Chareonthaitawee, Panithaya

BACKGROUND: Technetium-based cardiac amyloid radionuclide imaging enables noninvasive diagnosis of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), but conventional planar and visual semiquantitative approaches have important limitations. We developed the quantitative 3-dimensional Mayo 3D Score, defined as the ratio of mean left ventricular myocardial radiotracer uptake to right atrial blood-pool uptake using computed tomography (CT)-fused single-photon emission CT (SPECT) volumes of interest, and sought to validate its diagnostic performance against myocardial pathology. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent 99m Tc-pyrophosphate SPECT/CT at Mayo Clinic for suspected ATTR-CM between June 2017 and January 2025 with archived myocardial tissue were included. Baseline characteristics, including demographics, echocardiogram, biomarkers, visual semiquantitative, and Mayo 3D Score metrics, were collected. Myocardial specimens underwent histopathologic confirmation of amyloid, with amyloid subtype determination and further semiquantitative grading of amyloid burden and deposition patterns. RESULTS: Among 230 patients (median age, 72 years; 78% male), 107 (47%) had ATTR-CM, of whom 9 had hereditary ATTR-CM. The Mayo 3D Score showed excellent discrimination against pathology (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.92 [0.88–0.96]), exceeding planar Perugini (0.87 [0.83–0.92]; P =0.006), and heart-to-contralateral lung ratio (0.86 [0.81–0.91]; P =0.004) and comparable to SPECT Perugini (0.90 [0.86–0.94]; P =0.12). A cutoff ≥1.0 yielded 86.0% sensitivity, 92.7% specificity, 91.1% positive predictive value, and 88.4% negative predictive value. Among ATTR-positive cases, the Mayo 3D Score correlated strongly with semiquantitative amyloid burden (Spearman ρ=0.69), was higher in pericellular than nodular deposition patterns ( P <0.001), and was not associated with vascular involvement ( P =0.42). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected ATTR-CM undergoing 99m Tc-pyrophosphate SPECT/CT, the Mayo 3D Score demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared with planar metrics and comparable to SPECT Perugini, while correlating with myocardial ATTR burden and deposition patterns on pathology. These findings support its integration as a quantitative adjunct within clinical diagnostic ATTR-CM workflows.

BACKGROUND: Aortic enlargement is a powerful predictor of dissection and rupture, yet it is rarely evaluated during routine myocardial perfusion imaging, despite the widespread availability of computed tomography (CT) attenuation correction scans. The aim of this study was to determine whether fully automated, opportunistically derived, artificial intelligence-based aortic measurements from myocardial perfusion imaging CT attenuation correction scans are associated with adverse outcomes in a large multicenter cohort. METHODS: CT attenuation correction scans from patients undergoing positron emission tomography/CT and single-photon emission CT/CT myocardial perfusion imaging across 10 centers were included. A deep learning model automatically segmented the thoracic aorta, and a postprocessing algorithm extracted maximum ascending and descending diameters. The aortic size index was calculated by indexing the diameter to body surface area. RESULTS: A total of 29 339 patients (56% men; median age, 66 years [interquartile range, 58–75 years]) were included. Over a median follow-up of 3.5 years (interquartile range, 1.9–5.0 years), 5083 (17.3%) patients died. Median ascending and descending aortic size index values were 1.8 cm/m 2 (interquartile range, 1.6–2.0) and 1.5 cm/m 2 (interquartile range, 1.4–1.6), respectively, with an increase with age and higher values in females. Elevated aortic size index thresholds (ascending >2.2 cm/m 2 ; descending >1.6 cm/m 2 ) were significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality (ascending: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.07–1.26], P <0.001; descending: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.14–1.31]; P <0.001). Notably, the prognostic value of an abnormal aortic size index persisted independent of age, sex, and perfusion abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial intelligence can unlock previously unused information within routine myocardial perfusion imaging CT attenuation correction scans by rapidly and automatically quantifying aortic size at scale. Opportunistic aortic measurements derived from CT attenuation correction may serve as an adjunctive risk biomarker and could add prognostic value to standard myocardial perfusion imaging without additional imaging or radiation.

