Citations

Importance In patients with severe aortic valve stenosis at intermediate surgical risk, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a self-expanding supra-annular valve was noninferior to surgery for all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at 2 years. Comparisons of longer-term clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in these patients are limited. Objective To report prespecified secondary 5-year outcomes from the Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis in Intermediate Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement (SURTAVI) randomized clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants SURTAVI is a prospective randomized, unblinded clinical trial. Randomization was stratified by investigational site and need for revascularization determined by the local heart teams. Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis deemed to be at intermediate risk of 30-day surgical mortality were enrolled at 87 centers from June 19, 2012, to June 30, 2016, in Europe and North America. Analysis took place between August and October 2021. Intervention Patients were randomized to TAVR with a self-expanding, supra-annular transcatheter or a surgical bioprosthesis. Main Outcomes and Measures The prespecified secondary end points of death or disabling stroke and other adverse events and hemodynamic findings at 5 years. An independent clinical event committee adjudicated all serious adverse events and an independent echocardiographic core laboratory evaluated all echocardiograms at 5 years. Results A total of 1660 individuals underwent an attempted TAVR (n = 864) or surgical (n = 796) procedure. The mean (SD) age was 79.8 (6.2) years, 724 (43.6%) were female, and the mean (SD) Society of Thoracic Surgery Predicted Risk of Mortality score was 4.5% (1.6%). At 5 years, the rates of death or disabling stroke were similar (TAVR, 31.3% vs surgery, 30.8%; hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.85-1.22]; P = .85). Transprosthetic gradients remained lower (mean [SD], 8.6 [5.5] mm Hg vs 11.2 [6.0] mm Hg; P < .001) and aortic valve areas were higher (mean [SD], 2.2 [0.7] cm 2 vs 1.8 [0.6] cm 2 ; P < .001) with TAVR vs surgery. More patients had moderate/severe paravalvular leak with TAVR than surgery (11 [3.0%] vs 2 [0.7%]; risk difference, 2.37% [95% CI, 0.17%- 4.85%]; P = .05). New pacemaker implantation rates were higher for TAVR than surgery at 5 years (289 [39.1%] vs 94 [15.1%]; hazard ratio, 3.30 [95% CI, 2.61-4.17]; log-rank P < .001), as were valve reintervention rates (27 [3.5%] vs 11 [1.9%]; hazard ratio, 2.21 [95% CI, 1.10-4.45]; log-rank P = .02), although between 2 and 5 years only 6 patients who underwent TAVR and 7 who underwent surgery required a reintervention. Conclusions and Relevance Among intermediate-risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, major clinical outcomes at 5 years were similar for TAVR and surgery. TAVR was associated with superior hemodynamic valve performance but also with more paravalvular leak and valve reinterventions.

To the Editor.— The cases reported by Olson et al1 of pulmonary hemorrhage in children with systemic vasculitis clearly highlight the fact that children are not "immune" to these conditions. We must take issue, however, with the diagnosis of Henoch-Schönlein purpura in the patients described. Because Henoch-Schönlein purpura is a subset of systemic vasculitis, the clinical manifestations may mimic or be mimicked by other vasculitis syndromes such as polyarteritis nodosa, Wegener's granulomatosis, and systemic lupus erythematosus.2

Abstract Background: Immune Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a relapsing disorder, resulting from depletion of ADAMTS13. With the goal of preventing clinical relapse there has been considerable interest in ADAMTS13 monitoring and preemptive treatment. Indeed, preemptive treatment with rituximab has shown significant promise and is now included in the 2020 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) treatment guidelines. Evaluation of long-term outcomes of ADAMTS13 based preemptive treatment have generally relied on limited numbers of historical controls which did not incorporate matching for known risk factors for relapse such as race, number of prior episodes, and immunosuppression. Our study aims to leverage the data in the United States Thrombotic Microangiopathy (USTMA) iTTP registry to compare the clinical relapse-free survival (RFS) intervals between iTTP patients treated preemptively based on ADAMTS13 level and those treated only for clinical relapse base on clinical and laboratory manifestations of iTTP. Methods: We carried out a retrospective study utilizing the multi-center cohort of patients with iTTP from the USTMA Consortium (spanning 1985-2019 and containing 780 participant records). We selected for patients with relapsing disease treated either preemptively based on ADAMTS13 level or for clinical relapse. Each