Carrasquillo, Minerva M.

Emerging evidence suggests that systemic physiological factors may influence plasma biomarker concentrations of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related neurodegenerative processes, potentially affecting their specificity for central nervous system pathology. This study examined the relationship of demographic factors and medical comorbidities with plasma biomarkers of AD and neurodegeneration in a community-dwelling cohort of Black/African American (B/AA) older adults (N = 141). Participants underwent plasma assessment of phosphorylated tau at threonine 217 (p-Tau217), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light chain (NfL). Results showed associations between plasma p-Tau217 and amyloid PET positivity, and significant intercorrelations among p-Tau217, GFAP, and NfL. Stepwise regression models incorporated demographics, amyloid PET status, and laboratory measures of renal, metabolic, and lipid function as predictors for each biomarker. p-Tau217 was primarily predicted by amyloid PET and renal function; GFAP by age and sex; and NfL by renal function, age, and sex. Findings indicate plasma biomarker concentrations in B/AA older adults reflect both central AD-related pathology and systemic physiological factors, particularly renal function, and demographic influences. Results underscore the importance of accounting for comorbid medical conditions and demographic characteristics when interpreting blood-based biomarkers and highlight the need for comprehensive medical phenotyping to improve diagnostic specificity and clinical utility.

Abstract INTRODUCTION We investigated associations of plasma proteins with blood‐based amyloid/tau/neurodegeneration/inflammation (A/T/N/I) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS Plasma proteomics and clinical data from the Indiana AD Research Center ( N = 498) were used. Association analysis of plasma proteins with blood A/T/N/I biomarkers as well as diagnosis was performed, followed by replication in an independent cohort ( N = 323), network analysis, pathway enrichment, and machine learning classification to identify proteins and pathways related to AD risk. RESULTS We identified 35 proteins associated with AD, 20 of which were replicated in the independent cohort. We identified 150, 448, and 219 proteins associated with T/N/I biomarkers, respectively, revealing biomarker‐specific pathways. Network analysis identified two modules associated with T/N/I biomarkers, preserved in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and their enriched pathways. The classification model of proteins effectively differentiated AD (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.930). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest dysregulated plasma proteins and pathways in AD, enhancing our understanding of molecular mechanisms and diagnostic strategies for AD. Highlights Plasma proteins were identified as being associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and plasma biomarkers. The identified proteins were replicated in both plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteomics. The identified proteins were associated with AD biomarker‐specific pathways. The identified proteins improved the performance of the AD classification. Protein network analysis identified network modules and their enriched pathways.

Abstract INTRODUCTION African American (AA) individuals are underrepresented in biomarker studies for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Biomarkers that reflect the heterogeneity of AD and achieve the greatest accuracy across populations are sorely needed. METHODS Untargeted proteome measurements were obtained using the SomaScan 7k platform to identify novel plasma biomarkers for AD in AA participants with clinical diagnoses of AD dementia ( n = 181) and cognitively unimpaired (CU, n = 142). Machine learning was used to identify a set of plasma proteins that yielded the best classification accuracy. RESULTS A set of 36 proteins achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 to classify AD dementia versus CU, a 16% improvement over age, sex, and apolipoprotein E ( APOE) . This finding was replicated in multiple plasma and brain datasets (AUCs 0.73–0.97). Our findings underscore the importance of matrisome and cerebrovascular dysfunction in AD pathophysiology. DISCUSSION This study demonstrates the potential of biomarker discovery through untargeted plasma proteomics and machine learning. Highlights Conducted large‐scale plasma proteomics in Alzheimer's disease (AD) versus cognitively unimpaired controls. Machine learning biomarker discovery was replicated in an independent cohort. Novel set of proteins distinguishes AD versus controls with high accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.94). Achieved reproducibility across multiple replication cohorts (AUC = 0.73–0.97). Network analyses implicates matrisome biology and cerebrovascular dysfunction.

