Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

438 citation(s) found for "Yu, Evan Y".

Zygomatic Osteotomy and Repositioning: Current Thinking and Use of Technological Aids
Daum, Rachel , Seymour, Amanda C., Le, Hung , Bradshaw, Evan, Holan, Cole , Harshbarger, Raymond , Seymour, Amanda C.

FACE | August 11, 2025 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 502-511

10.1177/27325016251352171 Get It

Purpose: To present our approach to zygomatic osteotomy and repositioning using technological aids: virtual surgical planning, custom guides, and implants. Background: The zygomatic complex is highly 3-dimensional, establishing cheek prominence, facial width, and orbital morphology. Functionally, the zygoma supports soft tissues and is vital to mastication. The zygoma may require reconstruction after a variety of congenital or acquired conditions; however, Zygomatic Osteotomy and Repositioning (ZyOaR) is a complex operation with many technical considerations. The advent of virtual surgical planning (VSP) has enhanced efficiency, accuracy, and reproducibility, while permitting utilization of custom-designed guides and implants. There remains a paucity of literature on ZyOaR and its unique challenges. Methods: This case series includes all patients older than 18 years old undergoing ZyOaR with VSP between 2010 and 2024. Demographics and clinical etiology were noted. Outcomes included fidelity to preoperative plan, facial symmetry, mastication defects, and globe malposition. Results: Eight patients age 18 to 60 years old (mean = 38) met inclusion criteria. Three patients had congenital deformities, and 5 were post-traumatic. Follow-up time ranged from 1 to 50 months (mean = 17 months). There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. No patient had visual changes at latest follow-up. Preoperative VSP plans were compared to postoperative CT scans, showing a high degree of fidelity. All patients underwent secondary reconstructive and/or soft tissue procedures to achieve final results. Conclusions: Zygomatic Osteotomy and Repositioning (ZyOaR) is inherently difficult, and there is a current gap in the literature on its unique technical challenges. We present 8 cases of ZyOaR using VSP for patients with a range of disease etiologies. The procedures were well tolerated and maintained high surgical fidelity. In our experience, keys to optimize ZyOaR include comprehensive analysis of regional bony and soft tissue anatomy, virtual planning with production and use of surgical transfer guides, and custom 3D printed patient-specific implants.
Prostaglandin E2 as a Mechanistic Biomarker of Chronic Pancreatitis
Saloman, Jami L. , Jefferson, Bahiyyah, Fisher, William E., Fogel, Evan L. , Hart, Phil A. , Park, Walter G. , Vege, Santhi Swaroop , Yadav, Dhiraj , Topazian, Mark , Conwell, Darwin L. , Saloman, Jami L , Han, Samuel , Li, Liang

Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology | August 4, 2025 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 10 | Pages: e00897

10.14309/ctg.0000000000000897 | PMID 40758192 Get It

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a disease associated with chronic inflammation, fibrosis, and pain. There is a lack of tools available that facilitate early diagnosis, when intervention could prevent irreversible damage. Pilot data suggested prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) as a candidate biomarker for early CP. PGE2 activates signaling pathways that promote inflammation, pain, and fibrosis. METHODS: We assessed PGE2, metabolites, and downstream targets in pancreatic fluid collected endoscopically 0–10 (n = 110) and 10–20 (n = 111) minutes after intravenous secretin administration. PGE2 and metabolites were measured in plasma (n = 75) and urine (n = 71) from the same subjects. Subjects were enrolled in the PROCEED study and classified symptomatic controls, acute/recurrent acute pancreatitis (AP/RAP), or CP. RESULTS: A significant main effect was detected in 10–20 minutes pancreas fluid ( P = 0.027) and plasma ( P = 0.046); post hoc testing showed PGE2 was lower in the AP/RAP group compared with symptomatic controls. There was also trend toward lower PGE2 in urine ( P = 0.062). To elucidate the active downstream pathways, calcitonin gene-related peptide, substance P, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) 1, 2, 3, 7, 9, and 13 were measured in pancreas fluid. A significant difference between the 3 groups was detected for both MMP7 and MMP9. MMP7 was elevated in individuals with CP vs AP/RAP ( P = 0.012) for samples collected early but both time points for MMP9 ( P = 0.027, P = 0.002). DISCUSSION: While PGE2 is detectable in pancreas fluid, these data suggest that it may not be sensitive enough to distinguish between AP/RAP and CP. However, MMPs may distinguish between stages of pancreatitis and require further testing as potential diagnostic biomarkers.
Multicenter evaluation of blood culture contamination and blood cultures practices in US acute care hospitals: time for standardization
Fabre, Valeria , Hsu, Yea‐Jen , Carroll, Karen C. , Salinas, Alejandra , Abbo, Lilian M. , Bower, Chris , Berry, J. Michael, Degnan, Kathleen, Dhaubhadel, Pragya, Dress, Marci, Feeser, Baevin , Fisher, Mark , Flynn, Cynthia E. , Gettler, Erin , Glasser, Laurel J., Johnson, J. Kristie, Karaba, Sara M. , Kubischta, Alyssa, Landrum, B. Mark, Martinez, Marvin, Mermel, Leonard A. , Pepe, Dana , Qasba, Sonia, Rittmann, Barry , Robinson, Evan D. , Rosa, Rossana , Salinas, Jorge , Shah, Aditya , Schrank, Gregory M. , Spivak, Emily S , Stewart, Kathleen O., Wasylyshyn, Anastasia , Virk, Zunaira, Cosgrove, Sara E. , Abbo, Lilian M , Karaba, Sara M , Fabre, Valeria , Milstone, Aaron M. , Berry, Jennifer, Boyd, Sarah, Diekema, Daniel J. , Ford, Bradley , Glasser, Laurel J., Howard‐Anderson, Jessica , Kim, Justin , Mathers, Amy J. , Moehring, Rebekah W. , O’Horo, John C. , Rodriguez‐Nava, Guillermo , Ryder, Jonathan H. , Shelly, Mark , Talbot, Thomas R. , Schooneveld, Trevor Van , Gadala, Avinash

