Hayes, Sharonne N.

Background: Increased arterial stiffness, a marker of cardiovascular disease (CVD), is prevalent among African American (AA) adults and contributes to persistent CVD disparities. The Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) is a validated measure of arterial stiffness and predictor of adverse CVD outcomes. However, its relationship with the novel American Heart Association’s Life’s Essential 8 (LE8) cardiovascular health (CVH) construct has not been examined among AAs. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that increased arterial stiffness would be associated with lower CVH among AA adults. Methods: We analyzed baseline data from AA adults in the Techquity by FAITH! Trial, a 2-arm cluster randomized controlled trial conducted across 18 AA churches in Rochester and Minneapolis–St. Paul, Minnesota. Eligible participants (age ≥18 years with suboptimal diet or physical activity [PA]) completed validated electronic surveys (e.g., PA patterns) and clinical assessments (e.g., blood pressure [BP], lipids). CAVI was summarized as mean and categorized as normal (<8), borderline (8 to <9), or abnormal (≥9). CVH was assessed using the LE8 score (range 0-100 points) and categorized as low (<50), moderate (50-79), or high (≥80). Associations between CAVI and LE8 were assessed using multivariable linear regression adjusted for age, sex, and income (continuous) and Fisher’s exact test (categorical). LE8 components were compared across CAVI categories using Kruskal–Wallis tests. Results: Among 140 participants (mean age 53.0 years [SD 14.6]; 68% female), the mean LE8 score was 62.7 (SD 14.0). Nicotine exposure LE8 score was the highest (84.6 [SD 26.6]) and diet was the lowest (40.7 [SD 13.7]). Mean CAVI was 7.9 (SD 1.5), with 50% of participants classified as normal, 22% borderline, and 28% abnormal. No association between continuous CAVI and LE8 scores was observed after adjustment (unadjusted R 2 = 3.5%). All participants with high LE8 had normal CAVI, while abnormal CAVI was more prevalent among those with low (40%) and moderate (30%) LE8 scores (p<0.001). LE8 scores differed across CAVI categories for BP (median 50 in normal CAVI vs 30 in borderline/abnormal CAVI; p=0.003) and glucose LE8 scores (median 100 vs 60; p=0.014). Conclusions: Greater arterial stiffness was associated with lower CVH categories, with notable component-level differences in BP and glucose. Although not independently associated with overall LE8, integrating CAVI and LE8 categories may improve CVD risk stratification among AAs.

Abstract Spontaneous coronary artery dissection is an unusual, but increasingly recognized, cause of acute coronary syndrome. It is a potentially fatal disorder that predominantly (&gt;90% of cases) affects women, who are about 20 years younger (age 45–52 years) than those presenting with an acute coronary syndrome due to atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, and is the commonest cause of myocardial infarction associated with pregnancy. With the advent of improved coronary artery imaging modalities, including invasive coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS), and optical coherence tomography (OCT), spontaneous coronary artery dissection is being increasingly diagnosed. It is typically due to a spontaneous bleed in the tunica media of an epicardial coronary artery, with or without an intimal tear, that results in an intramural haematoma; the latter, in turn causing a separation or dissection of the lamellae formed by the layers of smooth muscle cells of the tunica media, which can propagate longitudinally. Although coronary artery dissection can be due to atherosclerotic disease that may, in fact, present spontaneously, or to trauma, or guidewire-induced intimal injury, the understanding that the entity now known as spontaneous coronary artery dissection is an idiopathic disorder that is not associated with atherosclerosis or trauma, and is not iatrogenic, is one that has emerged only relatively recently (last 10–15 years). This raises the question, what is the provenance of spontaneous coronary artery dissection as it is now defined and understood? Here, this issue is addressed by a detailed consideration of the medical literature from 1800.

