Griffin, Kim

Background: Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) accounts for nearly 25% of all ischemic strokes in young adults. CeAD can lead to the development of dissecting aneurysms (DA). However, the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of CeAD patients with DA is not well established. This study aims to identify risk factors for developing DA, subsequent growth, and impact on patient outcomes. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the Antithrombotics for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection (STOP-CAD), a multicenter cross-sectional international retrospective study. CeAD patients were stratified for the presence of DA. We used multivariable regression to identify factors associated with DA. Patients with DA were further analyzed for DA growth. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke after CeAD+DA diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included ischemic stroke after CeAD+DA with DA growth. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between DA and risk factors. We also performed univariate Cox regression and generated Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing study outcomes based on presence of DA and subsequent growth. Results: Of the 4023 patients included in the STOP-CAD study, 4008 were included in this analysis and 767 (19%) patients had DA (546 with DA on initial presentation). Patients with DA had a mean age of 46 [IQR 37-55] years and 50% (383) were women. In combined adjusted analyses, DA patients were more often non-Hispanic (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.94, p<0.02), more commonly had a history of migraine (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01-1.59, p=0.037), connective tissue disorder (aOR 2.02, 95% CI 1.22-3.36, p=0.007), minor neck trauma (aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.29-2.26, p<0.001) and were more likely to present with ischemic stroke (aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.05-2.87, p=0.031). DA growth was noted in 55 out of 546 (10%) patients with DA on presentation. There was no significant difference in the risk of ischemic stroke by day 180 in patients with DA (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92 [95% CI, 0.65-1.30]; P =0.63) or DA growth (HR 2.40, [95% CI, 0.79-7.24]; P =0.12). Conclusion: In this subanalysis of STOP-CAD, nearly one in five patients with CeAD developed a DA. Factors associated with a higher likelihood of DA included non-Hispanic ethnicity, history of migraine, connective tissue disorder, minor neck trauma, and ischemic stroke at presentation. DA diagnosis and DA growth did not impact the risk of subsequent ischemic stroke at 6 months.

Background: The clinical characteristics and complications associated with de novo pseudoaneurysm formation beyond the acute phase of cervical artery dissection remain poorly defined. In this study, we examined the incidence, risk factors, and related ischemic and hemorrhagic events of post-acute de novo pseudoaneurysm formation. Methods: We analyzed data from the STOP-CAD study (Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection). A de novo pseudoaneurysm was defined as a new (not present on initial imaging) focal enlargement in the diameter of the artery, greater than the native lumen. The incidence of de novo pseudoaneurysm was assessed at 90 days, 180 days, and beyond 180 days of follow-up. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for post-acute de novo pseudoaneurysm formation. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to compare ischemic and hemorrhagic events between patients with and without de novo pseudoaneurysms. Results: Among 4008 patients, 546 were excluded as they had dissecting pseudoaneursyms on initial presentation. Therefore, 3,462 patients were included in this analysis of whom 220 patients (6.35%) developed a de novo pseudoaneurysm over a maximum follow-up of 4.4 years. Of these, 127 (57.72%) were detected within the first 90 days, and 172 (78.18%) within the first 180 days. In multivariate regression analyses, in addition to hypertension, active smoking and Hispanic ethnicity, fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) was an independent risk factor for post-acute de novo pseudoaneurysm formation (adjusted OR: 2.160; 95% CI: 1.408–3.315; p < 0.001). Notably, the presence of a de novo pseudoaneurysm was not associated with a significant increase in ischemic (hazard ratio [HR] 1.43 [95% CI, 0.89–2.30]; P=0.14) or hemorrhagic events (hazard ratio [HR] 1.42 [95% CI, 0.43–4.69]; P=0.57). Conclusion: De novo pseudoaneurysm formation following a diagnosis of a cervical artery dissection is not uncommon and most frequently occurs within the first 180 days. FMD was independently associated with this complication. The development of a de novo pseudoaneurysm did not significantly increase the risk of subsequent ischemic or hemorrhagic events.

