Rogalskı, Emily

Abstract Genetic studies have significantly advanced our understanding of tauopathies, yet the genetic aetiology of Pick’s disease, a rare 3-Repeat tauopathy, remains unclear. The MAPT p.A152T variant has been identified as a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease and progressive supranuclear palsy, but its role in Pick’s disease is unknown. In this study, we examined the prevalence of MAPT p.A152T in the largest series of neuropathologically confirmed Pick’s disease cases to date (n = 401). Through genotyping, we identified a single mutation carrier in the Pick’s disease cohort (minor allele frequency = 0.12%). We previously reported MAPT p.A152T at a 0.20% frequency in healthy controls (n = 2456), suggesting that it does not associate with 3-Repeat tauopathy risk. To further investigate the effect of the variant on MAPT transcript expression, we used bulk RNA sequencing in Alzheimer’s disease and progressive supranuclear palsy A152T mutation carriers. We did not detect significant differences in 4-Repeat tau levels, though preliminary trends may indicate more nuanced effects that need to be examined with long-read sequencing in a larger series. Overall, our study suggests that MAPT p.A152T does not increase Pick’s disease risk and may instead be linked to 4-Repeat or mixed tau pathologies, warranting further functional investigation.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Research into cognitive dispersion – a cognitive process score measuring the intra‐individual variability (IIV) across a single testing session – suggests utility in neurodegenerative populations. Given widespread deficits observed in sporadic early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD), however, it is unclear if examining cognitive dispersion shows benefit in this condition. METHODS A total of 309 participants (188 amyloid‐positive EOAD, 43 amyloid‐negative early‐onset dementia [EOnonAD], 78 cognitively normal [CN]) completed neuropsychological testing twice over 12 months. Dispersion‐related differences among groups were assessed, as was cognitive dispersion's capacity to predict domain‐specific cognitive trajectories, and its convergence with imaging biomarkers. RESULTS EOAD participants displayed higher cognitive dispersion than EOnonAD participants, and associations with EOAD‐specific biomarkers. Additionally, cognitive dispersion was associated with 12‐month reliable change across several cognitive domains. DISCUSSION These preliminary results examine cognitive dispersion in sporadic EOAD. When used with baseline cognitive performance, cognitive dispersion measures may enrich future clinical trials in EOAD by enhancing treatment monitoring over time.

Abstract The growing availability of large-scale biomarker datasets has allowed data-driven methods to characterize Alzheimer’s disease biological heterogeneity. However, most prior studies have focused on cohorts of late-onset amnestic cases, leaving early-onset Alzheimer’s disease underexplored. We aimed to characterize tau-PET-based subtypes through a robust data-driven approach in the Longitudinal Early-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease Study. Baseline [18F]Flortaucipir PET scans from 365 amyloid-PET-positive participants with sporadic early-onset Alzheimer’s disease were quantified in the left and right medial temporal, lateral temporal, occipital, parietal, and frontal cortices. Tau PET values were z-scored against 85 amyloid-PET-negative cognitively normal age-matched participants and fitted into Subtype and Stage Inference (SuStaIn)—an unsupervised clustering algorithm that simultaneously models subtypes and progression from cross-sectional data. The derived subtypes were subsequently characterized by baseline and longitudinal clinical, cognitive, MRI, tau and amyloid PET features. We identified three tau-PET-based subtypes: on average, Subtype 1/Typical (n = 144, 40%) showed a predominant bilateral temporoparietal pattern typical of Alzheimer’s disease. Subtype 2/Left temporal (n = 111, 31%) showed predominant left temporal binding. Subtype 3/Posterior (n = 104, 29%) showed early and permeating occipitoparietal involvement. Subtypes did not differ in demographics or global amyloid burden, but were relatively more enriched for specific clinical presentations: S1/Typical for amnestic presentations, S2/Left Temporal for primary progressive aphasia, and S3/Posterior for posterior cortical atrophy. Baseline tau PET subtypes aligned with cortical atrophy patterns and domain-specific cognitive impairment. When follow-up tau PET scans were fitted to SuStaIn trained on baseline data, 85.6% (n = 172/201) of participants retained the same subtype classification, indicating subtype temporal stability, and progressed within subtypes by 0.56 ± 0.70 SuStaIn stage/year. Longitudinal voxel-wise linear mixed-effects modelling revealed tau accumulation patterns for each subtype in regions relatively spared at baseline: occipital lobe accumulation predominated in S1/Typical, bilateral frontal and right temporal in S2/Left Temporal, and bilateral frontotemporal lobes in S3/Posterior. All subtypes showed longitudinal increases in Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes, but with slower worsening in S3/Posterior compared with the other subtypes. Our findings reveal robust subtypes in sporadic early-onset Alzheimer’s disease characterized by distinct spatiotemporal tau patterns that parallel differences in clinical presentations and trajectories of neurodegeneration. These subtypes extend beyond traditional clinical syndromes and support a more nuanced framework for individualized prognosis and care. Incorporating tau PET subtyping into clinical trial design could enable more targeted therapeutic approaches for this younger population.

