Mazeika, Gandis

Abstract Biomarkers that aid in early detection of neurodegeneration are needed to enable early symptomatic treatment and enable identification of people who may benefit from neuroprotective interventions. Increasing evidence suggests that sleep biomarkers may be useful, given the bi-directional relationship between sleep and neurodegeneration and the prominence of sleep disturbances and altered sleep architectural characteristics in several neurodegenerative disorders. This study aimed to demonstrate that sleep can accurately characterize specific neurodegenerative disorders (NDD). A four-class machine-learning algorithm was trained using age and nine sleep biomarkers from patients with clinically-diagnosed manifest and prodromal NDDs, including Alzheimer’s disease dementia (AD = 27), Lewy body dementia (LBD = 18), and isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD = 15), as well as a control group (CG = 58). The algorithm was validated in a total of 381 recordings, which included the training data set plus an additional AD = 10, iRBD = 18, Parkinson disease without dementia (PD = 29), mild cognitive impairment (MCI = 78) and CG = 128. Test-retest consistency was then assessed in LBD = 10, AD = 9, and CG = 46. The agreement between the NDD profiles and their respective clinical diagnoses exceeded 75% for the AD, LBD, and CG, and improved when NDD participants classified Likely Normal with NDD indications consistent with their clinical diagnosis were considered. Profiles for iRBD, PD and MCI participants were consistent with the heterogeneity of disease severities, with the majority of overt disagreements explained by normal sleep characterization in 27% of iRBD, 21% of PD, and 26% of MCI participants. For test-retest assignments, the same or similar NDD profiles were obtained for 88% of LBD, 86% in AD, and 98% of CG participants. The potential utility for NDD subtyping based on sleep biomarkers demonstrates promise and requires further prospective development and validation in larger NDD cohorts.

Abstract Introduction n this cross-validation study, the distributions of sleep biomarker-based neurodegenerative disorder (NDD) risk were evaluated across a spectrum of NDD patients and presumed controls which were independent of the model development dataset. Methods Variables that included age, time-REM, non-REM hypertonia, autonomic-activation index, spindle-duration, atypical-N3, time-supine, sleep-efficiency, relative-theta, and theta/alpha obtained with Sleep Profiler were used to train a 4-class machine learning algorithm that generated probabilities of NDD risk for the groups: Alzheimer’s dementia (AD), Lewy body disorder (LBD), prodromal synucleinopathy (pSYN based on REM sleep behavior disorder patients), and controls (CG). Records with CG output probabilities >70% were labeled Probably-normal, and from 45-70% Likely-normal with indications of a NDD added when the LBD, AD or pSYN risks exceeded approximately 25%. Similar thresholds were used to assign Likely- or Probable- LBD, AD, pSYN or Mixed based on the group probabilities. This cross-validation study was designed to use datasets that were independent of those used to train the classification algorithm. Thus, NDD risk distributions were evaluated in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI=71), Parkinson’s disease (PD=16), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP=21) and control subjects (NC=41) with Mini-Mental State Exam scores>28 and/or normal for MCI by Petersen criteria. Results In the MCI group, NDD risk assignments were Probable-AD=26%, -Mixed=10%, -LBD=1%, Likely-AD= 7%, -Mixed=6%, -LBD=3%, -pSYN=1%, Likely-Normal indications-AD=9%, -pSYN=7%, -Mixed=4%, and Probably-Normal=26% In the PSP group, Probable-LBD=43%, -Mixed=29% and -pSYN=4%, Likely-Mixed=10%, Likely-Normal indications AD=10%, and Probably-Normal=4%. In the PD group, Probable-LBD=13%, -pSYN=13%, -AD=6%, Likely-Mixed=19%, -pSYN=6%, Likely-Normal Indications-pSYN=19%, -AD=12%, Likely-Normal=6% and Probably-Normal=6% In the NC group, 83% were assigned minimal NDD risk with Probably-Normal=70%, Likely-Normal plus indications=13%, but with Likely NDD=13% and Probable NDD=4%. Conclusion NDD risks were disbursed in a manner consistent with the range of severities expected In MCI and PD groups, with 25% exhibiting relatively normal sleep patterns. Over 70% of the PSP patients exhibited probable NDD risk, with patterns similar to those with LBD. The NC NDD risk distributions were consistent with those assigned to the CG used for model development. Support (if any) NIH grants R44AG050326, R44AG054256, RO1AG060477, R33AG064271, ULRR024150, R34AG056639.

