Jilaihawi, Hasan

BACKGROUND: Aortic enlargement is a powerful predictor of dissection and rupture, yet it is rarely evaluated during routine myocardial perfusion imaging, despite the widespread availability of computed tomography (CT) attenuation correction scans. The aim of this study was to determine whether fully automated, opportunistically derived, artificial intelligence-based aortic measurements from myocardial perfusion imaging CT attenuation correction scans are associated with adverse outcomes in a large multicenter cohort. METHODS: CT attenuation correction scans from patients undergoing positron emission tomography/CT and single-photon emission CT/CT myocardial perfusion imaging across 10 centers were included. A deep learning model automatically segmented the thoracic aorta, and a postprocessing algorithm extracted maximum ascending and descending diameters. The aortic size index was calculated by indexing the diameter to body surface area. RESULTS: A total of 29 339 patients (56% men; median age, 66 years [interquartile range, 58–75 years]) were included. Over a median follow-up of 3.5 years (interquartile range, 1.9–5.0 years), 5083 (17.3%) patients died. Median ascending and descending aortic size index values were 1.8 cm/m 2 (interquartile range, 1.6–2.0) and 1.5 cm/m 2 (interquartile range, 1.4–1.6), respectively, with an increase with age and higher values in females. Elevated aortic size index thresholds (ascending >2.2 cm/m 2 ; descending >1.6 cm/m 2 ) were significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality (ascending: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.07–1.26], P <0.001; descending: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.14–1.31]; P <0.001). Notably, the prognostic value of an abnormal aortic size index persisted independent of age, sex, and perfusion abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial intelligence can unlock previously unused information within routine myocardial perfusion imaging CT attenuation correction scans by rapidly and automatically quantifying aortic size at scale. Opportunistic aortic measurements derived from CT attenuation correction may serve as an adjunctive risk biomarker and could add prognostic value to standard myocardial perfusion imaging without additional imaging or radiation.

Importance In patients with severe aortic valve stenosis at intermediate surgical risk, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a self-expanding supra-annular valve was noninferior to surgery for all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at 2 years. Comparisons of longer-term clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in these patients are limited. Objective To report prespecified secondary 5-year outcomes from the Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis in Intermediate Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement (SURTAVI) randomized clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants SURTAVI is a prospective randomized, unblinded clinical trial. Randomization was stratified by investigational site and need for revascularization determined by the local heart teams. Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis deemed to be at intermediate risk of 30-day surgical mortality were enrolled at 87 centers from June 19, 2012, to June 30, 2016, in Europe and North America. Analysis took place between August and October 2021. Intervention Patients were randomized to TAVR with a self-expanding, supra-annular transcatheter or a surgical bioprosthesis. Main Outcomes and Measures The prespecified secondary end points of death or disabling stroke and other adverse events and hemodynamic findings at 5 years. An independent clinical event committee adjudicated all serious adverse events and an independent echocardiographic core laboratory evaluated all echocardiograms at 5 years. Results A total of 1660 individuals underwent an attempted TAVR (n = 864) or surgical (n = 796) procedure. The mean (SD) age was 79.8 (6.2) years, 724 (43.6%) were female, and the mean (SD) Society of Thoracic Surgery Predicted Risk of Mortality score was 4.5% (1.6%). At 5 years, the rates of death or disabling stroke were similar (TAVR, 31.3% vs surgery, 30.8%; hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.85-1.22]; P = .85). Transprosthetic gradients remained lower (mean [SD], 8.6 [5.5] mm Hg vs 11.2 [6.0] mm Hg; P &amp;lt; .001) and aortic valve areas were higher (mean [SD], 2.2 [0.7] cm 2 vs 1.8 [0.6] cm 2 ; P &amp;lt; .001) with TAVR vs surgery. More patients had moderate/severe paravalvular leak with TAVR than surgery (11 [3.0%] vs 2 [0.7%]; risk difference, 2.37% [95% CI, 0.17%- 4.85%]; P = .05). New pacemaker implantation rates were higher for TAVR than surgery at 5 years (289 [39.1%] vs 94 [15.1%]; hazard ratio, 3.30 [95% CI, 2.61-4.17]; log-rank P &amp;lt; .001), as were valve reintervention rates (27 [3.5%] vs 11 [1.9%]; hazard ratio, 2.21 [95% CI, 1.10-4.45]; log-rank P = .02), although between 2 and 5 years only 6 patients who underwent TAVR and 7 who underwent surgery required a reintervention. Conclusions and Relevance Among intermediate-risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, major clinical outcomes at 5 years were similar for TAVR and surgery. TAVR was associated with superior hemodynamic valve performance but also with more paravalvular leak and valve reinterventions.