Background/Objective: It remains unknown whether patients with the more common forms of hypermobility carry an elevated risk for the development of intracranial/cervical artery abnormalities. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, spontaneous cervical artery dissections, and fibromuscular dysplasia in patients with hypermobile Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome (hEDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) who presented to an academic headache clinic. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. We used an electronic medical record to look for all patients seen at the Mayo Clinic Florida Headache Center and EDS Clinic between 2019 and 2025 with a diagnosis of hEDS or HSD and neuroimaging of both the intracranial and cervical arteries. Results: There were 103 patients who met the inclusion criteria. There was no statistically significant difference between hEDS and HSD patients in developing cerebral/cervical arterial anomalies. Of the sample, 95% of the hypermobile patients with abnormal neuroimaging also had migraine. A total of eleven (10.7%) patients (hEDS + HSD) were diagnosed with unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Trends included age less than 50 years, small aneurysms in the anterior circulation, and having migraine with aura. Five (4.8%) patients were diagnosed with spontaneous cervical artery dissection with trends for HSD, over the age of 50 years, vertebral artery involvement and a history of migraine without aura. Six (5.8%) patients were diagnosed with fibromuscular dysplasia with trends for HSD, over the age of 50 years, carotid artery involvement and a history of migraine with aura. Conclusions: This is the first study to identify that patients with the more common type of EDS, HSD and hEDS, and a possible concomitant history of migraine have a heightened risk for the development of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, spontaneous cervical artery dissections, and fibromuscular dysplasia. Our findings suggest the need for targeted screening with intracranial and extracranial arterial imaging for this unique patient population.

Purpose. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) has emerged as an important cause of acute coronary syndrome predominantly affecting women. Although the knowledge of SCAD has expanded over the past 2 decades, limited evidence exists to guide post-event management and prevention of future adverse events. This review aims to synthesize the current understanding of SCAD and outline considerations for exercise prescription and cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in this unique population. Review Methods. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, incorporating original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and current clinical guidelines related to SCAD and CR. Summary. Current literature demonstrates that CR is safe in this population and is associated with improvement in measures of physical and mental health. Expert consensus supports reintroduction of exercise and an individualized multidisciplinary CR framework.This review highlights current evidence and expert recommendations for the multidisciplinary outpatient management of patients with SCAD.

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an important cause of acute coronary syndrome in women. Although the role of sex-hormones in the pathogenesis of SCAD is unclear, menopausal hormone therapy (HT) after SCAD is generally dissuaded. This limits management options for women with menopausal symptoms, the burden of which among SCAD patients is unknown. Aims: To quantify the burden of menopausal symptoms among women with a history of SCAD. Methods: We surveyed 1617 participants in the Mayo Clinic SCAD "Virtual" Multi-Center Registry on the topic of menopausal symptoms. Among women who had completed key portions of the survey (N = 846), 666 were identified as being either peri or post-menopausal based on patient report. Results: Menopausal symptom prevalence was high in women with SCAD (Figure). Many women (45%) experienced weight changes in the prior 6 months, and most (75%) never used HT for their menopausal symptoms. Forty-five (6%) women experienced menopause at age 45 or younger, and five (1%) experienced menopause at 40 or younger. At the time of the survey, intravaginal estrogen (11.4%) was the most common HT used, while all other individual HT therapies were used by fewer than 5%. Conclusions: Peri- and postmenopausal women with SCAD experience a high burden of menopausal symptoms, and very few use HT outside of intravaginal estrogen. These findings highlight the need for further exploration of treatment strategies for women with menopausal symptoms following SCAD including assessment of benefits versus harms in the subset of women with premature menopause.

The FAITH! (Fostering African-American Improvement in Total Health) Cardiovascular Health and Wellness Program is more than a decade-long community-based participatory research initiative aimed at addressing cardiovascular health disparities among African-Americans in Minnesota. Founded in 2013, the program employs a culturally tailored, community-driven approach by partnering with African-American faith communities to promote cardiovascular health through education, digital health tools, and multilevel interventions targeting the social determinants of health. Grounded in community-based participatory research principles, FAITH! prioritizes equitable academic-community partnerships, co-learning, community capacity building, and shared ownership in all aspects of research and implementation. The program’s exemplary innovations include the NIH-funded FAITH! Trial, a randomized clinical trial, testing a mobile health intervention (the FAITH! App) co-created with the African-American community, and the Techquity by FAITH! study. Techquity by FAITH! evaluates the effectiveness of a culturally relevant, community-informed mHealth intervention supported by a Digital Health Advocate network to improve overall cardiovascular health and digital health literacy. During its evolution, FAITH! has addressed emergent public health crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic, by adapting programming to provide emergency preparedness resources, health education, and vaccine outreach. Key outcomes include sustainable church-based health ministries, increased research participation, and successful translation of research into practice. The program has also contributed to research workforce development by mentoring and training diverse early-career scholars and community leaders in community-based participatory research and cardiovascular health equity research. Lessons learned highlight the transformative impact of community-based participatory research in building trust, facilitating culturally relevant dissemination, and sustaining health equity initiatives. The FAITH! model demonstrates a scalable, community-led strategy for advancing cardiovascular health in underserved populations and provides a blueprint for future initiatives aiming to reduce racial health disparities.

