Jaffe, Allan S.

Most patients with chest pain do not have acute myocardial infarction (AMI), yet post-AMI rule-out disposition remains variable. Detectable but sub-99th percentile high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) provides additional prognostic information. We evaluated the economic value of hs-cTnI-guided hospitalizations among non-AMI patients. We analyzed 1481 non-AMI chest pain visits with detectable baseline hs-cTnI across 29 U.S. emergency departments (2014–2016) in the prospective HIGH-US trial using the Atellica IM TnIH assay(Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY, US). We compared observed standard-of-care admissions with modeled pathways incorporating hs-cTnI thresholds and risk scores, assessing admission rates, costs, and diagnostic accuracy for 30-day death/MI. Overall, 1.0% (n = 15/1481) experienced 30-day death/MI. Standard-of-care admitted 59% of patients with 93% sensitivity and 41% specificity. The modeled pathway using hs-cTnI ≥ 5 ng/L plus non-low risk scores was associated with reduced projected admission of 41%, higher specificity of 60%, and the same 93% sensitivity. Estimated per-patient diagnostic costs were lower under Scenario 1 (noninvasive diagnostic testing only; $1025 vs. $1139) and under Scenario 2 (including inpatient/invasive procedures; $2672 vs. $3536). In subgroups, higher hs-cTnI thresholds conferred further economic benefit without compromising sensitivity. Incorporating sub-99th percentile hs-cTnI thresholds alongside risk scores may support more efficient resource use while maintaining safety, although findings require prospective validation.

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Point-of-care (POC) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) testing has the potential to expedite decision-making and reduce emergency department (ED) length of stay for patients presenting with possible myocardial infarction (MI) by ensuring that results are consistently available when looked for by clinicians. We assessed the real-life effectiveness and safety of implementing POC hs-cTn testing in the ED. METHODS We conducted a pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial. The control arm was usual care with an accelerated diagnostic pathway utilizing a single-sample rule-out step with a central laboratory hs-cTn assay. The intervention arm used the same pathway with a POC hs-cTnI. The primary effectiveness outcome was ED length of stay assessed using a generalized linear mixed model, and the safety outcome was 30-day MI or cardiac death. RESULTS Six sites participated with 59,980 ED presentations (44,747 individuals, 61±19 years, 49.5% female) from February 2023 to January 2025, in which 31,392 presentations were during the intervention arm. After adjustment for co-variates associated with length of stay, the intervention reduced length of stay by 13% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 9 to 16%. P<0.001), corresponding to a reduction of 47 minutes (95%CI, 33 to 61 minutes) from a mean length of stay in the control arm of 376 minutes. The 30-day MI or cardiac death rate was similar in the control and intervention arms (0.39% and 0.39% respectively, P=0.54). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of whole-blood hs-cTnI testing at the POC into an accelerated diagnostic pathway was safe and reduced length of stay in the ED compared with laboratory testing. (Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619001189112) Clinical Perspective What is new? Point-of-care troponin assays with good precision have become available and received regulatory approval as high-sensitivity assays. A pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial implementing the validated Siemens VTLi high-sensitivity point-of-care assay into 6 emergency departments investigating ∼60,000 patients, was conducted to ascertain if the rapid turnaround time reduced lengths of stay. Introduction of the VTLi high-sensitivity point-of-care assay into clinical pathways reduced emergency department lengths of stay by an average 13% (47 minutes) without compromising safety. What are the clinical implications? Early decision-making using a point-of-care high-sensitivity troponin assay within a structured clinical pathway was safe. Faster turnaround means troponin results are consistently available when clinicians first seek them. This can facilitate earlier decisions and reduce patient length of stay.

