Nho, Kwangsik

Abstract INTRODUCTION We investigated associations of plasma proteins with blood‐based amyloid/tau/neurodegeneration/inflammation (A/T/N/I) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS Plasma proteomics and clinical data from the Indiana AD Research Center ( N = 498) were used. Association analysis of plasma proteins with blood A/T/N/I biomarkers as well as diagnosis was performed, followed by replication in an independent cohort ( N = 323), network analysis, pathway enrichment, and machine learning classification to identify proteins and pathways related to AD risk. RESULTS We identified 35 proteins associated with AD, 20 of which were replicated in the independent cohort. We identified 150, 448, and 219 proteins associated with T/N/I biomarkers, respectively, revealing biomarker‐specific pathways. Network analysis identified two modules associated with T/N/I biomarkers, preserved in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and their enriched pathways. The classification model of proteins effectively differentiated AD (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.930). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest dysregulated plasma proteins and pathways in AD, enhancing our understanding of molecular mechanisms and diagnostic strategies for AD. Highlights Plasma proteins were identified as being associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and plasma biomarkers. The identified proteins were replicated in both plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteomics. The identified proteins were associated with AD biomarker‐specific pathways. The identified proteins improved the performance of the AD classification. Protein network analysis identified network modules and their enriched pathways.

Abstract INTRODUCTION African American (AA) individuals are underrepresented in biomarker studies for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Biomarkers that reflect the heterogeneity of AD and achieve the greatest accuracy across populations are sorely needed. METHODS Untargeted proteome measurements were obtained using the SomaScan 7k platform to identify novel plasma biomarkers for AD in AA participants with clinical diagnoses of AD dementia ( n = 181) and cognitively unimpaired (CU, n = 142). Machine learning was used to identify a set of plasma proteins that yielded the best classification accuracy. RESULTS A set of 36 proteins achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 to classify AD dementia versus CU, a 16% improvement over age, sex, and apolipoprotein E ( APOE) . This finding was replicated in multiple plasma and brain datasets (AUCs 0.73–0.97). Our findings underscore the importance of matrisome and cerebrovascular dysfunction in AD pathophysiology. DISCUSSION This study demonstrates the potential of biomarker discovery through untargeted plasma proteomics and machine learning. Highlights Conducted large‐scale plasma proteomics in Alzheimer's disease (AD) versus cognitively unimpaired controls. Machine learning biomarker discovery was replicated in an independent cohort. Novel set of proteins distinguishes AD versus controls with high accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.94). Achieved reproducibility across multiple replication cohorts (AUC = 0.73–0.97). Network analyses implicates matrisome biology and cerebrovascular dysfunction.

Importance Tau positron emission tomography (PET) allows in vivo detection of neurofibrillary tangles, a core neuropathologic feature of Alzheimer disease (AD). Objective To provide estimates of the frequency of tau PET positivity and its associated risk of clinical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants Longitudinal study using data pooled from 21 cohorts, comprising a convenience sample of 6514 participants from 13 countries, collected between January 2013 and June 2024. Cognitively unimpaired individuals and patients with a clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), AD dementia, or other neurodegenerative disorders were included. Exposures Tau PET with flortaucipir F 18, amyloid-β (Aβ) PET, and clinical examinations. Tau PET scans were visually rated as positive according to a US Food and Drug Administration– and European Medicines Agency–approved method, designed to indicate the presence of advanced neurofibrillary tangle pathology (Braak stages V-VI). Main Outcomes and Measures Frequency of tau PET positivity and absolute risk of clinical progression (eg, progression to MCI or dementia). Results Among the 6514 participants (mean age, 69.5 years; 50.5% female), median follow-up time ranged from 1.5 to 4.0 years. Of 3487 cognitively unimpaired participants, 349 (9.8%) were tau PET positive; the estimated frequency of tau PET positivity was less than 1% in those aged younger than 50 years, and increased from 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%) at 60 years to 19% (95% CI, 16%-24%) at 90 years. Tau PET positivity frequency estimates increased across MCI and AD dementia clinical diagnoses (43% [95% CI, 41%-46%] and 79% [95% CI, 77%-82%] at 75 years, respectively). Most tau PET–positive individuals (92%) were also Aβ PET positive. Cognitively unimpaired participants who were positive for both Aβ PET and tau PET had a higher absolute risk of progression to MCI or dementia over the following 5 years (57% [95% CI, 45%-71%]) compared with both Aβ PET–positive/tau PET–negative (17% [95% CI, 13%-22%]) and Aβ PET–negative/tau PET–negative (6% [95% CI, 5%-8%]) individuals. Among participants with MCI at the time of the tau PET scan, an Aβ PET–positive/tau PET–positive profile was associated with a 5-year absolute risk of progression to dementia of 70% (95% CI, 59%-81%). Conclusions and Relevance In a large convenience sample, a positive tau PET scan occurred at a nonnegligible rate among cognitively unimpaired individuals, and the combination of Aβ PET positivity and tau PET positivity was associated with a high risk of clinical progression in both preclinical and symptomatic stages of AD. These findings underscore the potential of tau PET as a biomarker for staging AD pathology.