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent neurodegenerative disease, yet our comprehension predominantly relies on studies within the non‐Hispanic White (NHW) population. To address this, Accelerating Medicines Partnership in AD (AMP‐AD) aimed to promote inclusivity in multi‐omics AD research, to unravel unique molecular signatures and pathways. The study aimed to provide comprehensive insights into the proteomic landscape of AD across diverse racial groups.MethodDorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and superior temporal gyrus (STG) brain tissues were donated from multiple centers (Mayo Clinic, Emory University, Rush University, Mt. Sinai School of Medicine) and were harmonized through neuropathological evaluation, specifically adhering to the Braak staging and CERAD criteria. Among 1105 DLPFC tissue samples (980 unique individuals), 322 were from African American donors, 214 from Latino Americans, 551 from NHW donors, and the rest were from a mixed or unknown racial background. Among 280 STG samples, 86 were African American, 76 Latino American, 116 NHW and the rest were mixed or unknown ethnicity. All tissues were uniformly homogenized and analyzed by tandem mass tag‐based mass spectrometry (TMT‐MS). Following quality control (QC), proteins with more than 50% missing values were removed and iterative principal component analysis was conducted to remove outliers within brain regions. Differential protein expression was conducted within and across races after adjusting for batch using regression‐analysis.ResultIn total, 9,180 proteins from the DLPFC, and 9,734 proteins from STG brain tissues were quantified by TMT‐MS. Further analysis identified approximately 3,000 differentially abundant proteins in AD brains compared to controls within race. The AD‐associated differentially abundant proteins were strongly correlated between DLPFC and STG regions and with CERAD and Braak. Protein levels of MAPT and APP demonstrated equivalent disease‐related elevations in both African American and NHW individuals with AD. Notably, after adjusting for AD, significant differences in protein levels were identified across race.ConclusionThe proteomics approach employed by AMP‐AD sheds light on the brain proteome in AD across diverse racial groups, emphasizing the importance of inclusive research in establishing robust and generalizable discoveries. The identified proteins here could underscore racial disparities beyond disease association, contributing to a more nuanced understanding of AD pathophysiology.

AbstractBackgroundTwo main risk factors of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are aging and APOE‐ε4. However, some individuals remain cognitively normal despite having these risk factors. They are considered “cognitively resilient”. This study aimed to identify molecular factors that confer cognitive resilience in APOE‐ε4 carriers ≥ 80 years of age and may serve as biomarkers.MethodWe applied weighted gene co‐expression network analysis (WGCNA) to generate consensus co‐expression networks from blood of participants in two antemortem cohorts, the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA, n=105), and the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI, n=91), using RNA‐sequencing and microarray data, respectively. We associated these networks with resilience (resilient vs non‐resilient), cognitive endophenotypes and hippocampal volume. Preservation between consensus networks from blood and those derived from postmortem brain tissues of AD and control donors from AMP‐AD (n=1174) was evaluated. We validated the human findings in four AD mouse models. Finally, machine learning models were utilized to discriminate cases (AD+mild cognitive impairment (MCI)) from controls in MCSA, ADNI and ANMerge antemortem cohorts.ResultFour consensus networks were significantly correlated with a memory phenotype (logical memory delayed recall=LMDR) and hippocampal volume in both MCSA and ADNI. Among these, blood expression module M3 was most preserved with the brain transcriptome. M3 was enriched with NDUF hub genes that are involved in the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Expression levels of M3 and many blood NDUFs had significant associations with better LMDR and hippocampal volume. In brain, NDUFs were upregulated in controls compared to AD, and their expression levels were associated with better global cognition and decreased AD neuropathology. Many NDUFs were significantly downregulated in the hippocampus or cortex of AD mice compared to wild‐types. Lastly, models that included blood NDUFs improved diagnostic accuracy of AD+MCI compared to models that only included demographic and risk variables (age, sex, APOE‐ε4) in MCSA, ADNI and ANMerge. In MCSA and ADNI, adding NDUFs’ expression to models that included established blood biomarkers (Aβ42/40, ptau181, NFL) further improved diagnostic accuracy.ConclusionOur results suggest that mitochondrial NDUFs are centrally‐linked peripheral molecular signatures that may be resilience factors against AD and serve as both therapeutic targets and novel diagnostic biomarkers.

AbstractBackgroundPlasma biomarker development is of increasing interest due to improved accessibility compared to established diagnostic modalities for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, current plasma biomarker candidates have not been tested comprehensively in diverse populations, and these markers represent only a fraction of pathways perturbed in AD. Therefore, there is a need to identify novel plasma biomarkers that account for both disease heterogeneity and patient diversity. This study seeks to address these knowledge gaps through untargeted plasma biomarker discovery in African Americans (AA), an underrepresented group in AD research despite having a higher risk of developing AD compared to non‐Hispanic Whites.MethodsUntargeted proteomics were performed using the SomaScan 7k assay on plasma samples from AA study participants clinically diagnosed as AD (n=142) or cognitively unimpaired (CU, n=144). Linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, and batch were implemented to identify differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). APOE was additionally adjusted for in a sensitivity analysis. DEPs with the lowest q‐values were selected as predictors in a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to assess their accuracy to discriminate AD versus CU individuals.ResultsA total of 153 DEPs were identified (q<0.05) when adjusting for age, sex, and batch, and 100 DEPs were identified when additionally adjusting for APOE. Of the 66 proteins overlapping between these models, SERPINA3, C7, IGFBP‐2, DKK3, SMOC1, and ACES had the lowest q‐values and were included in a ROC model adjusted for age, sex, and APOE. That model classified AD versus CU with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 (95%CI: 0.83‐0.91), a 10.4% improvement over the base model including age, sex, and APOE (AUC=0.78; 95%CI: 0.72‐0.83). Despite the unbiased selection of proteins included in the ROC model, all selected proteins have been associated with AD and implicated in related functional pathways such as neuroinflammation, synaptic function, and insulin signaling.ConclusionThis preliminary plasma biomarker panel demonstrates the potential diagnostic capabilities of biomarker discovery through untargeted proteomics. Future directions include validation of findings in external datasets, concomitant assessment of p‐tau217, and evaluation of machine learning models to define the optimal diagnostic and predictive set of plasma protein biomarkers for AD in AA.