BACKGROUND: Although the prognostic utility of positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial flow reserve (MFR) is well established, emerging data suggest that reduced subendocardial flows also predict adverse outcomes. However, the incremental value of subendocardial MFR (MFR SE ) beyond transmural MFR (MFR TM ) remains unclear. METHODS: We studied patients in a multicenter PET registry with normal perfusion on stress/rest Rb-82 PET, excluding those with a previous history of coronary artery bypass surgery, heart transplantation, or left ventricular ejection fraction <40%. The optimal MFR SE cutoff for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; death, myocardial infarction [MI], revascularization, or heart failure [HF] hospitalization) was determined using Youden’s index. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: concordant-normal (MFR TM ≥2.0; MFR SE ≥2.1), discordant (low-MFR SE , normal MFR TM ), and abnormal MFR TM . Clinical outcomes were compared by MFR groups. RESULTS: Among 6603 patients (normal N=4103; discordant N=885; abnormal N=1615) the mean age was 66.3±12.4 years, and 54% were women. Compared with the concordant-normal group, patients with discordant low-MFR SE were older and more likely to have hypertension, diabetes, peripheral artery disease, and previous percutaneous coronary intervention. The median MFR TM for normal, discordant, and abnormal groups were 2.86, 2.15, and 1.72, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 4.9 years, 1661 MACE events occurred. Discordant low-MFR SE patients had a higher risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.22–1.64) and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.14–1.61) compared with concordant-normal patients. The discordant group had an intermediate absolute risk of MACE, with an adjusted annualized event rate of 5.79% (95% CI, 5.10–6.49) compared with 3.99% (95% CI, 3.67–4.30; P <0.001) in the concordant-normal group and 8.35% (95% CI, 7.71–9.00; P <0.001) in the abnormal MFR TM group. CONCLUSIONS: Subendocardial MFR reveals clinically meaningful risk heterogeneity among patients with preserved transmural flow reserve, helping refine risk stratification beyond traditional PET metrics.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial flow reserve (MFR), measured by positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging, provides valuable information on epicardial coronary disease, diffuse atherosclerosis, and microvascular function. Despite its routine use, the prognostic efficacy of 13 N-ammonia PET MFR remains unconfirmed in larger multicenter cohorts of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. METHODS: We considered patients from 5 sites in the REFINE PET (Registry of Flow and Perfusion Imaging for Artificial Intelligence with PET) registry who underwent 13 N-ammonia PET myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease. Clinical and imaging data were collected at the time of myocardial perfusion imaging. MFR was quantified as the ratio of stress to rest myocardial blood flow, using QPET software (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models adjusted for clinical and imaging covariates. RESULTS: In total, 6277 patients were included (median age of 65 years, 56% male). Median follow-up time was 3.8 years. There were 1895 patients with MFR ≤2 and 4382 with MFR >2. Patients with MFR ≤2 had significantly higher mortality than those with MFR >2 (n=701 [37.0%] versus n=537 [12.3%], respectively; P <0.001). Annualized all-cause mortality rates by MFR and summed stress score ranged from 1.7 to 15.8. In multivariable analysis, MFR ≤2 was independently associated with increased all-cause mortality in the overall population (hazard ratio, 2.70 [95% CI, 2.41–3.03]; P <0.001), even among patients with no perfusion defects (hazard ratio, 2.36 [95% CI, 1.93–2.89]; P <0.001). Mortality risk decreased across increasing MFR deciles, ranging from hazard ratio, 2.73 (95% CI, 2.39–3.11) to hazard ratio, 0.35 (95% CI, 0.25–0.49). CONCLUSIONS: In this large multicenter cohort, MFR derived from 13 N-ammonia PET myocardial perfusion imaging is a strong, independent predictor of all-cause mortality, even in patients with normal perfusion. An MFR of ≤2 identifies elevated risk, while higher values are associated with improved survival. These findings support the routine integration of MFR to enhance risk stratification in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend 3-hour cardiac amyloid radionuclide imaging (CARI) for transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. Citing rapid blood clearance of 99m Tc-hydroxymethylene-diphosphonate (HMDP) and efficient laboratory throughput, 1-hour imaging is increasingly practiced despite limited supporting evidence. We sought to compare diagnostic performance and interpreter experience of 1-hour versus 3-hour HMDP-CARI. METHODS: Consecutive patients with suspected transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (n=114) underwent both 1-hour and 3-hour HMDP single photon emission computed tomography (CT)/CT. Two cardiologist-radiologist reader teams, blinded to imaging timepoint (1 versus 3 hours), assessed overall interpretation, single photon emission CT–based Perugini grade, interpretation difficulty, interpreter confidence, and need for CT-fused images for anatomic localization. Discordant, equivocal, and difficult cases were arbitrated by a third tie-breaking team. The myocardial-to-blood-pool radiotracer uptake ratio (3-dimensional Score) was measured as a surrogate of contrast resolution. RESULTS: Interinterpreter agreement was high at both time points (κ≥0.81), with more cases requiring arbitration at 3 hours versus 1 hour (22% versus 13%; P =0.049). Overall interpretation and Perugini grades were concordant between time points in 111/114 (97%) and 106/114 (93%) patients, respectively. Three patients (3%) were negative at 1 hour but equivocal at 3 hours, all of which were clinically ruled out for transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. Interpreter confidence was comparable at both timepoints (97% versus 95%; P =0.317). Compared with 3-hour imaging, contrast resolution was inferior (lower 3-dimensional score, P <0.001) and CT fusion was more frequently needed (57% versus 31%, P <0.001) at 1-hour imaging. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective, blinded comparison of 1-hour versus 3-hour HMDP-CARI, diagnostic performance and interpreter experience were similar, with readers requesting CT fusion more frequently at 1 hour to optimize myocardial-to-blood pool discrimination.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) attenuation correction scans are an intrinsic part of positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging using PET/CT, but anatomic information is rarely derived from these ultralow-dose CT scans. We aimed to assess the association between deep learning-derived cardiac chamber volumes (right atrial, right ventricular, left ventricular, and left atrial) and mass (left ventricular) from these scans with myocardial flow reserve and heart failure hospitalization. METHODS: We included 18 079 patients with cardiac PET/CT from 6 sites. A deep learning model estimated cardiac chamber volumes and left ventricular mass from CT attenuation correction imaging. Associations between deep learning-derived CT mass and volumes with heart failure hospitalization and reduced myocardial flow reserve were assessed in a multivariable analysis. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 4.3 years, 1721 (9.5%) patients experienced heart failure hospitalization. Patients with 3 or 4 abnormal chamber volumes were 7× more likely to be hospitalized for heart failure compared with patients with normal volumes. In adjusted analyses, left atrial volume (hazard ratio [HR], 1.25 [95% CI, 1.19–1.30]), right atrial volume (HR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.23–1.35]), right ventricular volume (HR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.20–1.31]), left ventricular volume (HR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.23–1.35]), and left ventricular mass (HR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.18–1.32]) were independently associated with heart failure hospitalization. In multivariable analyses, left atrial volume (odds ratio, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.0–1.19]) and ventricular mass (odds ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.6–1.17]) were independent predictors of reduced myocardial flow reserve. CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning–derived chamber volumes and left ventricular mass from CT attenuation correction were predictive of heart failure hospitalization and reduced myocardial flow reserve in patients undergoing cardiac PET perfusion imaging. This anatomic data can be routinely reported along with other PET/CT parameters to improve risk prediction.

