Cruz, Diana

Background and Objectives: Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is a leading cause of ischemic stroke in younger adults, yet sex-specific variations in its clinical presentation, imaging characteristics, and outcomes remain underexplored. We aimed to evaluate these differences using data from a large, multicenter registry. Methods: We analyzed data from the STOP-CAD registry, which includes patients with radiologically confirmed non-traumatic CeAD enrolled between 2015 and 2021 across multiple centers. Clinical and imaging characteristics were compared between men and women using multivariable logistic regression. Outcomes assessed included ischemic stroke recurrence at 180 days, excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–1) at 90 days, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality. Results: Among 4,023 patients with CeAD, 1,783 (44.6%) were women. Compared to men, women were younger (median age: 42 vs 50 years), more likely to have a history of migraine (26.9% vs 8.3%) and connective tissue disorders (14.3% vs 5.8%), and presented more frequently with non-ischemic symptoms such as headache, neck pain, or tinnitus (adjusted OR [aOR] 2.0; 95% CI, 1.8–2.3; p<0.001). Women had significantly higher odds of vertebral artery dissection (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-1.5; p<0.001), multivessel involvement (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.7-2.5; p<0.001), and pseudoaneurysm formation (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6; p=0.003). Despite these differences, there was no significant sex-based difference in key clinical outcomes: excellent functional recovery at 90 days (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.76-1.15 p=0.542), ischemic stroke recurrence at 180 days (OR 0.56 CI 0.23-1.3 p=0.213), or mortality (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.47-1.48, p=0.529). Conclusion: In this large international cohort, we observed women with CeAD were younger, more likely to present with non-ischemic symptoms with distinct imaging features. These underscore the need for heightened clinical suspicion of CeAD in women presenting with atypical symptoms, even in the absence of ischemic deficits or conventional vascular risk factors, and suggest that sex-specific phenotyping may enhance diagnostic accuracy and early management.

Background and Objectives: Pregnancy and the postpartum period increase the risk of cervical artery dissection (CEAD), a notable cause of stroke in young women. We aimed to describe the clinical presentation, imaging findings, and outcomes of CEAD occurring during pregnancy or shortly after delivery. Methods: We analyzed data from the STOP-CAD registry, a large international multicenter study of patients treated with antithrombotic therapy for non-traumatic CEAD between 2015 and 2021. This sub-study focused on women who were pregnant or within 12 weeks postpartum at the time of symptom onset. We assessed baseline clinical features, imaging results, acute stroke treatments, and functional outcomes. Results: Among 1,783 women in the registry, 62 (3.5%) had pregnancy-associated CEAD, with a median age of 34 years (IQR, 30-38). One-third had a history of migraine (33.9%), one-fifth had hypertension (21.0%), while other vascular risk factors were rare. Recent minor neck trauma was reported in 17.7%. Ischemic stroke symptoms occurred in 25 (40.3%) patients, and 23 (37.1%) had acute infarcts on imaging. However, most (59.7%) presented with non-ischemic symptoms. Vertebral artery dissections were more common than carotid dissections (62.9% vs. 48.4%), and 33.9% had multivessel involvement. Among patients presenting with ischemic stroke symptoms, 4 received thrombolysis and 7 underwent thrombectomy. Remarkably, 92% had excellent functional recovery (modified Rankin Score 0–1) at 90 days, and there were no stroke recurrences at 180 days. Conclusion: Pregnancy- and postpartum-associated CEAD is uncommon and associated with ischemic stroke in nearly half of patients. A history of migraine and hypertension may be potential risk factors. Despite the severity of presentation, most patients had favorable outcomes with timely treatment.

