Arnold, Marcel

Background: Patients with cervical artery dissection (CAD) have a higher prevalence of cerebral aneurysms, likely due to underlying vasculopathies. Understanding risk factors and outcomes in this population may inform screening and management strategies. Methods: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the STOP-CAD study, a multicenter international registry of patients with non-major trauma-related CAD across 63 centers. Cerebral aneurysms were identified based on medical history and intracranial vascular imaging obtained for dissection diagnosis. We compared demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging characteristics between patients with and without aneurysms. Variables with p<0.05 in univariate analysis were entered into a multivariable binary logistic regression to identify independent predictors. Clinical outcomes including ischemic stroke and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at follow-up were compared between both groups. Results: Out of 4023 patients included in the STOP-CAD study, 116 (2.9%) had at least one incidental cerebral aneurysm. In adjusted binary logistic regression, patients with cerebral aneurysm were more likely to have a history of migraine (aOR 1.78 95% CI 1.15-2.75, p=0.009), history of hypertension (aOR 1.65 95% CI 1.12-2.43, p = 0.010), known connective tissue disorder (aOR 3.47 95% CI 1.71-7.03), history of dissection (aOR 2.63 95% CI 1.31-5.28, p = 0.007), and a dissecting aneurysm at the site of the dissection (aOR 1.94 95% CI 1.25-3.01, p = 0.003). At follow-up, the presence of a cerebral aneurysm was not associated with ischemic stroke (7.8% vs. 5.6% p>0.1), but with a trend towards increased odds of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (3.4% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.062). Conclusions: Patients with CAD and concurrent incidental cerebral aneurysm were more likely to have a history of migraine headaches and markers of underlying vasculopathy and had a non-significantly increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage at follow-up. Further studies are needed to identify best practices for surveillance and risk stratification in this subgroup.

BACKGROUND: This individual participant data meta-analysis aimed to determine whether time to treatment influences the effect of intraarterial thrombolysis (IAT), intravenous thrombolysis, and conservative standard therapy on visual outcomes in nonarteritic central retinal artery occlusion. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Embase up to June 2023 for studies reporting treatment modality and peri-treatment best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) for ≥5 participants, excluding patients with nonsevere vision loss (BCVA <1.0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) or treated after 24 hours of symptom onset. The primary outcome was recovery from severe vision loss (final BCVA <1.0 logMAR). We used mixed-effect models and local polynomial regression to investigate nonlinear relationships between time to treatment and recovery from severe vision loss. RESULTS: Of 4074 screened studies, individual participant data were sought from 52, with 35 contributing individual participant data for 1038 participants. In total, 783 patients met inclusion criteria (age, 64.8±13.3 years; 35.5% female; baseline BCVA, 2.3±0.5 logMAR). For every hour decrease in time to treatment, thrombolysis was associated with greater improvement in BCVA (intraarterial, 0.02 logMAR [95% CI, 0–0.04]; intravenous, 0.04 logMAR [95% CI, 0.00–0.07]) than conservative standard therapy (0.01 logMAR [95% CI, 0–0.02]). A nonlinear relationship was detected for intraarterial thrombolysis with a changepoint at 8 hours (95% CI, 6.7–9.4). Thrombolysis was associated with increased recovery from severe vision loss compared with conservative standard therapy (intraarterial within 6 hours: odds ratio, 2.72 [95% CI, 1.02–7.28], 27.2% versus 12.0%; intravenous within 4.5 hours: odds ratio, 3.32 [95% CI, 1.24–8.92], 28.8% versus 11.1%). Findings were consistent in subgroup analysis restricted to patients receiving recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator. Monte-Carlo simulations showed that a randomized controlled trial would require 95 participants per group to achieve 80% power to detect an odds ratio of 3.0 for recovery from severe vision loss. CONCLUSIONS: Early intervention in nonarteritic central retinal artery occlusion is associated with improvement in visual recovery, with intraarterial thrombolysis and intravenous thrombolysis outperforming nonthrombolytic treatments. These findings warrant confirmation in sufficiently powered randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Small, randomized trials of patients with cervical artery dissection showed conflicting results regarding optimal stroke prevention strategies. We aimed to compare outcomes in patients with cervical artery dissection treated with antiplatelets versus anticoagulation. METHODS: This is a multicenter observational retrospective international study (16 countries, 63 sites) that included patients with cervical artery dissection without major trauma. The exposure was antithrombotic treatment type (anticoagulation versus antiplatelets), and outcomes were subsequent ischemic stroke and major hemorrhage (intracranial or extracranial hemorrhage). We used adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting to determine associations between anticoagulation and study outcomes within 30 and 180 days. The main analysis used an as-treated crossover approach and only included outcomes occurring with the above treatments. RESULTS: The study included 3636 patients (402 [11.1%] received exclusively anticoagulation and 2453 [67.5%] received exclusively antiplatelets). By day 180, there were 162 new ischemic strokes (4.4%) and 28 major hemorrhages (0.8%); 87.0% of ischemic strokes occurred by day 30. In adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting, compared with antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation was associated with a nonsignificantly lower risk of subsequent ischemic stroke by day 30 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.45–1.12]; P =0.145) and by day 180 (adjusted HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.28–2.24]; P =0.670). Anticoagulation therapy was not associated with a higher risk of major hemorrhage by day 30 (adjusted HR, 1.39 [95% CI, 0.35–5.45]; P =0.637) but was by day 180 (adjusted HR, 5.56 [95% CI, 1.53–20.13]; P =0.009). In interaction analyses, patients with occlusive dissection had significantly lower ischemic stroke risk with anticoagulation (adjusted HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.18–0.88]; P interaction =0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Our study does not rule out the benefit of anticoagulation in reducing ischemic stroke risk, particularly in patients with occlusive dissection. If anticoagulation is chosen, it seems reasonable to switch to antiplatelet therapy before 180 days to lower the risk of major bleeding. Large prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with cervical artery dissection (CAD) are at risk for subsequent ischemic events. We aimed to identify characteristics that are associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke after initial presentation of CAD and to evaluate the differential impact of anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy in these high-risk individuals. METHODS: This was a preplanned secondary analysis of the STOP-CAD study (Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection), a multicenter international retrospective observational study (63 sites from 16 countries in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa) that included patients with CAD predominantly between January 2015 and June 2022. The primary outcome was subsequent ischemic stroke by day 180 after diagnosis. Clinical and imaging variables were compared between those with versus without subsequent ischemic stroke. Significant factors associated with subsequent stroke risk were identified using stepwise Cox regression. Associations between subsequent ischemic stroke risk and antithrombotic therapy type (anticoagulation versus antiplatelets) among patients with identified risk factors were explored using adjusted Cox regression. RESULTS: In all, 4023 patients (mean age was 47.4 years; 44.5% were women) were included. By day 180, subsequent ischemic stroke occurred in 5.3% of the cohort. In adjusted Cox regression, factors associated with increased risk of subsequent ischemic stroke were prior history of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 7.31 [95% CI, 1.61–33.13]; P =0.010), presentation within 7 days from first symptoms (aHR, 3.04 [95% CI, 1.04–8.91]; P =0.043), infarct on baseline imaging (aHR, 9.85 [95% CI, 3.65–26.58]; P <0.001), and occlusive dissection (aHR, 2.34 [95% CI, 1.03–5.34]; P =0.043). Only patients with occlusive dissection demonstrated a reduced risk of subsequent ischemic stroke when treated with anticoagulation versus antiplatelets (aHR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.16–0.80]; P =0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis of the STOP-CAD study, several factors associated with subsequent ischemic stroke were identified among patients with CAD. Furthermore, we identified a potential benefit of anticoagulation in patients with CAD with occlusive dissection. These findings require validation by meta-analyses of prior studies to formulate optimal treatment strategies for specific high-risk CAD subgroups.

