Albertie, Monica

Abstract Background: Black men carry a disproportionate prostate cancer (CaP) burden and often experience significant psychosocial distress at the point of prostate cancer diagnosis (PPCD). Many report emotional shock, uncertainty, and limited access to culturally competent guidance, which can negatively affect treatment decisions and long-term survivorship. To address these needs, we developed the PPCD Virtual Reality Assistant (ViRA), an immersive, AI-enabled intervention co-designed with Black CaP survivors. ViRA delivers tailored psycho-oncology support, emotional guidance, and navigation of social determinants of health (SDOH) within virtual reality environments. This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of the PPCD ViRA (NCT06535802). Methods: ViRA was developed through a structured, seven-step co-design process with survivors, integrating mobile immersive technologies, SDOH navigation, and culturally grounded psycho-oncology content. Personalization was enabled through AI-driven predictive analytics and a recommendation engine. Alpha testing assessed initial usability and acceptability among 10 participants (seven team members and three Black CaP survivors). Beta testing with 24 Black men in Florida examined feasibility and preliminary efficacy. Results: A demonstration of ViRA is available (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mI-HS5R6sk). Alpha testing indicated strong usability, positive emotional engagement, and clear promise for enhancing support at the PPCD. In Beta testing, participants varied in age; most were married (58.3%), held a bachelor’s degree (45.8%), were retired (45.8%), and had a family history of cancer (83.3%). ViRA use was associated with increased engagement and reduced distress across participants. Overall, 74% rated ViRA as “excellent,” while the remainder rated it as “good” or “very good.” More than 90% reported being “very satisfied,” with the rest indicating satisfaction. Conclusions: Findings demonstrate high feasibility, acceptability, and cultural relevance of the PPCD ViRA for supporting Black men at diagnosis. Lessons learned highlight the need for culturally embedded design, emotional timing, community co-creation, flexible delivery formats, and strong community partnerships to advance digital health equity. The refinement and larger-scale validation to establish clinical utility and readiness for implementation is ongoing (NCT07126548). Citation Format: Folakemi T. Odedina, Che Ngufor, Christopher Williams, Mary Ellen Young, Floyd Willis, Adam M. Kase, Arnold Merriweather, Emelina Asto-Flores, Dee M. Glaser-Boivin, Jada Melton, Monica L. Albertie, Michelle Fudge, Quincy Wimberly, Inclusive Cancer Care Research Equity (iCCaRE) Consortium, Prostate Cancer Transatlantic Consortium (CaPTC). Novel application of the iCCaRE consortium virtual reality assistant (ViRA) to support Black men at the point of prostate cancer diagnosis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 6306.

Abstract Background: Black men across the African Diaspora experience a disproportionate burden of prostate cancer (CaP). The Inclusive Cancer Care Research Equity (iCCaRE) Consortium aims to eliminate CaP burden through global scientific collaboration, innovative research, community-engaged interventions, and next-generation workforce development. The primary objective for this Consortium was to optimize CaP diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship through research, research training and education, community engagement and community outreach. The Consortium integrates digital health technologies, community navigation, precision communication and precision science. Methods: Five full projects and one pilot project were launched across partner institutions in North America and Africa. Supported by multiple cores and services, the research activities included (1) implementation of a Point of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Virtual Robot Assistant (PPCD-ViRA); (3) initiation of a cancer care at home trial; (4) migrant health studies of Caribbean and Sub-Saharan African immigrants; (5) expansion of genomic and metabolomic research; and (6) digital, psychosocial, and survivorship intervention development. Training and dissemination activities were deployed through iCCaRE TV, webinars, and community engagement programs including the Global Prostate Health Dialogue (Glo-PHD). Results: In one year, accomplishments included 45 presentations, 17 publications, 16 grant submissions, and 3 awards. The consortium delivered 408 live webinar engagements and reached more than 400 men globally through Glo-PHD. PPCD-ViRA was fully developed and prepared for clinical deployment (see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mI-HS5R6sk). The African cohort expansion for genomic and metabolomic profiling was activated across several countries, with biospecimen collection underway. Media dissemination generated more than 15,000 views across platforms, including high-impact educational videos (see: www.youtube.com/@iCCaREConsortium). Training achievements included 13 early-career investigators and 7 trained prostate cancer advocates. Conclusions: In just one year, the iCCaRE Consortium Phase 2 made substantial progress toward transforming CaP equity globally. Through multidisciplinary science, digital innovation, and community partnerships, the consortium is building scalable infrastructure to address diagnosis experiences, treatment quality, and survivorship among Black men. Ongoing efforts will continue to advance precision medicine, culturally grounded interventions, and global capacity building. Citation Format: Folakemi T. Odedina, Arnold Merriweather, Roxana S. Dronca, Ernest T. Kaninjing, Solomon Rotimi, Gerardo Colon-Otero, Kimlin Ashing, Ademola A. Popoola, Gladys Asiedu, Opeyemi Bolajoko, Ewan COBRAN, Emelina Asto-Flores, Floyd Willis, Christopher Williams, Monica L. Albertie, Michelle Fudge, Oluwaseyi Toye, Collisa Mahin, Jada Melton, Inclusive Cancer Care Research Equity (iCCaRE) Consortium, Prostate Cancer Transatlantic Consortium (CaPTC). Achieving prostate cancer equity globally: Multinational advances from the iCCaRE consortium [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2382.

