McCabe, Pamela J.

ABSTRACTBackgroundAs a component of goal‐oriented care, goal‐setting is an important strategy to improve self‐management and reduce the economic and personal burden of chronic illness. Primary care nurses, as integral members of the healthcare team, play a pivotal role in providing self‐management support to patients with multiple chronic illnesses. Yet, little is known about their perspectives on partnering with patients to set meaningful goals within self‐management support programmes.AimTo explore perspectives of primary care nurses about their practice of goal‐setting with patients to improve self‐management.MethodsFor this qualitative exploratory study, we conducted semi‐structured interviews with 28 primary care nurses who provided self‐management support to patients with multiple chronic illnesses. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. This research was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board.ResultsKey themes from interviews focused on: (1) goal‐setting practices; (2) challenges encountered in goal‐setting; and (3) the perceived value‐add of using a patient‐centred goal‐setting approach. Nurses described practices that empower patients to take charge of goal‐setting, emphasising that the opportunity to create personal goals enhances motivation and enables the development of realistic action plans. Key challenges faced were patients' lack of familiarity with personal goal‐setting, competing life stressors and patients' reluctance to change.ConclusionOur findings contribute valuable insights about how primary care nurses approach goal‐setting within a self‐management support program. Notably, unlike previous studies where clinicians reported that time‐limited appointments and institutional expectations hindered patient‐centred goal‐setting, our participants practicing in an institutionally supported goal‐oriented patient‐centred model of care did not report time constraints or pressures to prioritise clinical goals over patient goals. Instead, they described patient‐centred goal‐setting practices that are associated with positive patient and clinical outcomes. To potentially corroborate and expand upon our findings and inform practice and training, future research should include qualitative and survey studies to explore primary care RNs perspectives about goal‐setting and observational research to evaluate nurse–patient goal‐setting interactions.

AbstractThe Adult Medical Care Coordination program (“the program”) was implemented at Mayo Clinic to promote patient self‐management and improve 30‐day unplanned readmission for patients with high risk for readmission after hospital discharge. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the program compared to usual care using a pragmatic, stepped wedge cluster randomized trial (“stepped wedge trial”). However, several challenges arose including large differences between the study arms. Our goal is to describe the challenges and present lessons learned on how to overcome such challenges and generate evidence to support practice decisions. We describe the challenges encountered during the trial, the approach to addressing these challenges, and lessons learned for other learning health system researchers facing similar challenges. The trial experienced several challenges in implementation including several clinics dropping from the study and care disruptions due to COVID‐19. Additionally, there were large differences in the patient population between the program and usual care arms. For example, the mean age was 76.8 for the program and 68.1 for usual care. Due to these differences, we adapted the methods using the propensity score matching approach that is traditionally applied to observational designs and adjusted for differences in observable characteristics. When conducting pragmatic research, researchers will encounter factors beyond their control that may introduce bias. The lessons learned include the need to weigh the tradeoffs of pragmatic design elements and the potential value of adaptive designs for pragmatic trials. Applying these lessons would promote the successful generation of evidence that informs practice decisions.

Background: Delay in seeking treatment for symptoms of atrial fibrillation (AF) represents a missed opportunity for early treatment that is critical for reducing serious complications of AF such as stroke and heart failure. Delays ranging from a few days to years after symptom onset have been reported. Little is known about the symptom experiences and cognitive behavioral responses that differentiate those who seek treatment early after symptom onset from those who delay treatment-seeking. Purpose: This study compared symptoms and cognitive behavioral responses of early and late (up to 24 hours versus greater than 24 hours after symptom onset) treatment seekers with symptoms of AF. Methods: A descriptive design was used. Participants (N = 150) were recruited from a Midwest academic medical center. Data regarding 1) type and character of symptoms 2) cognitive and behavioral responses to the symptoms and 3) time from symptom onset to seeking treatment were collected using a structured interview. Independent t-tests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical variables were used to compare treatment seeking groups. Results: Participants were 51% female, with a mean age of 66.5 SD = 11.1) years. Early treatment seekers (n = 27) were more likely to experience a rapid heartbeat (p <.01), unremitting symptoms (<.001), report fear associated with symptoms (p = .005), and appraise symptoms as very serious (p <.001). They were less likely to believe symptoms could be self-managed (p <.001). Late treatment seekers (n = 123) were more likely to experience fatigue and dyspnea as primary symptoms (p≤ .01), report intermittent symptoms (p <.001), attribute symptoms to stress (p ≤ .02), deconditioning (p <.001), or lack of sleep (p = .009), and take a “wait and see” approach to managing symptoms (p <.001). There were no differences between early and late treatment seekers for age, sex, marital status, education level, and history of coronary artery disease or heart failure. Conclusions: Symptom type and characteristic, and cognitive behavioral responses of early treatment seekers differed from those of late treatment seekers. Experiencing a rapid heartbeat and unremitting symptoms may have helped participants form a cognitive appraisal and behavioral response conducive to early treatment-seeking. Experiencing intermittent symptoms less identifiable with a cardiac origin may have hindered development of cognitive appraisals and behavioral responses that promote early treatment- seeking. Education to promote early treatment-seeking for symptoms should include information about the diverse type and characteristics of symptoms of AF.

