Young, Kathleen

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend 3-hour cardiac amyloid radionuclide imaging (CARI) for transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. Citing rapid blood clearance of 99m Tc-hydroxymethylene-diphosphonate (HMDP) and efficient laboratory throughput, 1-hour imaging is increasingly practiced despite limited supporting evidence. We sought to compare diagnostic performance and interpreter experience of 1-hour versus 3-hour HMDP-CARI. METHODS: Consecutive patients with suspected transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (n=114) underwent both 1-hour and 3-hour HMDP single photon emission computed tomography (CT)/CT. Two cardiologist-radiologist reader teams, blinded to imaging timepoint (1 versus 3 hours), assessed overall interpretation, single photon emission CT–based Perugini grade, interpretation difficulty, interpreter confidence, and need for CT-fused images for anatomic localization. Discordant, equivocal, and difficult cases were arbitrated by a third tie-breaking team. The myocardial-to-blood-pool radiotracer uptake ratio (3-dimensional Score) was measured as a surrogate of contrast resolution. RESULTS: Interinterpreter agreement was high at both time points (κ≥0.81), with more cases requiring arbitration at 3 hours versus 1 hour (22% versus 13%; P =0.049). Overall interpretation and Perugini grades were concordant between time points in 111/114 (97%) and 106/114 (93%) patients, respectively. Three patients (3%) were negative at 1 hour but equivocal at 3 hours, all of which were clinically ruled out for transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. Interpreter confidence was comparable at both timepoints (97% versus 95%; P =0.317). Compared with 3-hour imaging, contrast resolution was inferior (lower 3-dimensional score, P <0.001) and CT fusion was more frequently needed (57% versus 31%, P <0.001) at 1-hour imaging. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective, blinded comparison of 1-hour versus 3-hour HMDP-CARI, diagnostic performance and interpreter experience were similar, with readers requesting CT fusion more frequently at 1 hour to optimize myocardial-to-blood pool discrimination.

Background A multidisciplinary approach improves guideline‐directed medical therapy in systolic heart failure (HF), but its efficacy in patients with HF due to cardiac sarcoidosis is unreported. Methods and Results In a retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 848 patients from our institutional cardiac sarcoidosis clinics, identifying those with a cardiac sarcoidosis diagnosis, HF (left ventricular ejection fraction <50%) at index evaluation, and echocardiograms within 90 days and 11 to 36 months. Patients were stratified by participation in a pharmacist‐led medication therapy management (MTM) program for guideline‐directed medical therapy optimization (MTM versus non‐MTM [NMTM]) without randomization. Demographics, left ventricular ejection fraction, guideline‐directed medical therapy (quantified by Kansas City Medical Optimization score), and immunosuppressive therapy were assessed. Primary outcomes included changes in Kansas City Medical Optimization score, left ventricular ejection fraction, and cardiovascular event–free survival (unplanned HF hospitalization, left ventricular assist device /heart transplant, or death). The final cohort included 111 patients (median age, 57 years; 34% women; 64% New York Heart Association class I–II); 43 (39%) were MTM and 68 (61%) were NMTM. Mean Kansas City Medical Optimization score was similar at index evaluation (MTM, 23.2; NMTM, 29.6; P =0.83). At follow‐up (median, 16 months), the Kansas City Medical Optimization score increased significantly in both groups (MTM, 23.2 to 74.8; P <0.001; NMTM, 29.6 to 58.7; P <0.001) but was higher in MTM ( P =0.001). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction trended toward higher values in MTM (44.4% versus 40.0%, P =0.05). The primary clinical outcome occurred in 1 MTM (2.3%) and 16 NMTM (23.5%) patients, with higher risk in NMTM (hazard ratio, 11.97 [95% CI, 1.58–90.54]; P =0.002). Conclusions In this retrospective cohort study, a pharmacist‐led MTM program was associated with favorable guideline‐directed medical therapy optimization and lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis with HF.