Abstract Background: Digital access, health literacy, and confidence in obtaining cancer information are well-known factors that influence cancer beliefs and behaviors. However, less is understood about whether these information-related factors vary across regions within a cancer center's catchment area and how they collectively relate to cancer beliefs in large community samples. This study investigated regional differences in digital access, health literacy, and confidence in seeking information, and examined the connections between these factors and cancer risk perceptions, fatalistic beliefs, prevention confusion, and willingness to participate in cancer clinical trials. Methods: Data (N=2,334) from the 2023 Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center’s Cancer-Focused Needs Assessment, conducted across catchment areas in Arizona, Florida, and the Midwest (Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa). Regional differences in digital access (Internet use and device ownership), health literacy, and confidence in obtaining cancer information were analyzed using multivariable ANCOVAs and logistic regressions, adjusting for sociodemographic covariates. Follow-up models examined whether these information precursors are associated with perceived cancer risk, fatalistic beliefs, confusion about recommendations, and willingness to participate in cancer clinical trials, adjusting for the same covariates. Results: Regions showed minimal differences in digital access and health literacy. Health literacy was instead associated with ethnicity, age, gender, and education (all p<.001). Confidence in obtaining cancer information followed similar trends, with significant influences of ethnicity and gender (p<.01). Internet use was strongly associated with sociodemographic factors (all p<.01). Additionally, the information precursors consistently correlated with cancer beliefs across the full sample: Higher health literacy and greater confidence in obtaining cancer information were associated with increased perceived cancer risk, reduced cancer fatalism, and less confusion regarding prevention guidelines (ps < .001). Internet use and device access were significantly related to a greater willingness to participate in clinical trials (ps < .01). These relationships persisted even after controlling for sociodemographic covariates. Conclusions: Regional differences in digital access and health literacy were minimal, indicating a consistent information environment. Within this context, individual sociodemographic and information-related factors played a larger role, strongly shaping cancer beliefs. These findings underscore technology access and information empowerment as key targets for enhancing cancer prevention knowledge and research engagement, and indicate that the effects of information empowerment are primarily driven at the individual rather than the geographic level. Citation Format: Tingyu Zou, Monica L. Albertie, Emelina Asto-Flores, Manisha Salinas, Farhia Omar, Adeline Abbenyi, Noreen Stephenson, Nuwanthi Heendeniya, James R. Cerhan, Kathleen J. Yost, Folakemi T. Odedina. Digital access, health literacy, and cancer beliefs: Findings from a multi-region community survey [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 7553.

The FAITH! (Fostering African-American Improvement in Total Health) Cardiovascular Health and Wellness Program is more than a decade-long community-based participatory research initiative aimed at addressing cardiovascular health disparities among African-Americans in Minnesota. Founded in 2013, the program employs a culturally tailored, community-driven approach by partnering with African-American faith communities to promote cardiovascular health through education, digital health tools, and multilevel interventions targeting the social determinants of health. Grounded in community-based participatory research principles, FAITH! prioritizes equitable academic-community partnerships, co-learning, community capacity building, and shared ownership in all aspects of research and implementation. The program’s exemplary innovations include the NIH-funded FAITH! Trial, a randomized clinical trial, testing a mobile health intervention (the FAITH! App) co-created with the African-American community, and the Techquity by FAITH! study. Techquity by FAITH! evaluates the effectiveness of a culturally relevant, community-informed mHealth intervention supported by a Digital Health Advocate network to improve overall cardiovascular health and digital health literacy. During its evolution, FAITH! has addressed emergent public health crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic, by adapting programming to provide emergency preparedness resources, health education, and vaccine outreach. Key outcomes include sustainable church-based health ministries, increased research participation, and successful translation of research into practice. The program has also contributed to research workforce development by mentoring and training diverse early-career scholars and community leaders in community-based participatory research and cardiovascular health equity research. Lessons learned highlight the transformative impact of community-based participatory research in building trust, facilitating culturally relevant dissemination, and sustaining health equity initiatives. The FAITH! model demonstrates a scalable, community-led strategy for advancing cardiovascular health in underserved populations and provides a blueprint for future initiatives aiming to reduce racial health disparities.

