Newby, L. Kristin

Introduction/Background: CHIP is a risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease, cancer, and all-cause mortality. Previous work has shown that CHIP, and particularly larger CHIP clones, are associated with adverse CV outcomes, yet the molecular pathways through which CHIP impacts CV risk are poorly defined. Hypothesis/Research Question: We hypothesize that the integration of whole blood transcriptomics and methylomics will provide novel insights into the pathophysiology of CHIP. Methods/Approach: Whole blood DNA methylation profiling, transcriptomics, and whole exome sequencing with CHIP calling for variant allele frequencies (VAF) of ≥2% (CHIP) and ≥10% (large CHIP) were performed for 507 ISCHEMIA and ISCHEMIA-CKD participants with moderate-severe ischemia. We identified transcriptomic and methylomic differences between participants with CHIP and large CHIP vs no CHIP using DESeq2 and limma, adjusted for age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and probe set enrichment analysis (PSEA) were performed to identify pathway-level alterations in transcription and methylation, respectively. Results/Data: Clinical characteristics of study participants are described in Fig 1A . Compared to no CHIP (n=391), transcriptomics identified 6 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in CHIP (n=116) and 27 DEGs in large CHIP (n=35) (p-adj<0.05; abs(logFC)>0.25) (Fig 1B) . Compared to no CHIP, methylation identified no differentially methylated probes in CHIP and 6 in large CHIP (padj<0.20, abs(logFC)>0.03). GSEA identified 137 pathways significantly different in both CHIP and large CHIP vs. no CHIP (padj<0.05), while PSEA identified 724 and 2356 pathways (padj<0.20), respectively. Given its stronger relationship with methylation and transcription, downstream analyses focused on large CHIP. Integrating these data, we found 58 pathways to be both hypomethylated and transcriptionally upregulated in large CHIP, including azurophil granule-related pathways implicated in neutrophil degranulation (Fig 1C) . Further investigation into the gene-probe pairs driving the azurophil granule pathway enrichment in large CHIP revealed hypomethylation and increased transcription of genes implicated in neutrophil extracellular trap formation, including ELANE, PTRN3, AZU1, and CTSG (Fig 1D) . Conclusions: Integration of the methylome and transcriptome suggests large CHIP is linked to neutrophil-mediated immune pathways in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Introduction: Higher mtDNA-CN reflects better mitochondrial function, while lower levels indicate mtDNA release and increased inflammation. Although mtDNA-CN serves as a marker of cardiovascular health, the importance and mechanism of risk associated with mtDNA in high-risk individuals with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) remains poorly understood. To address this gap, we leveraged the ISCHEMIA Biorepository to: (1) evaluate the association between mtDNA-CN and all-cause death (ACD); and (2) define a transcriptomic profile associated with high mtDNA-CN and ACD risk for high-risk patients with CAD. Hypothesis: Higher mtDNA-CN is associated with reduced ACD risk and inflammation in high-risk patients enrolled in the ISCHEMIA Biorepository. Methods: Low pass whole genome sequencing and whole blood RNA-Seq were performed on 594 ISCHEMIA and ISCHEMIA-CKD participants with moderate-severe ischemia. Data were processed using the NYU deciphEHR pipeline and mtDNA was quantified using mitoAnalyzer. mtDNA-CN was median split, with samples having values ≤ median classified as the 'low' group and those > median as the 'high' group. Unadjusted group differences were assessed using Chi-squared tests. Survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, eGFR, dialysis status, ischemia severity, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Adjusted differential gene expression (DGE) and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were performed to explore molecular mechanisms underlying mtDNA-CN. Results: Median age was 67 (IQR: 57–78); 19% were female, 84% white, and 6% Hispanic. Hypertension (84%), diabetes (43%), and obesity (45%) were common; 26% had eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Median mtDNA-CN was 153 counts per sample. After multivariate adjustment , mtDNA-CN > median was associated with a 48% reduction in ACD (aHR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.30–0.90; P = 0.020) (Figure 1A) . DGE revealed downregulation of inflammatory genes in the mtDNA-CN group, including S100A9 (FC=-.41, p=3.32e-10) and S100A12 (FC=-.56, p=3.32e-10). Inflammatory pathways such as the inflammasome complex (NES=-2.17, p=9.32e-03) and interleukin-1 production (NES= -2.02, p=6.60e-03) were downregulated among participants in the high mtDNA-CN ( Figure 1B) . Conclusion: Higher mtDNA-CN is associated with lower risk of ACD and reduced inflammasome activity, suggesting that enhanced mitochondrial health may mitigate inflammasome-related pathology linked to ACD in patients with CAD.