preemptively treated episode was matched to up to five clinically relapsed episodes using covariate balancing propensity score nearest-neighbor matching by age, gender, race, prior relapse status, acute treatment, treatment center, and calendar year, with exact matching required for treatment center and prior relapse status. Time from prior episode to relapse was compared between preemptively treated episodes and matched controls using a Cox proportional hazards model weighted by the matching weights, including subclasses as a cluster, and using cluster-robust standard errors. Results: We identified 1068 episodes of iTTP. Of these. Thirteen participants accounting for a total of seventeen preemptive treatment episodes were included in the data set however, we included only the thirteen first uses of preemptive treatment to avoid selection bias. These were matched with 59 episodes treated for clinical relapse. Over 70% of the included participants in both groups were identified as black/African American. Distribution of immunosuppressive medications used in clinically relapsed cases were not significantly different than those used in preemptive treatment, and corticosteroids were the most frequently used. Demographic and treatment data before and after matching are included in Table 1. There was no significant difference in RFS between the groups, hazard ratio 0.63 (95% confidence interval 0.26-1.54), p=0.31. Conclusion: To our knowledge this is the first study to use matching controls to obtain a causal estimate of the effect of ADAMTS13 monitoring based preemptive treatment on RFS in iTTP. In contrast to previous work, we did not observe a significant increase in RFS in the preemptively treated group. It is possible that the limited number of preemptively treated episodes herein did not provide sufficient power to detect a difference. However, given the significant effect size that has been proposed, based on prior work, we suspect other factors may have also influenced this finding. Previous analysis of the USTMA iTTP registry has shown a higher incidence of relapse in African American participants. While the precise reason for this finding is not yet clear, it is worth considering that there may also be differential response to preemptive treatment. Our study highlights the importance of continued efforts to determine the generalizability and efficacy of ADAMTS13 monitoring based preemptive treatment in iTTP. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Gangaraju: Alexion: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy. Masias: Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Parnes: Sigilon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire/Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; I-mAb: Consultancy; Sunovion: Consultancy; Genentech/Hoffman LaRoche: Research Funding; UniQure: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aspa: Consultancy. Mazepa: Answering TTP Foundation: Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Other. OffLabel Disclosure: Rituximab, an anti CD20 monoclonal antibody will be discussed in relation to treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Abstract Introduction: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a thrombotic microangiopathy due to reduced activity of ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 13). This disorder can be due to a congenital deficiency state or be acquired (immune TTP (iTTP)) due to an antibody which either inhibits or causes clearance of ADAMTS13. The aim of our study was to determine whether ADAMTS13 inhibitor titer at initial presentation could serve as a predictor of refractory disease and relapse in iTTP. We also measured clinical outcomes across different gender and racial subgroups. Methods: The United States Thrombotic Microangiopathy (USTMA) iTTP registry was used to extract patient information for two academic institutions in Eastern North Carolina. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. The first iTTP episode recorded in the data base was used as the index episode. All patients included in the final analysis had an ADAMTS13 activity of <10%. An inhibitor level of 5 Bethesda units was arbitrarily chosen as the cutoff between low (<5) and high (>/5) inhibitor level. Response time was defined as the number of days of plasma exchange (PEX) required to achieve a platelet count of 150,000 for two consecutive days. Relapse was defined as occurrence of a new episode of iTTP 30 days after achievement of response. Refractory disease was defined as persistence of thrombocytopenia or absence of a sustained platelet count increment or platelet counts of < 50,000 despite 4-7 days of plasma exchanges and steroid treatment. Rituximab resistance was defined as lack of platelet recovery to more than 150,000 within 11 to 14 days of administration of the first dose of Rituximab. Results: A total of 161 patients with iTTP were identified. Ten patients had ADAMTS13 activity >10% and 15 patients did not