Smilowitz, Nathaniel R.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials comparing radial and femoral access report access site crossover rates of 3% to 9% for radial access and 1% to 3% for femoral access. However, contemporary real-world crossover rates are not well characterized. The aim was to evaluate contemporary trends and predictors of vascular access site crossover during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We analyzed index PCI procedures recorded in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry from 2018 to 2024. Access site crossover was identified using documented access data, with radial-to-femoral crossover inferred when the final successful access site was femoral. Temporal trends and clinical predictors of crossover were examined. Operator experience was assessed using cumulative total and radial PCI volumes from 2011 to 2024 as captured in CathPCI Registry versions 4 and 5. RESULTS: Among 3 861 790 index PCIs, 192 902 (5.0%) involved access site crossover, with a modest increase over time. Radial-to-femoral crossover accounted for 81.2% of crossover events. Factors independently associated with crossover included older age, female sex, higher body mass index, and peripheral vascular disease. Operators with the lowest total PCI volume and the lowest radial PCI volume experienced the highest crossover rates. Notably, operators with low radial PCI volume demonstrated a substantial decline in radial-to-femoral crossover over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary clinical practice, access site crossover rates are consistent with those reported in randomized trials. Although crossover occurs more frequently among lower-volume operators, rates decline with increasing operator experience, supporting the presence of a radial access learning curve and improvement in procedural performance over time.

Abstract Aims Type 2 myocardial infarction due to myocardial oxygen supply–demand imbalance is associated with poor outcomes. There are no guidelines to inform care for these patients. The consensus on the assessment and management of type 2 myocardial infarction is gained. Methods and results An international e-Delphi study including experts in type 2 myocardial infarction identified through systematic review was conducted. Participants were asked to describe their approach to (i) definition and diagnosis, (ii) risk stratification, (iii) assessment of coronary artery disease and cardiac function, (iv) specialty management, (v) treatment and secondary prevention, and (vi) communication and rehabilitation. Statements generated in round one were circulated, with consensus defined a priori as ≥70% agreement on a 5-point Likert scale. Where no consensus was reached, statements were amended and recirculated for a final round. The response rate was 56% (38/68), 54% (37/68), and 72% (49/68) in the first, second, and third rounds, respectively. Following the first round, 67 unique statements were generated across six domains. Overall, consensus was achieved on 64% (43/67) of statements. Consensus was achieved for 42% (5/12) of statements on the diagnosis of type 2 myocardial infarction, 75% (3/4) on risk stratification, 50% (9/18) on the assessment of coronary artery disease and cardiac function, 60% (6/10), on specialty management, 100% (9/9) on treatment and secondary prevention, and 79% (11/15) on communication and rehabilitation. Conclusion Consensus was obtained across a number of domains for the assessment and management of patients with type 2 myocardial infarction. However, there was limited agreement amongst experts on the diagnostic criteria, which may benefit from refinement.

Abstract Background Patients with ischemia and nonobstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) suffer from a broad range of anginal symptoms that may differ depending on the biologic sex of the patient, the underlying coronary vasomotor disorder, or the type of presentation. Purpose We sought to characterize the symptom description and angina classification of patients referred for invasive coronary function testing (CFT) in the DISCOVER INOCA multicenter registry, stratified by type of presentation (stable vs unstable), biologic sex, and underlying diagnosis, including coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), vasospastic angina (VSA), or other disorders such as symptomatic myocardial bridging. Methods DISCOVER INOCA is a prospective, multicenter registry in the United States that includes patients who are referred for clinically indicated coronary angiography and found to have INOCA. All patients underwent protocol-guided angiography, acetylcholine provocation, coronary thermodilution, and intravascular imaging. Symptom characteristics were compared between groups. Results From September 2022 until February 2024, 104 patients were enrolled, 78% were female, and mean age was 57 ± 11 years. The post-procedure diagnosis was CMD in 19%, VSA in 41%, a mixed syndrome in 15%, or other diagnosis in 26%. The average coronary flow reserve (CFR) was 2.9 ± 1.1 in the CMD group and 5.3 ± 3.0 in the VSA group, (p < 0.001). 53% of patients presented with stable angina and 47% with unstable or progressive symptoms. Symptoms included chest pain (89%), chest tightness (42%), chest pressure (39%), shortness of breath (53%), and fatigue (16%), and no significant differences were reported when stratified by diagnostic phenotype. Female patients were more likely to report arm/neck/back/jaw pain (25% vs 5% in men, p = 0.038). Symptom triggers included exertion/activity in 73%, emotional stress in 12%, and resting symptoms in 58%. In female patients 4% reported catamenial symptoms. Of patients with stable angina, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Angina Classification was Grade I in 25%, Grade II in 52%, Grade III in 21%, and Grade IV in 2%. In patients with unstable angina, the Braunwald Angina Classification was Class I in 9%, Class II in 73%, and Class III in 18%. Conclusions Patients with INOCA referred for clinically indicated coronary angiography and CFT were predominantly female and most commonly reported chest pain as a presenting symptom. Female patients were more likely to report arm/neck/back/jaw pain than male patients. Over half of patients reported resting symptoms with no differences between the diagnostic phenotypes (CMD, VSA, or other). The CCS and Braunwald angina classification indicated that most patients had moderate intensity symptoms. Patient-reported outcome measures will be used to systematically categorize the symptom burden in these patients.

Introduction: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays were first approved for use in the U.S. in 2017. They are the guideline preferred biomarker to evaluate patients with acute chest pain. Few data exist regarding implementation of hs-cTn assays in the U.S. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that use of hs-cTn assays has increased over time and that patients assessed with hs-cTn have a shorter length of stay (LOS) and similar use of cardiac testing. Methods: We examined trends in implementation of hs-cTn assays among participating hospitals in the NCDR Chest Pain MI Registry from 1/1/2019 through 9/30/2021. Excluding STEMI patients, associations between hs-cTn use, in-hospital diagnostic imaging, and patient outcomes were assessed using logistic or negative binomial regression models. Results: Among 550 participating hospitals with 251,000 patients in the registry, implementation of hs-cTn assays increased from 3.3% in Q1, 2019 to 32.6% in Q3, 2021 (P trend <0.0001; Figure ). Implementation was similar by hospital size, type, and geographic location. hs-cTn use was associated with more echocardiography among patients with NSTE-ACS (82% vs. 75%; aOR: 1.43, 95% CI, 1.19-1.73) but not in low-risk chest pain. hs-cTn use was associated with decreased odds of invasive coronary angiography in low-risk patients (3.7% vs. 4.5%; aOR: 0.73, 95% CI, 0.58-0.92) but similar use in NSTE-ACS. There was no association between hs-cTn use and non-invasive stress/CTCA testing. Among NSTE-ACS patients, hs-cTn use was not associated with PCI, CABG, or in-hospital mortality. Use of hs-cTn was associated with shorter LOS (47.6 hours vs. 48 hours; IRR: 0.96, 95% CI, 0.93-0.98). Conclusions: Although implementation of hs-cTn among U.S. hospitals is increasing, most U.S hospitals continue to use less-sensitive troponin assays. hs-cTn use was associated with shorter LOS overall, greater use of echocardiography in NSTE-ACS, and lower use of invasive angiograms in low-risk patients.

Pregnancy-associated myocardial infarction is a primary contributor to maternal cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Specific attention to the cause of myocardial infarction, diagnostic evaluation, treatment strategies, and postevent care is necessary when treating women with pregnancy-associated myocardial infarction. This review summarizes the current knowledge, consensus statements, and essential nuances.