Mathew, Verghese

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a serious complication, which occurs in 30% to 40% of patients after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and contributes to adverse outcomes. Advanced technology has enabled transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with High-risk Severe Aortic Stenosis (HRSAS). In these patients, the compliance of the systemic vasculature is an independent predictor of diastolic dysfunction, a known predictor of postoperative AF (POAF). We hypothesize that patients with HRSAS undergoing TAVR represent a population at increased risk for POAF. METHODS: The medical records of 195 TAVR patients at the Mayo Clinic from November 2008 to January 2013 were analyzed. All patient demographic, clinical, pre- and post-procedural outcomes were collected from the patients’ medical records, and reviewed to ascertain all cases of POAF (AF ≤30 days of surgery). Patients with a prior history of AF (n= 75 (38.5%)) were excluded. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify clinical predictors of POAF after TAVR. Results: The mean age of the study population was 80.8±7.8 years and 60.8% (n=73) were men. The mean STS risk score was 8.9±5.1. Of the 120 patients without prior AF, 20.8% (n=25) developed new-onset POAF after TAVR. Patients who developed POAF were more likely to have undergone a transapical or transaortic TAVR approach (OR 3.20; 95% CI (1.3-8.0), had a higher incidence of renal complications (52.0% vs 21.5%; p= 0.003), greater hospital length of stay (7.4±2.58 vs 5.0±2.6 days; p= 0.0003, and a trend toward higher 30-day mortality (28.0% vs 13.7%; p= 0.09) and pulmonary complications (16.0% vs 5.4%; p= 0.08) compared with those who did not develop POAF, respectively. Neurologic complications were not different between the 2 group (4.0% vs 3.2%; p= 0.85). Conclusions: Patients with High-risk Severe Aortic Stenosis undergoing TAVR have increased risk of POAF, primarily associated with a transapical or aortic surgical approach. Patients who develop POAF had higher incidence of post-procedural complications and longer hospitalizations. Therefore, perioperative strategies aimed at prevention of POAF are as important in TAVR patients as in those undergoing SAVR.

Introduction- Recent studies based on echocardiographic data have described an entity termed paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (AS) with preserved ejection fraction (EF). It is not clear whether this condition is also seen in patients who undergo hemodynamic catheterization. Objective- To determine the prevalence of low-flow in patients with low mean gradient (MG) severe AS despite preserved EF as determined by echocardiography who subsequently undergo hemodynamic catheterization. Methods- We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 259 patients who underwent hemodynamic catheterization at Mayo Clinic from 2000-2009 to assess the severity of AS within 6 months of their echocardiographic study. Results- A total of 35 patients (mean age 75±9yrs; 49% males) had MG (≤ 40 mm Hg) and aortic valve area (AVA ≤ 1 cm2) despite preserved EF (≥50%) as determined by echocardiography. A total of 7/35 patients (20%) had low flow by echocardiography, defined as stroke volume index (SVI) ≤ 35 ml/m2 (median SVI of 32 ml/m2, inter-quartile range 30-33 ml/m2). Among the same 35 patients, there were 23 patients who had both low MG (≤ 40 mm Hg) and severe AS (AVA ≤ 1 cm2), while a total of 14/35 patients (40%) had low MG, severe AS as well as low flow (median SVI of 32 ml/m2, inter-quartile range 29-33 ml/m2) as determined by hemodynamic catheterization. A statistically significant correlation with modest association was observed between invasive and noninvasive measurements of MG, SVI, and AVA (r=0.48 ; p = 0.003; r=0.48; p = 0.004 ; r=0.36; p=0.03 respectively) in our study group of 35 patients. In most patients (94%) MG by catheterization was also ≤ 40 mm Hg. However, agreement between echocardiography and catheterization to identify patients with paradoxical low-flow, low MG, severe AS was poor (kappa = 0.03). Conclusions- 1) Paradoxical low flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis is also observed in patients who undergo hemodynamic catheterization. 2) Further studies are needed to better understand the pathophysiology, best method for diagnosis and true prevalence of this entity.