have a reported inhibitor level. These subjects were not included in the final analysis. The cohort had 28% male (n =38/136) and 72% (n=98/136) female patients. There were more African American patients 73% (n=99/136) than Caucasians 24% (n=32/136). There were also 2 Hispanic, 1 Native American and 2 patients with unidentified race. Median ADAMTS3 inhibitor titer was 1.05 (Range 0-87). Forty three patients with ADAMTS13 activity <10 % had an inhibitor level of 0 (i.e undetectable).They were included in the low inhibitor group. Overall, 88% patients (n=120/136) had low inhibitor level and only 12% (n=16/136) had a high inhibitor. Thirteen percent females (n=13/98) and 8% (n=3/38) males had a high inhibitor level (p=0.387). Fourteen percent (n=14/99) African Americans and 6 % (n=2/32) Caucasians had a high inhibitor, p=0.23. In the low inhibitor group 30% (n=36/120) patients suffered at least one episode of relapse whereas 31% (n=5/16) had relapsed in the high inhibitor group. The median time to response was 6 days (range 1-76) in the low inhibitor group and 7 days (range 4-20) in the high inhibitor group (p=0.61). While looking at the various subgroups, median time to response for males was 6 days (range 4-21), females 6 days (range 1-76) , African Americans 6 days (range 3-29) , and Caucasians 6 days (range 1-76). The frequency of refractory disease was 31 % (n=5/16) in the high inhibitor group and 29% (n=34/119) in the low inhibitor group. At the time of enrollment in the registry, Rituximab was not a part of first line therapy. Only 26 out of 136 patients had received Rituximab. In the low inhibitor group 5 patients displayed Rituximab resistance whereas there were no patients in the high inhibitor group with Rituximab resistance. Conclusion: When evaluating patients presenting with iTTP in two centers in North Carolina, no correlation was found between a high inhibitor levels of >/ 5 Bethesda units and risk of relapse or refractory disease. A larger study is needed to evaluate this further. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Introduction: Acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP) due to an acquired deficiency in the enzyme ADAMTS13 leads to ultra-large von Willebrand multimers, thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. Complications include microvascular and macrovascular thrombosis. We present an unusual case of a patient with a history of refractory aTTP who experienced relapsed aTTP following COVID-19 vaccine. Case Description: A 57-year-old African-American male with a history of refractory aTTP experienced a relapse following 3 years of remission after receiving COVID-19 vaccination. The patient was initially diagnosed with aTTP in 2016, after presenting with symptoms of dark urine, mild headaches and transient episodes of aphasia and paresthesia. Due to symptoms and persistently low ADAMTS13 levels, he required prolonged and extensive treatment including over 5 weeks of daily therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), followed by gradual reduction in frequency of TPE sessions, as well as trials of rituximab, eculizumab, steroids, mycophenolate mofetil and bortezomib. Ultimately, he achieved remission after 9 months of intermittent TPE, 3 months of weekly bortezomib 1 mg/m 2, mycophenolate mofetil up-titrated to 1,750 mg twice daily, and then slowly tapered off over a 2-year period. The patient was doing well for 3 years without manifestations of aTTP (2 years off all therapeutics), until he developed a petechial rash 7 weeks after receiving the second dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. He was found to have acute thrombocytopenia with platelets of 38 x 10 9/L (normal range 135-317 x 109/L), from a baseline of 200-300 x 10 9/L. He was referred to the emergency department, where additional labs were notable for mildly elevated LDH of 508 U/L (normal range 122-222 U/L), hemoglobin of 12.4 g/dL (normal range 13.2-16.6 g/dL), creatinine at baseline, and peripheral blood smear showing 1-3 schistocytes per high-powered field. ADAMTS13 activity level was t <5% (normal >/= 70%), with positive ADAMTS13 inhibitor screen and titer of 1.5 (normal <0.4), consistent with relapsed aTTP. The patient was admitted to the hospital, and initiated on daily TPE, with steroids and diphenhydramine prior to each TPE session. He quickly improved with TPE alone , but given his history of refractory aTTP, he was discharged on weekly rituximab for 4 weeks and caplacizumab 11 mg daily for 30 days. His platelets remained stable within the upper limit of normal during his 30 day course of caplacizumab. However, 3 weeks after completion of caplacizumab, he had an acute drop in his platelets to 23 x 10 9/L. His ADAMTS13 level was again found to be <5%, and inhibitor level was the highest that it had ever been at 11.4. He was again hospitalized and underwent 8 sessions of daily TPE, as well as re-initiation of caplacizumab, mycophenolate mofetil 500 mg bid (with increasing