Sidhu, Mandeep S.

Introduction/Background: CHIP is a risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease, cancer, and all-cause mortality. Previous work has shown that CHIP, and particularly larger CHIP clones, are associated with adverse CV outcomes, yet the molecular pathways through which CHIP impacts CV risk are poorly defined. Hypothesis/Research Question: We hypothesize that the integration of whole blood transcriptomics and methylomics will provide novel insights into the pathophysiology of CHIP. Methods/Approach: Whole blood DNA methylation profiling, transcriptomics, and whole exome sequencing with CHIP calling for variant allele frequencies (VAF) of ≥2% (CHIP) and ≥10% (large CHIP) were performed for 507 ISCHEMIA and ISCHEMIA-CKD participants with moderate-severe ischemia. We identified transcriptomic and methylomic differences between participants with CHIP and large CHIP vs no CHIP using DESeq2 and limma, adjusted for age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and probe set enrichment analysis (PSEA) were performed to identify pathway-level alterations in transcription and methylation, respectively. Results/Data: Clinical characteristics of study participants are described in Fig 1A . Compared to no CHIP (n=391), transcriptomics identified 6 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in CHIP (n=116) and 27 DEGs in large CHIP (n=35) (p-adj<0.05; abs(logFC)>0.25) (Fig 1B) . Compared to no CHIP, methylation identified no differentially methylated probes in CHIP and 6 in large CHIP (padj<0.20, abs(logFC)>0.03). GSEA identified 137 pathways significantly different in both CHIP and large CHIP vs. no CHIP (padj<0.05), while PSEA identified 724 and 2356 pathways (padj<0.20), respectively. Given its stronger relationship with methylation and transcription, downstream analyses focused on large CHIP. Integrating these data, we found 58 pathways to be both hypomethylated and transcriptionally upregulated in large CHIP, including azurophil granule-related pathways implicated in neutrophil degranulation (Fig 1C) . Further investigation into the gene-probe pairs driving the azurophil granule pathway enrichment in large CHIP revealed hypomethylation and increased transcription of genes implicated in neutrophil extracellular trap formation, including ELANE, PTRN3, AZU1, and CTSG (Fig 1D) . Conclusions: Integration of the methylome and transcriptome suggests large CHIP is linked to neutrophil-mediated immune pathways in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Introduction: CHIP is associated with CAD and mortality. The prognostic relevance of CHIP for high-risk patients with confirmed CAD is unknown. Hypothesis: CHIP variants are associated with cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality in high-risk patients with known CAD in the ISCHEMIA Trials Biorepository. Methods: 895 ISCHEMIA and ISCHEMIA-CKD (hereafter, ISCHEMIA Trials) participants with moderate-severe ischemia and next-generation sequencing performed for CHIP variant allele fractions of ≥2% (CHIP) and ≥10% (large CHIP) were included. Unadjusted and multivariable adjusted (age, sex, diabetes, eGFR not on HD, HD, and LVEF) associations of CHIP and large CHIP with a) ISCHEMIA Trials initial phase primary endpoint (CV death, myocardial infarction (MI), or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest, RCA) and b) ISCHEMIA Trials combined initial and extended follow-up phase (hereafter, Cumulative) endpoint of all-cause death . Results: Median (IQR) age of sequenced participants was 67 (56 – 79) years, 19% were female, 83% white, and 6% Hispanic. Hypertension (84%), diabetes (45%) and obesity (47%) were common, 26% had an eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73m 2 . The prevalence of CHIP and large CHIP was 23% and 7%, and both increased with age ( Figure 1a ). CHIP mutations in DNMT3A were detected in 106 (12%), TET2 CHIP in 44 (5%), and ASXL1 CHIP in 21 (2%) participants ( Figure 1b ). DNMT3A, TET2, and CREBBP mutations collectively comprised 199 (52%) of overall CHIP mutations, including individuals with multiple mutations in the same gene (N overall = 385); 67 participants (7%) had mutations in >1 gene. Over 3.1 years of RCT follow-up there were 135 (20%), 32 (16%) and 15 (18%) primary endpoints for no CHIP, CHIP and large CHIP, respectively. Over 6.8 years of EXTEND follow-up, there were 126 (18%), 47 (23%) and 24 (29%) deaths in the no CHIP, CHIP and large CHIP groups, respectively. After multivariable adjustment there was no association between CHIP or large CHIP and CV events or mortality ( Figure 1c ). Conclusion: Neither CHIP nor large CHIP was associated with adverse outcomes in 895 high-risk individuals with confirmed CAD, despite a high prevalence of these mutations.