Background African Americans have a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, leading to higher cardiovascular disease mortality than White adults. Our culturally tailored mobile health (mHealth) lifestyle intervention ( FAITH! App) has previously demonstrated efficacy in promoting ideal cardiovascular health in African Americans. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis from a cluster randomized controlled trial among African-Americans from 16 churches in Minnesota that compared the FAITH! App to a delayed intervention control group. A subgroup of participants with ≥ 1 diagnosis of overweight/obesity, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, or diabetes was examined. The primary outcome was a change in LS7 score—a measure of cardiovascular health ranging from poor to ideal (range 0–14 points)—at 6-months post-intervention. Results The analysis included 49 participants (intervention group: n = 20; mean age 58.8 years, 75% female; control group: n = 29, mean age 52.5 years, 76% female) with no significant baseline differences in cardiovascular risk factors. Compared to the control group, the intervention group showed a greater increase in LS7 score across all cardiovascular risk factors at 6-months post-intervention, with statistically significant differences among those with overweight/obesity (intervention effect 1.77, p < 0.0001) and 2+ or 3+ cardiovascular risk factors (1.00, p = 0.03; 1.09, p = 0.04). The intervention group demonstrated a higher increase in the percentage of participants with intermediate or ideal LS7 scores than the control group, although these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions Our culturally tailored mHealth lifestyle intervention was associated with significant increases in LS7 scores among African Americans with preexisting cardiovascular risk factors, suggesting its efficacy in improving cardiovascular health among this population.

While studies have evaluated the utility of telehealth in replacing in-person clinical encounters, there is a dearth of literature examining the quality of patient-physician communication with telehealth encounters. Accordingly, this study assessed the feasibility of using virtual cardiology clinical encounters to examine patient-physician interaction, communication, and perceptions of the clinical encounter. Telemedicine cardiology clinical encounters were audio- and video-recorded following the encounter, patients, and cardiologists completed an electronic survey to assess perceptions of the encounter. Qualitative analysis of the communication and statistical analysis of the survey data was conducted, providing descriptive data. The study included 11 patient-physician dyads; all patients were non-Hispanic White. Cardiologists were more racially and ethnically diverse (63% Asian). Most patients agreed telemedicine was comparable to in-person encounters (85.7%), with all cardiologists reporting that patients appeared satisfied with the encounter. We utilized an assessment tool to examine patient-physician communication in the recorded virtual encounters. This study suggests examining patient-physician communication using virtual clinical encounters is feasible, although there are barriers that need addressing for larger studies.

Abstract Background African-American (AA) women are less likely to achieve ideal cardiovascular (CV) health compared with women of other racial/ethnic subgroups, primarily due to structural and psychosocial barriers. A potential psychosocial construct relevant to ideal CV health is the superwoman schema (SWS). Purpose We explored whether the SWS was associated with perceived stress, CV risk factors, and overall CV health among AA women. Methods This cross-sectional analysis of the FAITH! Heart Health+ Study was conducted among AA women with high cardiometabolic risk. Pearson correlation evaluated associations between SWS and CV risk factors (e.g., stress, hypertension, diabetes, etc.). The 35-item SWS questionnaire includes five domains. Stress was measured by the 8-item Global Perceived Stress Scale (GPSS). CV health was assessed using the American Heart Association Life’s Simple 7 (LS7) rubric of health behaviors/biometrics. Data acquisition spanned from February to August 2022. Results The 38 women included in the analysis (mean age 54.3 [SD 11.5] years) had a high CV risk factor burden (71.1% hypertension, 76.3% overweight/obesity, 28.9% diabetes, 39.5% hyperlipidemia). Mean GPSS level was 7.7 (SD 5.2), CV health score 6.7 (SD 1.8), and SWS score 60.3 (SD 18.0). Feeling an “obligation to help others” and “obligation to present an image of strength” had strongest correlations with GPSS score among all SWS domains (r = 0.51; p = .002 and r = 0.39; p = .02, respectively). Correlation among the SWS domains and traditional CV risk factors was not statistically significant. Conclusion Our findings suggest that an obligation to help others and to project an image of strength could be contributing to stress among AA women.