Shahjouei, Shima

Background Evidence to guide the optimal timing of antiplatelet and oral anticoagulants (OACs) therapy after hemorrhagic infarction (HI) versus parenchymal hematoma (PH) is limited and inconsistent, leading to substantial variation in practice. This study's goal was to study the practice pattern and compare clinical outcomes associated with early‐versus‐delayed initiation of antiplatelet/OACs after hemorrhagic transformation (HT). Methods This multicenter, retrospective, cross‐sectional study included patients with acute ischemic stroke and HT. Patients with an HI or PH were categorized by HT to antithrombotic initiation time, and their outcomes—30‐day HT exacerbation, composite outcomes of recurrent stroke/systemic emboli, 90‐day vascular death, and functional outcomes—were compared. Results Of 748 patients, 496 received antiplatelets, and 252 received OACs after HT. The median HT‐to‐antiplatelet time was significantly shorter after HI than PH (1 [interquartile range, 0–2] versus 3 [interquartile range, 1–5] days; P <0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in HT exacerbation and composite outcomes (30‐day), as well as vascular death and unfavorable functional outcomes (90‐day), between patients who received same‐day, early (HI, <1 day; PH, <3 days), or late (HI, >1 day; PH, >3 days) antiplatelets after either HI or PH. Among patients on OACs, those with HI had shorter median HT‐to‐OAC time than PH (7 [interquartile range, 2–15] versus 15 [interquartile range, 7–32] days; P <0.001). Although HT exacerbation rates (30‐day) were comparable between early (HI, <7 days; PH, <15 days) and late (HI, >7 days; PH, >15 days) OAC initiation after either HI or PH, late initiation after PH was accompanied by higher rates of composite outcomes (30‐day) than early initiation (20.7% versus 3%; P =0.044). Regression models adjusted for demographics, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and stroke severity showed no statistically significant association between early initiation of antiplatelets or OACs with HT exacerbation risk. Conclusions Our study found no statistically significant difference in HT exacerbation between early and late initiation of antiplatelets or OACs among patients with HI/PH, while prolonged delay among patients with PH were accompanied by increased systemic thromboembolic events. Although these findings offer preliminary clinical insight, prospective studies are needed.

Background: Studies have suggested that administering antithrombotics—oral anticoagulants (OACs) and antiplatelets (APLT)—after acute ischemic stroke(AIS) with hemorrhagic transformation (HT) is safe and can reduce ischemic recurrence. However, the safety of their early initiation after HT remains unclear. Method: This study utilized data from nine centers across several countries. The study population included patients with AIS who subsequently experienced HT. Patients with a specific HT type—hemorrhagic infarction(HI) or parenchymal hematoma(PH)—were categorized based on the time between HT and antithrombotic initiation, and their outcomes were compared. Outcomes included 30-day HT exacerbation and composite outcomes of recurrent stroke and systemic emboli, as well as 90-day vascular death and functional outcome. Results: Of 748 patients,496 received APLT, and 252 were prescribed OACs after HT. The median HT-to-APLT time was significantly shorter among HI patients than PH patients(1[IQR:0-2] vs. 3[IQR:1-5] days,p<0.001). The rates of 30-day HT exacerbation and composite outcomes, as well as 90-day vascular death and unfavorable functional outcomes, did not significantly differ between patients who received same-day, early (HI:<1day;PH:<3days), or late (HI:>1day;PH:>3days) APLTs after either HI or PH. Among patients who received OACs, those with HI had a significantly shorter median HT-to-OAC time than PH (7[IQR:2-15] vs. 15[IQR:7-32] days,p<0.001). However, 30-day HT exacerbation rates were comparable between early (HI:<7days;PH:<15days) and late (HI:>7days;PH:>15days) OAC initiation among patients with either HI or PH, late initiation among patients with PH was associated with higher rates of 30-day composite outcomes than early initiation(20.7% vs. 3%,p=0.044). Based on regression models adjusted for NIHSS and stroke severity, early initiation of APLTs or OACs was not associated with increased risk of HT exacerbation. Conclusion: Findings suggest that the same-day initiation of APLTs after HI or PH-1, and within 1-3days following PH-2, might not be associated with HT exacerbation or worsening outcomes. Similarly, OACs initiated 2-7days after HI and 7-15days after PH may not be associated with worsened patients' outcomes, whereas delays beyond these timeframes can be associated with higher thromboembolic risk.

