in both models (p=0.05. p=0.04). Compared with college graduates, those with HS education had longer TTP delays in both models (p=0.03. p=0.02). Conclusions: In this large cohort of patients with high-grade asymptomatic carotid stenosis, higher flow velocities correlated with greater TTP delays, suggesting an increasing hemodynamic impairment with greater degree of stenosis above 70%. Our findings have implications for management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis which are being tested in the CREST-H and CREST-2 studies. Exercise and education may independently impact cerebral hemodynamics.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral hemodynamic impairment in patients with asymptomatic high-grade (>70%) internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis is associated with risk of stroke and cognitive decline, but correlations between the degree of stenosis and hemodynamic impairment are derived from small case series. Using baseline data from 242 participants in the CREST-H study (Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis–Hemodynamics), we hypothesized that the degree of stenosis in the ICA would correlate with time-to-peak (TTP) delay in ipsilateral cerebral blood flow using MR/CT perfusion scans, adjusting for demographic and cardiovascular risk variables. METHODS: From all participants, ICAs were insonated using a 7 to 10 MHz probe for peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end diastolic velocity. Dynamic contrast perfusion imaging was standardized across 61 CREST-H sites, using standard sequential T2*-weighted perfusion imaging. CT perfusion used standard clinical protocols. TTP delay was calculated in the ipsilateral versus contralateral hemispheres. In cross-sectional analysis, linear regression was used to model TTP delay as the outcome variable and PSV, end diastolic velocity, and PSV ICA/common carotid artery ratio on the index and nonindex side as primary predictor variables in 6 separate models, adjusting for covariates, followed by automated backward elimination model reduction. RESULTS: Among 392 CREST-H participants, the 242 with complete data for all variables were included in the regression analysis (age, 70±7.6; 62% M). End diastolic velocity on the index side correlated with TTP delay (β=0.003, P =0.005). PSV had a similar correlation but did not reach significance (β=0.001, P =0.099), nor did ICA/common carotid artery ratio (β=0.003, P =0.126). Nonindex side PSV, end diastolic velocity, and ICA/common carotid artery ratio showed no correlation with TTP delay ( P =0.268, P =0.495, P =0.380, respectively). Circle of Willis completeness did not correlate with TTP. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of patients with high-grade asymptomatic carotid stenosis, higher end-diastolic flow velocities correlated with greater TTP delays, supporting a definition of hemodynamically significant stenosis. Our findings have implications for the management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis, which will be tested in the CREST-H study. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03121209.

BACKGROUND: This individual participant data meta-analysis aimed to determine whether time to treatment influences the effect of intraarterial thrombolysis (IAT), intravenous thrombolysis, and conservative standard therapy on visual outcomes in nonarteritic central retinal artery occlusion. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Embase up to June 2023 for studies reporting treatment modality and peri-treatment best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) for ≥5 participants, excluding patients with nonsevere vision loss (BCVA <1.0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) or treated after 24 hours of symptom onset. The primary outcome was recovery from severe vision loss (final BCVA <1.0 logMAR). We used mixed-effect models and local polynomial regression to investigate nonlinear relationships between time to treatment and recovery from severe vision loss. RESULTS: Of 4074 screened studies, individual participant data were sought from 52, with 35 contributing individual participant data for 1038 participants. In total, 783 patients met inclusion criteria (age, 64.8±13.3 years; 35.5% female; baseline BCVA, 2.3±0.5 logMAR). For every hour decrease in time to treatment, thrombolysis was associated with greater improvement in BCVA (intraarterial, 0.02 logMAR [95% CI, 0–0.04]; intravenous, 0.04 logMAR [95% CI, 0.00–0.07]) than conservative standard therapy (0.01 logMAR [95% CI, 0–0.02]). A nonlinear relationship was detected for intraarterial thrombolysis with a changepoint at 8 hours (95% CI, 6.7–9.4). Thrombolysis was associated with increased recovery from severe vision loss compared with conservative standard therapy (intraarterial within 6 hours: odds ratio, 2.72 [95% CI, 1.02–7.28], 27.2% versus 12.0%; intravenous within 4.5 hours: odds ratio, 3.32 [95% CI, 1.24–8.92], 28.8% versus 11.1%). Findings were consistent in subgroup analysis restricted to patients receiving recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator. Monte-Carlo simulations showed that a randomized controlled trial would require 95 participants per group to achieve 80% power to detect an odds ratio of 3.0 for recovery from severe vision loss. CONCLUSIONS: Early intervention in nonarteritic central retinal artery occlusion is associated with improvement in visual recovery, with intraarterial thrombolysis and intravenous thrombolysis outperforming nonthrombolytic treatments. These findings warrant confirmation in sufficiently powered randomized controlled trials.

