Zedde, Marialuisa

Background: Patients with cervical artery dissection (CAD) have a higher prevalence of cerebral aneurysms, likely due to underlying vasculopathies. Understanding risk factors and outcomes in this population may inform screening and management strategies. Methods: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the STOP-CAD study, a multicenter international registry of patients with non-major trauma-related CAD across 63 centers. Cerebral aneurysms were identified based on medical history and intracranial vascular imaging obtained for dissection diagnosis. We compared demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging characteristics between patients with and without aneurysms. Variables with p<0.05 in univariate analysis were entered into a multivariable binary logistic regression to identify independent predictors. Clinical outcomes including ischemic stroke and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at follow-up were compared between both groups. Results: Out of 4023 patients included in the STOP-CAD study, 116 (2.9%) had at least one incidental cerebral aneurysm. In adjusted binary logistic regression, patients with cerebral aneurysm were more likely to have a history of migraine (aOR 1.78 95% CI 1.15-2.75, p=0.009), history of hypertension (aOR 1.65 95% CI 1.12-2.43, p = 0.010), known connective tissue disorder (aOR 3.47 95% CI 1.71-7.03), history of dissection (aOR 2.63 95% CI 1.31-5.28, p = 0.007), and a dissecting aneurysm at the site of the dissection (aOR 1.94 95% CI 1.25-3.01, p = 0.003). At follow-up, the presence of a cerebral aneurysm was not associated with ischemic stroke (7.8% vs. 5.6% p>0.1), but with a trend towards increased odds of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (3.4% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.062). Conclusions: Patients with CAD and concurrent incidental cerebral aneurysm were more likely to have a history of migraine headaches and markers of underlying vasculopathy and had a non-significantly increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage at follow-up. Further studies are needed to identify best practices for surveillance and risk stratification in this subgroup.

Background: Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) accounts for nearly 25% of all ischemic strokes in young adults. CeAD can lead to the development of dissecting aneurysms (DA). However, the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of CeAD patients with DA is not well established. This study aims to identify risk factors for developing DA, subsequent growth, and impact on patient outcomes. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the Antithrombotics for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection (STOP-CAD), a multicenter cross-sectional international retrospective study. CeAD patients were stratified for the presence of DA. We used multivariable regression to identify factors associated with DA. Patients with DA were further analyzed for DA growth. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke after CeAD+DA diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included ischemic stroke after CeAD+DA with DA growth. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between DA and risk factors. We also performed univariate Cox regression and generated Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing study outcomes based on presence of DA and subsequent growth. Results: Of the 4023 patients included in the STOP-CAD study, 4008 were included in this analysis and 767 (19%) patients had DA (546 with DA on initial presentation). Patients with DA had a mean age of 46 [IQR 37-55] years and 50% (383) were women. In combined adjusted analyses, DA patients were more often non-Hispanic (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.94, p<0.02), more commonly had a history of migraine (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01-1.59, p=0.037), connective tissue disorder (aOR 2.02, 95% CI 1.22-3.36, p=0.007), minor neck trauma (aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.29-2.26, p<0.001) and were more likely to present with ischemic stroke (aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.05-2.87, p=0.031). DA growth was noted in 55 out of 546 (10%) patients with DA on presentation. There was no significant difference in the risk of ischemic stroke by day 180 in patients with DA (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92 [95% CI, 0.65-1.30]; P =0.63) or DA growth (HR 2.40, [95% CI, 0.79-7.24]; P =0.12). Conclusion: In this subanalysis of STOP-CAD, nearly one in five patients with CeAD developed a DA. Factors associated with a higher likelihood of DA included non-Hispanic ethnicity, history of migraine, connective tissue disorder, minor neck trauma, and ischemic stroke at presentation. DA diagnosis and DA growth did not impact the risk of subsequent ischemic stroke at 6 months.