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) patients have decline in cognitive domains including memory, language, visuospatial, and/or executive function and brain pathology including amyloid‐β and tau deposition, neurodegeneration, and frequent vascular co‐pathologies detectable by neuroimaging and/or cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers. However, molecular disease mechanisms are complex and heterogeneous. It is necessary to develop cost‐effective blood‐based biomarkers reflecting brain molecular perturbations in AD. We identified blood‐based gene and co‐expression network level changes associated with AD/mild cognitive impairment (MCI) diagnosis and AD‐related phenotypes.MethodWe performed differential gene expression and weighted gene co‐expression network analysis, followed by meta‐analysis, using blood transcriptome data of 391 participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and 654 participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. The neuroimaging phenotypes include microhemorrhages, infarcts, amyloid burden, hippocampal volume, and white matter hyperintensities. The cognitive phenotypes include standardized cognitive subtest scores and composite scores for memory, language, visuospatial, and executive function.ResultFive out of 18 modules(M) are significantly associated with diagnosis or cognition (FDR‐adjusted p<0.05). M1 and M15 both positively associates with memory, M1 positively associated with language and M15 with visuospatial function. M1 and M15 are enriched in differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with language and executive function, respectively. M2 negatively associates with logical memory delayed recall scores(LMDR), memory, executive, and language functions and is enriched in DEGs for these phenotypes. M8 negatively associates with memory, language and executive functions and is enriched in DEGs for memory and language. M12 positively associates with LMDR. M1 and M15 are down‐regulated while M2 and M8 are up‐regulated in AD/MCI patients. Cell‐type enrichment analysis showed M2 is enriched in monocytes and neutrophils; M8 in monocytes; M15 in B cells (FDR <0.05). Gene ontology terms enriched in these modules indicated broad consistency with their cell types.ConclusionWe identified five modules significantly associated with AD/MCI or cognitive phenotypes using blood transcriptome data. These findings nominate blood transcriptome changes and their enriched biological processes as potential pathomechanisms in cognitive decline and AD/MCI development. We aim to investigate these blood transcripts as potential biomarkers for AD or AD‐related phenotypes and therapeutic targets through additional replication and experimental validation studies.

AbstractBackgroundAfrican Americans (AA) and Latin Americans (LA) are at a higher risk of developing AD compared to non‐Hispanic whites (NHW) but are traditionally underrepresented in AD research. The disproportionate risk is likely multifactorial including differences in co‐morbidities and structural and social determinants of health (SSDoH). AD risk is thought to result from multiple genetic and environmental factors, and their interactions (GxE). However, the molecular mechanisms underlying these interactions are largely unknown. The best‐established genetic risk factor for AD is APOE‐ε4, while APOE‐ε2 is protective. Environmental factors, such as living in neighborhoods with greater socioeconomic disadvantage, have been associated with greater AD neuropathology and worse cognitive function. Studying the potential modifying role of neighborhood disadvantage regarding associations of APOE‐ε4 and APOE‐ε2 with AD risk using a socioeconomic metric like the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) in a multiethnic post‐mortem cohort could offer valuable insights for precision medicine.MethodWe analyzed a post‐mortem cohort of 421 multi‐ethnic donors (NHW: N = 234, AD = 70, non‐AD = 164; LA: N = 145, AD = 102, non‐AD = 43; AA: N = 42, AD = 24, non‐AD = 18), from Mayo Clinic Florida, Banner Sun Health Research Institute, and the University of Florida Brain Banks as part of the AMP AD Diversity initiative. This study used the same neuropathological criteria to categorize AD vs. non‐AD as in the MayoRNAseq study (syn5550404). ADI from the Neighborhood Atlas® was obtained from de‐identified addresses. Associations of APOE‐ε4, APOE‐ε2, and ADI with AD risk were examined using logistic regression models adjusted for age‐at‐death, sex, and ethnic group; interactions of APOE genotype with ADI were also assessed.ResultAPOE‐ε4 and APOE‐ε2 showed a significant association with AD diagnosis (APOE‐ε4combined cohort OR = 3.23, P = 3.14E‐08; APOE‐ε2combined cohort OR = 0.30, P = 0.003). However, contrary to prior findings, our study found no association between ADI and AD diagnosis [OR = 1.023 (per each 10 unit increase in ADI), P = 0.629]. No significant interactions of ADI with APOE‐ε4 or APOE‐ε2 regarding association with AD diagnosis were identified (P = 0.083, P = 0.781).ConclusionThis is the first study evaluating the potential interaction of neighborhood disadvantage with APOE on AD risk in a multi‐ethnic autopsy cohort. However, these findings require further investigation in larger, more well‐powered cohorts for validation.