Importance In patients with severe aortic valve stenosis at intermediate surgical risk, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a self-expanding supra-annular valve was noninferior to surgery for all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at 2 years. Comparisons of longer-term clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in these patients are limited. Objective To report prespecified secondary 5-year outcomes from the Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis in Intermediate Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement (SURTAVI) randomized clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants SURTAVI is a prospective randomized, unblinded clinical trial. Randomization was stratified by investigational site and need for revascularization determined by the local heart teams. Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis deemed to be at intermediate risk of 30-day surgical mortality were enrolled at 87 centers from June 19, 2012, to June 30, 2016, in Europe and North America. Analysis took place between August and October 2021. Intervention Patients were randomized to TAVR with a self-expanding, supra-annular transcatheter or a surgical bioprosthesis. Main Outcomes and Measures The prespecified secondary end points of death or disabling stroke and other adverse events and hemodynamic findings at 5 years. An independent clinical event committee adjudicated all serious adverse events and an independent echocardiographic core laboratory evaluated all echocardiograms at 5 years. Results A total of 1660 individuals underwent an attempted TAVR (n = 864) or surgical (n = 796) procedure. The mean (SD) age was 79.8 (6.2) years, 724 (43.6%) were female, and the mean (SD) Society of Thoracic Surgery Predicted Risk of Mortality score was 4.5% (1.6%). At 5 years, the rates of death or disabling stroke were similar (TAVR, 31.3% vs surgery, 30.8%; hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.85-1.22]; P = .85). Transprosthetic gradients remained lower (mean [SD], 8.6 [5.5] mm Hg vs 11.2 [6.0] mm Hg; P &amp;lt; .001) and aortic valve areas were higher (mean [SD], 2.2 [0.7] cm 2 vs 1.8 [0.6] cm 2 ; P &amp;lt; .001) with TAVR vs surgery. More patients had moderate/severe paravalvular leak with TAVR than surgery (11 [3.0%] vs 2 [0.7%]; risk difference, 2.37% [95% CI, 0.17%- 4.85%]; P = .05). New pacemaker implantation rates were higher for TAVR than surgery at 5 years (289 [39.1%] vs 94 [15.1%]; hazard ratio, 3.30 [95% CI, 2.61-4.17]; log-rank P &amp;lt; .001), as were valve reintervention rates (27 [3.5%] vs 11 [1.9%]; hazard ratio, 2.21 [95% CI, 1.10-4.45]; log-rank P = .02), although between 2 and 5 years only 6 patients who underwent TAVR and 7 who underwent surgery required a reintervention. Conclusions and Relevance Among intermediate-risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, major clinical outcomes at 5 years were similar for TAVR and surgery. TAVR was associated with superior hemodynamic valve performance but also with more paravalvular leak and valve reinterventions.

Background and Objectives: Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma agonists, such as pioglitazone (PIO) enhanced hematoma resolution and improved functional recovery in our animal model of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We conducted a translational Phase II randomized, controlled clinical trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PIO in patients with spontaneous ICH and to explore the rate of hematoma resolution and clinical outcome. Methods: Patients with spontaneous ICH within 24 hours of symptom onset were randomly allocated 1:1 to placebo or PIO. Patients received escalating doses of PIO daily for three days, followed by a 30mg maintenance dose for the duration of treatment. Duration of treatment was when 75% of the ICH had resolved as determined by serial MRI or 10 weeks of treatment, whichever occurred first. The primary safety outcome was mortality at Day 14. Secondary measures of safety include any mortality, symptomatic cerebral edema, congestive heart failure, edema, hypoglycemia, anemia, and hepatotoxicity. Secondary measures of efficacy include hematoma resolution and clinical outcome. The MTD was determined using the Continual Reassessment Method. Results: From March 2009 to April 2013, 84 patients (42 PIO, 42 control) were enrolled into 11 dose tiers, with a planned range from 0.1-2.0 mg/kg/d. Table 1 demonstrates preliminary baseline and clinical characteristics of patients by treatment group. Overall, 2/84 patients died within 2 weeks after ICH; however mortality rate never exceeded prespecified criteria. The study will be complete in October 2013 and the treatment team remains blinded to treatment allocation. Secondary outcomes by treatment group and the MTD of PIO will be reported. Conclusions: We have completed the treatment phase of the SHRINC Trial. Long term follow-up is on-going. These results will provide the foundation for an efficacy trial evaluating PIO as a potential treatment for patients with spontaneous ICH.

Baseline Differences in Risk Factor Control and Medication Use Between 2 Trials Employing Intensive Medical Management (SAMMPRIS & CREST2) Background: The CREST2 trial Intensive Medical Management (IMM) protocol was adapted from the SAMMPRIS trial. However, since the 2011 publication of initial results of SAMMPRIS, there has been a greater appreciation for the importance of risk factor control in patients at risk of stroke associated with atherosclerosis. Therefore, we sought to determine differences in baseline risk factor control and medication use between SAMMPRIS and CREST2. Methods: Baseline risk factor and medication use data from 451 patients enrolled in SAMMPRIS (2008-2011) with severe symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis and 1473 patients enrolled in CREST2 (2014-2019) with severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis were compared using the Chi-square test and t-test. Results: The Table shows baseline risk factor values and medications. SAMMPRIS patients were younger but had significantly worse risk factor control than CREST2 patients for all measures. There was no significant difference in statin use at baseline, but the mean SAMMPRIS subjects’ LDL was 16.1 mg/dL higher than in CREST2. CREST2 patients had higher rates of use of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), and thiazides, but lower rates of use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Conclusions: Despite being older, CREST2 patients have significantly better baseline risk factor profiles than SAMMPRIS patients. This could be due to greater appreciation of the importance of risk factor control and healthy lifestyle habits for stroke prevention or more aggressive treatment targets in guideline recommendations. Although risk factor control appears to be improving since SAMMPRIS, many CREST2 patients are still not meeting recommended risk factor goals at baseline and may benefit from IMM protocols.