BACKGROUND: Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) may result in dissecting aneurysm (DA) formation. We aimed to characterize risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with DA in a large, international CeAD cohort. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of STOP-CAD (Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection), an international, multicenter, retrospective cohort. Patients with spontaneous CeAD were assessed for DA at baseline and de novo DA formation. Significant covariates in univariable analysis were included in multivariable regression models aiming to identify factors associated with DA formation. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the association of DA with ischemic and hemorrhagic outcomes. RESULTS: Among 4008 patients with CeAD, 546 (13.6%) had a DA at baseline, and 221/2938 (7.5%) patients developed a de novo DA during follow-up, of which 172/221 (78.2%) were detected in the first 180 days. Patients with DA had a mean age of 47 years, and 383 (49.9%) were women. Baseline or de novo DA was associated with a history of connective tissue disorder (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.02 [95% CI, 1.22–3.36]), fibromuscular dysplasia (aOR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.28–2.25]), and multiple vessel dissection (aOR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.19–1.98]). Lower odds of DA were seen in Hispanic ethnicity (aOR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.43–0.97]) and ischemic stroke presentation (aOR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.34–0.49]). Fibromuscular dysplasia was associated with de novo DA formation (aOR, 2.30 [95% CI, 1.52–3.49]). DA was not associated with ischemic stroke (hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.44–1.16]; P =0.173) or intracranial hemorrhage (HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.42–2.84]; P =0.86) by day 180. CONCLUSIONS: DAs are relatively common manifestations of CeAD, typically occurring within 6 months of CeAD diagnosis. DA was not associated with an increased risk of subsequent ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Small, randomized trials of patients with cervical artery dissection showed conflicting results regarding optimal stroke prevention strategies. We aimed to compare outcomes in patients with cervical artery dissection treated with antiplatelets versus anticoagulation. METHODS: This is a multicenter observational retrospective international study (16 countries, 63 sites) that included patients with cervical artery dissection without major trauma. The exposure was antithrombotic treatment type (anticoagulation versus antiplatelets), and outcomes were subsequent ischemic stroke and major hemorrhage (intracranial or extracranial hemorrhage). We used adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting to determine associations between anticoagulation and study outcomes within 30 and 180 days. The main analysis used an as-treated crossover approach and only included outcomes occurring with the above treatments. RESULTS: The study included 3636 patients (402 [11.1%] received exclusively anticoagulation and 2453 [67.5%] received exclusively antiplatelets). By day 180, there were 162 new ischemic strokes (4.4%) and 28 major hemorrhages (0.8%); 87.0% of ischemic strokes occurred by day 30. In adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting, compared with antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation was associated with a nonsignificantly lower risk of subsequent ischemic stroke by day 30 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.45–1.12]; P =0.145) and by day 180 (adjusted HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.28–2.24]; P =0.670). Anticoagulation therapy was not associated with a higher risk of major hemorrhage by day 30 (adjusted HR, 1.39 [95% CI, 0.35–5.45]; P =0.637) but was by day 180 (adjusted HR, 5.56 [95% CI, 1.53–20.13]; P =0.009). In interaction analyses, patients with occlusive dissection had significantly lower ischemic stroke risk with anticoagulation (adjusted HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.18–0.88]; P interaction =0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Our study does not rule out the benefit of anticoagulation in reducing ischemic stroke risk, particularly in patients with occlusive dissection. If anticoagulation is chosen, it seems reasonable to switch to antiplatelet therapy before 180 days to lower the risk of major bleeding. Large prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with cervical artery dissection (CAD) are at risk for subsequent ischemic events. We aimed to identify characteristics that are associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke after initial presentation of CAD and to evaluate the differential impact of anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy in these high-risk individuals. METHODS: This was a preplanned secondary analysis of the STOP-CAD study (Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection), a multicenter international retrospective observational study (63 sites from 16 countries in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa) that included patients with CAD predominantly between January 2015 and June 2022. The primary outcome was subsequent ischemic stroke by day 180 after diagnosis. Clinical and imaging variables were compared between those with versus without subsequent ischemic stroke. Significant factors associated with subsequent stroke risk were identified using stepwise Cox regression. Associations between subsequent ischemic stroke risk and antithrombotic therapy type (anticoagulation versus antiplatelets) among patients with identified risk factors were explored using adjusted Cox regression. RESULTS: In all, 4023 patients (mean age was 47.4 years; 44.5% were women) were included. By day 180, subsequent ischemic stroke occurred in 5.3% of the cohort. In adjusted Cox regression, factors associated with increased risk of subsequent ischemic stroke were prior history of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 7.31 [95% CI, 1.61–33.13]; P =0.010), presentation within 7 days from first symptoms (aHR, 3.04 [95% CI, 1.04–8.91]; P =0.043), infarct on baseline imaging (aHR, 9.85 [95% CI, 3.65–26.58]; P <0.001), and occlusive dissection (aHR, 2.34 [95% CI, 1.03–5.34]; P =0.043). Only patients with occlusive dissection demonstrated a reduced risk of subsequent ischemic stroke when treated with anticoagulation versus antiplatelets (aHR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.16–0.80]; P =0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis of the STOP-CAD study, several factors associated with subsequent ischemic stroke were identified among patients with CAD. Furthermore, we identified a potential benefit of anticoagulation in patients with CAD with occlusive dissection. These findings require validation by meta-analyses of prior studies to formulate optimal treatment strategies for specific high-risk CAD subgroups.