BACKGROUND: This individual participant data meta-analysis aimed to determine whether time to treatment influences the effect of intraarterial thrombolysis (IAT), intravenous thrombolysis, and conservative standard therapy on visual outcomes in nonarteritic central retinal artery occlusion. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Embase up to June 2023 for studies reporting treatment modality and peri-treatment best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) for ≥5 participants, excluding patients with nonsevere vision loss (BCVA <1.0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) or treated after 24 hours of symptom onset. The primary outcome was recovery from severe vision loss (final BCVA <1.0 logMAR). We used mixed-effect models and local polynomial regression to investigate nonlinear relationships between time to treatment and recovery from severe vision loss. RESULTS: Of 4074 screened studies, individual participant data were sought from 52, with 35 contributing individual participant data for 1038 participants. In total, 783 patients met inclusion criteria (age, 64.8±13.3 years; 35.5% female; baseline BCVA, 2.3±0.5 logMAR). For every hour decrease in time to treatment, thrombolysis was associated with greater improvement in BCVA (intraarterial, 0.02 logMAR [95% CI, 0–0.04]; intravenous, 0.04 logMAR [95% CI, 0.00–0.07]) than conservative standard therapy (0.01 logMAR [95% CI, 0–0.02]). A nonlinear relationship was detected for intraarterial thrombolysis with a changepoint at 8 hours (95% CI, 6.7–9.4). Thrombolysis was associated with increased recovery from severe vision loss compared with conservative standard therapy (intraarterial within 6 hours: odds ratio, 2.72 [95% CI, 1.02–7.28], 27.2% versus 12.0%; intravenous within 4.5 hours: odds ratio, 3.32 [95% CI, 1.24–8.92], 28.8% versus 11.1%). Findings were consistent in subgroup analysis restricted to patients receiving recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator. Monte-Carlo simulations showed that a randomized controlled trial would require 95 participants per group to achieve 80% power to detect an odds ratio of 3.0 for recovery from severe vision loss. CONCLUSIONS: Early intervention in nonarteritic central retinal artery occlusion is associated with improvement in visual recovery, with intraarterial thrombolysis and intravenous thrombolysis outperforming nonthrombolytic treatments. These findings warrant confirmation in sufficiently powered randomized controlled trials.

Introduction: Branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO) results from the blood flow compromise in of the branches of the central retinal artery. Data is limited on the outcome of patients with BRAO who received thrombolytic therapy as acute phase management protocol. Method: This study is a sub-analysis of our prior systematic review and meta-analysis on the visual outcome of patients with retinal artery occlusion who received intra-arterial (IA) or intra-venous (IV) thrombolytics within the first 24 hours. PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect via Elsevier, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Trip Medical Database were systematically searched with a predefined protocol to record the change in the visual acuity (VA) after thrombolytic therapy. We limited this study to the patients with BRAO who received urokinase (UK) or tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). Results: Among 1153 identified studies, 771 patients with retinal artery occlusion received thrombolytic therapy. BRAO was observed in 19 patients (2.5%, mean age: 65 years). IAT-tPA was administered in 8 (42.1%), IVT-tPA in 7 (36.8%), and IVT-UK in 4 (21.1%). Median time from the onset of visual change to thrombolysis was 6.0 [4.5-10.5] hours. Patients had mean baseline logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) of 0.9±0.8. VA improvement of ≥0.1 logMAR (one Snellen line) was seen among 17 (89.5%), VA improvement of ≥0.3 logMAR (three Snellen lines) among 13 (68.4%), and a final VA of 20/100 or better among 16 (84.2%). One (5.3%) patient had intra-ocular hemorrhage post thrombolysis. Conclusion: Compared to central retinal artery occlusion, patient with branched retinal occlusion have better visual recovery following IA or IV thrombolysis. These results can be affected by the small number of the patients in this study.

Background: Whether thrombolysis improves outcomes in non-arteritic central retinal artery occlusion (naCRAO) is uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the rate of visual recovery after intra-venous thrombolysis (IVT) or intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) administration of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or urokinase among patients with naCRAO and explore the parameters affecting the final visual acuity (VA). Aim: We systematically searched six databases. Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and VA of ⩾20/100 were used to quantify visual recovery. To explore the role of other factors on visual recovery, we defined two models for studies with aggregated data (designs 1 and 2) and 16 models for individual participant data (IPD, models 1–16). Summary of Review: We included data from 771 patients out of 72 publications in nine languages. Visual improvement for ⩾0.3 logMAR was reported in 74.3% of patients who received IVT-tPA within 4.5 h (CI: 60.9–86.0%; unadjusted rate: 73.2%) and 60.0% of those who received IAT-tPA within 24 h (CI: 49.1–70.5%; unadjusted rate: 59.6%). VA of ⩾20/100 was observed among 39.0% of patients after IVT-tPA within 4.5 h and 21.9% of those with IAT-tPA within 24 h. IPD models highlighted the association between improved visual outcomes and VA at presentation, at least 2 weeks follow-up before reporting the final VA, antiplatelet therapy, and shorter symptom onset to thrombolysis window. Conclusion: Early thrombolytic therapy with tPA is associated with enhanced visual recovery in naCRAO. Future studies should refine the optimum time window for thrombolysis in naCRAO.