Background Cardiovascular biomarkers such as NT‐proBNP (N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide) are used for heart failure risk stratification in patients with acquired heart disease, but there are limited data about its role in patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. The current study aims to assess the role of serial NT‐proBNP measurements for risk stratification in adults with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Methods We studied adults with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries with ≥2 NT‐proBNP measurements (2003–2024). Temporal change in NT‐proBNP was calculated as relative change from baseline levels. Results Of 152 patients (age 47±13 years, 45% men), baseline NT‐proBNP was 539 (interquartile range, 193–1549) pg/mL, and relative change from baseline levels of NT‐proBNP was 34% (interquartile range, −11 to 67). Of 152 patients, 45 (30%) had cardiovascular events (heart failure hospitalization [n=29], ventricular assist device [n=5], heart transplantation [n=11], and death [n=10]), yielding a 10‐year incidence of 26%. Higher baseline NT‐proBNP and relative change from baseline levels were associated with cardiovascular events. Serial NT‐proBNP measurements had incremental prognostic value compared with baseline measurement. The correlates of higher NT‐proBNP levels were atrial fibrillation, hypertension, right ventricular dilation and dysfunction, and atrioventricular valve regurgitation. Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system antagonist was associated with lower NT‐proBNP levels and lower risk of cardiovascular events. Conclusions NT‐proBNP testing is inexpensive, widely available, and noninvasive, making it well suited for longitudinal surveillance in adults with congenital heart disease. Most of the correlates for elevated NT‐proBNP levels were modifiable, providing target for therapeutic interventions.

Abstract Object Transdermal biosensors may provide an alternative to conventional blood-based biomarker measurement. Our purpose was to determine the binary correlation between transdermal (Infrasensor™; RCE, Inc, Carlsbad, CA) and conventional blood-based measurements. Methods This was a secondary analysis from a previously published observational cardiac troponin I (cTnI) study performed to establish the upper reference level of cTnI, at 10 US hospitals. After obtaining informed consent, 2 cohorts of patients were enrolled: 1) those who completed a health assessment questionnaire and appeared healthy, and 2) those with a known elevated cTnI per the local hospital standard assay. All blood lab analyses were performed at the University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD. Normal was defined as cTnI <53.48 ng/L (male) or 34.11 ng/L (female) using the Siemens Atellica IM assay (Siemens Medical Solutions, Mountain View, CA), NT-proBNP <450 pg/mL (>75 years) or <124 pg/mL (<75 years), creatinine >1.17 mg/dL (male) or >0.95 mg/dL (female), and HbA1c <6.4%. The Infrasensor was placed on the patient’s wrist for measurement and blood drawn for analysis at approximately the same time. Results Of 840 enrolled patients, the median (IQR) age was 46 (30,57), 416 (49.5%) were female, 10.36% Hispanic, 6.7% Asian, 12.9% African American, and 69.1% White. Elevated lab tests were 102 hscTnI’s, 156 NTproBNP’s, 37 HbA1C’s, and 163 creatinine’s. Significant binary correlations were found between all transdermal signals and the corresponding lab blood levels Conclusion Infrasensor transcutaneous measurement demonstrates similar results as that obtained from blood testing in the central laboratory. Capsule The Infrasensor (RCE, Inc, Carlsbad, CA, USA) is rapid point of care transcutaneous biomarker measurement device. This study evaluated its ability to provide qualitative results for troponin I, NTproBNP, creatinine, and HbA1c levels in 840 patients. Significant correlations were found between all transdermal signals and the corresponding binary lab blood levels.

Abstract Background Dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (DPP3) is a peptidase released from dying cells. It cleaves proteins in the renin–angiotensin pathway, which can result in hemodynamic instability. At elevated concentrations DPP3 is associated with worse outcomes, particularly in patients with shock. Herein we describe the assay performance of a DPP3 assay (4TEEN4 Pharmaceuticals GmbH) in human plasma. Methods DPP3 concentration was measured using the DPP3 immunoluminometric assay (4TEEN4 Pharmaceuticals GmbH) and the signal was read using a luminometer (Berthold Centro LB963). Analytical performance was established for precision, linearity, accuracy, detection limit, analytical specificity, reference interval, kit lot-to-lot comparison, specimen type, and sample stability. Results Limit of detection was verified at 1.6 ng/mL in EDTA plasma with a coefficient of variation (CV) of &lt;10%. Precision studies revealed a CV ≤ 6% at 28.5 ng/mL and 59.4 ng/mL and comparability with a manufacturer performed assay was demonstrated between 7.7 and 195.2 ng/mL. An upper 97.5% limit of 22 ng/mL without age or sex associations was verified in healthy donors. The assay was not susceptible to interference from lipemia or bilirubin. However, measured DPP3 concentrations increased linearly with increasing hemolysis. DPP3 concentrations are stable in EDTA plasma for up to 24 h and at least 11 months when stored ambient or at −80°C, respectively. Conclusions DPP3 can be measured precisely in EDTA plasma using the immunoluminometric DPP3 assay. Given the potential clinical use of DPP3 in critical care patients, caution should be taken to avoid inducing pre-analytical hemolysis during sample collection.