Innovations in cardiac imaging have fundamentally advanced the understanding and treatment of cardiovascular disease. These advances in noninvasive cardiac imaging have also expanded the role of the cardiac imager and dramatically increased the demand for imagers who are cross-trained in multiple modalities. However, we hypothesize that there is significant variation in the availability of cardiac imaging expertise and a disparity in the adoption of advanced imaging technologies across the United States. To evaluate this, we have brought together the leaders of cardiovascular imaging societies, imaging trainees, as well as collaborated with national imaging accreditation commissions and imaging certification boards to assess the state of cardiac imaging and the diversity of the imaging workforce in the United States. Aggregate data confirm the presence of critical gaps, such as limited access to imaging and imaging expertise in rural communities, as well as disparities in the imaging workforce, notably among women and underrepresented minorities. Based on these results, we have proposed solutions to promote and maintain a robust and diverse community of cardiac imagers and improve equity and accessibility for cardiac imaging technologies.

Abstract Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), with either extracardiac involvement or in isolation, is increasingly recognized. Complications from cardiac involvement are the leading cause of death in patients with sarcoidosis, rendering early detection extremely important given the significant therapeutic and prognostic implications. However, the diagnosis of CS remains challenging due to the lack of a reliable gold standard, largely due to the low sensitivity of traditional endomyocardial biopsy and patchy myocardial involvement. Recent advances in cardiac imaging with [18F] fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography ([18F]FDG PET/CT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) have provided unprecedented information on the prevalence of CS and have revolutionized the diagnosis and management of CS patients. Abnormal PET/CMR findings are now major criteria in societal guidelines to establish a probabilistic diagnosis of CS. This review provides a brief introduction to CS and a summary of current diagnostic criteria, followed by a review on the current use and strengths of PET/CT and CMR for diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment response evaluation. CMR is the most robust technique to assess left ventricular function, to detect myocardial fibrosis and differentiate CS from other cardiomyopathies and has an excellent negative predictive value. On the other hand, [18F]FDG PET/CT is the modality of choice to assess active myocardial inflammation which may be amenable to immunosuppressive treatment as well as to detect extracardiac involvement, to identify potential biopsy sites and to monitor treatment efficacy. Understanding the complementary value of both techniques is crucial to the optimal utilization of advanced imaging in patients with CS. Lastly, some gaps are identified for future research.

Myocarditis is defined as inflammation of the myocardium according to clinical, histological, biochemical, immunohistochemical, or imaging findings. Inflammation can be categorized histologically by cell type or pattern, and many causes have been implicated, including infectious, most commonly viral, systemic autoimmune diseases, vaccine-associated processes, environmental factors, toxins, and hypersensitivity to drugs. Sarcoid myocarditis is increasingly recognized as an important cause of cardiomyopathy and has important diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications in patients with systemic sarcoidosis. The clinical presentation of myocarditis may include an asymptomatic, subacute, acute, fulminant, or chronic course and may have focal or diffuse involvement of the myocardium depending on the cause and time point of the disease. For most causes of myocarditis except sarcoidosis, myocardial biopsy is the gold standard but is limited due to risk, cost, availability, and variable sensitivity. Diagnostic criteria have been established for both myocarditis and cardiac sarcoidosis and include clinical and imaging findings particularly the use of cardiac magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography. Beyond diagnosis, imaging findings may also provide prognostic value. This case-based review focuses on the current state of multimodality imaging for the diagnosis and management of myocarditis and cardiac sarcoidosis, highlighting multimodality imaging approaches with practical clinical vignettes, with a discussion of knowledge gaps and future directions.