Abstract Aims Type 2 myocardial infarction due to myocardial oxygen supply–demand imbalance is associated with poor outcomes. There are no guidelines to inform care for these patients. The consensus on the assessment and management of type 2 myocardial infarction is gained. Methods and results An international e-Delphi study including experts in type 2 myocardial infarction identified through systematic review was conducted. Participants were asked to describe their approach to (i) definition and diagnosis, (ii) risk stratification, (iii) assessment of coronary artery disease and cardiac function, (iv) specialty management, (v) treatment and secondary prevention, and (vi) communication and rehabilitation. Statements generated in round one were circulated, with consensus defined a priori as ≥70% agreement on a 5-point Likert scale. Where no consensus was reached, statements were amended and recirculated for a final round. The response rate was 56% (38/68), 54% (37/68), and 72% (49/68) in the first, second, and third rounds, respectively. Following the first round, 67 unique statements were generated across six domains. Overall, consensus was achieved on 64% (43/67) of statements. Consensus was achieved for 42% (5/12) of statements on the diagnosis of type 2 myocardial infarction, 75% (3/4) on risk stratification, 50% (9/18) on the assessment of coronary artery disease and cardiac function, 60% (6/10), on specialty management, 100% (9/9) on treatment and secondary prevention, and 79% (11/15) on communication and rehabilitation. Conclusion Consensus was obtained across a number of domains for the assessment and management of patients with type 2 myocardial infarction. However, there was limited agreement amongst experts on the diagnostic criteria, which may benefit from refinement.

Introduction: CHIP is associated with CAD and mortality. The prognostic relevance of CHIP for high-risk patients with confirmed CAD is unknown. Hypothesis: CHIP variants are associated with cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality in high-risk patients with known CAD in the ISCHEMIA Trials Biorepository. Methods: 895 ISCHEMIA and ISCHEMIA-CKD (hereafter, ISCHEMIA Trials) participants with moderate-severe ischemia and next-generation sequencing performed for CHIP variant allele fractions of ≥2% (CHIP) and ≥10% (large CHIP) were included. Unadjusted and multivariable adjusted (age, sex, diabetes, eGFR not on HD, HD, and LVEF) associations of CHIP and large CHIP with a) ISCHEMIA Trials initial phase primary endpoint (CV death, myocardial infarction (MI), or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest, RCA) and b) ISCHEMIA Trials combined initial and extended follow-up phase (hereafter, Cumulative) endpoint of all-cause death . Results: Median (IQR) age of sequenced participants was 67 (56 – 79) years, 19% were female, 83% white, and 6% Hispanic. Hypertension (84%), diabetes (45%) and obesity (47%) were common, 26% had an eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73m 2 . The prevalence of CHIP and large CHIP was 23% and 7%, and both increased with age ( Figure 1a ). CHIP mutations in DNMT3A were detected in 106 (12%), TET2 CHIP in 44 (5%), and ASXL1 CHIP in 21 (2%) participants ( Figure 1b ). DNMT3A, TET2, and CREBBP mutations collectively comprised 199 (52%) of overall CHIP mutations, including individuals with multiple mutations in the same gene (N overall = 385); 67 participants (7%) had mutations in >1 gene. Over 3.1 years of RCT follow-up there were 135 (20%), 32 (16%) and 15 (18%) primary endpoints for no CHIP, CHIP and large CHIP, respectively. Over 6.8 years of EXTEND follow-up, there were 126 (18%), 47 (23%) and 24 (29%) deaths in the no CHIP, CHIP and large CHIP groups, respectively. After multivariable adjustment there was no association between CHIP or large CHIP and CV events or mortality ( Figure 1c ). Conclusion: Neither CHIP nor large CHIP was associated with adverse outcomes in 895 high-risk individuals with confirmed CAD, despite a high prevalence of these mutations.

