Luis, Sushil Allen

Background Pericarditis may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality and can be a clinically challenging entity to diagnose. There is a clinical need for automated artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to act as a screening aid to assist with the early and accurate detection of pericarditis. Methods We developed p-Cal, a browser-based pericarditis risk calculator that fuses the patient clinical data and 12-lead ECG image to estimate risk for pericarditis. The ECG encoder was designed based on a pretrained MedCLIP Vision Transformer and random forest classifier was used for the clinical tabular data. These two modalities were fused at the decision-level using a meta classifier. Model reasoning for both modalities was assessed using advanced explainable AI techniques—attention maps from the transformer model were used to interpret ECG images, while SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) force plots were applied to analyse the tabular data. Results A total of 6508 patients (mean age 54.8±16.1 years, 50.9% female) were used for training and internal validation of the AI model, of whom 902 patients had a confirmed diagnosis of pericarditis (13.8%) and the remainder were normal controls. On 1302 hold-out test patients, the Fusion Model demonstrated the best discriminatory performance, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89, which surpassed the ECG (AUC = 0.85) and the clinical data only models (AUC = 0.74) performance. On external validation in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) Database, the fusion model achieved an AUC of 0.81. Conclusion A late fusion AI model integrating tabular clinical electronic medical record data and ECG signal has robust predictive capability for pericarditis as a screening tool.

Background Recurrent pericarditis may be mediated through inappropriate activation of the NACHT, leucine‐rich repeat, and pyrin domain‐containing protein 3 inflammasome. Pharmaceutically manufactured cannabidiol is an oral formulation that inhibits NACHT, leucine‐rich repeat, and pyrin domain‐containing protein 3 inflammasome activation and development of pericarditis in a preclinical model. Methods This Phase 2, open‐label, multicenter trial included adult patients with symptomatic recurrent pericarditis: pericarditis chest pain ≥4 on an 11‐point numerical rating scale with an elevated C‐reactive protein (≥1 mg/dL) or at least mild pericardial inflammation on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. At enrollment, patients were on stable doses of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, colchicine, and/or corticosteroids. Cannabidiol was administered during an 8‐week treatment period and an optional 18‐week extension period when background therapy was tapered and discontinued. The primary efficacy end point was change in patient‐reported pericarditis pain. Secondary end points included normalization of C‐reactive protein and percentage of patients with recurrences. Results Among 27 patients (18 women, mean age 53 years), baseline maximal numerical rating scale pain score was 5.8±1.7, and 10 patients had elevated C‐reactive protein. At Week 8, maximal numerical rating scale pain score was 2.1±1.8, and median time to numerical rating scale score ≤2 was 5 days. Among the 10 patients with baseline C‐reactive protein elevation, C‐reactive protein was normal at Week 8 in 8 patients (80%). During the extension period, 17 (71%) of 24 patients remained free of pericarditis recurrence. A serious adverse event leading to cannabidiol discontinuation occurred in 1 patient. Conclusions In symptomatic patients with recurrent pericarditis, pharmaceutically manufactured cannabidiol appears safe and associated with reductions in pericarditis pain and systemic inflammation. Registration URL: clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT05494788.

Purpose of review This review provides a contemporary, evidence-based update on the pathophysiological mechanisms and rapidly evolving therapeutic options for recurrent pericarditis. Recent findings Recent studies have elucidated the pathogenesis of recurrent pericarditis, identifying autoinflammation as a key mechanism and interleukin-1 (IL-1) as a central modulator of the inflammatory cascade. Multiple clinical trials have investigated novel therapeutic approaches, particularly focusing on IL-1 inhibition. The recent FDA approval of IL-1 pathway blockade for recurrent pericarditis has revolutionized treatment, offering patients significantly improved quality of life and symptom management. Summary The enhanced understanding of the autoinflammatory nature of recurrent pericarditis, coupled with groundbreaking advances in targeted therapies, has transformed the treatment landscape for affected patients. The emergence of IL-1 inhibitors as an effective therapeutic option promises substantial improvements in clinical outcomes and patient well being. Clinicians must familiarize themselves with these new treatments, their efficacy, and potential limitations to optimize patient care and guide therapeutic decision-making in this challenging condition.