Background and Objectives: Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is a common cause of ischemic stroke in young adults. We aim to identify age-based differences in clinical presentation, imaging findings, and outcomes after CeAD. Methods: This was a sub-study using the STOP-CAD registry, a multicenter cross-sectional international retrospective study of patients diagnosed with CeAD and treated with an antithrombotic from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2021. Baseline clinical and imaging characteristics were compared between younger and older adults with CeAD (≤45 versus >45 years of age) using multivariable logistic regression. We chose this age cut off due to its frequent usage in stroke in the young literature. Multiple logistic regression models were used to determine association between young age and outcomes after CeAD (ischemic stroke at 180 days, excellent functional outcome with modified Rankin Scale of 0-1 at 90 days, and mortality) after adjusting for sex, vascular risk factors, CeAD characteristics, and NIHSS on presentation. Results: Among 4023 CeAD patients included in the study, 1901 (47.3%) were ≤45 years of age. Patients were followed for a median of 307 days (IQR 102-831). Young adults with CeAD were more likely to be women (Odds Ratio [OR], 2.4; 95% CI, 2.1-2.9; p<0.001), of Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 1.8; 95% CI 1.3-2.5; p<0.001), have a history of migraines (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.0; p<0.001) and recent neck trauma (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-1.9; p<0.001) while having fewer traditional vascular risk factors. Young adults with CeAD had higher odds of a non-ischemic presentation (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5; p=0.013), vertebral artery dissection (OR 2.5; 95% CI, 2.2-3.0; p<0.001), and multivessel involvement (OR 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9; p=0.004). In adjusted analysis, younger age was not associated with an increased risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (adjusted Hazard Ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% CI 0.2-1.2; p=0.119). Younger age was associated with significantly greater odds of excellent functional outcome at 90 days (aOR, 1.48; 1.20-1.84, p<0.001) and lower risk of death at follow up (aHR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.17-0.81; p=0.012) after CeAD. Conclusion: In a large international cohort, young adults with CeAD had a distinct clinical phenotype with higher odds of non-ischemic presentation, vertebral artery dissection, and multivessel involvement while having fewer traditional vascular risk factors. Young adults had a decreased odds of disability and mortality after CeAD.

BACKGROUND: Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) may result in dissecting aneurysm (DA) formation. We aimed to characterize risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with DA in a large, international CeAD cohort. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of STOP-CAD (Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection), an international, multicenter, retrospective cohort. Patients with spontaneous CeAD were assessed for DA at baseline and de novo DA formation. Significant covariates in univariable analysis were included in multivariable regression models aiming to identify factors associated with DA formation. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the association of DA with ischemic and hemorrhagic outcomes. RESULTS: Among 4008 patients with CeAD, 546 (13.6%) had a DA at baseline, and 221/2938 (7.5%) patients developed a de novo DA during follow-up, of which 172/221 (78.2%) were detected in the first 180 days. Patients with DA had a mean age of 47 years, and 383 (49.9%) were women. Baseline or de novo DA was associated with a history of connective tissue disorder (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.02 [95% CI, 1.22–3.36]), fibromuscular dysplasia (aOR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.28–2.25]), and multiple vessel dissection (aOR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.19–1.98]). Lower odds of DA were seen in Hispanic ethnicity (aOR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.43–0.97]) and ischemic stroke presentation (aOR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.34–0.49]). Fibromuscular dysplasia was associated with de novo DA formation (aOR, 2.30 [95% CI, 1.52–3.49]). DA was not associated with ischemic stroke (hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.44–1.16]; P =0.173) or intracranial hemorrhage (HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.42–2.84]; P =0.86) by day 180. CONCLUSIONS: DAs are relatively common manifestations of CeAD, typically occurring within 6 months of CeAD diagnosis. DA was not associated with an increased risk of subsequent ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cervical artery dissection (CeAD) may experience a recurrent dissection, but its frequency, risk factors, and clinical implications are not well defined. We aimed to determine the risk, associated factors, and clinical impact of recurrent CeAD. METHODS: The STOP-CAD study (Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection) was a multicenter international retrospective observational study of patients with CeAD treated between January 2015 and June 2022. Recurrent dissection was defined as a CeAD occurring at least 7 days after the diagnosis of the index event that affects a different artery or a different segment of the same artery. Patients were followed from day 7 up to 2 years. The absolute risk of recurrent CeAD over time was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were used to assess predictors of CeAD recurrence. RESULTS: Of the 4023 patients included in STOP-CAD, 3836 (median age 46 years, 45% women) were eligible for this analysis. During a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 295 (97–720) days, 88 (2.29%) patients had a CeAD recurrence. Median time-to-recurrent CeAD was 53 (interquartile range, 18–157) days. The estimated risk of recurrent CeAD at 2 years was 3.22% (95% CI, 2.59%–4.00%). In multivariable analyses, younger age (adjusted odds ratios, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.96–0.99]), migraine (adjusted odds ratio, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.14–3.07]), and fibromuscular dysplasia (adjusted odds ratio, 2.90 [95% CI, 1.66–5.06]) were associated with CeAD recurrence, while presenting with an ischemic stroke was associated with a lower likelihood of recurrence (adjusted odds ratio, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.29–0.75]). These associations with CeAD recurrence over time were confirmed by Cox regression analyses. Among the 88 patients with recurrent CeAD, only 5 had accompanying ischemic events (3 strokes, 2 transient ischemic attacks). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, recurrent CeAD was uncommon, approximately half of the events were diagnosed within the first 2 months of the index event, and recurrent events rarely caused new ischemic events. Younger age, migraine, absence of ischemic stroke at presentation, and signs of fibromuscular dysplasia may help identify high-risk patients.