Abstract Introduction In this pilot study, the diagnostic agreement for sleep biomarker-based neurodegenerative disorder (NDD) risk probabilities was evaluated in patients with Alzheimer’s disease dementia (AD), Lewy Body disease (LBD), and isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) and controls with a Mini-Mental State Exam scores>28. Methods Sleep biomarkers recorded with the Sleep Profiler (Advanced Brain Monitoring, Inc) were used as inputs to a 4-class machine learning algorithm trained to assign NDD risk probabilities to AD=27, LBD=19, iRBD=15 and controls (CG=58). Input variables included age, time-REM, non-REM hypertonia, autonomic-activation index, spindle-duration, atypical-N3, time-supine, sleep-efficiency, relative-theta, and theta/alpha. Records with CG output probabilities >70% were labeled Probably-normal, and from 45-70% Likely-normal with indications of a NDD added when the LBD, AD or prodromal synucleinopathy (pSYN) risks exceeded approximately 25%. Similar thresholds were used to assign Likely- or Probable- LBD, AD, or pSYN based each of the group probabilities. Classification accuracies were evaluated in AD=37, LBD=19, iRBD=19 and CG=61 records. Longitudinal test-retest reliabilities were assessed for CG (n=45, range 8-56 months), and after six-months for LBD (n=10) and AD (n=9). Results In the AD group, NDD risk assignments were consistent with diagnoses=85%, with Probable-NDD=59%, Likely-NDD=11%, Normal plus AD/Mixed indications=15%, but with 5%=Probably-normal. In the LBD group, assigned risks were consistent with the diagnosis=79%, with Probable-NDD=74%, Normal with pSYN indications=5%, but with 11%=Probably-normal. In the iRBD group, Probable-NDD=42%, Normal plus pSYN indications=26% and Probably-normal=32%. In the CG group, 89% were assigned minimal NDD risks with Probably-normal=67%, Normal plus indications=22%, but with Likely NDD=8% and Probable NDD=3%. The AD test-retest reliability showed the same NDD classifications=78%, with slightly increasing=11% and decreased=11%. In the LBD group, the same NDD classifications were achieved=80%, with trending equivalence=10%, and decreasing severity=20%. The CG test-retest reliability showed the same NDD classifications=76%, with trending equivalence=22%, and increased severity=2%. Conclusion Consistencies between the diagnoses and assigned NDD risks and test-retest classification agreements were approximately 80% in the AD, LBD, and CG groups. In the iRBD group, the NDD risks were disbursed consistent with the range of expected severities. These results needed to be cross-validated in independent NDD datasets. Support (if any) NIH grants R44AG050326, R44AG054256, RO1AG060477, R33AG064271, ULRR024150, R34AG056639.

Abstract Introduction In this pilot study, sleep biomarker-based neurodegenerative disorder (NDD) risk was assessed in a clinical cohort of patients diagnosed with varying severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods Consecutive in-home multi-night Sleep Profiler records from a community sleep clinic were screened for age >54 years old. Cases with comorbid restless leg syndrome, hypersomnia, missing apnea-hypopnea indexes (AHI), AHI< 5 or single-night recordings were excluded. The 67 remaining records were 40% female, ages 63 + 7.4 years and up to 84 years old. NDD risk was assigned using a machine-learning algorithm combining age and nine sleep biomarkers to assign group probabilities: for Alzheimer’s disease, Lewy Body disease, prodromal synucleinopathy and controls (CG). Sleep biomarkers included: time-REM, non-REM hypertonia, autonomic-activation index, spindle-duration, atypical-N3, time-supine, sleep-efficiency, relative-theta, and theta/alpha. Those with CG probability score >70% were classified as “Probably-normal”. Those with CG probability between 45 - 70% were classified as “Likely-normal”. Insomnia severity >14 and a PHQ 9 > 5 were used as cutoffs for clinical insomnia and depression. Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to evaluate group differences. Results This cohort had 37% mild, 34% moderate, and 29% severe OSA. Self-reported comorbid insomnia and depression were present in 43%. Seventy-three percent of patients were classified as “Probably-normal”, 16% “Likely-normal”, 11% “Likely-NDD” or “Probable-NDD”. The “Probably-normal” group was younger than the rest of the cohort (62 + 6.2 years vs. 68 + 8.6 years, p< 0.01). Of those classified as “Probably-normal” (n=49), OSA was mild in 16, moderate in 17 and severe in 16. Mean AHI trended higher in the “Probably-normal” group than in those with elevated NDD risk (29 + 23.9 vs. 19 + 13.6 events/h, p=0.085). Conclusion Approximately 89% of the clinical cohort was classified as “Probably-normal” or “Likely-normal”. NDD risk was age-dependent. Interactions between OSA severity and NDD risk were not apparent in these findings, possibly related to group-wide effects. NDD risk, as measured by this model, did not appear to be adversely biased by untreated OSA. These results suggest a need for longitudinal studies to compare NDD risk in untreated OSA versus controls without sleep disordered breathing. Support (if any) NIH grants R44AG050326, R44AG054256, RO1AG060477, R33AG064271, ULRR024150, and R34AG056639.

