Weber, Brittany

BACKGROUND: Although the prognostic utility of positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial flow reserve (MFR) is well established, emerging data suggest that reduced subendocardial flows also predict adverse outcomes. However, the incremental value of subendocardial MFR (MFR SE ) beyond transmural MFR (MFR TM ) remains unclear. METHODS: We studied patients in a multicenter PET registry with normal perfusion on stress/rest Rb-82 PET, excluding those with a previous history of coronary artery bypass surgery, heart transplantation, or left ventricular ejection fraction <40%. The optimal MFR SE cutoff for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; death, myocardial infarction [MI], revascularization, or heart failure [HF] hospitalization) was determined using Youden’s index. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: concordant-normal (MFR TM ≥2.0; MFR SE ≥2.1), discordant (low-MFR SE , normal MFR TM ), and abnormal MFR TM . Clinical outcomes were compared by MFR groups. RESULTS: Among 6603 patients (normal N=4103; discordant N=885; abnormal N=1615) the mean age was 66.3±12.4 years, and 54% were women. Compared with the concordant-normal group, patients with discordant low-MFR SE were older and more likely to have hypertension, diabetes, peripheral artery disease, and previous percutaneous coronary intervention. The median MFR TM for normal, discordant, and abnormal groups were 2.86, 2.15, and 1.72, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 4.9 years, 1661 MACE events occurred. Discordant low-MFR SE patients had a higher risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.22–1.64) and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.14–1.61) compared with concordant-normal patients. The discordant group had an intermediate absolute risk of MACE, with an adjusted annualized event rate of 5.79% (95% CI, 5.10–6.49) compared with 3.99% (95% CI, 3.67–4.30; P <0.001) in the concordant-normal group and 8.35% (95% CI, 7.71–9.00; P <0.001) in the abnormal MFR TM group. CONCLUSIONS: Subendocardial MFR reveals clinically meaningful risk heterogeneity among patients with preserved transmural flow reserve, helping refine risk stratification beyond traditional PET metrics.

Patients with psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are at significantly increased risk for cardiovascular (CV) disease, attributed to chronic systemic inflammation and a high burden of cardiometabolic comorbidities. Despite this, CV risk factors in this population are frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated. This consensus document, developed by the Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Clinics Multicenter Advancement Network (PPACMAN), provides practical recommendations for dermatologists, rheumatologists, and primary care physicians to improve CV risk assessment and management in PsO and PsA. Key recommendations include conducting baseline CV risk assessments at diagnosis—particularly for patients with moderate-to-severe PsO, PsA, or those requiring biologic therapy—and routine screening for hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. The use of biomarkers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and lipoprotein(a) may help refine risk stratification. Patients at elevated risk should be referred to their primary care provider or a cardiologist for further evaluation and may require additional imaging, including coronary artery calcium scoring. Lifestyle counseling on diet, exercise, weight management, and smoking cessation is essential. Pharmacologic strategies, such as earlier initiation of statins and consideration of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, are encouraged when clinically appropriate. Systemic inflammation should be reduced using anti-inflammatory therapies, although outcome data remain mixed. Clinicians must carefully assess the risks and benefits of NSAIDs, corticosteroids, and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. This document aims to bridge existing gaps in interdisciplinary care and facilitate earlier, more aggressive CV risk management in psoriatic disease, aligning with current cardiology and dermatology guidelines to reduce morbidity and mortality.

Abstract Background Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is a chronic autoinflammatory disease mediated by IL-1 that requires long-term treatment. While the 2015 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines position IL-1 pathway inhibition only after corticosteroids, complications associated with long-term steroid use underscore the importance of steroid-sparing strategies. Rilonacept, an IL-1α and IL-1β cytokine trap, is the only FDA-approved treatment for RP (available since April 2021). RESONANCE, an ongoing 5-year non-interventional US registry of patients (pts) with RP, has collected real-world data from pts cared for by cardiologists with a focus on pericardial disease, with a goal of informing contemporary RP clinical management. Purpose Analysis of temporal trends in RP management from RESONANCE. Methods From a database cut-off (DCO) on 21 December 2023, patient demographics and disease characteristics are reported for 242 active RP pts (excluding RHAPSODY prior participants) at 20 US sites (median [Q1:Q3] 2.1 [1.5:2.6] years and 556 patient-years [PY] of observation). Complete medication class use data were available for 239 pts (total 546 PY). Proportional medication class use prior to initiating rilonacept was analyzed annually across the observation period. Results Mean (standard deviation) age at DCO was 50.2 (16.6) years; 58.1% were female. Median [Q1:Q3] disease duration at DCO from index pericarditis episode was 3.1 [2.2:5] years. Median [Q1:Q3] number of prior recurrences at enrollment was 3 [2:5]. Prior to rilonacept availability, NSAIDs/Colchicine/Aspirin represented the highest proportion of treatment (73% of PY); steroid use was 9% of PY, IL-1 pathway inhibition (anakinra) was 13% of PY, and conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) were 0.46% PY (no RP-specific treatment was 5% of PY) (Fig 1). In the years since rilonacept availability, proportional IL-1 pathway inhibition use has increased, from 13% of PY in 2020-21 to 26% of PY in 2023, driven by an increase in rilonacept use (6%, 13%, 16% of PY in 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively). Over that same period, proportional NSAIDs/Colchicine/Aspirin use (57%-63% of PY) has been consistently 6-times more than proportional steroid use (10%-11% of PY). Among pts who initiated rilonacept (n=81), similar proportions transitioned from NSAIDs/Colchicine/Aspirin as from corticosteroids (Fig 2), a robust trend observed each year. Of those pts transitioning from corticosteroids, 1/3 had used corticosteroids for &lt;30 days and 1/3 for &gt;6 months. Conclusions Real-world data from the RESONANCE registry reveal a temporal shift in RP management in US centers with RP-focused cardiologists, with increased proportional IL-1 pathway inhibition use since rilonacept availability in 2021. Advancing beyond 2015 guideline recommendations, IL-1 pathway inhibition is often being used as steroid-sparing treatment, i.e., after colchicine instead of chronic corticosteroids.