Citations 1
Diagnostic Performance and Interpreter Experience of 1-Hour Versus 3-Hour 99m Tc-HMDP Cardiac Amyloid Radionuclide Imaging: A Prospective, Blinded Comparison
Tersalvi, Gregorio , Carey, Patricia , Garmany, Armin , Scott, Christopher G. , Maldonado, Francisco J., Krüger, Leandi , Hruska, Carrie B. , Johnson, Geoffrey B. , Jouni, Hayan, Rodriguez‐Porcel, Martin , Askew, J. Wells , Bois, John P. , Young, Kathleen A. , Anavekar, Nandan S., Grogan, Martha , Homb, Andrew, Zhang, Jun , Kruger, Livia F , Hruska, Carrie B , Johnson, Geoffrey B , Rodriguez-Porcel, Martin G., Askew, J Wells , Young, Kathleen , Grogan, Martha , Dispenzieri, Angela , Chareonthaitawee, Panithaya , Homb, Andrew C, AbouEzzeddine, Omar F , Scott, Christopher , Tersalvi, Gregorio , Carey, Patricia , Zhang, Jun , Maldonado, Francisco J., Dispenzieri, Angela , Chareonthaitawee, Panithaya , AbouEzzeddine, Omar F.
Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging | December 8, 2025 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available
10.1161/circimaging.125.018745
BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend 3-hour cardiac amyloid radionuclide imaging (CARI) for transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. Citing rapid blood clearance of 99m Tc-hydroxymethylene-diphosphonate (HMDP) and efficient laboratory throughput, 1-hour imaging is increasingly practiced despite limited supporting evidence. We sought to compare diagnostic performance and interpreter experience of 1-hour versus 3-hour HMDP-CARI. METHODS: Consecutive patients with suspected transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (n=114) underwent both 1-hour and 3-hour HMDP single photon emission computed tomography (CT)/CT. Two cardiologist-radiologist reader teams, blinded to imaging timepoint (1 versus 3 hours), assessed overall interpretation, single photon emission CT–based Perugini grade, interpretation difficulty, interpreter confidence, and need for CT-fused images for anatomic localization. Discordant, equivocal, and difficult cases were arbitrated by a third tie-breaking team. The myocardial-to-blood-pool radiotracer uptake ratio (3-dimensional Score) was measured as a surrogate of contrast resolution. RESULTS: Interinterpreter agreement was high at both time points (κ≥0.81), with more cases requiring arbitration at 3 hours versus 1 hour (22% versus 13%; P =0.049). Overall interpretation and Perugini grades were concordant between time points in 111/114 (97%) and 106/114 (93%) patients, respectively. Three patients (3%) were negative at 1 hour but equivocal at 3 hours, all of which were clinically ruled out for transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. Interpreter confidence was comparable at both timepoints (97% versus 95%; P =0.317). Compared with 3-hour imaging, contrast resolution was inferior (lower 3-dimensional score, P <0.001) and CT fusion was more frequently needed (57% versus 31%, P <0.001) at 1-hour imaging. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective, blinded comparison of 1-hour versus 3-hour HMDP-CARI, diagnostic performance and interpreter experience were similar, with readers requesting CT fusion more frequently at 1 hour to optimize myocardial-to-blood pool discrimination.