Abstract Background Insulin resistance leads to changes in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism prior to developing prediabetes, including an increase in the concentration of large very-low-density lipoprotein particles (LVLDL-p), the mean size of VLDL (VLDL-s), and the concentration of small low-density lipoprotein particles (sLDL-p). Conversely, there is a decrease in the concentration of large high-density lipoprotein particles (LHDL-p), mean size of HDL (HDL-s), and mean size of LDL (LDL-s). Clinically validated studies show that proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) can measure these six parameters and derive a lipoprotein insulin resistance (LP-IR) score, ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater risk for insulin resistance. The reference method for calculating LP-IR relies on a proprietary NMR spectrometer, spectral deconvolution method, and algorithm. This study seeks to determine if lipoprotein subfraction parameters measured from a commercially available NMR system can produce LP-IR scores comparable to the reference method. Methods Serum lipoprotein NMR spectra were collected using a Bruker Ascend 600 MHz magnet, Bruker Avance NEO 500 spectrometer, and the Numares AXINON lipoFIT System to report the six LP-IR score parameters between January 2023 and January 2025 (Cohort A, n = 2,474). During the same period, LP-IR score and parameters were collected using the Vantera Clinical Analyzer (400 MHz) with the LipoProfile LP4 method (Cohort B, n = 2,959). Linear regression of decile-matched data for each parameter yielded adjustment equations to align lipoFIT values with the LipoProfile method. LP-IR scores were then calculated for both adjusted and unadjusted values using a previously published LP-IR scoring algorithm. Finally, LP-IR scores were compared for sera with measures from both instruments was (Cohort C, n = 108). Results The median concentrations of sLDL-p, LDL-s, VLDL-s, HDL-S matched between Cohort A and B (&lt;1% difference). Significant differences were noted for LVLDL-p and LHDL-p, with percent differences of 21.5% and 23.5%, respectively. Despite closely matching medians, the distributions varied greatly, with a mean interquartile range (IQR) percent difference across measures of 31.2% (Table 1). After distribution matching, all parameter median and mean IQR percent differences fell to &lt;5% and &lt;10%, respectively, between Cohort A and Cohort B. In Cohort C the LP-IR score matched well (y=1.1x-15, r=0.92; 95%CI 0.88, 0.94). Following distribution matching adjustment of lipoFIT values for Cohort C, new calculated LP-IR scores matched with reduced bias (y=0.94x-1.2) while correlation was slightly reduced (r=0.88 [0.83, 0.92]). By comparison, adjustments made via scaling lipoFIT values proportionally by the ratio of the medians between Cohort A and Cohort B yielded calculated LP-IR scores in Cohort C that maintained a similar bias prior to adjustments (y=1.2x-21), highlighting the ability of distribution matching to reduce bias. Conclusion Adjustments to measured lipoprotein parameters from a commercially available NMR spectrometer can be achieved via distribution matching. These adjustments greatly reduce the bias between a commercially available method and algorithm compared to the reference method, allowing for wider adoption of LP-IR score reporting.