Background: The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is expected to increase 2.5-fold by 2050. As a result, there will be a greater demand for clinicians to provide patient education regarding the nature of AF and its management. Early self-management education is critical to provide patients with knowledge and skills they need to recognize AF, control its progression, and reduce associated complications of stroke and heart failure. Greater understanding of patients’ experiences from symptom onset through initial treatment for AF is needed to guide development of patient centered interventions to promote early effective self-management. Purpose: To describe patients’ experiences from symptom onset through initial treatment of AF. Methods: A descriptive qualitative design was used. Twenty females and 21 males at a Midwest academic medical center were interviewed using open-ended questions to explore their experiences from symptom onset through the initial treatment for AF. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Participants’ mean age was 64.3 SD = 10.1 years. Themes emerging from data were: 1) understanding the meaning of symptoms 2) learning about AF 3) emotional response and 4) feeling cared for by healthcare providers. Participants were unacquainted with AF and took cues from providers’ responses to appraise their symptoms and diagnosis. Fear and uncertainty were reduced when providers initiated prompt treatment. Receiving clear, comprehensive information about AF was appreciated by participants and described as a factor in feeling cared for by providers. Conclusions: Providers’ played a critical role in reducing patients' emotional distress and helping them to develop an accurate understanding of AF symptoms and treatment. This study provides new insight into participant experiences from symptom onset through initial treatment of AF which may inform development of patient centered interventions to promote early effective AF self-management.

Background: Efforts to improve prescription of oral anticoagulation (OAC) drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation have had limited success in improving guideline adherence. Methods: We evaluated adherence to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association performance measures for OAC in eligible patients with a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score ≥2 and trends in prescription over time in the American Heart Association’s Get With The Guidelines–AFIB (atrial fibrillation) registry. Adjusted associations with in-hospital outcomes were also determined. The cohort included 33 235 patients with a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score ≥2 who were admitted for atrial fibrillation and were enrolled at 115 sites between January 1, 2013, and September 31, 2017. Results: The median (25th, 75th percentile) age was 73 years (65, 81 years); 51% were female; and the median (25th, 75th percentile) CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was 4 (3, 5). At admission, 16 206 (59.5%) of 27 221 patients with a previous diagnosis of atrial fibrillation were taking OAC agents, and OAC drug use at admission was associated with a lower adjusted odds of in-hospital ischemic stroke (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.24–0.59; P <0.0001). At discharge, prescription of OAC in eligible patients (no contraindications) was 93.5% (n=25 499 of 27 270). In a sensitivity analysis, when excluding only strict contraindications (4.6%, n=1497 of 32 806), OAC prescription at discharge was 80.3%. OAC prescription at discharge was higher in those aged ≤75 years, men, those with heart failure, those with previous atrial fibrillation ablation, and those with rhythm control ( P <0.0001 for all). OAC use was lowest in Hispanic patients (90.2%, P <0.0001). Prescription of OAC at discharge in eligible patients improved over time from 79.9% to 96.6% ( P <0.0001). Conclusions: Among hospitals participating in the GWTG-AFIB quality improvement program, OAC prescription at discharge in eligible guideline-indicated patients increased significantly and improved consistently over time. These data confirm that high-level adherence to guideline-recommended stroke prevention is achievable.