Background: Recurrent pericarditis results from inflammasome activation and is associated with significant morbidity. Cannabidiol has been shown to block numerous inflammasome signaling pathways, including reducing transcription of pro-IL-1β and NLRP3, and inhibiting secretion of IL-1β and IL-6. Aim: To assess the impact of oral pharmaceutically manufactured (P-)cannabidiol in recurrent pericarditis patients (pts). Methods: Adult pts (≥18 years) with symptomatic, recurrent pericarditis (≥2 recurrences) were eligible for this open-label, multicenter study. Eligible pts had pericarditis chest pain with a numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score ≥4 within 7 days prior to enrollment, together with either elevated (≥1.0 mg/dL) C-reactive protein (CRP) within the prior 7 days or prior pericardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac imaging. Pts had to be on chronic treatment with NSAIDs, colchicine or corticosteroids (any combination) with stable baseline (BL) doses. Oral P-cannabidiol was uptitrated to 10 mg/kg twice daily (BID), or maximum tolerated dose. The primary efficacy endpoint was improvement in NRS pain score at week 8 (WK8). A secondary efficacy endpoint among pts with elevated BL CRP was the percentage of pts with CRP normalization (≤0.5 mg/dL) at WK8. Results: 27 pts, mean age of 53 years (range 24-77), 18 of female sex, with a median of 3 prior pericarditis episodes were enrolled. CRP was ≥1.0 mg/dL in 10 pts (37%) at BL. Prior evidence of LGE was present in 21 pts (78%). At BL, 41% of pts were receiving corticosteroid therapy. The highest tolerated study medication dose was BID 10 mg/kg in 20 pts (74.1%), 7.5 mg/kg in 4 pts (14.8%), and 5 mg/kg in 3 pts (11.1%). All 27 pts (100%) completed the WK8 visit. Mean NRS score decreased by 3.7, from 5.8 at BL to 2.1 at WK8. In those with CRP elevation at BL, CRP normalized in 8 pts (80%) by WK8, with mean CRP decreasing from 5.71 to 0.31 mg/dL. Study medication was discontinued due to AEs in 2 pts (7.4%). 24 pts (89%) tolerated P-cannabidiol with a treatment response and proceeded into the 18-week extension period (EP) where background therapy is weaned. Conclusions: Among pts with symptomatic pericarditis recurrence, oral administration of P-cannabidiol led to a clinically relevant reduction in pericarditis chest pain (measured by NRS score) and in CRP. P-cannabidiol was shown to be safe and generally well tolerated, with the majority of pts reaching the target dose and continuing into the study EP.

Background: Carcinoid heart disease (CaHD) typically affects tricuspid and pulmonary valves and is associated with poor survival. To date, the role of right ventricular (RV) and atrial (RA) strain has not been evaluated in such cohort. Research Questions: To evaluate RV and RA strain patterns and assess their impact on survival and congestive heart failure (CHF) development. Methods: Retrospective study of CaHD patients (ICD 9/10 diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor and echocardiographic evidence of CaHD prior to any surgical intervention; 2004-2019). Longitudinal strain was evaluated using speckle-tracking, RV/RA-focused view was used. RV strain was averaged from 3 and 6 segments for free wall (FWS) and global strain (GS), respectively. Auto-tracking with manual adjustment was done to ensure optimal tracking. The tracing of RV/RA endocardium was done with 15 points using the tricuspid valve annulus as a reference. The impact of strain parameters on mortality and CHF was evaluated with the Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses. Results: A total of 138 patients were included (mean age was 63 ± 10 years; 47% females). Median follow-up was 5.0 years (3.7-8.2). Significant RA and RV enlargement (72 and 79%, respectively) was more common than RV dysfunction (10%). The most common valvular disease > moderate was tricuspid regurgitation (TR; 97%) followed by pulmonary regurgitation (PR; 70%). RV GS mean was -21 + 6%, with FWS of -23 + 7%. The mean RA strain analysis revealed (93% sinus rhythm): a reservoir of 26 + 11%, a conduit of 14 + 8%, and an atrial contraction of 12 + 8%. Strain parameters were not associated with overall mortality. As opposed to PR/TR severity and RV/RA enlargement/dysfunction, patients with low RA reservoir strain (<23%) were more likely to develop CHF (adjusted-HR=1.80, p=0.04, 95% CI 1.04 - 3.134). Conclusions: Our findings suggests that CaHD patients have RV/RA dysfunction with overall reduced strain parameters. Patients with low RA reservoir had higher risk of CHF, but none of the RV/RA strain parameters were associated with excess mortality. This shows how strain analysis could complement other echocardiographic parameters in CaHD morbidity assessment.