taper), and a prednisone taper. Intravenous Cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m 2 was also added every 3 weeks. With this regimen, patient's platelet count normalized and remain stable, and his ADAMTS13 activity level has reached 52-59%. Discussion: Cases of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) have been described as a complication following vaccination with formulations containing replication-defective adenoviral vectors (AstraZeneca-Oxford and Johnson&Johnson COVID-19 vaccines)(Arepally and Ortel 2021, Simpson, Shi et al. 2021). VITT and aTTP are both immune-mediated, however, VITT is distinct and pathogenically linked to autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), given the presence of anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies in these patients, whereas aTTP is due to reduction in ADAMTS13 level, secondary to an antibody inhibitor of ADAMTS13 (Arepally and Ortel 2021). Recently, cases have been reported of de novo aTTP developing shortly after COVID-19 vaccination with all available vaccines, except the Moderna (mRNA-1273) vaccine (Al-Ahmad, Al-Rasheed et al. 2021, de Bruijn, Maes et al. 2021, Maayan, Kirgner et al. 2021, Ruhe, Schnetzke et al. 2021, Waqar, Khan et al. 2021, Yocum and Simon 2021). Additionally, cases of relapsed aTTP have been described following only the BNT162B2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine (Maayan, Kirgner et al. 2021, Sissa, Al-Khaffaf et al. 2021). This is the first case, to our knowledge, reported in the literature of aTTP following vaccination with Moderna's mRNA-1273 vaccine. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Leukocytoclastic vasculitis is a rare form of immune-mediated vasculitis that might be caused by infections or autoimmune diseases or might be precipitated by specific medications. We describe a 65-year-old patient, who was receiving vancomycin for a methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus permacath infection. Vancomycin was chosen due to medication non-adherence and the patient’s desire to receive antimicrobial therapy in conjunction with his scheduled dialysis sessions. The patient’s medical history was notable for untreated hepatitis C infection and end-stage renal disease, requiring hemodialysis three times a week. Vancomycin was administered during dialysis sessions. After one week of therapy, the patient developed bilateral lower extremity purpura. Skin biopsy was suggestive of leukocytoclastic vasculitis with an absence of intravascular thrombi. Serum cryoglobulins were negative, making cryoglobulinemia due to HCV infection unlikely. Following cessation of vancomycin therapy, the rash gradually disappeared with scarring in the form of post-purpuric hyperpigmentation. Despite its widespread use, vancomycin is a rare cause of leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Clinicians should keep in mind a wide range of differential diagnosis of bilateral lower extremity purpura as treatment differs depending on its underlying etiology.

AbstractEpilepsy is a heterogeneous condition with disparate etiologies and phenotypic and genotypic characteristics. Clinical and research aspects are accordingly varied, ranging from epidemiological to molecular, spanning clinical trials and outcomes, gene and drug discovery, imaging, electroencephalography, pathology, epilepsy surgery, digital technologies, and numerous others. Epilepsy data are collected in the terabytes and petabytes, pushing the limits of current capabilities. Modern computing firepower and advances in machine and deep learning, pioneered in other diseases, open up exciting possibilities for epilepsy too. However, without carefully designed approaches to acquiring, standardizing, curating, and making available such data, there is a risk of failure. Thus, careful construction of relevant ontologies, with intimate stakeholder inputs, provides the requisite scaffolding for more ambitious big data undertakings, such as an epilepsy data commons. In this review, we assess the clinical and research epilepsy landscapes in the big data arena, current challenges, and future directions, and make the case for a systematic approach to epilepsy big data.

Hereditary thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura is an ultra-rare disorder caused by biallelic mutations in the ADAMTS13 gene. Because it can be difficult to diagnose, plasma ADAMTS13 activity assessment should be considered in patients with thrombocytopenia, anemia, and schistocytes on peripheral blood smear. We present the diagnostic evaluation of a patient with hereditary thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Genetic testing revealed one known pathogenic mutation and one novel mutation of ADAMTS13 classified as likely pathogenic on the basis of parental genetic testing and in silico analyses. We further discuss off-label use of prophylactic plasma-derived Factor VIII (Koate-DVI) and the benefit of rare disease registries.