Introduction: Studies have demonstrated an association between hyperkalemia and increased mortality in patients with myocardial infarction, but limited data exist regarding hyperkalemia and associated death among unselected cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients. Hypothesis: Hyperkalemia is associated with mortality in CICU patients. Methods: Historical cohort of 9,681 CICU patients admitted from January 2007 to December 2015 with serum potassium measured on admission. Hyperkalemia was defined as admission potassium >=5.0 mEq/L, normokalemia as admission potassium 3.5-4.9 mEq/L, and hypokalemia as admission potassium <3.5 mEq/L. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine predictors of hospital mortality. Post-discharge survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Mean age was 67±15 years with 3,629 (36%) females and hospital mortality of 9%. Hyperkalemia occurred in 1,187 (12.3%), and hypokalemia occurred in 719 (7.4%). Compared to normokalemic patients, both hyperkalemic patients (unadjusted OR 2.85, 95% CI 2.40-3.39; P<.001) and hypokalemic patients (unadjusted OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.85-2.88; P<.001) were at increased risk of hospital mortality. After adjustment for illness severity and renal function, only hyperkalemic patients were at increased risk of hospital death (adjusted OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.07-1.69; p = 0.01), while hypokalemic patients were not (P = NS). Among hospital survivors, hyperkalemic patients had lower post-discharge survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis (P <0.001), while hypokalemic patients had similar survival compared to normokalemic patients (p = NS). After adjustment for illness severity and renal function, hospital survivors with hyperkalemia were at increased risk for post-discharge mortality compared with normokalemic patients (adjusted HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.28; p=.003). Conclusions: Hyperkalemia on CICU admission is associated with higher hospital and post-discharge mortality, independent of renal function and illness severity. This emphasizes the importance of potassium abnormalities as a risk predictor in patients admitted to the CICU.

Background In participants with concomitant chronic coronary disease and advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), the effect of treatment strategies on the timing of dialysis initiation is not well characterized. Methods and Results In ISCHEMIA‐CKD (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches–Chronic Kidney Disease), 777 participants with advanced CKD and moderate or severe ischemia were randomized to either an initial invasive or conservative management strategy. Herein, we compare the proportion of randomized participants with non–dialysis‐requiring CKD at baseline (n=362) who initiated dialysis and compare the time to dialysis initiation between invasive versus conservative management arms. Using multivariable Cox regression analysis, we also sought to identify the effect of invasive versus conservative chronic coronary disease management strategies on dialysis initiation. At a median follow‐up of 23 months (25th–75th interquartile range, 14–32 months), dialysis was initiated in 18.9% of participants (36/190) in the invasive strategy and 16.9% of participants (29/172) in the conservative strategy (P= 0.22). The median time to dialysis initiation was 6.0 months (interquartile range, 3.0–16.0 months) in the invasive group and 18.2 months (interquartile range, 12.2–25.0 months) in the conservative group (P= 0.004), with no difference in procedural acute kidney injury rates between the groups (7.8% versus 5.4%; P =0.26). Baseline clinical factors associated with earlier dialysis initiation were lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (hazard ratio [HR] associated with 5‐unit decrease, 2.08 [95% CI, 1.72–2.56]; P <0.001), diabetes (HR, 2.30 [95% CI, 1.28–4.13]; P =0.005), hypertension (HR, 7.97 [95% CI, 1.09–58.21]; P =0.041), and Hispanic ethnicity (HR, 2.34 [95% CI, 1.22–4.47]; P =0.010). Conclusions In participants with non–dialysis‐requiring CKD in ISCHEMIA‐CKD, randomization to an invasive chronic coronary disease management strategy (relative to a conservative chronic coronary disease management strategy) is associated with an accelerated time to initiation of maintenance dialysis for kidney failure. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01985360.

Introduction: The benefits of optimal medical therapy (OMT) with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery have been evaluated in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) but analyses have not been stratified by detailed angiographic CAD burden or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods: A patient-level meta-analysis was undertaken among T2DM patients enrolled in COURAGE, BARI 2D and FREEDOM to assess the impact of randomization to OMT, PCI + OMT, or CABG + OMT on a composite end-point of Death/MI/Stroke and stratified by LVEF (≥ 50%, < 50%), 1, 2 or 3 vessel disease (VD) (% diameter stenosis ≥ 50%) and presence or absence of proximal left anterior descending (pLAD) disease. Hazard ratios (HR) for treatment groups were calculated from Cox regression models including all patients adjusting for trial and revascularization stratum in BARI 2D. Multivariable adjustment for risk factors was performed as a sensitivity analysis. Results: There were 5,034 patients included in the analysis (BARI 2D: n=2,368, COURAGE: n=766, FREEDOM: n=1,900) of whom 17% had LVEF < 50%, 29% had pLAD, and 77% had 2 or 3 VD. A total of 1,591 patients were randomized to OMT alone, 2,118 to PCI + OMT, and 1,325 to CABG + OMT. There were 1,116 events during a median 4.5 year follow-up. There was no significant effect on outcomes with OMT vs PCI + OMT irrespective of LVEF, presence/absence of pLAD and number of VD. By contrast, CABG + OMT significantly reduced the risk of Death/MI/Stroke in patients with 2 or 3 VD, irrespective of LVEF and presence/absence of pLAD (see Table). Results were similar with multivariable adjustment. Conclusions: In patients with T2DM and stable CAD, OMT alone appears to be as effective as PCI + OMT while CABG + OMT significantly reduces cardiovascular events in those with multivessel CAD, irrespective of LVEF or presence of pLAD.