Abstract Introduction. Understanding the unique social and environmental contexts of communities is essential for designing effective, locally tailored cancer intervention strategies. This study aimed to identify key findings from a comprehensive, multifaceted, cancer-focused needs assessment conducted across three U.S. regions, offering insights into the social, behavioral, and structural barriers that hinder cancer prevention and control, and informing regionally tailored interventions. Methods. This study focused on adult residents within the Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center catchment areas, covering 75 counties across Arizona, Florida, and the Midwest (Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Iowa). Data was collected through collaborations with the University of Florida and Mayo Clinic Survey Research Centers, and the “Boots on the Ground" approach involving community health workers. Methods included phone calls, online submissions, and community outreach for an anonymous survey. Validated measures assessed healthcare access, lifestyle, social networks, neighborhood conditions, and discrimination. Descriptive analyses were conducted using valid responses. Non-responses and selections of “Prefer not to answer” were excluded from percentage calculations to ensure interpretive accuracy. Results. Involving 2,681 respondents, the data reveal consistent yet regionally nuanced barriers to cancer prevention. Health insurance coverage was relatively high across all regions—77.6% in Arizona, 85.5% in Florida, and 89.2% in the Midwest. Despite this, access to care remained limited. In Arizona, 22% of respondents could not afford to see a regular doctor, and 41.3% reported delays due to work or transportation. In Florida, 26.6% reported financial barriers to primary care, and nearly half (49.7%) experienced delays in receiving care. The Midwest showed fewer neighborhood safety concerns but still faced high rates of care delays (46.7%) and housing-related issues (42.6%). Neighborhood-level challenges were common. Housing-related problems were reported by 42.9% of respondents in Arizona, 54% in Florida, and 42.6% in the Midwest. Concerns about drug use were highest in Arizona (40%) but present across all regions. Health behavior risks were also widespread: 72–79% of respondents reported sleep difficulties, and many reported low physical activity, suboptimal sun protection, and routine alcohol use. Psychosocial stressors were prominent, with 51–65% of respondents reporting experiences of disrespect and 42–66% feeling unheard by healthcare providers. Conclusions. Despite relatively high rates of insurance coverage, communities across all regions face persistent challenges in accessing timely, affordable, and respectful healthcare. Coupled with neighborhood instability, adverse health behaviors, and psychosocial stressors, these barriers highlight the urgent need for regionally tailored strategies that strengthen both cancer prevention and care. Addressing these interconnected challenges at the community level is essential for promoting more equitable cancer outcomes. Citation Format: Tingyu Zou, Monica L. Albertie, Emelina Asto-Flores, Manisha Salinas, Farhia Omar, Adeline Abbenyi, Noreen Stephenson-Hubert, Nuwanthi Heendeniya, Kathleen Yost, Folakemi T. Odedina. Place, people, and prevention: Contextual drivers of cancer health equity in three US Regions [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 18th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities; 2025 Sep 18-21; Baltimore, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2025;34(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B031.