Abstract INTRODUCTION : Despite expanding use of plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD), minimal examination has been undertaken in early‐onset AD (EOAD). Prior analyses assessed criterion and convergent validity of common plasma biomarkers in a well‐characterized sample with sporadic EOAD. METHODS : Plasma amyloid beta (Aβ) 42/40, tau phosphorylated at threonine 231 (p‐tau231), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light change (NfL) levels were obtained for 189 EOAD, 52 early‐onset non‐AD (EOnonAD), and 83 cognitively normal (CN) participants. Diagnostic group differences, convergence with imaging biomarkers, and the capacity to predict specific cognitive domains were investigated. RESULTS : After controlling for cognitive status, EOAD participants exhibited more pathologic levels of Aβ42/40, p‐tau231, and GFAP relative to EOnonAD participants. However, NfL displayed the greatest sensitivity to non‐amnestic cognitive impairment across the sample. DISCUSSION : These results establish criterion and convergent validity of plasma biomarkers in sporadic EOAD and highlight complementary roles that AD‐specific and non‐specific plasma markers may play across the course of AD care.

Abstract Early-onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) and Late-onset AD (LOAD) differ in clinical presentations and rates of progression. We aimed to compare baseline and longitudinal tau PET burden, and their relationship with clinical variables in amyloid-PET positive, cognitively impaired participants from the Longitudinal Early-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease Study (EOAD; n=390) and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (LOAD; n=211). Patients with EOAD showed higher baseline tau PET retention, broader neuroanatomical involvement and faster accumulation rates over time compared to LOAD, after adjusting for amyloid load and clinical stage. Tau PET showed stronger correlations with baseline amyloid burden and clinical measures of global cognition and function in EOAD than LOAD. We conclude that earlier age of onset in AD is linked to a more aggressive tauopathy, which in turn is a primary driver of clinical decline. These findings suggest that optimal therapeutic targets and strategies may differ between EOAD and LOAD. One Sentence Summary Younger patients with Alzheimer’s disease show more aggressive tau spread, suggesting age of onset defines distinct disease pathways with key clinical implications.

Abstract INTRODUCTION The genetic basis of sporadic early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) remains largely unknown, prompting evaluation of late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) polygenic risk in EOAD. METHODS A LOAD polygenic score (PGS) was calculated in the Longitudinal Early‐onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS) and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study and tested for associations with AD risk, cognitive performance, and imaging and fluid biomarkers. RESULTS Though PGS was elevated in LOAD and EOAD, it was not a significant predictor of EOAD adjusting for APOE ε4 carrier status and was not associated with age of EOAD onset ( p = 0.106) or with cognitive performance ( p = 0.417). In LEADS, greater LOAD PGS was associated with differences in neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers, including elevated synaptosomal‐associated protein 25 (SNAP‐25) ( p = 2.3 × 10 −5 ). DISCUSSION While LOAD polygenic risk contributed minimally to EOAD onset and cognitive dysfunction, PGS association with fluid biomarkers in LEADS suggests a role for LOAD polygenic risk in EOAD pathophysiology. Highlights LOAD PGSs were elevated in both LOAD and EOAD compared to controls; however, LOAD PGS did not significantly predict EOAD risk, age at onset, or cognitive performance independent of APOE ε4 in the LEADS. Higher LOAD PGS was associated with lower amyloid PET Centiloids (less brain amyloid deposition) as well as lower CSF biomarker Aβ42 in LEADS (proxy marker suggesting higher brain amyloid deposition) in LEADS; these contradictory findings support the need for larger studies to further investigate whether LOAD PGS is associated with increased amyloid deposition in EOAD. Higher LOAD PGS was also associated with higher levels of CSF synaptosomal‐associated protein 25 (SNAP‐25), a key component of the SNARE complex, suggesting that LOAD genetic factors may contribute to dysregulation of synaptic transmission and/or pathological protein aggregation in EOAD.