Abstract Background Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is a chronic autoinflammatory disease mediated by IL-1 that requires long-term treatment. While the 2015 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines position IL-1 pathway inhibition only after corticosteroids, complications associated with long-term steroid use underscore the importance of steroid-sparing strategies. Rilonacept, an IL-1α and IL-1β cytokine trap, is the only FDA-approved treatment for RP (available since April 2021). RESONANCE, an ongoing 5-year non-interventional US registry of patients (pts) with RP, has collected real-world data from pts cared for by cardiologists with a focus on pericardial disease, with a goal of informing contemporary RP clinical management. Purpose Analysis of temporal trends in RP management from RESONANCE. Methods From a database cut-off (DCO) on 21 December 2023, patient demographics and disease characteristics are reported for 242 active RP pts (excluding RHAPSODY prior participants) at 20 US sites (median [Q1:Q3] 2.1 [1.5:2.6] years and 556 patient-years [PY] of observation). Complete medication class use data were available for 239 pts (total 546 PY). Proportional medication class use prior to initiating rilonacept was analyzed annually across the observation period. Results Mean (standard deviation) age at DCO was 50.2 (16.6) years; 58.1% were female. Median [Q1:Q3] disease duration at DCO from index pericarditis episode was 3.1 [2.2:5] years. Median [Q1:Q3] number of prior recurrences at enrollment was 3 [2:5]. Prior to rilonacept availability, NSAIDs/Colchicine/Aspirin represented the highest proportion of treatment (73% of PY); steroid use was 9% of PY, IL-1 pathway inhibition (anakinra) was 13% of PY, and conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) were 0.46% PY (no RP-specific treatment was 5% of PY) (Fig 1). In the years since rilonacept availability, proportional IL-1 pathway inhibition use has increased, from 13% of PY in 2020-21 to 26% of PY in 2023, driven by an increase in rilonacept use (6%, 13%, 16% of PY in 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively). Over that same period, proportional NSAIDs/Colchicine/Aspirin use (57%-63% of PY) has been consistently 6-times more than proportional steroid use (10%-11% of PY). Among pts who initiated rilonacept (n=81), similar proportions transitioned from NSAIDs/Colchicine/Aspirin as from corticosteroids (Fig 2), a robust trend observed each year. Of those pts transitioning from corticosteroids, 1/3 had used corticosteroids for &lt;30 days and 1/3 for &gt;6 months. Conclusions Real-world data from the RESONANCE registry reveal a temporal shift in RP management in US centers with RP-focused cardiologists, with increased proportional IL-1 pathway inhibition use since rilonacept availability in 2021. Advancing beyond 2015 guideline recommendations, IL-1 pathway inhibition is often being used as steroid-sparing treatment, i.e., after colchicine instead of chronic corticosteroids.

Abstract Aims In the Phase 3 trial, RHAPSODY, rilonacept effectively resolved active pericarditis recurrences, and long-term treatment led to sustained pericarditis recurrence risk reduction. Prior analysis suggested association between higher late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) at baseline and more rapid recurrence upon rilonacept suspension after 12 weeks of treatment. This subgroup analysis assessed the utility of longitudinal serial cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for tracking clinical improvement and predicting post-treatment cessation outcomes to help guide clinical decision-making. Methods and results At an 18-month decision milestone (18MDM) in the RHAPSODY long-term extension, investigators decided if patients would continue rilonacept, suspend rilonacept for off-treatment observation, or discontinue the study. Pericardial thickness, pericardial oedema (T2-short tau inversion recovery, T2-STIR), and LGE were determined at baseline and 18MDM by an imaging core lab blinded to clinical data, and pericarditis recurrence was investigator-assessed. CMR results in patients with data at both baseline and 18MDM (n = 13) showed that pericardial thickness, T2-STIR, and LGE were reduced during rilonacept treatment. Among patients with CMR data who suspended rilonacept at the 18MDM (n = 7), five (71%) had a pericarditis recurrence within 1–4 months of rilonacept suspension, despite all having had none/trace LGE (n = 7) and negative T2-STIR (n = 7) at the 18MDM and two having received prophylactic colchicine. Conclusion Continued clinical improvement during prolonged rilonacept treatment corresponded with improvement on CMR, including reduced pericardial thickness, resolution of pericardial oedema, and resolution of LGE. However, none/trace LGE at 18MDM while on treatment did not predict absence of pericarditis recurrence upon subsequent rilonacept suspension in this size-limited subgroup.