Importance In patients with severe aortic valve stenosis at intermediate surgical risk, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a self-expanding supra-annular valve was noninferior to surgery for all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at 2 years. Comparisons of longer-term clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in these patients are limited. Objective To report prespecified secondary 5-year outcomes from the Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis in Intermediate Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement (SURTAVI) randomized clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants SURTAVI is a prospective randomized, unblinded clinical trial. Randomization was stratified by investigational site and need for revascularization determined by the local heart teams. Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis deemed to be at intermediate risk of 30-day surgical mortality were enrolled at 87 centers from June 19, 2012, to June 30, 2016, in Europe and North America. Analysis took place between August and October 2021. Intervention Patients were randomized to TAVR with a self-expanding, supra-annular transcatheter or a surgical bioprosthesis. Main Outcomes and Measures The prespecified secondary end points of death or disabling stroke and other adverse events and hemodynamic findings at 5 years. An independent clinical event committee adjudicated all serious adverse events and an independent echocardiographic core laboratory evaluated all echocardiograms at 5 years. Results A total of 1660 individuals underwent an attempted TAVR (n = 864) or surgical (n = 796) procedure. The mean (SD) age was 79.8 (6.2) years, 724 (43.6%) were female, and the mean (SD) Society of Thoracic Surgery Predicted Risk of Mortality score was 4.5% (1.6%). At 5 years, the rates of death or disabling stroke were similar (TAVR, 31.3% vs surgery, 30.8%; hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.85-1.22]; P = .85). Transprosthetic gradients remained lower (mean [SD], 8.6 [5.5] mm Hg vs 11.2 [6.0] mm Hg; P < .001) and aortic valve areas were higher (mean [SD], 2.2 [0.7] cm 2 vs 1.8 [0.6] cm 2 ; P < .001) with TAVR vs surgery. More patients had moderate/severe paravalvular leak with TAVR than surgery (11 [3.0%] vs 2 [0.7%]; risk difference, 2.37% [95% CI, 0.17%- 4.85%]; P = .05). New pacemaker implantation rates were higher for TAVR than surgery at 5 years (289 [39.1%] vs 94 [15.1%]; hazard ratio, 3.30 [95% CI, 2.61-4.17]; log-rank P < .001), as were valve reintervention rates (27 [3.5%] vs 11 [1.9%]; hazard ratio, 2.21 [95% CI, 1.10-4.45]; log-rank P = .02), although between 2 and 5 years only 6 patients who underwent TAVR and 7 who underwent surgery required a reintervention. Conclusions and Relevance Among intermediate-risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, major clinical outcomes at 5 years were similar for TAVR and surgery. TAVR was associated with superior hemodynamic valve performance but also with more paravalvular leak and valve reinterventions.

Introduction: Triple oral antithrombotic therapy (TOAT) (aspirin, clopidogrel, and warfarin) is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Despite this, the optimal management of patients with indications for warfarin following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been established. We sought to compare long-term clinical outcomes between patients receiving TOAT with those receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (aspirin and clopidogrel) after PCI. Hypothesis: Patients with clinical indications for warfarin have higher baseline risk which is largely responsible for the observed differences in outcomes between patients receiving TOAT vs. DAPT. Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 9,009 patients. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, ischemic or embolic events (myocardial infarction or stroke), or bleeding. Secondary outcomes were death plus ischemic or embolic events, death plus bleeding, death, MI, stroke, and bleeding. A 2:1 propensity matched analysis was also performed. Results: In 9,009 patients, 812 received TOAT and 8,197 received DAPT. Median follow-up was 61 months. The primary end point occurred in 2,749 patients. At 1 year, 22% of patients treated with TOAT had the primary endpoint versus 11% of DAPT patients (p<0.001). At 1 year, secondary end points of death or ischemic or embolic events (19% vs. 10%, p<0.001), and death or bleeding events (15% vs. 5%, p<0.001) also occurred with a higher frequency with TOAT. After propensity matched analysis the above differences were no longer significant with 1 year primary endpoint rates of 19% vs. 17% respectively (HR 1.95%, CI 0.88, 1.47; p = 0.33). Following propensity matching the only significant difference between TOAT and DAPT groups was minor bleeding (5% vs. 2%; HR 2.65, 95% CI 1.39, 5.03; p=0.003). Conclusions: In a large single center registry with comprehensive follow up, patients treated with TOAT had higher rates of ischemic and bleeding events. However, when baseline risks are accounted for event rates are similar, other than minor bleeding, indicating patient risk characteristics are largely responsible for the observed differences in outcomes.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at high surgical risk. We investigated the impact of TAVR on left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) function using conventional echocardiography parameters. Methods and results: A total of 202 consecutive patients (age 80.6±8.0 years, aortic valve area 0.80±0.16cm 2 ) who underwent TAVR at Mayo Clinic between 2008 and 2013 were included in the study. LV ejection fraction (EF) and RV systolic function including tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (FAC) and, systolic excursion velocity (S’) were compared before (median 33.5 days) and after TAVR procedure (median 30 days). Patients who underwent pacemaker implantation after TAVR were excluded. LV EF significantly improved following TAVR (55.3±12.6% pre vs 58.5±11.1% post; p<0.05). In contrast, RV systolic function significantly decreased after TAVR (pre vs post; TAPSE: 18.8±6.3 mm vs 17.4±6.3 mm, FAC: 42.6±9.8% vs 37.3±8.2%; S’: 10.7±2.6 cm/s vs 10.2±2.6 cm/s; p<0.05 for all). Stratifying RV functional change by TAVR approach site, patients undergoing trans-femoral TAVR (n=100) showed RV deterioration only by FAC (see Table). In contrast, RV systolic dysfunction was more prominent in trans-apical approach group (n=87) with significant decline in all parameters of RV systolic function (see Table). Conclusion: TAVR is associated with early enhancement in LV systolic function. However, there is evidence of worsening RV function in a significant number of patients. Further studies are necessary to determine whether this deterioration in RV function is related to anatomic access site or to other factors, and to evaluate its prognostic significance.