Abstract Aims The Shock Academic Research Consortium (SHARC) recently proposed pragmatic consensus definitions to standardize classification of cardiogenic shock (CS) in registries and clinical trials. We aimed to describe contemporary CS epidemiology using the SHARC definitions in a cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) population. Methods and results The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) is a multinational research network of advanced CICUs coordinated by the TIMI Study Group (Boston, MA). Cardiogenic shock was defined as a cardiac disorder resulting in SBP &lt; 90 mmHg for ≥30 min [or the need for vasopressors, inotropes, or mechanical circulatory support (MCS) to maintain SBP ≥ 90 mmHg] with evidence of hypoperfusion. Primary aetiologic categories included acute myocardial infarction-related CS (AMI-CS), heart failure-related CS (HF-CS), and non-myocardial (secondary) CS. Post-cardiotomy CS was not included. Heart failure-related CS was further subcategorized as de novo vs. acute-on-chronic HF-CS. Patients with both cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic components of shock were classified separately as mixed CS. Of 8974 patients meeting shock criteria (2017–23), 65% had isolated CS and 17% had mixed shock. Among patients with CS (n = 5869), 27% had AMI-CS (65% STEMI), 59% HF-CS (72% acute-on-chronic, 28% de novo), and 14% secondary CS. Patients with AMI-CS and de novo HF-CS were most likely to have had concomitant cardiac arrest (P &lt; 0.001). Patients with AMI-CS and mixed CS were most likely to present in more severe shock stages (SCAI D or E; P &lt; 0.001). Temporary MCS use was highest in AMI-CS (59%). In-hospital mortality was highest in mixed CS (48%), followed by AMI-CS (41%), similar in de novo HF-CS (31%) and secondary CS (31%), and lowest in acute-on-chronic HF-CS (25%; P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion SHARC consensus definitions for CS classification can be pragmatically applied in contemporary registries and reveal discrete subpopulations of CS with distinct phenotypes and outcomes that may be relevant to clinical practice and future research.

BACKGROUND: Associations of early changes in vasoactive support with cardiogenic shock (CS) mortality remain incompletely defined. METHODS: The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is a multicenter registry of cardiac intensive care units. Patients admitted with CS (2018–2023) had vasoactive dosing assessed at 4 and 24 hours from cardiac intensive care unit admission and quantified by the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS). Prognostic associations of VIS at both time points, as well as change in VIS from 4 to 24 hours, were examined. Interaction testing was performed based on mechanical circulatory support status. RESULTS: Among 3665 patients, 82% had a change in VIS <10, with 7% and 11% having a ≥10-point increase and decrease from 4 to 24 hours, respectively. The 4 and 24-hour VIS were each associated with cardiac intensive care unit mortality (13%–45% and 11%–73% for VIS <10 to ≥40, respectively; P trend <0.0001 for each). Stratifying by the 4-hour VIS, changes in VIS from 4 to 24 hours had a graded association with mortality, ranging from a 2- to >4-fold difference in mortality comparing those with a ≥10-point increase to ≥10-point decrease in VIS ( P trend <0.0001). The change in VIS alone provided good discrimination of cardiac intensive care unit mortality (C-statistic, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.70–0.75]) and improved discrimination of the 24-hour Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (0.72 [95% CI, 0.69–0.74] to 0.76 [95% CI, 0.74–0.78]) and the clinician-assessed Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions shock stage (0.72 [95% CI, 0.70–0.74] to 0.77 [95% CI, 0.75–0.79]). Although present in both groups, the mortality risk associated with VIS was attenuated in patients managed with versus without mechanical circulatory support (odds ratio per 10-point higher 24-hour VIS, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.23–1.49] versus 1.84 [95% CI, 1.69–2.01]; P interaction <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Early changes in the magnitude of vasoactive support in CS are associated with a gradient of risk for mortality. These data suggest that early VIS trajectory may improve CS prognostication, with the potential to be leveraged for clinical decision-making and research applications in CS.

Introduction: Circulating biomarkers may improve prediction of cardiovascular (CV) events in chronic coronary disease (CCD). The incremental value of biomarkers in CCD after adjustment for clinical factors, inducible ischemia and coronary artery disease (CAD) severity is uncertain. Methods: 756 ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) participants with site-determined moderate-severe ischemia and 9 assayed biomarkers (Figure) were included. Among participants with interpretable stress tests for ischemia and CAD by computed coronary tomography angiography (CCTA) (N=507), associations of biomarkers with the primary (CV death, myocardial infarction (MI), or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest) or secondary endpoints (CV death or MI) were evaluated using sequentially adjusted multivariable Cox proportional hazards models (Model 1=unadjusted, Model 2=clinical features, Model 3=Model 2 + multivessel CAD by CCTA, and Model 4=Model 3 + severe ischemia). Results: Median (IQR) participant age was 64 (57-70) years, 19% were female, 81% white, and 5% Hispanic. Hypertension (85%), diabetes (46%) and obesity (45%) were common, 28% had an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73m 2 . Severe ischemia was present in 44%, and 39% had multivessel CAD (≥70% stenosis) by CCTA. Over 3.5 (2.4-4.7) years of follow-up there were 146 (19%) primary and 128 (17%) secondary endpoints. Soluble CD40L, GDF-15, NT-proBNP, hsTnT were associated with the primary and secondary endpoints in univariable and multivariable (adjusting for clinical features, multivessel CAD and severe ischemia) models. Conclusion: Biomarkers of inflammation (GDF-15), thrombosis (sCD40L), myocardial stretch (NT-proBNP) and injury (hs-troponin) were associated with CV endpoints in the ISCHEMIA trial independent of clinical features, multivessel CAD and severe ischemia.