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) patients have decline in cognitive domains including memory, language, visuospatial, and/or executive function and brain pathology including amyloid‐β and tau deposition, neurodegeneration, and frequent vascular co‐pathologies detectable by neuroimaging and/or cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers. However, molecular disease mechanisms are complex and heterogeneous. It is necessary to develop cost‐effective blood‐based biomarkers reflecting brain molecular perturbations in AD. We identified blood‐based gene and co‐expression network level changes associated with AD/mild cognitive impairment (MCI) diagnosis and AD‐related phenotypes.MethodWe performed differential gene expression and weighted gene co‐expression network analysis, followed by meta‐analysis, using blood transcriptome data of 391 participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and 654 participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. The neuroimaging phenotypes include microhemorrhages, infarcts, amyloid burden, hippocampal volume, and white matter hyperintensities. The cognitive phenotypes include standardized cognitive subtest scores and composite scores for memory, language, visuospatial, and executive function.ResultFive out of 18 modules(M) are significantly associated with diagnosis or cognition (FDR‐adjusted p<0.05). M1 and M15 both positively associates with memory, M1 positively associated with language and M15 with visuospatial function. M1 and M15 are enriched in differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with language and executive function, respectively. M2 negatively associates with logical memory delayed recall scores(LMDR), memory, executive, and language functions and is enriched in DEGs for these phenotypes. M8 negatively associates with memory, language and executive functions and is enriched in DEGs for memory and language. M12 positively associates with LMDR. M1 and M15 are down‐regulated while M2 and M8 are up‐regulated in AD/MCI patients. Cell‐type enrichment analysis showed M2 is enriched in monocytes and neutrophils; M8 in monocytes; M15 in B cells (FDR <0.05). Gene ontology terms enriched in these modules indicated broad consistency with their cell types.ConclusionWe identified five modules significantly associated with AD/MCI or cognitive phenotypes using blood transcriptome data. These findings nominate blood transcriptome changes and their enriched biological processes as potential pathomechanisms in cognitive decline and AD/MCI development. We aim to investigate these blood transcripts as potential biomarkers for AD or AD‐related phenotypes and therapeutic targets through additional replication and experimental validation studies.

AbstractBackgroundSystemic inflammation plays a pivotal role in many chronic diseases including Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Assessing the composition of immune pathways in neurodegenerative diseases can contribute to precision medicine. Using publicly available transcriptomic data, we sought to elucidate transcriptional networks pertinent to inflammatory pathways across brain regions and peripheral blood in AD/mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and peripheral blood in Parkinson’s disease (PD).MethodFor the AD/MCI vs. control dataset, we analyzed bulk‐RNAseq collected from 6 brain regions of donors from ROSMAP, Mayo Clinic, and Mount Sinai School of Medicine (MSSM) brain banks available from the AMP‐AD consortium. Ante‐mortem, blood RNAseq expression data was retrieved from the AMP‐AD Emory Vascular cohort and Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA). We also collected blood‐derived microarray expression data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). For the PD vs Control dataset, blood‐derived bulk‐RNAseq from the PDBP and PPMI cohorts were available through the AMP‐PD consortium. Following quality control, normalization, and residual generation to account for biological and technical variables, co‐expression network modules and their enriched pathways were identified using WGCNA within each dataset. Module/trait correlation tests for aging and diagnosis (cases [AD/MCI or PD] vs control) phenotypes were evaluated. Gene Ontology enrichment analyses were executed to identify enriched pathways and brain or blood cell types within the modules. Modules were tested for preservation across cohorts.ResultWe identified conserved immune signatures across brain regions and cohorts. Modules involved in immune response were preserved across all cohorts. Blood consensus modules involved in immune response were preserved in the brain and vice versa. Some immune modules were associated with AD/MCI, PD, and/or aging. Brain immune modules are significantly associated with aging and/or AD. Significant correlations (q<0.05) with PD diagnosis were present. In the MCSA and Emory vascular cohorts, there were no significant (q<0.05) associations between modules and diagnosis, while in ADNI there were nominal (p<0.05) associations.ConclusionPreserved transcriptional immune networks were identified across blood and brain and across two neurodegenerative diseases. Expanding gene co‐expression network analyses to other diseases and integrating additional omics measures and phenotypes can further strengthen these findings to unravel the immune signatures across complex diseases.