BACKGROUND: Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) may result in dissecting aneurysm (DA) formation. We aimed to characterize risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with DA in a large, international CeAD cohort. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of STOP-CAD (Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection), an international, multicenter, retrospective cohort. Patients with spontaneous CeAD were assessed for DA at baseline and de novo DA formation. Significant covariates in univariable analysis were included in multivariable regression models aiming to identify factors associated with DA formation. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the association of DA with ischemic and hemorrhagic outcomes. RESULTS: Among 4008 patients with CeAD, 546 (13.6%) had a DA at baseline, and 221/2938 (7.5%) patients developed a de novo DA during follow-up, of which 172/221 (78.2%) were detected in the first 180 days. Patients with DA had a mean age of 47 years, and 383 (49.9%) were women. Baseline or de novo DA was associated with a history of connective tissue disorder (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.02 [95% CI, 1.22–3.36]), fibromuscular dysplasia (aOR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.28–2.25]), and multiple vessel dissection (aOR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.19–1.98]). Lower odds of DA were seen in Hispanic ethnicity (aOR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.43–0.97]) and ischemic stroke presentation (aOR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.34–0.49]). Fibromuscular dysplasia was associated with de novo DA formation (aOR, 2.30 [95% CI, 1.52–3.49]). DA was not associated with ischemic stroke (hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.44–1.16]; P =0.173) or intracranial hemorrhage (HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.42–2.84]; P =0.86) by day 180. CONCLUSIONS: DAs are relatively common manifestations of CeAD, typically occurring within 6 months of CeAD diagnosis. DA was not associated with an increased risk of subsequent ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Small, randomized trials of patients with cervical artery dissection showed conflicting results regarding optimal stroke prevention strategies. We aimed to compare outcomes in patients with cervical artery dissection treated with antiplatelets versus anticoagulation. METHODS: This is a multicenter observational retrospective international study (16 countries, 63 sites) that included patients with cervical artery dissection without major trauma. The exposure was antithrombotic treatment type (anticoagulation versus antiplatelets), and outcomes were subsequent ischemic stroke and major hemorrhage (intracranial or extracranial hemorrhage). We used adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting to determine associations between anticoagulation and study outcomes within 30 and 180 days. The main analysis used an as-treated crossover approach and only included outcomes occurring with the above treatments. RESULTS: The study included 3636 patients (402 [11.1%] received exclusively anticoagulation and 2453 [67.5%] received exclusively antiplatelets). By day 180, there were 162 new ischemic strokes (4.4%) and 28 major hemorrhages (0.8%); 87.0% of ischemic strokes occurred by day 30. In adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting, compared with antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation was associated with a nonsignificantly lower risk of subsequent ischemic stroke by day 30 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.45–1.12]; P =0.145) and by day 180 (adjusted HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.28–2.24]; P =0.670). Anticoagulation therapy was not associated with a higher risk of major hemorrhage by day 30 (adjusted HR, 1.39 [95% CI, 0.35–5.45]; P =0.637) but was by day 180 (adjusted HR, 5.56 [95% CI, 1.53–20.13]; P =0.009). In interaction analyses, patients with occlusive dissection had significantly lower ischemic stroke risk with anticoagulation (adjusted HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.18–0.88]; P interaction =0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Our study does not rule out the benefit of anticoagulation in reducing ischemic stroke risk, particularly in patients with occlusive dissection. If anticoagulation is chosen, it seems reasonable to switch to antiplatelet therapy before 180 days to lower the risk of major bleeding. Large prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

Subacute, painful weakness is a common problem encountered by neurologists and can be associated with systemic symptoms. The patient presented with 6 weeks of progressive neuropathic pain followed by sensory changes and distal-predominant weakness. This case reviews the broad differential for such a presentation and a comprehensive, stepwise approach to diagnosis. Particular attention is paid to the potentially treatable polyradiculoneuropathies, including more recently recognized immune-mediated etiologies. Through this stepwise approach, we review how a definitive diagnosis was made.

AbstractWith the rise of the opioid epidemic, the practicing neurologist must recognize the patterns of a growing number of opioid-associated neurological injuries. This is in addition to the classic toxidrome of miosis, altered mental status, and respiratory depression, which must never be overlooked, as it is reversible and potentially lifesaving. Several other idiosyncratic syndromes due to opioid-related nervous system insults are defined by their characteristic imaging findings and portend variable functional recovery. Opioid toxicity can not only lead to brain injury, but also spinal cord and, rarely, peripheral nerve injury. As several newer synthetic opioids are undetectable by most assays, a low threshold to suspect opioid exposure must be maintained.