Chronic illness affects >50% of adults in the United States and accounts for >80% of healthcare spending. The purpose of this study was to determine whether beliefs about one’s chronic disease (illness representation) are associated with self-care activation, emergency department (ED) visits, or hospitalizations. Using a cross-sectional design, we recruited older adults with heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and chronic kidney disease. The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) measured perceptions about disease. The Patient Activation Measure measured self-care activation. ED visits and hospitalizations were measured by self-report. IPQ-R scores were analyzed using latent profile analysis to identify subgroups. Participants included 187 adults (mean age 65 years, 54% female, 74% Black). We found three subgroups (stable, overwhelmed, and confident). Groups did not differ demographically or by disease. The stable group (few consequences, non-fluctuating pattern) had the fewest hospitalizations. The overwhelmed group (many consequences, fluctuating pattern, high negative emotion) had high hospitalizations and low self-care ability. The confident group (high disease control, well-understood) had the highest self-care ability, but also high hospitalizations. ED visits did not differ by group. We found three subgroups that differ in their illness representation and health outcomes. Findings suggest that assessing patients’ illness representations may have important implications for subgroup-specific interventions.

177 Background: Dignity Therapy (DT) is a psychosocial intervention used primarily at the end of life to improve quality of life and promote patient dignity, but many individuals are unable to complete it due to health decline/death. In addition, when individuals face potential mortality, they evaluate life plans to determine tasks and behaviors most important to them. Consistent with guidelines to provide palliative care interventions simultaneously with cancer treatment, the purpose of this study was to evaluate initial patient-reported outcomes of an intervention combination (Dignity Therapy + Life Plan [DT/LP]) for those with advanced pancreatic or lung cancer receiving treatment within a year of diagnosis. Methods: This was a single-arm, Phase I/II pilot study, conducted in the outpatient setting at an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center. Dignity Therapy consisted of a focused life review intervention delivered during three outpatient oncology encounters for each patient. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and edited to produce a legacy document. Participants scribed a list of 3-6 life goals for the LP intervention. Outcomes measured at baseline, immediately post DT/LP, and 3 months later were distress (Distress Thermometer), quality of life (FACT and LASA), spirituality (FaCIT-Sp-12), dignity (Patient Dignity Inventory), and purpose in life (Purpose in Life Test- Short Form). Data were analyzed with one-sample, two-sided t-tests (alternate: Wilcoxan). Results: Eighteen advanced pancreatic or lung cancer patients enrolled, mean age 64. There were no significant differences among all variables from baseline to post-DT/LP and 3 months later, with the exception of less distress experienced between baseline and 3 months after DT/LP ( p= 0.04). Conclusions: The DT/LP intervention did not show improvements in these psychosocial outcomes, but patients with advanced cancer typically experience worsening physical and psychosocial symptoms with active treatment. Therefore, maintaining these outcomes from baseline is a worthy goal, as we may be preventing further morbidity in an advanced cancer population. Further research is needed, however, given this small sample size. Clinical trial information: NCT02132325.

Early detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) is crucial for averting AF-related stroke and heart failure, but treatment is delayed when AF is not recognized. The critical need for early detection and treatment requires education to promote AF awareness. Knowledge deficits, attitudes, and beliefs about AF that should be addressed to improve awareness and reduce treatment-seeking delay in older adults at risk for developing AF have not been well documented. The purpose of this study was to describe knowledge, treatment-seeking attitudes, and beliefs about AF in adults ≥65 years old and identify demographic characteristics associated with knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs. Patients with no history of AF recruited from an academic medical center were interviewed using the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs about Atrial Fibrillation Survey. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent t tests. Participants ( N = 180) were 63% male with a mean age of 73.7 ± 6.0 years, and 52% held ≥ 4-year college degree. About one third could not identify common symptoms of AF including palpitations (31%), chest pain (36%), dyspnea (30%), and fatigue (35%). A majority (84%) lacked confidence to recognize AF, and 58% were not sure when they should seek care for AF symptoms. Nearly a third (32%) believed palpitations are always present with AF, and 74% believed that low energy would not be their only symptom of AF. Higher scores for AF Symptom Knowledge ( p = .02) were observed in females, and General Knowledge about AF was greater for younger participants ( p < .001). Participants lacked knowledge and confidence to aid decision-making for treatment-seeking for symptoms of AF and held inaccurate beliefs about AF that could hinder early treatment-seeking. Programs to promote AF awareness should explain the spectrum of symptoms that may be manifested by AF and include action plans for responding to symptoms.