Krakowski, Andrew C.

AbstractPediatric procedure‐related pain management is often incompletely understood, inadequately addressed, and critical in influencing a child's lifelong relationship with the larger healthcare community. We present a comprehensive review of infiltrative anesthetics, including a comparison of their mechanisms of action and relative safety and efficacy data to help guide clinical selection. We also describe the multimodal utilization of adjunct therapies—in series and in parallel—to support the optimization of pediatric periprocedural pain management, enhance the patient experience, and provide alternatives to sedation medication and general anesthesia.

AbstractPediatric procedure‐related pain management is often incompletely understood, inadequately addressed, and critical in influencing a child's lifelong relationship with the larger health care community. We highlight the evolution of ethics and expectations around optimizing periprocedural pain management as a fundamental human right. We investigate the state‐of‐the‐art of topical anesthetics, reviewing their mechanisms of action and providing comparisons of their relative safety and efficacy data to help guide clinical selection. In total, this two‐part review offers a combination of conventional approaches and innovative techniques that should be used multimodally—in series and in parallel—to help optimize pain management and provide alternatives to sedation medication and general anesthesia.

Importance Laser-assisted drug delivery (LADD) is used for various medical and cosmetic applications. However, there is insufficient evidence-based guidance to assist clinicians performing LADD. Objective To develop recommendations for the safe and effective use of LADD. Evidence Review A systematic literature review of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and MEDLINE was conducted in December 2019 to identify publications reporting research on LADD. A multidisciplinary panel was convened to draft recommendations informed by the systematic review; they were refined through 2 rounds of Delphi survey, 2 consensus meetings, and iterative review by all panelists until unanimous consensus was achieved. Findings Of the 48 published studies of ablative fractional LADD that met inclusion criteria, 4 were cosmetic studies; 21, oncologic; and 23, medical (not cosmetic/oncologic), and 6 publications of nonablative fractional LADD were included at the request of the expert panel, producing a total of 54 studies. Thirty-four studies (63.0%) were deemed to have low risk of bias, 17 studies (31.5%) had moderate risk, and 3 (5.5%) had serious risk. The key findings that informed the guidelines developed by the expert panel were as follows: LADD is safe in adults and adolescents (≥12 years) with all Fitzpatrick skin types and in patients with immunosuppression; it is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ, actinic cheilitis, hypertrophic scars, and keloids; it is useful for epidermal and dermal analgesia; drug delivery may be increased through the application of heat, pressure, or occlusion, or by using an aqueous drug solution; laser settings should be selected to ensure that channel diameter is greater than the delivered molecule; antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended, except with impaired wound healing; antiviral prophylaxis is recommended when treating the face and genitalia; and antifungal prophylaxis is not recommended. The guideline’s 15 recommendations address 5 areas of LADD use: (I) indications and contraindications; (II) parameters to report; (III) optimization of drug delivery; (IV) safety considerations; and (V) prophylaxis for bacterial, viral, and fungal infections. Conclusions and Relevance This systematic review and Delphi consensus approach culminated in an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for safe and effective use of LADD in a variety of applications. Future research will further improve our understanding of this novel treatment technique.

Superficial angiomyxomas are cutaneous mesenchymal tumours that typically present clinically as slow‐growing, solitary, asymptomatic nodules that can occur at any age. Histopathologically, these dermal and subcutaneous tumours are characterized by abundant myxoid stroma, numerous thin‐walled and often arbourising blood vessels, and spindled to stellate fibroblast‐like cells. While usually sporadic, superficial angiomyxomas can occasionally be associated with Carney complex (CNC), an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by inactivating germline mutations in the 1‐alpha regulatory subunit of protein kinase A (PRKAR1A) and various clinical manifestations, including cardiac myxomas, facial lentigines, epithelioid blue naevi, endocrinopathies and psammomatous melanotic schwannomas. In this study, we sought to characterize the presence or absence of PRKAR1A expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in sporadic superficial angiomyxomas based on our observations in an index case. In total, PRKAR1A immunohistochemical expression was determined in 15 sporadic superficial angiomyxoma cases retrieved from the surgical pathology archives. IHC demonstrated that the lesional cells in 12 cases (80%) were non‐reactive to antibodies against PRKAR1A. This study provides evidence in support of a role for PRKAR1A in the development of clinically non‐syndromic superficial angiomyxomas. Together with previous studies, this report demonstrates that PRKAR1A may play an important role in the development of a variety of myxomatous mesenchymal tumours.