Objective Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) may be limited to the extracranial extradural space or extend to the intradural space. Intradural extension can potentially increase the risk of stroke and subarachnoid hemorrhage. However, the factors associated with intradural extension and its impact on clinical outcome remain unclear. Methods This was a secondary analysis of the STOP‐CAD observational, multi‐center study. Patients with CeAD and intradural extension (CeADid) were compared with those with pure CeAD extradural dissections (CeADed) using multiple regression analyses. Results Of 4,023 patients with CeAD, 534 (13.3%) had CeADid. In comparison to patients with CeADed, those with CeADid more often had clinical overt stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) at presentation, acute infarcts on imaging, a vertebral artery affected, and severe stenosis of the involved vessel ( p < 0.001 for all). In contrast, carotid involvement and complete occlusions were more frequent in patients with CeADed ( p < 0.001 for both). CeADid was associated with a shift in the distribution of scores on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) toward worse functional outcome (odds ratio [OR] = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.62–0.92) but the odds for favorable outcomes (mRS = 0–2) did not differ between the groups after appropriate adjustments on multivariate analysis. CeADid was independently associated with higher mortality at 180 days on multivariate analysis (adjusted OR = 2.84, 95% CI = 1.50–5.38). Interpretation CeADid is associated with more severe clinical presentation, a shift toward less favorable outcomes, and higher mortality rates. These findings suggest that CeADid may represent a high‐risk type of CeAD. ANN NEUROL 2026;99:1189–1197

BACKGROUND: Small, randomized trials of patients with cervical artery dissection showed conflicting results regarding optimal stroke prevention strategies. We aimed to compare outcomes in patients with cervical artery dissection treated with antiplatelets versus anticoagulation. METHODS: This is a multicenter observational retrospective international study (16 countries, 63 sites) that included patients with cervical artery dissection without major trauma. The exposure was antithrombotic treatment type (anticoagulation versus antiplatelets), and outcomes were subsequent ischemic stroke and major hemorrhage (intracranial or extracranial hemorrhage). We used adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting to determine associations between anticoagulation and study outcomes within 30 and 180 days. The main analysis used an as-treated crossover approach and only included outcomes occurring with the above treatments. RESULTS: The study included 3636 patients (402 [11.1%] received exclusively anticoagulation and 2453 [67.5%] received exclusively antiplatelets). By day 180, there were 162 new ischemic strokes (4.4%) and 28 major hemorrhages (0.8%); 87.0% of ischemic strokes occurred by day 30. In adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting, compared with antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation was associated with a nonsignificantly lower risk of subsequent ischemic stroke by day 30 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.45–1.12]; P =0.145) and by day 180 (adjusted HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.28–2.24]; P =0.670). Anticoagulation therapy was not associated with a higher risk of major hemorrhage by day 30 (adjusted HR, 1.39 [95% CI, 0.35–5.45]; P =0.637) but was by day 180 (adjusted HR, 5.56 [95% CI, 1.53–20.13]; P =0.009). In interaction analyses, patients with occlusive dissection had significantly lower ischemic stroke risk with anticoagulation (adjusted HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.18–0.88]; P interaction =0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Our study does not rule out the benefit of anticoagulation in reducing ischemic stroke risk, particularly in patients with occlusive dissection. If anticoagulation is chosen, it seems reasonable to switch to antiplatelet therapy before 180 days to lower the risk of major bleeding. Large prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with cervical artery dissection (CAD) are at risk for subsequent ischemic events. We aimed to identify characteristics that are associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke after initial presentation of CAD and to evaluate the differential impact of anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy in these high-risk individuals. METHODS: This was a preplanned secondary analysis of the STOP-CAD study (Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection), a multicenter international retrospective observational study (63 sites from 16 countries in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa) that included patients with CAD predominantly between January 2015 and June 2022. The primary outcome was subsequent ischemic stroke by day 180 after diagnosis. Clinical and imaging variables were compared between those with versus without subsequent ischemic stroke. Significant factors associated with subsequent stroke risk were identified using stepwise Cox regression. Associations between subsequent ischemic stroke risk and antithrombotic therapy type (anticoagulation versus antiplatelets) among patients with identified risk factors were explored using adjusted Cox regression. RESULTS: In all, 4023 patients (mean age was 47.4 years; 44.5% were women) were included. By day 180, subsequent ischemic stroke occurred in 5.3% of the cohort. In adjusted Cox regression, factors associated with increased risk of subsequent ischemic stroke were prior history of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 7.31 [95% CI, 1.61–33.13]; P =0.010), presentation within 7 days from first symptoms (aHR, 3.04 [95% CI, 1.04–8.91]; P =0.043), infarct on baseline imaging (aHR, 9.85 [95% CI, 3.65–26.58]; P <0.001), and occlusive dissection (aHR, 2.34 [95% CI, 1.03–5.34]; P =0.043). Only patients with occlusive dissection demonstrated a reduced risk of subsequent ischemic stroke when treated with anticoagulation versus antiplatelets (aHR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.16–0.80]; P =0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis of the STOP-CAD study, several factors associated with subsequent ischemic stroke were identified among patients with CAD. Furthermore, we identified a potential benefit of anticoagulation in patients with CAD with occlusive dissection. These findings require validation by meta-analyses of prior studies to formulate optimal treatment strategies for specific high-risk CAD subgroups.