Abstract Introduction In this pilot study, we explored sleep biomarker risk probabilities for different neurodegenerative disorder (NDD) phenotypes across a spectrum of NDD patients, compared with controls. Methods We analyzed a cohort of patients with different NDD phenotypes who underwent in-home recordings with Sleep Profiler, including Lewy body disease (LBD=20), Alzheimer’s disease dementia (AD=29), and isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD=19). Controls with an MMSE>28 (CG=61) and patients with Parkinson disease (PD=16) and mild-cognitive-impairment (MCI=41) also participated. We developed a machine-learning classifier that assigned NDD probabilities for LBD, AD, iRBD, and CG. The input variables included: time-REM, non-REM hypertonia, autonomic-activation index, spindle-duration, atypical-N3, time-supine, sleep-efficiency, relative-theta, and theta/alpha. Probabilities >50% were assigned “likely”, and for CG>=50% and a NDD group probability 20-50%, the assignment was normal “plus”. Probability assignments were then made for the NDD and CG groups, then further applied to the PD and MCI patient groups. Results The CG group participants were assigned Normal-Likely=74%, Normal+AD=11%, Normal+iRBD=5%, iRBD-Likely=5%, and AD-Likely=5%. LBD patient distributions were LBD-Likely=70%, iRBD-Likely=5%, AD-Likely=5%, Normal+LBD=5%, Normal+iRBD=5%, Normal+AD=5%, and Normal-Likely=5%. AD group distributions were AD-Likely=71%, LBD-Likely=4%, Normal+AD=14%, Normal+iRBD=4%, Normal-Likely=7%. iRBD patients were characterized with iRBD-Likely=37%, LBD-Likely=5%, AD-Likely=5%, Normal+iRBD=27%, Normal-Likely=26%. PD patients were assigned iRBD-Likely=29%, LBD-likely=14%, AD-Likely=14%, Normal+iRBD=21%, Normal+AD=7%, Normal-Likely=14%. MCI distributions were AD-Likely=45%, LBD-Likely=8%, iRBD-Likely=5%, Normal+AD=21%, Normal-Likely=13%. Conclusions For LBD, AD and CG groups, correct risk assignments were >70% while gross misclassifications were <10%. Classification patterns for PD, MCI and iRBD were disbursed in a manner consistent with the range of severities expected in each group.