AbstractBackgroundSystemic inflammation plays a pivotal role in many chronic diseases including Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Assessing the composition of immune pathways in neurodegenerative diseases can contribute to precision medicine. Using publicly available transcriptomic data, we sought to elucidate transcriptional networks pertinent to inflammatory pathways across brain regions and peripheral blood in AD/mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and peripheral blood in Parkinson’s disease (PD).MethodFor the AD/MCI vs. control dataset, we analyzed bulk‐RNAseq collected from 6 brain regions of donors from ROSMAP, Mayo Clinic, and Mount Sinai School of Medicine (MSSM) brain banks available from the AMP‐AD consortium. Ante‐mortem, blood RNAseq expression data was retrieved from the AMP‐AD Emory Vascular cohort and Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA). We also collected blood‐derived microarray expression data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). For the PD vs Control dataset, blood‐derived bulk‐RNAseq from the PDBP and PPMI cohorts were available through the AMP‐PD consortium. Following quality control, normalization, and residual generation to account for biological and technical variables, co‐expression network modules and their enriched pathways were identified using WGCNA within each dataset. Module/trait correlation tests for aging and diagnosis (cases [AD/MCI or PD] vs control) phenotypes were evaluated. Gene Ontology enrichment analyses were executed to identify enriched pathways and brain or blood cell types within the modules. Modules were tested for preservation across cohorts.ResultWe identified conserved immune signatures across brain regions and cohorts. Modules involved in immune response were preserved across all cohorts. Blood consensus modules involved in immune response were preserved in the brain and vice versa. Some immune modules were associated with AD/MCI, PD, and/or aging. Brain immune modules are significantly associated with aging and/or AD. Significant correlations (q<0.05) with PD diagnosis were present. In the MCSA and Emory vascular cohorts, there were no significant (q<0.05) associations between modules and diagnosis, while in ADNI there were nominal (p<0.05) associations.ConclusionPreserved transcriptional immune networks were identified across blood and brain and across two neurodegenerative diseases. Expanding gene co‐expression network analyses to other diseases and integrating additional omics measures and phenotypes can further strengthen these findings to unravel the immune signatures across complex diseases.

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) is a devastating neurodegenerative disorder with few therapies to treat, mitigate or prevent its onset. Understanding of this disease is predominantly based on research in non‐Hispanic Whites (NHW) although AD disproportionately affects African Americans (AA) and Latin Americans (LA), underrepresented in AD research. To address this knowledge gap, the Accelerating Medicine Partnership for Alzheimer’s Disease (AMP‐AD) Diversity Working Group was launched to generate multi‐omics data from post‐mortem brain tissue from donors of predominantly AA and LA descent. Here, we focus on genomic and transcriptomics measures, made available through the AD Knowledge Portal (ADKP).MethodBrain tissue from dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), caudate nucleus (CN), superior temporal gyrus (STG) and temporal pole (TP) regions of AA (N = 299), LA (N = 344) and NHW (N = 532) donors was obtained through Mayo Clinic, Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, Emory, Columbia, Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Banner Sun Health, and 1Florida. DNA extracted from DLPFC tissue samples (n = 641) was utilized for whole genome sequencing (WGS) at New York Genome Center (NYGC). RNAseq of 2,224 samples was conducted either at Mayo, Rush or NYGC. Sequencing reads were processed through GenomeGPS and MAPRseq pipelines for WGS and RNAseq data, respectively. Following quality control (QC), RNAseq data was normalized and assessed for sources of variation (SOV). Integration of WGS and RNAseq data to perform comparative eQTL analysis across multi‐ethnic populations and brain regions is ongoing.ResultWGS data for 621 donors, and RNAseq data generated at Mayo (n = 1,136 samples), Rush (n = 627), and NYGC (n = 779) sequencing centers, were deposited to the ADKP. Consensus processing of RNAseq data revealed site, sex, race/ethnicity, RIN, AD diagnosis, age at death and/or library batch as SOV across various sites and brain regions. Principal component analysis of gene expression measures revealed no major stratification by disease or brain region. Accompanying clinical metadata of donors have been distributed through ADKP.ConclusionThese multi‐omics data made available to the research community is expected to be an initial step towards bridging our data and knowledge gap to elucidate conserved and distinct AD related pathways across these underrepresented at‐risk populations.