Abstract Introduction: The disproportionate prostate cancer (CaP) burden, which includes high mortality rates, is significantly attributed to the characteristics of the social determinants of the health status of the Black Male population. Designing targeted interventions to address poor health outcomes through a collaborative population-based approach could reduce CaP health disparities. The Community Living Lab (CoLLab) Learning Health System was developed to address ethnically sensitive, targeted approaches that will eliminate CaP health disparities among Black Men. This study assessed demographic factors and Knowledge on prostate cancer screening attitudes and research participation among black men. Method: The collab project employed a social ecological model to design intervention to address barriers to CaP screening and participation in clinical trials. A validated, pretested questionnaire was used to collect information on demographics, CaP knowledge, attitudes, testing, and a history of participation in research and clinical trials. Baseline data were collected from 3 American Legion posts (ALPs). The association between variables was evaluated using the Chi-square test. Results: Participants between 60-69 years were 28.38%, and those aged 40-49 were 12.16%. Most are US-born Black (89.8%), with others identifying as African-born Black (6.76%) and Caribbean-born Black (1.35%). Approximately 43.24% were retired, and 36.49% were working full-time. CaP knowledge was high in 43.9%, moderate in 46.6%, and low in 9.5%. Only 45% of the participants have undergone Prostate-Specific Antigen test, and 24.6% have had a Digital Rectal Examination. Reported past clinical trials and research participation were very low (9.38%). Participants with higher knowledge levels had higher information scores (p < .0001), favored various research settings (p = 0.0008), had favorable attitudes towards CaP testing (p < .0001), and were more likely to participate in research (p = 0.0117). Work status was found to impact CaP Knowledge (p = 0.0117). Participants with stronger beliefs about prostate cancer may have different attitudes toward testing (p = 0.0444). Age did not impact attitudes toward CaP testing (p = 0.4298). Conclusion: The knowledge of CaP was found to impact the attitudes, testing, and disposition of the participants towards research. The baseline data generated from the clinical study will curate insightful evidence that will create innovative approaches to prostate cancer education among males in Black communities. Citation Format: Opeyemi O. Bolajoko, Quincy A. Wimberly, Daniel W. Lee, Collisa Mahin, Michelle Fudge, Shaina E. Flynn, Arnold J. Merriweather, Trevanne R. Matthews Hew, Monica L. Albertie, Dery Greene, Wayne Ford, Toshiko Moultrie, Floyd B. Willis, Folakemi T. Odedina. Influence of demographic factors and knowledge on prostate cancer screening attitude and research participation among Black men [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 18th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities; 2025 Sep 18-21; Baltimore, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2025;34(9 Suppl):Abstract nr C138.

Abstract Introduction: Understanding how communities access and engage with health information is essential for effective health communication. Health literacy—the ability to read, understand, and use healthcare information—plays a crucial role in making informed health decisions. With the rise of digital technologies, internet access and online engagement have become key tools for obtaining health information. However, variations in health literacy and digital engagement can limit some populations' ability to fully access these resources. This study examined health literacy, cancer information-seeking behaviors, internet access, and digital engagement among adults in the Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center catchment areas to inform more effective and region-specific health communication strategies. Methods: This study focused on adult residents within the Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center catchment areas, covering 75 counties across Arizona, Florida, and the Midwest (Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Iowa). Data were collected through partnerships with the University of Florida and Mayo Clinic Survey Research Centers, and the "Boots on the Ground" approach involving community health workers. Methods included phone calls, online submissions, and community outreach for an anonymous survey. Validated measures assessed health literacy, information access, and digital engagement. Descriptive analyses were performed using valid responses, excluding non-responses and "Prefer not to answer" options to ensure interpretive accuracy. Results: Data from 2,681 respondents highlighted consistent barriers to cancer prevention with regional differences. In Arizona, 42.6% of respondents need help reading medical materials, but only 3.1% reported lacking confidence in obtaining cancer-related information. In contrast, 63.1% felt very or completely confident in accessing cancer advice. The primary sources of health information were doctors (17.6%), internet searches (11.4%), and family (9.8%). In Florida, 38.4% need assistance, but only 2.7% lack confidence, and 68.2% feel very or completely confident. Doctors (18%) and internet searches (13.1%) were top sources. In the Midwest, 38.5% struggle with medical documents, and 3.1% reported lacking confidence, while 66.4% felt very or completely confident. Internet access is widespread across all regions, with smartphones being the dominant device. Daily internet use for communication, browsing, and engagement with health apps and social networks remains high. Conclusion: Although many respondents face challenges with reading health-related materials, most report high confidence in obtaining cancer information, suggesting a gap between functional health literacy and perceived ability to access information. The widespread use of mobile devices and near-universal internet access offers a valuable opportunity to enhance health communication through digital tools. These findings emphasize the importance of tailored digital outreach to bridge literacy gaps and ensure underserved populations can access reliable health information. Citation Format: Tingyu Zou, Monica L. Albertie, Emelina Asto-Flores, Manisha Salinas, Farhia Omar, Adeline Abbenyi, Noreen Stephenson-Hubert, Nuwanthi Heendeniya, Kathleen Yost, Folakemi T. Odedina. Health literacy and digital engagement across US Regions: Insights from the mayo clinic catchment areas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 18th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities; 2025 Sep 18-21; Baltimore, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2025;34(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B030.