Journal of Clinical Microbiology | July 11, 2025 | Volume: 63 | Issue: 8 | Pages: No page available

10.1128/jcm.00530-25 | PMID 40643261 Get It

ABSTRACT Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommends a blood culture contamination (BCC) threshold of <3%, with ≤1% considered optimal. However, there is not a standardized definition of BCC, and the effect of multiple definitions on BCC rates or what definitions laboratories use remain unknown. We surveyed 52 hospitals and analyzed 362,078 blood cultures (BCx) collected 1 September 2019 to 31 August 2021 from 62 intensive care units (ICUs) and 231 wards from 48 of these hospitals. We calculated and compared BCC rates using the College of American Pathologists (CAP) or CLSI criteria (both utilize a limited number of skin commensals to define BCC) and the comprehensive National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) commensal list. We characterized factors associated with BCC and related outcomes (central-line associated bloodstream infection [CLABSI] and vancomycin use). BCC, BCx positivity, and single BCx rates were monitored by 100%, 39%, and 21% of hospitals, respectively. Hospitals used CAP (65%), CLSI (17%), and NHSN (17%) criteria to define BCC. Mean BCC rate by CAP (CAP-BCC) was 1.38% for ICUs and 0.96% for wards. BCC rates remained similar by CLSI criteria but increased when using NHSN list. Sharing BCC data outside of the laboratory, measuring additional BCx quality indicators, and limiting central catheter-drawn BCx were associated with lower BCC rates. BCC was associated with higher CLABSI rates in ICUs. This study demonstrated variability in laboratory practices and opportunities to optimize BCx stewardship. IMPORTANCE Blood culture contamination (BCC) is associated with patient harm and unnecessary use of healthcare resources. BCC thresholds have been established; however, multiple BCC definitions exist. There is limited data on how BCC rates differ depending on the BCC definition used, what definitions laboratories most commonly use, or their approach to other blood cultures (BCx) quality indicators such as single rates or BCx positivity. A cross-sectional multicenter survey and analysis of BCx data from intensive care unit and wards revealed that most laboratories did not track single BCx or BCx positivity rates and that there was variability in how BCC was defined. Additionally, BCC rates were influenced by the definition used. BCC was associated with increased central-line associated bloodstream infection rates.
Type 1 Diabetes Autoantibodies in Acute, Recurrent Acute, and Chronic Pancreatitis
Wasserfall, Clive , Forsmark, Chris E. , Li, Liang , Hart, Phil A. , Goodarzi, Mark O. , Kudva, Yogish C. , Yadav, Dhiraj , Conwell, Darwin L. , Andersen, Dana K. , Casu, Anna , Cusi, Ken, Fogel, Evan L. , Park, Walter G. , Wasserfall, Clive H , Li, Shuang , Bellin, Melena D. , Conwell, Darwin L. , Serrano, Jose, Fisher, William P. , Hughes, Steven J. , Van Den Eeden, Stephen K

Diabetes | July 9, 2025 | Volume: 74 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1603-1612

10.2337/db24-0931 | PMID 40633067 Get It

Pancreatogenic or type 3c diabetes, which occurs as a consequence of pancreatitis, may have several mechanisms. Mechanisms overlapping with those of type 2 diabetes have been explored, including insulin resistance and insulin deficiency. However, autoimmune mechanisms in response to unmasking β-cell antigens, similar to those of type 1 diabetes (T1D), have not been thoroughly examined. We performed cross-sectional T1D autoantibody profiling in a large prospective cohort (N = 927) of adults with acute, recurrent acute, or chronic pancreatitis. We examined correlations of prevalence of autoantibodies against GAD (GAD antibody), IA-2 (IA-2 antibody), zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8; ZnT8 antibody), and insulin (insulin autoantibody [IAA]) with clinical and demographic features, including presence of diabetes, diabetes treatment, and family history of diabetes. Diabetes was present in 11 (12%) of 94 participants with acute pancreatitis, 69 (27%) of 273 with recurrent acute pancreatitis, and 235 (43%) of 560 with chronic pancreatitis. Among these groups, islet autoantibodies were respectively found in five (5.3%) of 94, 48 (17.6%) of 273, and 127 (22.6%) of 560. The proportions of individuals with diabetes who were autoantibody positive were 45%, 70%, and 54%, respectively (most commonly IAA, which may reflect exogenous insulin use). However, across the entire cohort, 27 participants (2.9%) had two, two (0.2%) had three, and one (0.1%) had four T1D-associated autoantibodies, respectively, suggesting a potential pathogenic link that should be further explored. ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS Type 1 diabetes–associated autoimmune mechanisms have not been thoroughly examined in pancreatitis-associated diabetes. We assessed the prevalence of four islet autoantibodies in serum from a large prospective cohort of patients with acute, recurrent acute, or chronic pancreatitis. Diabetes was present in 11 (12%) of 94 participants with acute pancreatitis, 69 (27%) of 273 with recurrent acute pancreatitis, and 235 (43%) of 560 with chronic pancreatitis. Excluding those with only insulin autoantibody positivity, which is confounded by insulin treatment, islet autoantibodies were identified in 51 (5.5%) of 927 participants, and 30 (3.2%) of 297 were positive for two or more autoantibodies. Our findings suggest pancreatitis may elicit islet autoimmunity in a subset of patients, necessitating prospective longitudinal follow-up.
BraTS-PEDs: Results of the Multi-Consortium International Pediatric Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge 2023
Kazerooni, Anahita Fathi , Khalili, Nastaran, Liu, Xinyang , Jiang, Zhifan , Pavaine, Julija , Jones, Blaise V. , Sheth, Nakul , McAllister, Aaron S. , Tu, Wenxin , Rodriguez, Andres Fernandez, Shaikh, Ibraheem S , Sanchez-Montano, Mariana , Lai, Hollie Anne , Adewole, Maruf , Albrecht, Jake, Anazodo, Udunna, Anwar, Syed Muhammed, Aristizábal, Alejandro , Baid, Ujjwal , Bergquist, Timothy , Conte, Gian-Marco, Eddy, James A. , Ezhov, Ivan , Gandhi, Deep , Gottipati, Anurag , Haldar, Shuvanjan, Janas, Anastasia , Elaine, Elaine, Karargyris, Alexandros , Kassem, Hasan, Khalili, Neda , Maleki, Nazanin , Meier, Zeke, Saluja, Rachit , Sheller, Micah , Shinohara, Russell Takeshi, Viswanathan, Karthik , Wang, Chunhao , Storm, Phillip B. , Packer, Roger, Hummel, Trent R. , Hoffman, Lindsey M. , Nabavizadeh, Ali , Ware, Jeffrey B., Rood, Brian , Resnick, Adam J., Linguraru, Marius George , Khalili, Nastaran, Haldar, Debanjan , Zapaishchykova, Anna , Shah, Lubdha M. , Prabhu, Sanjay P. , Nandolia, Khanak , Anderson, Hannah, Bagheri, Sina , Borja, Austin J. , Calabrese, Evan , Chung, Verena , Familiar, Ariana , Farahani, Keyvan , Iglesias, Juan Eugenio , Kofler, Florian , LaBella, Dominic , Leemput, Koen Van , Li, Hongwei , Meier, Zeke, Menze, Bjoern H. , Moawad, Ahmed W. , Pati, Sarthak , Piraud, Marie , Poussaint, Tina Young , Reitman, Zachary J. , Rudie, Jeffrey D. , Shinohara, Russell Taki , Wiestler, Benedikt , Wiggins, Walter F. , Davatzikos, Christos , Bornhorst, Miriam , Blank, Peter M K de , Aboian, Mariam , Kann, Benjamin H. , Bakas, Spyridon , Vossough, Arastoo

Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging | June 26, 2025 | Volume: 3 | Issue: June 2025 | Pages: 72-87

10.59275/j.melba.2025-f6fg Get It

Pediatric central nervous system tumors are the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in children. The five-year survival rate for high-grade glioma in children is less than 20%. The development of new treatments is dependent upon multi-institutional collaborative clinical trials requiring reproducible and accurate centralized response assessment. We present the results of the BraTS-PEDs 2023 challenge, the first Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge focused on pediatric brain tumors. This challenge utilized data acquired from multiple international consortia dedicated to pediatric neuro-oncology and clinical trials. BraTS-PEDs 2023 aimed to evaluate volumetric segmentation algorithms for pediatric brain gliomas from magnetic resonance imaging using standardized quantitative performance evaluation metrics employed across the BraTS 2023 challenges. The top-performing AI approaches for pediatric tumor analysis included ensembles of nnU-Net and Swin UNETR, Auto3DSeg, or nnU-Net with a self-supervised framework. The BraTS-PEDs 2023 challenge fostered collaboration between clinicians (neuro-oncologists, neuroradiologists) and AI/imaging scientists, promoting faster data sharing and the development of automated volumetric analysis techniques. These advancements could significantly benefit clinical trials and improve the care of children with brain tumors.
The Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS-METS) Challenge 2023: Brain Metastasis Segmentation on Pre-treatment MRI
Janas, Anastasia , Baid, Ujjwal , Ramakrishnan, Divya , Saluja, Rachit , Ashraf, Nader, Maleki, Nazanin , Yordanov, Nikolay , Fehringer, Pascal, Gkampenis, Athanasios , Amiruddin, Raisa, Adewole, Maruf , Albrecht, Jake, Anazodo, Udunna, Anwar, Syed Muhammad, Bergquist, Timothy , Chiang, Veronica , Eddy, J. Mark , Ezhov, Ivan , Khalili, Nastaran, Jiang, Zhifan , Johanson, Elaine, Kazerooni, Anahita Fathi , Krantchev, Kiril, Linguraru, Marius George , Liu, Xinyang , Meier, Zeke, Moy, Harrison, Osenberg, Klara , Reitman, Zachary, Shinohara, Russell Takeshi, Wang, Chunhao , Shafique, Umber, Willms, Klara, Avesta, Arman , Bousabarah, Khaled , Chakrabarty, Satrajit , Gennaro, Nicolò , Holler, Wolfgang, Lost, Jan , Marcus, Daniel S. , Maresca, R, Merkaj, Sarah, Pedersen, Gabriel Cassinelli, Reppert, Marc von , Teytelboym, Oleg M., Tillmans, Niklas, Westerhoff, Malte , Youssef, Ayda , Pflüger, Irada, Perez-Carillo, Gloria J. Guzman, Memon, Fatima, Krycia, Mark, Patro, Satya Narayana , Petrović, Bojan , Schrickel, E. Brooke, Besada, Cristina , Chu, Sammy, Dusoi, Alexandru, Farage, Luciano , Fong, Amy, Gray, R. Ian, Krumpelman, Chase, Lincoln, Christie M. , Maros, Máté E. , Morón, Fanny , Nimchinsky, Esther A. , Patel, Uresh, Rohatgi, Saurabh , Sayah, Anousheh , Schwartz, Eric D. , Shiroishi, Mark S. , Valerie, Jewels, White, Matthew L. , Zohrabian, Vahe M. , Brüßeler, Melanie, Ghonim, Mohamed, Okar, Abdullah , Pasquini, L. , Soumala, Theodora, Taherzadeh, Mahsa , Vollmuth, Philipp, Foltyn, Martha , Abayazeed, Aly, Dellepiane, Francesco , Verdier, Maria Correia de , Al-Rubaiey, Sanaria, Ashraf, Kholod, Asla, Moamen M., Badawy, Mohamed , Lomer, Nima Broomand , Bukatz, Jan, Chen, Jim, Cimflová, Petra , Corr, Felix, Crawley, Alexis, Deptula, Lisa, Elakhdar, Tasneem, Shawali, Islam H., Frick, Alexandra, Haider, Muhammad Ammar , Hierro, Fátima , Jacobs, Sarah Maria, Hsieh, Kuang-chun Jim, Kersting, Katharina , Kida, Laura, Kollia, Sofia , Koukoulithras, Ioannis, Li, Xiao , Abouelatta, Ahmed, Mansour, Aya, Maria-Zamfirescu, Ruxandra-Catrinel, Marsiglia, Marcela , Mateo-Camacho, Yohana Sarahi , McArthur, Mark J., McDonnell, Olivia, McHugh, M, Moassefi, Mana , Morsi, Samah Mostafa, Munteanu, Alexander , Naqvi, Syed Raza, Nikanpour, Yalda , Alnoury, Mostafa , Nouh, Abdullah Mohamed Aly, Pappafava, Francesca, Patel, Markand D., Petrucci, S. , Rawie, Eric, Raymond, Scott B. , Roohani, Borna, Sabouhi, Sadeq, Sánchez‐García, Laura , Shaked, Zoe , Altes, Talissa A. , Isufi, Edvin , Dhemesh, Yaseen , Gass, Jaime, Thacker, Jonathan, Tarabishy, Abdul , Turner, Benjamin , Worede, Fikadu , Yousry, Sara, Lerebo, Wondwossen , Aristizábal, Alejandro , Karargyris, Alexandros , Kassem, Hasan , Sheller, Micah , Link, Katherine E. , Moawad, Ahmed W. , Ashraf, Nader, Jekel, Leon , Manteghinejad, Amirreza , Aneja, Sanjay , Anwar, Syed Muhammad, Chung, Verena , Conte, Gian Marco , Dako, Farouk , Eddy, James, Khalili, Nastaran, Farahani, Keyvan , Iglesias, Juan Eugenio , Kofler, Florian , LaBella, Dominic , Leemput, Koen Van , Li, Hongwei , Meier, Zeke, Menze, Bjoern H. , Piraud, Marie , Shinohara, Russell Taki , Wiestler, Benedikt , Wiggins, Walter F. , Kaur, Manpreet , LaMontagne, Pamela , Lin, MingDe , Maresca, Ryan, Petersen, Gabriel Cassinelli , Sotiras, Aristeidis , Godfrey, Devon , Floyd, Scott , Rauschecker, Andreas M. , Villanueva-Meyer, Javier E. , Cho, Jaeyoung , Bendszus, Martin , Brugnara, Gianluca , Cramer, Justin , Johnson, Derek R. , Kam, Anthony , Kwan, Benjamin Y. M. , Lai, Lillian M. , Lall, Neil , So, Tiffany Y. , Thompson, Gerard , Wu, Lei , Bansal, Anu , Barkhof, Frederik , Druzgal, T. Jason , Feltrin, Fabrício Stewan , Fung, Steve H. , Ikuta, Ichiro , Iv, Michael , Postma, Alida A. , Mahajan, Amit Kumar , Joyner, David , Létourneau‐Guillon, Laurent , Miller, Elka , Özsarlak, Ö. , Saha, Atin , Shih, Robert , Small, Juan E. , Tanwar, Manoj , Weinberg, Brent D. , Young, Robert J. , Azizova, Aynur , Ghonim, Mohanad , Ghonim, Mohamed, Sharifi, Yasaman , Singh, Gagandeep, Sollmann, Nico , Vollmuth, Philipp, Foltyn‐Dumitru, Martha , Malhotra, Ajay , Lohmann, Philipp , Pérez‐García, Víctor M. , Elhalawani, Hesham M. , Duarte Armindo, Rui , Asla, Moamen M., Bisschop, Jeroen , Faghani, Shahriar , Gulati, Vaibhav , Dahl, Rasmus Holmboe , McArthur, Mark, McHugh, Maire, Moassefi, Mana , Nandolia, Khanak , Petrucci, Samantha, Sanchez-Garcia, Laura M., Suthar, Pokhraj Prakashchandra , Vacca, Sebastiano , Vilanilam, George K. , Warren, Daniel, Weiss, David, Pati, Sarthak , Calabrese, Evan , Tahon, Nourel Hoda , Nada, Ayman , Velichko, Yury , Bakas, Spyridon , Rudie, Jeffrey D. , Aboian, Mariam

Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging | June 26, 2025 | Volume: 3 | Issue: December 2025 | Pages: 204-247

10.59275/j.melba.2025-9bd3 Get It

The translation of AI-generated brain metastases (BM) segmentation into clinical practice relies heavily on diverse, high-quality annotated medical imaging datasets. The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge has gained momentum for testing and benchmarking algorithms using rigorously annotated internationally compiled real-world datasets. This study presents the results of the segmentation challenge and characterizes the challenging cases that impacted the performance of the winning algorithms. Untreated brain metastases on standard anatomic MRI sequences (T1, T2, FLAIR, T1PG) from eight contributed international datasets were annotated in stepwise method: published UNET algorithms, student, neuroradiologist, final approver neuroradiologist. Segmentations were ranked based on lesion-wise Dice and Hausdorff distance (HD95) scores. False positives (FP) and false negatives (FN) were rigorously penalized, receiving a score of 0 for Dice and a fixed penalty of 374 for HD95. The mean scores for the teams were calculated. Eight datasets comprising 1303 studies were annotated, with 402 studies (3076 lesions) released on Synapse as publicly available datasets to challenge competitors. Additionally, 31 studies (139 lesions) were held out for validation, and 59 studies (218 lesions) were used for testing. Segmentation accuracy was measured as rank across subjects, with the winning team achieving a LesionWise mean score of 7.9. The Dice score for the winning team was 0.65 ± 0.25. Common errors among the leading teams included false negatives for small lesions and misregistration of masks in space. The Dice scores and lesion detection rates of all algorithms diminished with decreasing tumor size, particularly for tumors smaller than 100 mm3. In conclusion, algorithms for BM segmentation require further refinement to balance high sensitivity in lesion detection with the minimization of false positives and negatives. The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge successfully curated well- annotated, diverse datasets and identified common errors, facilitating the translation of BM segmentation across varied environments and providing the tools for future development of personalized volumetric reports to patients undergoing BM treatment.
Standardization of Blood Product Orders Improves Patient Safety in Pediatric Transfusion Medicine: A Collaborative Project
Rollins, Margo , Thompson, Sarah , Rogers, Beverly Barton , DomBourian, Melkon, Kinney, Stephanie , Nizzi, Frank, Noland, Daniel K., Su, Leon , Winstead, Randy, Andrews, Jennifer , Annen, Kyle , Chou, Stella T. , Kandaswamy, Swaminathan , Kinney, Stephanie , Orenstein, Evan William , Winstead, Randy, Carter, Alexis B.