Abstract Introduction Atypical N3 sleep (AN3=delta waves with limited theta and sigma) has been associated with ICU delirium and sepsis and averaged 25% of sleep time in Japanese ICU patients. We were interested in exploring whether AN3 might be a marker of cerebral dysfunction in ambulatory patients across a range of neurodegenerative disorders, including those with a dementia diagnosis. Methods After ethics review and with informed consent, patients with Lewy body disease (DLB/PDD: n=20,male=90%,age=70 + 6.2), Alzheimers disease dementia (AD: n=29,male=79%,age=75 + 6.7), Parkinson disease (PD: n=16,male=69%,age=67 + 8.7), mild cognitive impairment (MCI: n=41,male=63%,age=70 + 8.5), isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD: n=19,male=74%,age=64 + 9.6) and a control group (CG: n=61,male=47%,age=65 + 8.3) were studied with the Sleep Profiler and auto-detected AN3 computed. Between-group comparisons were assessed with Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests. Results The mean percentages of sleep time with AN3 were significantly greater in DLB/PDD (8 + 12.3) vs. PD (4 + 10.8), AD (2 + 3.7), MCI (2 + 2.3), iRBD (1 + 1.6), and CG (1 + 2.4)(all p<0.02). The proportions of records with abnormal AN3 (>5% of sleep time) were significantly greater in those with DLB/PDD=35% vs. MCI=10%, iRBD=5% and CG=5% (all p<0.05), but not AD=17% and PD=13%. Conclusions Further investigations are needed to determine if abnormal AN3 may be a biomarker that distinguishes patients with Lewy body spectrum diseases from alternative pathologies and/or could be helpful in monitoring the side effects of CNS-acting medications

Abstract Introduction In 2015, Lee et al. observed sleeping position influenced the efficiency of glymphatic clearance in rats. In 2018, Levendowski et al. reported supine sleep was independently associated with neurodegenerative disorders (NDD)(odds ratio=3.7). This update further evaluates the comparative frequency of the supine sleep position across a spectrum of cognitive impairment, including patients diagnosed with a Parkinsonian spectrum disorder (PSD), Alzheimer’s disease dementia (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), compared with a control group (CG) of patients without a known cognitive disorder. Methods After ethics review and with informed consent, a control group (CG: n=170), PSD (n=36), AD (n=29) and MCI group (n=41) were studied in-home with the Sleep Profiler; 89% across two-nights. Between-group comparisons were assessed with Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests. Results The hours of supine sleep were greater in PSD=3.0 + 1.9, AD=3.2 + 2.0 and MCI=3.0 + 2.0 vs. CG=1.9 + 1.8 (all p<0.002). The proportion of patients with >2 hours of supine sleep were PSD=69%, AD=69% and MCI=59% vs. CG=39%, with odds ratios of PSD=3.6, AD=3.5 and MCI=2.2 (all p<0.001). Conclusions Here we provide further evidence for a relatively strong association between supine sleep and neurodegenerative disease including PSD, AD and MCI cohorts. The nature of this association remains unclear from cross sectional study designs. Future prospective studies should test if there is a causal link between supine sleep and subsequent development of neurodegeneration.

Abstract Introduction Sleep markers can assess prodromal risk for neurodegenerative disorders (NDD). In a recent study conducted by the Mayo Clinic, most isolated REM sleep behavior disorder patients preferred knowing about their risk for parkinsonism or dementia. In their email survey, patients indicated a strong preference for disclosure of prognostic NDD risk in order to spur family discussions and plan for the future. For this pilot study, the Mayo questions were modified in order to investigate the perspectives and preferences of community-based adults about potentially being at-risk of a NDD and how it might impact their lives. Methods A brief survey was administered to Rotary Club attendees prior to a presentation on sleep and neurodegenerative disease. Each question offered five responses: strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, or strongly agree. Personal identifiers were not obtained. Thirty-four surveys were completed from approximately equal numbers of older men and women with estimated ages above 50 years. Personal information were not obtained (e.g., age and sex). Results When asked whether it was important to know their NDD risk given the fact that there are no known methods to prevent or cure the disease, most (83%) strongly agreed or agreed, while only 18% preferred not to know their NDD risk. The majority felt they would be more pessimistic about their future if identified as being at risk of NDD the (62% strongly agreed/agreed). Most believed their priorities and plans for living life would change (68% strongly agreed/agreed). Further, the vast majority felt that knowing NDD risk would help them plan for the future (89% strongly agreed/agreed), including planning for health resources and support (88% strongly agreed/agreed). Conclusion Eighty-three percent of those surveyed reported they would benefit from knowing if they were at risk of NDD, even though the majority would feel more pessimistic about their future. The vast majority (89%) responded that knowing their NDD risk would help them plan for the future. These results suggest that most community adults might be receptive to future sleep screening for NDD with results. Investigations are underway to confirm these findings in a broader community-based study. Support (if any) NIA-R44AG050326