Abstract Background Agitation is a clinically significant symptom contributing to behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) but is poorly understood across the different syndromes related to Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD). This study investigates sex differences in agitation across FTLD‐related syndromes and its relationship to various neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS). Method We analyzed data from 1,654 participants (916 males, 738 females; average ages 65.8 and 65.9, respectively) from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) and ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) study with a FTLD‐related syndrome: behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), Primary Progressive Aphasia (non‐fluent variant (nfvPPA), semantic variant (svPPA)), Corticobasal syndrome (CBS) and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP). Participants’ symptoms were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Prevalence ratios and odds ratios were computed to assess the likelihood of NPS comorbidities when agitation was present in males and females. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed to identify NPS associated with agitation and how they varied by sex. Result Males were more likely to experience anxiety (bvFTD: p <0.001, CBS: p <0.01, PSP: p <0.0001), apathy (nfvPPA: p <0.01, PSP: p <0.01), depression (bvFTD: p <0.0001, PSP<0.01), disinhibition (nfvPPA: p <0.0001), PSP: p <0.001), and motor symptoms (bvFTD: p <0.01, CBS: p <0.01) when agitation was present. In contrast, females had a higher likelihood of experiencing disinhibition in svPPA ( p <0.001). These findings suggest that agitation is associated with a wider range of NPS in males than in females. Agitation and NPS are especially prominent in males with PSP. Conclusion This study reveals significant sex differences in NPS in FTLD‐related syndromes when agitation is present. Males and especially PSP, are more likely to experience a broader range of NPS in association with agitation. These findings underscore the need for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms driving these sex differences, particularly focusing on the neurobiological impact of agitation, the recognition of symptoms in the presence of greater behavioral disturbances, and potential variations from informant reports. Understanding these factors will provide valuable insights into the role of agitation in the presentation of NPS across FTLD‐related syndromes. Ultimately, addressing these gaps will enhance our ability to effectively treat and manage agitation in both male and female patients with FTLD‐related syndromes.

Abstract Background Staging disease severity in dementia research requires input from an informant. The Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR) is the most used instrument for staging in Alzheimer's Disease (AD); but has been expanded to stage patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) with the CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD. An informant effect on the CDR has been reported in AD. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether informant characteristics influence the CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD in a large cohort of participants with frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Method We included participants with a FTLD‐related syndrome from the ALLFTD study. We included participants with a CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD higher than 0, information on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI‐Q). We performed a conditional growth model using multilevel linear regression analysis. We performed an exploratory stratified analysis by patient sex. Result We included 1411 participants, totalling 2063 visits. The patient's age at the initial visit was 64.7±9.4 years and 44.0% were females. Females were 69.2% of the informants, and the relationship was 79.1% spouse or partner, 10.6% children, 4.1% were siblings and 6.2% other. The CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD scores were affected by informant characteristics. The CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD scores were 0.41 (CI 95%:0.08 to 0.75) higher with female informants. The frequency of visits was associated with a CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD score 0.86 higher (CI 95%:0.17 to 0.56) when visiting at least once a week, 1.46 higher (CI 95%:0.46 to 2.47) when visiting daily, and 0.83 higher (CI 95%:0.06 to 1.60) when living with the patient compared with visiting less than once a week. As expected, CDR‐FLTD scores increased with lower MoCA and higher NPI‐Q scores. In the stratified analysis by sex, we found that female informant was associated with higher CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD scores only when patients were male. Conclusion We found that the CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD is influenced by informant sex and frequency of visits in patients with FTLD‐related syndromes. These results are similar to those observed in AD patients and underscore the need to recognize that informant characteristics may impact dementia severity scales.