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine | June 24, 2025 | Volume: 150 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 58-71

10.5858/arpa.2024-0074-oa | PMID 40555783 Get It

Context.— Complexity of ordering and transfusing blood is particularly evident in the pediatric population. Simplification, clarification, and standardization of blood orders can decrease complexity and improve patient safety. Objective.— To improve patient safety by optimizing electronic ordering of blood components in pediatrics through a collaborative process improvement initiative. Design.— A multidisciplinary working group, formed as part of a value stream analysis to improve transfusion safety at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta (Atlanta, Georgia), focused on decreasing variability and providing clarity when ordering, preparing, and transfusing blood using the electronic health record. Through benchmarking with other pediatric institutions and a collaborative design process with multiple local stakeholders, an extensive redesign in the existing orders and order sets occurred. Metrics were collected to determine if a change was an improvement. Results.— Nurse and laboratory informaticists, a pathology informaticist, and a transfusion medicine specialist built the new orders based on the design. The new orders focused on the following changes: standardization, introduction of logic, naming conventions, clarifying definitions, adding calculations, improving transparency of history and laboratory data, removing aliquots, clarifying communication, and implementing additional modules to inform the provider of necessary information about the patient. Metrics included a decrease in the number of orders changed within an hour, decreased calls from the blood bank to the provider to clarify the order, and an absence of overtransfusions and transfusion-related serious safety events for a year following implementation. Conclusions.— This collaborative initiative, using standard process improvement tools, resulted in standardized blood orders improving transfusion safety.
Posterior Graft Laryngotracheal Reconstruction for Bilateral Vocal Cord Paralysis in a Resource-Limited Setting: Building a Replicable Airway Reconstruction Program in Eldoret, Kenya
Isaac, André , Menach, Owen , Rotich, Gerald, Callaghan, Amy, Isaac, Daniela Migliarese , Wiedermann, Josh, Holinski, Paula , Anton, Natalie , Propst, Evan J. , Ngoitsi, Henry, Isaac, Daniela M , Rotich, Gerald

Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery | June 17, 2025 | Volume: 54 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/19160216251345468 | PMID 40528278 Get It