Background Abnormal serum sodium levels have been associated with higher mortality among patients with acute coronary syndromes and heart failure. We sought to describe the association between sodium levels and mortality among unselected cardiac intensive care unit ( CICU ) patients. Methods and Results We retrospectively reviewed consecutive adult patients admitted to our cardiac intensive care unit from 2007 to 2015. Hyponatremia and hypernatremia were defined as admission serum sodium <135 and >145 mE q/L, respectively. In‐hospital mortality was assessed by multivariable regression, and postdischarge mortality was evaluated by Cox proportional‐hazards analysis. We included 9676 patients with a mean age of 68±15 years (37.5% females). Hyponatremia occurred in 1706 (17.6%) patients, and hypernatremia occurred in 322 (3.3%) patients; these groups had higher illness severity and a greater number of comorbidities. Risk of hospital mortality was higher with hyponatremia (15.5% versus 7.5%; unadjusted odds ratio, 2.41; 95% CI , 2.06–2.82; P <0.001) or hypernatremia (17.7% versus 8.6%; unadjusted odds ratio, 2.82; 95% CI , 2.09–3.80; P <0.001), with a J‐shaped relationship between admission sodium and mortality. After multivariate adjustment, only hyponatremia was significantly associated with in‐hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14–1.76; P =0.002). Among hospital survivors, risk of postdischarge mortality was higher in patients with hyponatremia (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% CI , 1.17–1.41; P <0.001) or hypernatremia (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.12–1.64; P =0.002). Conclusions Hyponatremia and hypernatremia on admission to the cardiac intensive care unit are associated with increased unadjusted short‐ and long‐term mortality. Further studies are needed to determine whether correcting abnormal sodium levels can improve outcomes in cardiac intensive care unit patients.

Background Hyperkalemia has been associated with increased mortality in patients with myocardial infarction, but few data exist regarding hyperkalemia in cardiac intensive care unit ( CICU ) patients. We hypothesize that hyperkalemia is associated with increased mortality in unselected CICU patients. Methods and Results We retrospectively reviewed a historical cohort of 9681 CICU patients admitted from January 2007 to December 2015. Hyperkalemia was defined as admission potassium ≥5.0 mEq/L and hypokalemia as admission potassium <3.5 mEq/L. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine predictors of in‐hospital mortality. Postdischarge survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. The mean age of included patients was 67±15 years, with 36% females, and in‐hospital mortality was 9%. Hyperkalemia occurred in 1187 (12.3%) and hypokalemia occurred in 719 (7.4%) patients. Both patients with hyperkalemia (unadjusted odds ratio, 2.85; 95% CI, 2.40–3.39; P <0.001) and patients with hypokalemia (unadjusted odds ratio, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.85–2.88; P <0.001) were at increased risk of unadjusted in‐hospital mortality. After adjustment for illness severity and renal function, only patients with hyperkalemia demonstrated increased risk of in‐hospital death (adjusted odds ratio, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.11–1.87; P =0.006). Among hospital survivors, only patients with hyperkalemia had lower postdischarge survival by Kaplan–Meier analysis ( P <0.001). After adjustment for illness severity and renal function, hospital survivors with admission hyperkalemia remained at increased risk for postdischarge mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.08–1.34; P <0.001). Conclusions Hyperkalemia on CICU admission is associated with higher in‐hospital and postdischarge mortality, independent of renal function and illness severity. These findings emphasize the importance of potassium abnormalities as a risk predictor in patients admitted to the CICU .

Background: Efforts to improve prescription of oral anticoagulation (OAC) drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation have had limited success in improving guideline adherence. Methods: We evaluated adherence to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association performance measures for OAC in eligible patients with a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score ≥2 and trends in prescription over time in the American Heart Association’s Get With The Guidelines–AFIB (atrial fibrillation) registry. Adjusted associations with in-hospital outcomes were also determined. The cohort included 33 235 patients with a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score ≥2 who were admitted for atrial fibrillation and were enrolled at 115 sites between January 1, 2013, and September 31, 2017. Results: The median (25th, 75th percentile) age was 73 years (65, 81 years); 51% were female; and the median (25th, 75th percentile) CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was 4 (3, 5). At admission, 16 206 (59.5%) of 27 221 patients with a previous diagnosis of atrial fibrillation were taking OAC agents, and OAC drug use at admission was associated with a lower adjusted odds of in-hospital ischemic stroke (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.24–0.59; P <0.0001). At discharge, prescription of OAC in eligible patients (no contraindications) was 93.5% (n=25 499 of 27 270). In a sensitivity analysis, when excluding only strict contraindications (4.6%, n=1497 of 32 806), OAC prescription at discharge was 80.3%. OAC prescription at discharge was higher in those aged ≤75 years, men, those with heart failure, those with previous atrial fibrillation ablation, and those with rhythm control ( P <0.0001 for all). OAC use was lowest in Hispanic patients (90.2%, P <0.0001). Prescription of OAC at discharge in eligible patients improved over time from 79.9% to 96.6% ( P <0.0001). Conclusions: Among hospitals participating in the GWTG-AFIB quality improvement program, OAC prescription at discharge in eligible guideline-indicated patients increased significantly and improved consistently over time. These data confirm that high-level adherence to guideline-recommended stroke prevention is achievable.