Importance In patients with severe aortic valve stenosis at intermediate surgical risk, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a self-expanding supra-annular valve was noninferior to surgery for all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at 2 years. Comparisons of longer-term clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in these patients are limited. Objective To report prespecified secondary 5-year outcomes from the Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis in Intermediate Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement (SURTAVI) randomized clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants SURTAVI is a prospective randomized, unblinded clinical trial. Randomization was stratified by investigational site and need for revascularization determined by the local heart teams. Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis deemed to be at intermediate risk of 30-day surgical mortality were enrolled at 87 centers from June 19, 2012, to June 30, 2016, in Europe and North America. Analysis took place between August and October 2021. Intervention Patients were randomized to TAVR with a self-expanding, supra-annular transcatheter or a surgical bioprosthesis. Main Outcomes and Measures The prespecified secondary end points of death or disabling stroke and other adverse events and hemodynamic findings at 5 years. An independent clinical event committee adjudicated all serious adverse events and an independent echocardiographic core laboratory evaluated all echocardiograms at 5 years. Results A total of 1660 individuals underwent an attempted TAVR (n = 864) or surgical (n = 796) procedure. The mean (SD) age was 79.8 (6.2) years, 724 (43.6%) were female, and the mean (SD) Society of Thoracic Surgery Predicted Risk of Mortality score was 4.5% (1.6%). At 5 years, the rates of death or disabling stroke were similar (TAVR, 31.3% vs surgery, 30.8%; hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.85-1.22]; P = .85). Transprosthetic gradients remained lower (mean [SD], 8.6 [5.5] mm Hg vs 11.2 [6.0] mm Hg; P &amp;lt; .001) and aortic valve areas were higher (mean [SD], 2.2 [0.7] cm 2 vs 1.8 [0.6] cm 2 ; P &amp;lt; .001) with TAVR vs surgery. More patients had moderate/severe paravalvular leak with TAVR than surgery (11 [3.0%] vs 2 [0.7%]; risk difference, 2.37% [95% CI, 0.17%- 4.85%]; P = .05). New pacemaker implantation rates were higher for TAVR than surgery at 5 years (289 [39.1%] vs 94 [15.1%]; hazard ratio, 3.30 [95% CI, 2.61-4.17]; log-rank P &amp;lt; .001), as were valve reintervention rates (27 [3.5%] vs 11 [1.9%]; hazard ratio, 2.21 [95% CI, 1.10-4.45]; log-rank P = .02), although between 2 and 5 years only 6 patients who underwent TAVR and 7 who underwent surgery required a reintervention. Conclusions and Relevance Among intermediate-risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, major clinical outcomes at 5 years were similar for TAVR and surgery. TAVR was associated with superior hemodynamic valve performance but also with more paravalvular leak and valve reinterventions.