Abstract Background This study simulates how assay-specific bias influences the diagnostic performance of 0/1-h accelerated diagnostic protocols (ADPs) for 3 different high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays. Methods We included 1493 patients presenting with chest pain. hs-cTnT (Roche Diagnostics), hs-cTnI from Abbott Diagnostics (hs-cTnI-A), and Siemens Healthineers (hs-cTnI-S) were measured at admission. The absolute total error observed in a state-of-the-art EQA study were added to the admission concentrations, producing 6 new variables being adjusted for maximum possible bias (if analytical variation is 0) (+biasmean, +biasmax95%CI, +biasmin95%CI, −biasmean, −biasmax95%CI, −biasmin95%CI). The influence of this “worst-case scenario” bias was compared after calculating sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and rule-out proportion for 30-day myocardial infarction or death for the observed and bias-adjusted hs-cTn concentrations. Results For 0-h rule-out, hs-cTnI-S and hs-cTnT had a sensitivity of &gt;99.0%, compared to 97.7% for hs-cTnI-A. After adding the bias, sensitivity was unchanged for hs-cTnI-S (99.5%), but lower for hs-cTnT (95.5%), and hs-cTnI-A (96.2%). For the 0-/1-h algorithm, adding bias reduced sensitivity to 95.5% for hs-cTnT, while both hs-cTnI algorithms were unchanged (100.0%). Rule-out proportions for 0 h ranged from 0% to 60.0% for hs-cTnT, 28.2%–62.7% for hs-cTnI-A, and 3.5%–35.5% for hs-cTnI-S. For the 0-/1-h algorithm, ranges were 57.7%–75.8% (hs-cTnT), 52.8%–67.5% (hs-cTnI-A), and 45.7%–61.2% (hs-cTnI-S), Conclusion Analytical bias of hs-cTn assays affects the clinical rule-out rate of the 0/1-h ADPs more than the diagnostic sensitivity. Bias may have a greater influence on the proportion of patients requiring hospital admission and may contribute to the heterogeneity of the reported rule-out rates of current ADPs. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Number: NCT02620202

Abstract Background Several guidelines groups have made recommendations about how to use natriuretic peptides (NPs) to screen patients with diabetes for incipient heart failure. This group is at risk for undetected and stage B heart failure, where structural heart disease is present despite the absence of clinical signs and symptoms. These recommendations are based on trial data that suggest there are therapeutic options to benefit these patients. Content These guidelines do not adequately account for the marked analytic differences between NP assays nor their high degree of biological and analytical variability. Thus, without additional data and guidance, these recommendations could lead to excessive testing for some groups but might disadvantage others. In addition, these issues could lead to difficulties in the interpretation of values. Accordingly, the Committee on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Bio Markers of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry has developed a consensus educational document to describe these difficulties and define areas where additional data are needed. Clinicians should be cognizant of differences in the assays for NPs, the high degree of variability of values, differences in sex and ethnicity and the need to factor in a variety of clinical and treatment variables in interpreting NP values. Summary These suggestions for diabetes eventually will include others at high risk. They will require close attention to the issues involved in measuring and interpreting NP values.

Abstract Background Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is directly associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) risk. Subfractionation of LDL enables differentiation between large-buoyant LDL (&gt;20.5 nm) and small-dense LDL (≤20.5 nm). Small-dense LDL reportedly increases CAD risk, as do LDL-C and LDL particle (LDL-P) concentrations. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) reports LDL-C, LDL-P, and LDL size (LDL-s). We investigated associations between these outputs and their agreement on CAD risk information. Methods Associations between LDL-P, LDL-C, and LDL-s measured by NMR were evaluated in serum from clinically ordered samples (n = 26 710), and a subset of patients with CAD evaluation from coronary angiography (n = 356). Correlations were determined using Spearman ρ, and clinical classifications were compared using the following thresholds for increased risk: LDL-C &gt; 160 mg/dL, LDL-P &gt; 1600 nmol/L, and LDL-S &lt; 20.5 nm. Results The large laboratory NMR data set showed LDL-C was highly correlated with LDL-P (ρ = 0.87), and moderately with LDL-s (ρ = 0.51). Correlation between LDL-P and LDL-s was weakest (ρ = 0.21). When comparing pairwise high- and low-risk laboratory values, concordant values were observed in 99.8%, 43%, and 25% of cases for LDL-P/LDL-C, LDL-s/LDL-P, and LDL-C/LDL-s, respectively. In patients with angiography and NMR results, CAD was diagnosed in 40% (6/15) of patients with concordant high-risk LDL-C and small-dense LDL-s in the smaller patient cohort, but only 19% (6/31) of CAD-positive patients with high-risk LDL-C had small-dense LDL-s. Conclusions LDL-s and LDL-C are frequently discordant at established LDL-C risk cutoffs. CAD diagnosis was found in similar numbers regardless of LDL-s phenotype.