The European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline on Primary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System (PACNS), developed according to ESO standard operating procedures (SOP) and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, was elaborated to assist clinicians in the diagnostic and treatment pathway of patients with PACNS in their decision making. A working group involving vascular neurologists, neuroradiologists, rheumatologists, a neuropathologist and a methodologist identified 17 relevant clinical questions; these were addressed according to the patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcomes (PICO) framework and systematic literature reviews were performed. Notably, each PICO was addressed with respect to large vessel (LV)-PACNS and small vessel (SV)-PACNS. Data to answer many questions were scarce or lacking and the quality of evidence was very low overall, so, for some PICOs, the recommendations reflect the ongoing uncertainty. When the absence of sufficient evidence precluded recommendations, Expert Consensus Statements were formulated. In some cases, this applied to interventions in the diagnosis and treatment of PACNS which are embedded widely in clinical practice, for example patterns of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) abnormalities. CSF analysis for hyperproteinorrachia and pleocytosis does not have evidence supporting their use as diagnostic tools. The working group recommended that caution is employed in the interpretation of non-invasive vascular imaging due to lack of validation and the different sensitivities in comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and histopathological analyses. Moreover, there is not a neuroimaging pattern specific for PACNS and neurovascular issues are largely underreported in PACNS patients. The group’s recommendations on induction and maintenance of treatment and for primary or secondary prevention of vascular events also reflect uncertainty due to lack of evidence. Being uncertain the role and practical usefulness of current diagnostic criteria and being not comparable the main treatment strategies, it is suggested to have a multidisciplinary team approach in an expert center during both work up and management of patients with suspected PACNS. Highlighting the limitations of the currently accepted diagnostic criteria, we hope to facilitate the design of multicenter, prospective clinical studies and trials. A standardization of neuroimaging techniques and reporting to improve the level of evidence underpinning interventions employed in the diagnosis and management of PACNS. We anticipate that this guideline, the first comprehensive European guideline on PACNS management using GRADE methodology, will assist clinicians to choose the most effective management strategy for PACNS.

ObjectiveEpidemiological data to characterize the individual risk profile of patients with spontaneous cervical artery dissection (sCeAD) are rather inconsistent.Methods and ResultsIn the setting of the Italian Project on Stroke in Young Adults Cervical Artery Dissection (IPSYS CeAD), we compared the characteristics of 1,468 patients with sCeAD (mean age = 47.3 ± 11.3 years, men = 56.7%) prospectively recruited at 39 Italian centers with those of 2 control groups, composed of (1) patients whose ischemic stroke was caused by mechanisms other than dissection (non‐CeAD IS) selected from the prospective IPSYS registry and Brescia Stroke Registry and (2) stroke‐free individuals selected from the staff members of participating hospitals, matched 1:1:1 by sex, age, and race. Compared to stroke‐free subjects, patients with sCeAD were more likely to be hypertensive (odds ratio [OR] = 1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.37–1.98), to have personal history of migraine with aura (OR = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.74–3.34), without aura (OR = 2.67, 95% CI = 2.15–3.32), and family history of vascular disease in first‐degree relatives (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.39–2.05), and less likely to be diabetic (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.47–0.91), hypercholesterolemic (OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.62–0.91), and obese (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.31–0.54). Migraine without aura was also associated with sCeAD (OR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.47–2.22) in comparison with patients with non‐CeAD IS. In the subgroup of patients with migraine, patients with sCeAD had higher frequency of migraine attacks and were less likely to take anti‐migraine preventive medications, especially beta‐blockers, compared with the other groups.InterpretationThe risk of sCeAD is influenced by migraine, especially migraine without aura, more than by other factors, increases with increasing frequency of attacks, and seems to be reduced by migraine preventive medications, namely beta‐blockers. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:585–595