Introduction: Chronic coronary disease (CCD) is a leading cause of death worldwide. Whole blood (WB) transcriptomic (RNA-seq) and methylation ‘omics’ data can discern molecular underpinnings of CCD and create molecular subtypes to aid risk prediction. Methods: Of 1,064 participants with moderate-severe ischemia (Age: 67.1±6.2, 19.4% Female, 17% non-White) from the ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) biorepository, 646 participants had available WB RNA-seq and 737 had WB methylation data ( Fig 1A ). Unsupervised clustering and differential analyses identified omics-derived molecular subtypes. We identified co-regulated gene modules of each subtype, performed subtype-level enrichment of clinical variables, and performed Kaplan-Meier analyses for time to cardiovascular (CV) death or myocardial infarction (MI). Results: Multi-omic analysis revealed 4 RNA-seq-derived subtypes (RS) and 3 methylation-derived subtypes (MS). RNA-seq Subtype 1 (RS1) was enriched for molecular drivers indicative of an adaptive immune response, had clinical enrichment of female sex, statin use, and greater ischemia, and had decreased risk of CV death or MI ( Fig 1B ). RNA-seq Subtype 2 (RS2) was enriched for innate immune response pathway, and patients who were older and White, and was associated with increased risk of CV death or MI. Similarly, methylation subtypes also yielded a high-risk subtype (MS3) and a low-risk subtype (MS2) ( Fig 1C ). Integration of transcriptomic and methylomic subtypes led to further distinction of resilient and vulnerable subgroups. Conclusions: WB RNA-seq and methylation data identified molecularly-defined subtypes that informed the underlying disease pathology of CCD patients in ISCHEMIA. These subgroups were differentially enriched for clinical characteristics and event outcomes, demonstrating the potential use for blood-based omics tests to aid in the prognosis of CCD.

Introduction: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays were first approved for use in the U.S. in 2017. They are the guideline preferred biomarker to evaluate patients with acute chest pain. Few data exist regarding implementation of hs-cTn assays in the U.S. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that use of hs-cTn assays has increased over time and that patients assessed with hs-cTn have a shorter length of stay (LOS) and similar use of cardiac testing. Methods: We examined trends in implementation of hs-cTn assays among participating hospitals in the NCDR Chest Pain MI Registry from 1/1/2019 through 9/30/2021. Excluding STEMI patients, associations between hs-cTn use, in-hospital diagnostic imaging, and patient outcomes were assessed using logistic or negative binomial regression models. Results: Among 550 participating hospitals with 251,000 patients in the registry, implementation of hs-cTn assays increased from 3.3% in Q1, 2019 to 32.6% in Q3, 2021 (P trend <0.0001; Figure ). Implementation was similar by hospital size, type, and geographic location. hs-cTn use was associated with more echocardiography among patients with NSTE-ACS (82% vs. 75%; aOR: 1.43, 95% CI, 1.19-1.73) but not in low-risk chest pain. hs-cTn use was associated with decreased odds of invasive coronary angiography in low-risk patients (3.7% vs. 4.5%; aOR: 0.73, 95% CI, 0.58-0.92) but similar use in NSTE-ACS. There was no association between hs-cTn use and non-invasive stress/CTCA testing. Among NSTE-ACS patients, hs-cTn use was not associated with PCI, CABG, or in-hospital mortality. Use of hs-cTn was associated with shorter LOS (47.6 hours vs. 48 hours; IRR: 0.96, 95% CI, 0.93-0.98). Conclusions: Although implementation of hs-cTn among U.S. hospitals is increasing, most U.S hospitals continue to use less-sensitive troponin assays. hs-cTn use was associated with shorter LOS overall, greater use of echocardiography in NSTE-ACS, and lower use of invasive angiograms in low-risk patients.