Importance Bilateral vocal cord paralysis is a challenging problem to manage in adults, and a known complication of thyroid surgery which is more common in resource-limited settings. Posterior graft laryngotracheal reconstruction is a management option that has not been studied in this population or setting. Objective To report the surgical outcomes of posterior graft laryngotracheal reconstruction for bilateral vocal cord paralysis in a resource-limited setting, and to evaluate the efficacy of a hybrid system for teaching this technique in Kenya. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Tertiary public referral hospital, Eldoret, Kenya Participants Adults >18 years with tracheostomy dependence secondary to bilateral vocal cord paralysis after thyroid surgery or other iatrogenesis. The hybrid training program included Kenyan surgeons and surgical trainees. Intervention or Exposures Posterior graft laryngotracheal reconstruction and hybrid training system included didactic lectures, simulation-based training, case discussion and planning, and live cases. Main Outcomes Measures One-year airway outcomes measured by achievement of tracheostomy decannulation, and self-reported surgeon knowledge and skill acquisition. Results Ten patients met criteria and were included in the analysis, with mean age 42 years (range 30-62 years) and had been tracheostomy dependent for an average of 6 years (range 1-12 years). Seven (70%) had open reconstruction, and 3 (30%) had endoscopic reconstruction. All were decannulated and remained tracheostomy-free at 1 year. Three surgeons and 7 trainees participated in the hybrid teaching methods. All reported increased comfort in laryngotracheal reconstruction, with all 3 surgeons reporting comfort performing the surgeries independently. Conclusion Posterior graft laryngotracheal reconstruction shows promise as a potential method of treating bilateral vocal cord paralysis and achieving decannulation in a resource-limited setting. Relevance The methods reported in this study lend themselves to replication and expansion to other similar settings. The authors plan to replicate this work in other centers in East Africa.
Frequency and Clinical Outcomes Associated With Tau Positron Emission Tomography Positivity
Raghavan, Sheelakumari, Costoya‐Sánchez, Alejandro , Mainta, Ismini , Rodríguez-Fonseca, Omar Darío, Perissinotti, Andrés , Gu, Yuna , Yun, Jihwan, Peretti, Débora Elisa , Aguiar, Pablo , Bischof, Gérard N. , Seo, Sang Won , Villeneuve, Sylvia , O’Brien, John T. , Jagust, William, Frisoni, Giovanni B. , Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Carrillo, Marı́a C., Joie, Renaud La , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Pontecorvo, Michael J. , Johnson, Keith A. , Weiner, Michael W. , Petersen, Ronald C., Jack, Clifford R. , Schöll, Michael , Labonté, Anne , Faubert, Anne‐Marie, Mathieu, Axel, Madjar, Cécile , Carrier, Charles Edouard, Kazazian, Christina, Lepage, Claude, Maillet, David , Michaud, Diane, Couture, Doris, Dea, Doris, Courcot, Blandine, Debacker, Clément , Fontaine, David, Knopman, David S. , Multhaup, Gerhard, Maltais, Jean‐Robert, Breitner, John C.S. , Poirier, Judes, Cheewakriengkrai, Laksanun, Sager, Mark A., Dauar‐Tedeschi, Marina, Rajah, Natasha, Aisen, Paul, Toussaint, Paule‐Joanne , Pierre, Bellec, Kostopoulos, Penelope, Étienne, Pierre , Tariot, Pierre N. , Orban, Pierre , Hoge, Rick, Thomas, Ronald J. , Gauthier, Serge , Craft, Suzanne , Montine, Thomas J. , Nair, Vasavan, Bohbot, Véronique D. , Venugopalan, Vinod, Ituria‐Medina, Yasser, Khachaturian, Zaven S., Teigner, Eduard, Anthal, Elena, Yu, Elsa, Ferdinand, Fabiola, Pogossova, Galina, Mayrand, Ginette, Duclair, Guerda, Gagné, Guylaine, Newbold‐Fox, Holly, Leppert, Illana, Tremblay‐Mercier, Jennifer , Frenette, Joanne, Frappier, Josée, Kat, Justin, Miron, Justin , Wan, Karen, Mahar, Laura, Carmo, Leopoldina, Théroux, Louise, Dufour, Marianne, Lafaille‐Magnan, Marie‐Élyse, Savard, Mélissa, Tuwaig, Miranda, Petkova, Mirela, Rioux, Pierre, Meyer, P.T., El‐Khoury, Rana, Gordon, Renee, Giles, Renuka, Das, Samir, Wang, Seqian, Tabrizi, Shirin , Mathotaarachchi, Sulantha , Dubuc, Sylvie, Lee, Tanya , Beaudry, Thomas, Gervais, Valérie, Pagé, Véronique, Desautels, René, Benbouhoud, Fatiha, Saint‐Fort, Eunice Farah, Verfaillie, Sander C.J. , Farzin, Sarah , Salaciak, Alyssa , Tullo, Stéphanie , Daoust, Leslie‐Ann, Köbe, Theresa , McSweeney, Melissa, Nilsson, Nathalie , Pishnamazi, Morteza, Bedetti, Christophe , Hudon, Louise, Greco, Claudia, Chapleau, Marianne , St‐Onge, Frédéric , Boutin, Sophie , Geddes, Maiya R. , Ducharme, Simon , Jean, Gabriel, Sylvain, Elisabeth, Élie, Marie‐Josee, Leblond‐Baccichet, Gloria, Soucy, Jean‐Paul , Ozlen, Hazal , Bailly, Julie, Mohammediyan, Béry, Chen, Yalin , Remz, Jordana, Rentz, Dorene M., Amariglio, Rebecca E. , Blacker, Deborah , Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Dickerson, Brad C., Donovan, Nancy J. , Farrell, Michelle E. , Gómez, Cristina Lois, Marshall, Gad A. , Oaoo, Kate, Price, Julie, Prokopiou, Prokopis C. , Reynolds, Gretchen , Skylar-Scott, Irina A., Vila‐Castelar, Clara , Yang, Hyun‐Sik , Trojanowki, John Q., Green, Robert C, Perrin, Richard J. , Shaw, Leslie M. , Potter, William Z. , Bernard, Marie , Jackson, Jonathan, Masliah, Eliezer , Masterman, Donna, Okonkwo, Ozioma, Ryan, Laurie, Silverberg, Nina, Fleisher, Adam , Fockler, Juliet , Conti, Cat, Jin, Chengshi , Nosheny, Rachel L. , Ashford, Mariam, Flenniken, Derek , Kormos, Adrienne, Montine, Tom, Rafii, Michael, Raman, Rema , Gessert, Devon, Salazar, Jennifer, Zimmerman, Caileigh, Cabrera, Yuliana, Walter, Sarah , Miller, Garrett, Coker, Godfrey, Clanton, Taylor, Hergesheimer, Lindsey, Smith, Stephanie , Adegoke, Olusegun, Mahboubi, Payam, Moore, Shelley, Pizzola, Jeremy, Shaffer, Elizabeth , Harvey, Danielle, Forghanian-Arani, Arvin, Borowski, Bret, Ward, Chad, Gunter, Jeff, Kantarci, Kejal, Thompson, Paul , Jahanshad, Neda , DeCarli, Charles , Knaack, Alexander , Fletcher, Evan, Chen, Stephanie R, Choe, Mark, Crawford, Karen , Yuschkevich, Paul A, Reiman, Eric M. , Mathis, Chet, Landau, Susan , Cairns, Nigel J. , Householder, Erin, Franklin, Erin , Bernhardt, Haley, Taylor‐Reinwald, Lisa, Korecka, Magdalena , Figurski, Michal, Neu, Scott, Nho, Kwangsik, Foroud, Tatiana M., Faber, Kelley , Wilmes, Kristi, Thal, Leon J., Dage, Jeffrey L. , Eloyan, Ani , Hammers, Dustin B. , Kirby, Kala, Kramer, Joel, Legarde, Julien, Murray, Melissa E., Newell, Kathy L. , Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Clark, David , Day, Gregory S, Duara, Ranjan , Graff-Radford, Neill R, Grant, Ian , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Steven, Sha, Sharon J. , Carrillo, María C. , O'Brien, John Tiernan , Jack, Clifford R , Schöll, Michael , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Dage, Jeffrey L , Rial, Alexis Moscoso , Heeman, Fiona , Raghavan, Sheelakumari , Essen, Martijn van , Camacho, Valle , Silva‐Rodríguez, Jesús , Ribaldi, Federica , Coomans, Emma M. , Brum, Wagner Scheeren , Grothe, Michel J. , Drzezga, Alexander E. , Malpetti, Maura , Rowe, James B. , Giessen, Elsmarieke van de , Ossenkoppele, Rik , Smith, Ruben , Hansson, Oskar , Garibotto, Valentina , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , LaMontagne, Pamela , Sperling, Reisa Anne , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Tam, Angela , Binette, Alexa Pichet , Dansereau, Christian , Picard, Cynthia , Michaud, Diane, Couture, Doris, Cuello, A. Claudio , Barkun, Alan , Evans, Alan Charles , Tardif, Christine Lucas , Knopman, David S. , Near, Jamie , Leoutsakos, Jeannie‐Marie , Brandt, Jason , Pruessner, Jens C. , Morris, John C. , Collins, D. Louis , Chakravarty, M. Mallar , Eisenberg, Mark Jeffrey , Rajah, Maria Natasha , Rosa-Neto, Pedro , Bellec, Pierre , Thomas, Ronald, Fonov, Vladimir , Vallee, Isabelle, Vogel, Jacob W. , Dadar, Mahsa , Appleby, Melissa , Meyer, Pierre‐François, Gonneaud, Julie , Pascoal, Tharick Ali , Vachon‐Presseau, Étienne , Spreng, R. Nathan , Rentz, Dorene M. , Buckley, Rachel F. , Gagliardi, Geoffroy Pierre , Gatchel, Jennifer R. , Guzmán‐Vélez, Edmarie , Jacobs, Heidi I.L. , Jutten, Roos J. , Pardilla‐Delgado, Enmanuelle , Price, Julie C. , Quiroz, Yakeel T. , Schultz, Aaron P. , Schultz, Stephanie A. , Sepulcre, Jorge , Vannini, Patrizia , Toga, Arthur W. , Beckett, Laurel , Saykin, Andrew J. , Potter, William, Barnes, Lisa L. , Gonzalez, Hector, Ho, Carole , Hsiao, John , Jackson, Jonathan , Veitch, Dallas P. , Neuhaus, John M , Rafii, Michael S. , Jimenez‐Maggiora, Gustavo Adolfo , Donohue, Michael , Arani, Arvin , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Jones, David T. , Kantarci, Kejal , Senjem, Matthew L. , Reid, Robert I. , Fox, Nick C. , Malone, Ian B. , Thomopoulos, Sophia I. , Nir, Talia M. , Tosun, Duygu , Das, Sandhitsu R. , Koeppe, Robert A. , Chen, Kewei , Risacher, Shannon L. , Shen, Li , Nudelman, Kelly , Ghetti, Bernardino , Grinberg, Lea T. , Hammers, Dustin B , Kirby, Kala, Kukull, Walter A. , Murray, Melissa E. , Polsinelli, Angelina J. , Atri, Alireza , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Honig, Lawrence S. , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Musiek, Erik , Salloway, Steve , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S , Wolk, S. J. , Womack, Kyle

