Shoirah, Hazem

Background Rapid stroke type identification is essential for time‐sensitive interventions, yet timely neuroimaging remains limited, especially in pre‐hospital and resource‐constrained settings. The EMVision emu™ Brain Scanner is a portable neurodiagnostic device using non‐ionizing electromagnetic signals to distinguish stroke subtypes. In an Australian prevalidation study enrolling 277 suspected stroke patients, it demonstrated diagnostic accuracy with sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 85% for hemorrhagic and 95% and 80% for ischemic strokes, respectively. Case studies and image reconstructions provided (figures 1 and 2). This follow‐up study aims to validate the diagnostic performance of emu™ for detecting intracranial hemorrhage in an international cohort, targeting ≥80% sensitivity and specificity. Methods A prospective, multi‐center, international, paired diagnostic accuracy study, with 4 US sites and 2 Australian sites. It will enroll 300 patients presenting within 12 hours of stroke onset. Patients will be stratified into two arms: intracranial hemorrhage, and ischemic stroke, TIA, or stroke mimic. Participants will undergo standard imaging, followed by non‐invasive scan by the emu™ device. Ground‐truth diagnoses will be adjudicated by a blinded expert panel. The primary endpoints are the sensitivity and specificity of the emu™ device for detecting hemorrhage, calculated against the reference standard. Statistical inference will rely on whether the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval for sensitivity and specificity exceeds 80%. Results First Australian and US enrollments occurred on June 11, 2025, and July 3, 2025, respectively. Latest progress in the study will be presented at the time of conference. Conclusion This is the first international validation study of a portable electromagnetic brain scanner for intracranial hemorrhage detection; a novel, non‐ionizing, diagnostic tool that can revolutionize acute stroke triage, enabling earlier treatment decisions, improved workflows, and equitable access to neuroimaging. image image

Importance In patients with severe aortic valve stenosis at intermediate surgical risk, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a self-expanding supra-annular valve was noninferior to surgery for all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at 2 years. Comparisons of longer-term clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in these patients are limited. Objective To report prespecified secondary 5-year outcomes from the Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis in Intermediate Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement (SURTAVI) randomized clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants SURTAVI is a prospective randomized, unblinded clinical trial. Randomization was stratified by investigational site and need for revascularization determined by the local heart teams. Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis deemed to be at intermediate risk of 30-day surgical mortality were enrolled at 87 centers from June 19, 2012, to June 30, 2016, in Europe and North America. Analysis took place between August and October 2021. Intervention Patients were randomized to TAVR with a self-expanding, supra-annular transcatheter or a surgical bioprosthesis. Main Outcomes and Measures The prespecified secondary end points of death or disabling stroke and other adverse events and hemodynamic findings at 5 years. An independent clinical event committee adjudicated all serious adverse events and an independent echocardiographic core laboratory evaluated all echocardiograms at 5 years. Results A total of 1660 individuals underwent an attempted TAVR (n = 864) or surgical (n = 796) procedure. The mean (SD) age was 79.8 (6.2) years, 724 (43.6%) were female, and the mean (SD) Society of Thoracic Surgery Predicted Risk of Mortality score was 4.5% (1.6%). At 5 years, the rates of death or disabling stroke were similar (TAVR, 31.3% vs surgery, 30.8%; hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.85-1.22]; P = .85). Transprosthetic gradients remained lower (mean [SD], 8.6 [5.5] mm Hg vs 11.2 [6.0] mm Hg; P < .001) and aortic valve areas were higher (mean [SD], 2.2 [0.7] cm 2 vs 1.8 [0.6] cm 2 ; P < .001) with TAVR vs surgery. More patients had moderate/severe paravalvular leak with TAVR than surgery (11 [3.0%] vs 2 [0.7%]; risk difference, 2.37% [95% CI, 0.17%- 4.85%]; P = .05). New pacemaker implantation rates were higher for TAVR than surgery at 5 years (289 [39.1%] vs 94 [15.1%]; hazard ratio, 3.30 [95% CI, 2.61-4.17]; log-rank P < .001), as were valve reintervention rates (27 [3.5%] vs 11 [1.9%]; hazard ratio, 2.21 [95% CI, 1.10-4.45]; log-rank P = .02), although between 2 and 5 years only 6 patients who underwent TAVR and 7 who underwent surgery required a reintervention. Conclusions and Relevance Among intermediate-risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, major clinical outcomes at 5 years were similar for TAVR and surgery. TAVR was associated with superior hemodynamic valve performance but also with more paravalvular leak and valve reinterventions.