Best, Patricia J.M.

Previous studies about the COVID-19 pandemic on STEMI patient outcomes have conflicting results. It remains unclear if this may be attributed to regional differences and/or differences during COVID-19 wave periods. Using the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines–Coronary Artery Disease registry data, we evaluated (1) time metrics related to STEMI system goals and (2) regional variation in STEMI incidence and in-hospital mortality during pandemic wave time periods. The study included all patients 18–100 years old admitted with STEMI (n = 72,516) to 1 of 435 American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines–Coronary Artery Disease hospitals (1 October 2019–31 December 2021). Of these, 70.8% were male and 73.0% non-Hispanic White, with a median age of 63 (IQR 18) years. Compared to pre-pandemic time frames, patients with STEMI had a higher risk profile, delayed time to treatment, were treated with fibrinolytic therapy or primary PCI, and were transferred for primary PCI at similar rates, and had higher adjusted in-hospital mortality (during the second wave in the South and Midwest). Preservation of STEMI systems of care resulted in an overall lower in-hospital mortality rate than predicted, although opportunities exist to improve treatment delays. Regional differences in mortality rates require further study.

Abstract Background Concern for acute kidney injury (AKI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a major determinant in the decision to pursue cardiac catheterization if otherwise indicated. A bedside AKI risk prediction model derived from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR), most recently updated in 2023, employs relatively complex parameters for AKI prediction. Purpose To test the efficacy of a simplified pre-procedural 5-variable bedside score for post-PCI AKI prediction based on the NCDR model. Methods We analyzed our institution’s NCDR-reported catheterization laboratory registry between Q2 2022 and Q1 2023. Inclusion criteria, variable selection, and definitions were based on the NCDR model. A bedside prediction model was validated, including 5 pre-procedural variables: anemia (hemoglobin <10 mg/dl), history of heart failure, stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate <30 mg/dl), cardiac arrest, and shock status. Results We included 840 patients, of which 593 (70.6%) were men. Mean age was 69 (±12.5). Most procedures were performed on an urgent basis (444, 52.9%). AKI developed in 107 (12.7%) patients. Compared to the non-AKI group, patients who developed AKI were older (age 74±11.5 vs 68.3 ±12.5), and more frequently had anemia (23.6% vs 7.4%), diabetes (51.4% vs 35.2%), severe frailty (45.8% vs 23.7%), heart failure (62.6% vs 29.7%), cardiac arrest (13.1% vs 2.9%), CKD (30.8% vs 6%), shock (12.1% vs 1.5%), and mechanical circulatory support (7.5% vs 2.9%), p<0.001. Utilizing integer scores, the simplified bedside model employing 5 pre-procedural variables demonstrated discrimination similar to the bedside NCDR model, with a C-statistic of 0.77 (0.60-0.88) and excellent calibration (intercept of 0.31 and slope of 1.03) (Figure), indicating the robust performance of the model (compared to bedside NCDR model with a C-statistic 0.793, intercept of -0.197, and slope of 0.957). Conclusion A simplified NCDR-based bedside score using 5 pre-procedural variables is an effective tool for predicting AKI as a complication of PCI, with comparable performance to the 2023 updated bedside NCDR AKI risk model.

Introduction: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a nonatherosclerotic cause of acute coronary syndrome. While most patients are managed conservatively, some patients may require percutaneous or surgical revascularization. Limited data exist on SCAD patients referred for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Hypothesis: Examine the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of SCAD patients referred for CABG. Methods: Retrospective study of patients enrolled in the Mayo Clinic SCAD Registry between 2010-2020 who underwent CABG during the initial management of acute SCAD episode. Results: Among the 81 patients with SCAD referred for CABG, 3 (4%) were men, mean age was 40.6 +/- 8.4 years; the majority were white (91%), and 24 (30%) had pregnancy-associated SCAD (P-SCAD). The most common presenting symptom was chest pain 80 (99%); 57 (70%) presented with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and 21 (26%) presented with non-ST elevation MI. Multivessel dissection occurred in 40 (49%), left anterior descending artery (LAD) involvement occurred in 66 (81%) and left main (LM) in 32 (40%). Left ventricular ejection fraction was <50% in 40 patients (49%) at time of initial SCAD. The most common reasons for CABG were the presence of high-risk anatomy (56%), hemodynamic instability/active ischemia (7%), failed PCI (9%), and other/unknown (12%). Most patients received venous plus arterial bypass grafts 42 (52%), saphenous vein grafts in 20 (25%), and left internal mammary artery in 17 (21%). Screening for underlying arteriopathy was performed in 50 (62%) of whom 29 (36%) had fibromuscular dysplasia. Recurrent SCAD occurred in 10 (12%) after an average of 6.2 +/- 5 years after initial SCAD. Of those with recurrent SCAD, none required repeat surgical revascularization and 6 required percutaneous intervention (PCI). There were no deaths. Conclusions: Patients undergoing CABG for SCAD commonly present with STEMI, LM, or multivessel dissection, and failed percutaneous intervention attempts. In addition, CABG for P-SCAD was more frequent than expected and may relate to the increased prevalence of multivessel dissection. CABG was associated with low mortality, but recurrent SCAD may still occur.