JAMA | June 16, 2025 | Volume: 334 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 229

10.1001/jama.2025.7817 | PMID 40522652 Get It

Importance Tau positron emission tomography (PET) allows in vivo detection of neurofibrillary tangles, a core neuropathologic feature of Alzheimer disease (AD). Objective To provide estimates of the frequency of tau PET positivity and its associated risk of clinical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants Longitudinal study using data pooled from 21 cohorts, comprising a convenience sample of 6514 participants from 13 countries, collected between January 2013 and June 2024. Cognitively unimpaired individuals and patients with a clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), AD dementia, or other neurodegenerative disorders were included. Exposures Tau PET with flortaucipir F 18, amyloid-β (Aβ) PET, and clinical examinations. Tau PET scans were visually rated as positive according to a US Food and Drug Administration– and European Medicines Agency–approved method, designed to indicate the presence of advanced neurofibrillary tangle pathology (Braak stages V-VI). Main Outcomes and Measures Frequency of tau PET positivity and absolute risk of clinical progression (eg, progression to MCI or dementia). Results Among the 6514 participants (mean age, 69.5 years; 50.5% female), median follow-up time ranged from 1.5 to 4.0 years. Of 3487 cognitively unimpaired participants, 349 (9.8%) were tau PET positive; the estimated frequency of tau PET positivity was less than 1% in those aged younger than 50 years, and increased from 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%) at 60 years to 19% (95% CI, 16%-24%) at 90 years. Tau PET positivity frequency estimates increased across MCI and AD dementia clinical diagnoses (43% [95% CI, 41%-46%] and 79% [95% CI, 77%-82%] at 75 years, respectively). Most tau PET–positive individuals (92%) were also Aβ PET positive. Cognitively unimpaired participants who were positive for both Aβ PET and tau PET had a higher absolute risk of progression to MCI or dementia over the following 5 years (57% [95% CI, 45%-71%]) compared with both Aβ PET–positive/tau PET–negative (17% [95% CI, 13%-22%]) and Aβ PET–negative/tau PET–negative (6% [95% CI, 5%-8%]) individuals. Among participants with MCI at the time of the tau PET scan, an Aβ PET–positive/tau PET–positive profile was associated with a 5-year absolute risk of progression to dementia of 70% (95% CI, 59%-81%). Conclusions and Relevance In a large convenience sample, a positive tau PET scan occurred at a nonnegligible rate among cognitively unimpaired individuals, and the combination of Aβ PET positivity and tau PET positivity was associated with a high risk of clinical progression in both preclinical and symptomatic stages of AD. These findings underscore the potential of tau PET as a biomarker for staging AD pathology.
Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection: The STOP-CAD Study
Yaghi, Shadi, Shu, Liqi , Mandel, Daniel , Henninger, Nils , Muppa, Jayachandra , Affan, Muhammad , Lodhi, Omair ul haq , Heldner, Mirjam R. , Seiffge, David , Omran, Setareh Salehi , Crandall, Ross , Lester, Evan, Mena, Diego López, Araúz, Antonio , Nehme, Ahmad , Boulanger, Marion , Sousa, João André , Sargento‐Freitas, João , Barata, Vasco , Castro‐Chaves, Paulo , Brito, Maria Teresa , Khan, Muhib , Mallick, Dania, Rothstein, Aaron , Khazaal, Ossama , Kaufmann, Josefin E. , Engelter, Stefan T. , Traenka, Christopher , Sousa, Diana Aguiar de , Soares, Mafalda , Rosa, Sara , Zhou, Lily , Gandhi, Preet , Field, Thalia S. , Mancini, Steven, Metanis, Issa , Pan, Kelly , Dantu, Vishnu , Baumgartner, Karl , Nolte, Christian H. , Choi, Richard , MacDonald, Jason , Shahripour, Reza Bavarsad , Ghannam, Malik , Almajali, Mohammad , Sanchez, Sebastian , Zine-Eddine, Fayçal, Poppe, Alexandre Y. , Fonseca, Ana Catarina , Baptista, Maria Fortuna , Cruz, Diana , Marco, Giovanna De , Griffin, Kim, Kuohn, Lindsey , Frontera, Jennifer , Amar, Jordan , Giles, James , Grisendi, Ilaria , Nzwalo, Hipólito , Liebeskind, David S. , Molaie, Amir , Cavalier, Annie, Kam, Wayneho , Grory, Brian Mac , Kasab, Sami Al , Eltatawy, Ali , Chervak, Lina , Chulluncuy‐Rivas, Roberto, Aziz, Yasmin , Bakradze, Ekaterina , Tran, Thanh Lam , Rodrigo‐Gisbert, Marc , Velez, Faddi Saleh, Gracia, Jorge Ortiz, Mudassani, Varsha, Vishnu, Venugopalan Y. , Yaddanapudi, Sridhara , Adams, L, Browngoehl, Abigail, Ranasinghe, Tamra , Dunston, Randy, Lynch, Zachary, Penckofer, Mary , Mayer, Silvia, Zubair, Adeel , Cheng, Yee Kuang, Ferreira, Vítor Mendes , Asad, Syed Daniyal , Sarwat, Zoha, Balabhadra, Anvesh , Patel, Shivam , Secchi, Thaís , Mantovani, Gabriel, Kim, Young Dae , Krishnaiah, Balaji , Elangovan, Cheran , Lingam, Sivani, Quereshi, Abid, Alvarado, Alonso, Khasiyev, Farid , Linares, Guillermo , Mannino, Marina , Terruso, Valeria, Vassilopoulou, Sofia , Tentolouris, Vasilis, Martínez-Marino, Manuel , Wall, Victor Carrasco , Indraswari, Fransisca , Jamal, Sleiman El , Alvi, Muhammad , Sarvath, Mohammed, Kass‐Hout, Tareq , Shi, Feina , Zhang, Jinhua , Said, Jamil , Sen, Shayak, Ghani, Mohammad R , Elnazeir, Marwa , Xiao, Han , Kala, Narendra , Khan, Farhan , Mohammadzadeh, Nahid , Furie, Karen L. , Alvarado‐Bolaños, Alonso , Tentolouris-Piperas, Vasileios , Leon Guerrero, Christopher R , Henninger, Nils , Muppa, Jayachandra , Heldner, Mirjam R , Liebeskind, David S. , Field, Thalia S , Keser, Zafer , Aziz, Yasmin , Mandel, Daniel M , Seiffge, David , Arauz, Antonio , Sousa, Joao Andre , Sargento-Freitas, Joao , Castro-Chaves, Paulo , Kaufman, Josefin E , Engelter, Stefan T , Aguiar de Sousa, Diana , Soares, Mafalda , Rosa, Sara , Metanis, Issa , Nolte, Christian H , Bavarsad Shahripour, Reza , Almajali, Mohammad , Fonseca, Ana Catarina , Kuohn, Lindsey , Frontera, Jennifer , Giles, James , Nzwalo, Hipolito , Mac Grory, Brian , Eltatawy, Ali , Rodrigo Gisbert, Marc , Vishnu, Venugopalan Y , Ranasinghe, Tamra , Mendes Ferreira, Vítor , Kim, Young Dae , Elangovan, Cheran , Alvarado-Bolanos, Alonso , Khasiyev, Farid , Tentolouris-Piperas, Vasileios , Martinez Marino, Manuel , Ghani, Mohammad , Xiao, Han , Khan, Farhan , Nehme, Ahmad , Yaghi, Shadi , Antonenko, Kateryna , Arnold, Marcel , Touzé, Emmanuel , Leker, Ronen R , Burton, Tina , von Rennenberg, Regina , MacDonald, Jason, Guo, Xiaofan , Samaniego, Edgar A , Rioux, Bastien , Cruz, Diana , Romoli, Michele , Longoni, Marco , Keser, Zafer , Zedde, Marialuisa , Pascarella, Rosario , Anadani, Mohammad , Kicielinski, Kimberly , Requena, Manuel , Velez, Faddi G. Saleh , Havenon, Adam de , Siegler, James E. , Willey, Joshua , Sharma, Richa , Marto, João Pedro , Klein, Piers , Nguyen, Thanh N. , Martins, Sheila , Fridman, Sebastian , Liu, Shilin , Ali, Farman, Morsi, Rami Z. , Sokhi, Dilraj , Simpkins, Alexis N. , Gomez, Roberto, Sen, Shayak, Stretz, Christoph , Goldstein, Eric