Abstract Aims To assess the contemporary trends in aortic stenosis (AS) interventions in the USA before and after the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods and results We utilized the National-Inpatient-Sample to assess temporal trends in the incidence, cost, and outcomes of AS interventions between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2016. During the study’s period, AS interventions increased from 96 to 137 per 100 000 individuals &gt; 60 years old, P &lt; 0.001. In-hospital expenditure on AS interventions increased from $2.28 billion in 2003 to $4.33 in 2016 P &lt; 0.001. Among patients who underwent aortic valve replacement, the proportion of TAVI increased from 11.9% in 2012 to 43.2% in 2016 (P &lt; 0.001). Males and Hispanics had lower proportions of TAVI compared with females and White patients. Adjusted in-hospital mortality of isolated SAVR decreased from 5.4% in 2003 to 3.3% in 2016 (P &lt; 0.001), whereas adjusted in-hospital mortality of TAVI decreased from 4.7% in 2012 to 2.2% in 2016, P &lt; 0.001. The incidence of new dialysis, permanent pacemaker implantation, and blood transfusion decreased after both TAVI and SAVR between 2012 and 2016. However, the rate of post-operative stroke did not significantly decrease. Length of stay and cost of hospitalization decreased after both SAVR and TAVI, although the later remained higher with TAVI. Rates of non-home discharge decreased over time after TAVI but remained stable after isolated SAVR. Conclusion This nationwide survey documents the increasing incidence of AS interventions, the rising cost of modern AS care, and the paradigm shift in aortic valve replacement practice in the USA.

Common genetic variation in CYP2C19 (cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily C, polypeptide 19) *2 and *3 alleles leads to a loss of functional protein, and carriers of these loss-of-function alleles when treated with clopidogrel have significantly reduced clopidogrel active metabolite levels and high on-treatment platelet reactivity resulting in increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, especially after percutaneous coronary intervention. The Food and Drug Administration has issued a black box warning advising practitioners to consider alternative treatment in CYP2C19 poor metabolizers who might receive clopidogrel and to identify such patients by genotyping. However, routine clinical use of genotyping for CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention is not recommended by clinical guidelines because of lack of prospective evidence. To address this critical gap, TAILOR-PCI (Tailored Antiplatelet Initiation to Lessen Outcomes due to Decreased Clopidogrel Response After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) is a large, pragmatic, randomized trial comparing point-of-care genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy with routine care to determine whether identifying CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele patients prospectively and prescribing alternative antiplatelet therapy is beneficial.

AbstractBackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is typically performed under general anesthesia (GA). However, there is increasing data supporting the safety of performing TAVR under local anesthesia/conscious sedation (LA). We performed a meta‐analysis to gain better understanding of the safety and efficacy of LA versus GA in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR.Methods and ResultsWe comprehensively searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science. Effect sizes were summarized using risk ratios (RRs) difference of the mean (DM), and 95% CIs (confidence intervals) for dichotomous and continuous variables respectively. Twenty‐six studies and 10,572 patients were included in the meta‐analysis. The use of LA for TAVR was associated with lower overall 30‐day mortality (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57–0.93; P = 0.01), use of inotropic/vasopressor drugs (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28–0.72; P < 0.001), hospital length of stay (LOS) (DM, −2.09; 95% CI, −3.02 to −1.16; P < 0.001), intensive care unit LOS (DM, −0.18; 95% CI, −0.31 to −0.04; P = 0.01), procedure time (DM, −25.02; 95% CI, −32.70 to −17.35; P < 0.001); and fluoroscopy time (DM, −1.63; 95% CI, −3.02 to −0.24; P = 0.02). No differences were observed between LA and GA for stroke, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, permanent pacemaker implantation, acute kidney injury, paravalvular leak, vascular complications, major bleeding, procedural success, conduction abnormalities, and annular rupture.ConclusionOur meta‐analysis suggests that use of LA for TAVR is associated with a lower 30‐day mortality, shorter procedure time, fluoroscopy time, ICU LOS, hospital length of stay, and reduced need for inotropic support.