Importance In patients with severe aortic valve stenosis at intermediate surgical risk, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a self-expanding supra-annular valve was noninferior to surgery for all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at 2 years. Comparisons of longer-term clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in these patients are limited. Objective To report prespecified secondary 5-year outcomes from the Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis in Intermediate Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement (SURTAVI) randomized clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants SURTAVI is a prospective randomized, unblinded clinical trial. Randomization was stratified by investigational site and need for revascularization determined by the local heart teams. Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis deemed to be at intermediate risk of 30-day surgical mortality were enrolled at 87 centers from June 19, 2012, to June 30, 2016, in Europe and North America. Analysis took place between August and October 2021. Intervention Patients were randomized to TAVR with a self-expanding, supra-annular transcatheter or a surgical bioprosthesis. Main Outcomes and Measures The prespecified secondary end points of death or disabling stroke and other adverse events and hemodynamic findings at 5 years. An independent clinical event committee adjudicated all serious adverse events and an independent echocardiographic core laboratory evaluated all echocardiograms at 5 years. Results A total of 1660 individuals underwent an attempted TAVR (n = 864) or surgical (n = 796) procedure. The mean (SD) age was 79.8 (6.2) years, 724 (43.6%) were female, and the mean (SD) Society of Thoracic Surgery Predicted Risk of Mortality score was 4.5% (1.6%). At 5 years, the rates of death or disabling stroke were similar (TAVR, 31.3% vs surgery, 30.8%; hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.85-1.22]; P = .85). Transprosthetic gradients remained lower (mean [SD], 8.6 [5.5] mm Hg vs 11.2 [6.0] mm Hg; P &amp;lt; .001) and aortic valve areas were higher (mean [SD], 2.2 [0.7] cm 2 vs 1.8 [0.6] cm 2 ; P &amp;lt; .001) with TAVR vs surgery. More patients had moderate/severe paravalvular leak with TAVR than surgery (11 [3.0%] vs 2 [0.7%]; risk difference, 2.37% [95% CI, 0.17%- 4.85%]; P = .05). New pacemaker implantation rates were higher for TAVR than surgery at 5 years (289 [39.1%] vs 94 [15.1%]; hazard ratio, 3.30 [95% CI, 2.61-4.17]; log-rank P &amp;lt; .001), as were valve reintervention rates (27 [3.5%] vs 11 [1.9%]; hazard ratio, 2.21 [95% CI, 1.10-4.45]; log-rank P = .02), although between 2 and 5 years only 6 patients who underwent TAVR and 7 who underwent surgery required a reintervention. Conclusions and Relevance Among intermediate-risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, major clinical outcomes at 5 years were similar for TAVR and surgery. TAVR was associated with superior hemodynamic valve performance but also with more paravalvular leak and valve reinterventions.