Abstract Introduction: The Community Engagement Internal Medicine Residents Rotation (IMRR) connects Mayo Clinic Florida (MCF) medical professionals to partners in the Florida catchment area to better understand administrative operations, the referral processes of these organizations and how best they fit the needs of the communities they serve. The goal is to give residents exposure to a more diverse population including rural, Black and Hispanic/Latin as well as connecting them with partners where community- based research is conducted. This IMRR is also designed to encourage cancer-focused community based research (CBR). We learned that the lack of patient diversity at MCF was a drawback to resident recruitment and developing an interest in cancer focused health disparities research. We agreed to assist in this potential solution to the diversity deficit. Methods: The goal for the elective is to provide senior residents with an introduction to community engagement and cancer focused community engaged research. The elective consists of one week of didactics and one of experiential learning. The first week includes an introduction to cancer health disparities in our catchment areas and how to conduct cancer focused CBR. During the second week, residents interact with community partners focused on providing care and cancer education to those who otherwise may not have access to resources. Strategically, these partners are those with whom we are engaged in cancer research initiatives. Internal Medicine Residents (IMR) complete visitation paperwork that included Background Screenings and Sovereign Immunity Contracts. We limit the number of IMR to two in order to accommodate some of the smaller community clinic spaces. IMR visit community partners for no less than a half day each and at the end of the rotation they debrief and complete rotation evaluations. Data: Rotation evaluations aggregated to date indicate 91.67% of IMR feel the rotation meets the goals and objectives. In addition, evaluation comments indicate an improved understanding of population health as well as community resources for improved health and wellness in underserved populations. Anecdotal comments also show evidence of increased understanding of cancer focused CBR and cancer related health disparities. Conclusion: IMMR through community outreach and engagement visits have increased understanding of how partners address varying cancer burden needs. The IMRR has increased residents’ awareness of how environment impacts access to healthcare and improved cost-conscious ordering and treatment plans (medications). IMR better understand the significance of how social determinants of health (SDOH) resources impact community. IMR are better equipped to help patients and their families navigate to additional SDOH solutions and are familiar with the referral process for community safety net resources. The offer of this type of IMRR has enhanced recruitment to MCF training programs and significantly increased IM and fellow participation in cancer focused CBR initiatives and studies. Citation Format: Monica Albertie, Chelsea Reeves, Noreen Stephenson, Folakemi Odedina. Mayo Clinic Cancer Comprehensive Center Community Outreach and Engagement Internal Medicine Residents Rotations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B035.

Abstract The Cancer Advocacy Training Program aimed to enhance participants' knowledge, skills, and confidence in cancer advocacy, particularly addressing disparities in cancer health outcomes. This evaluation assesses the program's impact through pre- and post-training survey comparisons. The program included 25 participants from various states and focused on comprehensive training. Surveys measured changes in knowledge, attitudes, self-perceived skills, and confidence. Results showed that accurate identification of cancer's main categories increased from 83% to 96%, and awareness of the NCI's mammogram recommendations rose from 70% to 96%. Recognition of the root causes of health disparities remained at 100%, and belief in the inclusivity of cancer advocacy roles was consistently high. Understanding of trust dynamics in advocacy increased by 50%, and recognition of essential political advocacy components improved by 14%. Specific learning outcomes indicated consistent identification of research advocates, a 23% increase in knowledge of strategic funding sources, a 31% improvement in understanding health communication audiences, a 19% rise in awareness of patient advocacy benefits, and a 13% increase in comprehension of informed consent. Confidence in advocacy skills also saw significant improvements. "Extremely confident" participants increased to 33% in problem-solving, adaptability, and communication with stakeholders. Confidence in fundraising and partnership building rose to 19%, evaluation of advocacy outcomes to 24%, identifying key issues to 29%, presentation skills to 33%, and using digital tools to 29%. Self-efficacy results demonstrated notable gains: confidence in solving difficult problems related to cancer advocacy increased with participants reporting "extremely confident" rising from 11% to 33%. Confidence in adaptability under stress improved significantly, with "extremely confident" participants rising from 11% to 33%. Effective communication with stakeholders saw a significant increase, with "extremely confident" participants rising from 17% to 33%. Fundraising and partnership-building confidence increased from 6% to 19%, and confidence in evaluating advocacy outcomes improved, with "extremely confident" participants rising from 6% to 24%. The program effectively enhanced participants' knowledge, attitudes, and advocacy skills, integrating theoretical and practical learning. Gains in confidence across problem-solving, adaptability, and communication skills underline the program's success in preparing participants for real-world advocacy. Participant feedback confirmed the program's relevance and efficacy, suggesting future iterations should emphasize diversity in advocacy and deepen content on key topics. This program serves as a valuable model for empowering cancer advocates and addresses the critical need for targeted training to reduce cancer health disparities. Citation Format: Manisha Salinas, Monica Albertie. Empowering cancer advocates: Evaluating the impact of a comprehensive training program [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B112.