Abstract Aims Aortic valve calcification (AVC) is prognostic in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). We assessed the AVC prognostic value in non-severe AS patients. Methods and results We conducted a retrospective study of 395 patients with non-severe AS, LVEF ≥ 50%. The Agatston method was used for CT AVC assessment. The log-rank test determined the best AVC cut-offs for survival under medical surveillance: 1185 arbitrary unit (AU) in men and 850 AU in women, lower than the established cut-offs for severe AS (2064 AU in men and 1274 AU in women). Patients were divided into 3 AVC groups based on these cut-offs: low (&lt;1185 AU in men and &lt;850 AU in women), sub-severe (1185–2064 AU in men and 850–1274 AU in women), and severe (&gt;2064 AU in men and &gt;1274 AU in women). Of 395 patients (mean age 73 ± 12 years, 60.5% men, aortic valve area 1.23 ± 0.30 cm2, mean pressure gradient 28 ± 8 mmHg), 218 underwent aortic valve intervention (AVI) and 158 deaths occurred during follow-up, 82 before AVI. Median survival time under medical surveillance was 2.1 (0.7–4.9) years. Compared with the low AVC group, both sub-severe and severe AVC groups had higher risk for all-cause death under medical surveillance after comprehensive adjustment including echocardiographic AS severity and coronary artery calcium score (all P ≤ 0.006); while mortality risk was similar between sub-severe and severe AVC groups (all P ≥ 0.2). This mortality risk pattern persisted in the overall survival analysis after adjustment for AVI. AVI was protective of all-cause death in the sub-severe and severe AVC (all P ≤ 0.01), but not in the low AVC groups. Conclusion Sub-severe AVC is a robust risk stratification parameter in patients with non-severe AS and may inform AVI timing.

Introduction: Carcinoid heart disease (CHD) is a rare sequelae of hormonally active neuroendocrine tumors that often requires cardiac surgical intervention. Little is reported on cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation in the CHD patient population. Hypothesis: We sought to establish the safety and efficacy of CIED implantation in patients with CHD. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with a diagnosis of CHD who underwent CIED implantation at our institution (Mayo Clinic) and evaluated indications for implant, perioperative complications, and mortality. Results: A total of 27 patients with a cumulative follow up of 75 patient-years were identified during the study period. The most common indication for device implant was high grade atrioventricular block (n=18, 66.7%). 14 (51.8%) had baseline conduction disease and 26 (96.2%) underwent cardiac surgery prior to CIED implant. The majority of devices implanted were dual chamber permanent pacemakers (PPM) (n=17, 63.0%), while other devices included single chamber PPM, epicardial PPM, chronic resynchronization devices, and intracardiac defibrillators. Peri-operative complication occurred in 6 patients (22.2%), with 2 patients requiring ICU level care. No patient suffered carcinoid crisis during implantation and there was no peri-implant mortality. Long term, 3 patients required device extraction: 1 for infection, 1 for lead related pain, and 1 for generator migration. The median time to death from implant was 2.5 years, with one-year mortality at 15%. Conclusions: In this unique cohort of patients with CHD, CIED can be performed safely. CIED most often occurred in the post cardiac surgical period and carcinoid crisis was uncommon.

Background: Non-cardiac surgery (NCS) in patients with severe aortic stenosis has traditionally been associated with high perioperative mortality. Aortic valve replacement is recommended prior to elective NCS, but the impact of this strategy has not been systematically assessed. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing major NCS at Mayo Clinic between 2000 and 2013. Patients undergoing aortic valve intervention (AVI) prior to NCS were compared to those undergoing surgery without prior AVI (control). Patients undergoing emergency surgery were excluded. Primary endpoint was occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE; combination of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, new/worsening heart failure, ventricular arrhythmia) within 30 days of NCS; secondary endpoints were mortality at 30 days and 1 year after NCS. Results: 180 patients (age 74.5 ± 10.5 years, 64% male) who underwent NCS within 12 months after AVI, were compared to 232 patients (age 76.6 ± 10.7 years, 56% male) in the control group. Patients undergoing AVI were more often symptomatic than controls (41% vs 26%, p = 0.002). MACE was significantly higher in the control group (21.6% vs 5.6%, p < 0.001), mainly due to the increased risk of heart failure in the postoperative period in this group (18.5% vs 2.2%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the rate of myocardial infarction (1.7% vs 0.6%, p = 0.39), ventricular arrhythmia (0.9 % vs 0 %, p = 0.51) or stroke (0.9 % vs 0 %, p = 0.51). Kaplan-Meier assessment demonstrated no significant difference at 30 days but a reduction in 1 year mortality in the AVI group compared to the control group (Figure). Conclusions: Pre-operative AVI for severe aortic stenosis results in reduced heart failure and improved 1 year survival. However, other MACE and 30 day mortality appears unchanged. Pre-operative AVI should be considered in symptomatic patients, where the benefit of AVI is demonstrated to be greatest.