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a nonatherosclerotic cause of myocardial infarction (MI) occurring most often in young women without cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. SCAD is associated with fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD), pregnant/postpartum state, and extreme mental stress or physical exertion. Migraine headaches have been reported common in SCAD and may increase CVD risk. The objective was to assess differences in presentation, clinical factors, and outcomes in SCAD patients with migraines (M-SCAD) compared to those without, and determine M-SCAD prevalence. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional observation study of patients with angiographically confirmed SCAD was conducted using the Mayo Clinic SCAD Registry. Participant-provided data and records were reviewed for migraine history, CVD risk factors, SCAD details, CVD and migraine therapies, and outcomes. Ordinal and nominal variables were compared using Pearson's chi squared test, and continuous variables were compared using Student's t-test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Among 586 patients with complete questionnaires, 236 had a history of migraines; the lifetime and 1-year prevalence of migraines were 40% and 27% respectively. Migraines are more common in SCAD survivors than a comparable population (40% vs 33%, p=0.0002). M-SCAD patients were more likely to be female (99.6% vs 94%, p=0.001), have SCAD at a younger age (45.3 yrs. vs 47.6 yrs., p=0.004), and report a history of aneurysms (7.6% vs 1.7%, p=0.0004), 46% of which occurred in head or neck vessels. There was a trend toward increased head and neck FMD in M-SCAD (32% vs 23%, p=0.095). Prevalence of depression (27% vs 17%, p=0.005), anxiety (32% vs 24%, p=0.038), recurrent angina (62% vs 44%, p=<0.001) and concern for recurrent SCAD (46% vs 37%, p=0.034) were higher in M-SCAD. Triptans were stopped in 39% of migraineurs at the time of MI. Conclusion: As compared to SCAD survivors without migraines, those with M-SCAD are younger, more often report a history of depression, anxiety, and aneurysms, and have more chest pain after SCAD. Further investigation into this association and development of safe, effective treatments of both headache and angina after SCAD is needed.

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is the principal cause of peripartum myocardial infarction (MI). Clinical features remain incompletely understood. Methods: Medical records of all women enrolled in a SCAD registry at the Mayo Clinic were reviewed to identify those who were either pregnant or ≤12 weeks postpartum at time of initial event. Diagnosis of SCAD was confirmed with coronary angiography in all cases. Obstetrical outcomes and incidence of recurrent SCAD events were assessed. Results: In total, 38 of 363 women enrolled in the registry met criteria for peripartum MI due to SCAD. Mean age at time of SCAD was 36±3 (range 27-42) years; 3 patients were pregnant at the time of initial event, and all pregnancies except 2 resulted in a live birth. Ten (26%) were diagnosed with multivessel SCAD (MV-SCAD). Most (60%) postpartum events occurred within 30 days of delivery. Antecedent co-morbidities included gestational hypertension/preeclampsia (9), fibromuscular dysplasia (7), gestational diabetes (4), and mixed connective tissue disease (1). Compared to US population birth data, women with peripartum SCAD were more likely to be ≤ 30 years at the time of first delivery (60% vs 42%) and more often multiparous (80% vs 59%). On long-term follow-up (median 3.7 years, IQR 1.1-7.1), 5 (13%) women experienced recurrent SCAD, with one episode occurring following a subsequent pregnancy. MV-SCAD was not associated with increased risk of recurrence (p=0.44). Conclusion: Women with peripartum SCAD are both older than the general obstetrical population at the time of first pregnancy and frequently multiparous at time of initial SCAD event. The highest frequency of SCAD was encountered during the first postpartum month, suggesting variations in hormonal and hemodynamic factors may contribute to SCAD events in susceptible women.

Introduction: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an uncommon but increasingly recognized cause of acute coronary syndrome and sudden cardiac death. We aim to review the occurrence of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in the Mayo Clinic SCAD Registry (MCSR) to gain insight into the association of SCAD and atrial arrhythmias. Methods: Atrial arrhythmias were queried amongst patients in the MCSR using diagnostic codes and text contained in both a large data repository known as the Advanced Cohort Explorer as well as a clinical database maintained by nurse abstractors for patients in the MCSR. All positive were manually verified using available medical records. Univariable logistic regression analysis was performed using JMP to investigate associations with classic cardiovascular risk factors. Results: A total of 1,215 patients from the Mayo SCAD registry were included. Six patients had a pre SCAD atrial arrhythmia, 19 had an atrial arrhythmia during a SCAD event, and 11 had a post SCAD atrial arrhythmia. Univariable analysis did not reveal significant associations with diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or smoking. Conclusion: Atrial arrhythmias were not uncommonly seen in patients at the time of or after SCAD, especially after cardiac arrest or coronary artery bypass grafting. No significant associations with traditional cardiovascular risk factors were observed. Further investigation into the mechanism of atrial arrhythmia development as well as its management in the setting of SCAD is warranted.