Stroke | June 4, 2025 | Volume: 55 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 908-918

10.1161/strokeaha.123.045731 | PMID 38335240 Get It

BACKGROUND: Small, randomized trials of patients with cervical artery dissection showed conflicting results regarding optimal stroke prevention strategies. We aimed to compare outcomes in patients with cervical artery dissection treated with antiplatelets versus anticoagulation. METHODS: This is a multicenter observational retrospective international study (16 countries, 63 sites) that included patients with cervical artery dissection without major trauma. The exposure was antithrombotic treatment type (anticoagulation versus antiplatelets), and outcomes were subsequent ischemic stroke and major hemorrhage (intracranial or extracranial hemorrhage). We used adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting to determine associations between anticoagulation and study outcomes within 30 and 180 days. The main analysis used an as-treated crossover approach and only included outcomes occurring with the above treatments. RESULTS: The study included 3636 patients (402 [11.1%] received exclusively anticoagulation and 2453 [67.5%] received exclusively antiplatelets). By day 180, there were 162 new ischemic strokes (4.4%) and 28 major hemorrhages (0.8%); 87.0% of ischemic strokes occurred by day 30. In adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting, compared with antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation was associated with a nonsignificantly lower risk of subsequent ischemic stroke by day 30 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.45–1.12]; P =0.145) and by day 180 (adjusted HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.28–2.24]; P =0.670). Anticoagulation therapy was not associated with a higher risk of major hemorrhage by day 30 (adjusted HR, 1.39 [95% CI, 0.35–5.45]; P =0.637) but was by day 180 (adjusted HR, 5.56 [95% CI, 1.53–20.13]; P =0.009). In interaction analyses, patients with occlusive dissection had significantly lower ischemic stroke risk with anticoagulation (adjusted HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.18–0.88]; P interaction =0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Our study does not rule out the benefit of anticoagulation in reducing ischemic stroke risk, particularly in patients with occlusive dissection. If anticoagulation is chosen, it seems reasonable to switch to antiplatelet therapy before 180 days to lower the risk of major bleeding. Large prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.