Weiner, Michael W.

Importance Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly used in research and clinical settings to determine the etiology of cognitive decline and eligibility for amyloid-targeting therapies. To assist with amyloid PET evaluation and to guide clinical decision-making, images can be quantified in a standardized unit called Centiloid, the interpretation of which can vary according to the method and threshold used. Objective To collect Centiloid values from available studies and determine robust positivity cutoffs using data-driven methods and correspondence with visual reads. Data Sources PubMed search (October 2024) identified studies with Centiloid values. Corresponding authors were invited to share individual participant data. Additional data were obtained through access-controlled repositories and conference outreach (July 2024-July 2025). Study Selection Studies were included if they provided Centiloids, radiotracer, age, and sex. Data Extraction and Synthesis Each study was analyzed using a unified statistical pipeline; study estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) were fitted to Centiloid values for each study. In studies with a bimodal distribution (per integrated completed likelihood), single cutoffs for positivity were set as mean plus 2 SDs of the lower gaussian component. Using GMMs, a double-cutoff approach defined a lower certainty range using a 90% posterior probability cutoff for assignment to the low (amyloid-negative) vs high (amyloid-positive) component. An alternative Centiloid cutoff was derived from maximizing the correspondence (Cohen κ) with the binary visual reads when available. Results This meta-analysis included cross-sectional amyloid PET scans acquired with 5 radiotracers from 49 227 participants across 53 studies from 15 countries (mean age, 71 years; 54% female, 62% cognitively impaired). The data-driven GMM approach identified a bimodal distribution in 51 studies (n = 48 786), resulting in a single cutoff for positivity of 18 Centiloids (95% CI,16-19; I 2 = 97%). The double-cutoff approach revealed high confidence for interpreting scans as negative when Centiloid values were lower than 11 (95% CI, 9-13; I 2 = 95%) and interpreting scans as positive if Centiloid values were higher than 26 (95% CI, 24-28; I 2 = 95%). In analyses of correspondence with binary (positive or negative) visual reads of amyloid PET scans (n = 35 045; 36 studies), Centiloids were highly predictive of visual positivity (Cohen κ, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.83-0.89; I 2 = 96%) with a cutoff of 27 Centiloids (95% CI, 24-30; I 2 = 80%). Conclusions and Relevance In this individual participant data meta-analysis, positivity cutoffs converged around 18 Centiloids (data-driven) and 27 Centiloids (visual reads). Findings from a double-cutoff analysis suggest that scans in the 11 to 26 Centiloid range should be interpreted with caution depending on the context of use.

Abstract The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) recently celebrated its 20th anniversary, reflecting two decades of major contributions to Alzheimer's research through open data sharing and longitudinal multimodal assessments. This review synthesizes 122 high‐impact studies using ADNI data or biospecimens from 2023 to mid‐2025 to clarify mechanisms of Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression. Studies describe impairment of glymphatic clearance and the impact of cerebral small vessel disease, trajectories of amyloid beta and tau deposition, inflammation, metabolic disturbances, synaptic dysfunction, and neurodegeneration, leading to cognitive impairment and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Multifactorial contributions from genetic and epigenetic influences, co‐pathologies and comorbidities, and mechanisms of resilience modulate disease progression. Finally, heterogeneity of clinical presentation and disease course is described in the context of multiple contributing factors, highlighting the complexity of AD. By integrating imaging, fluid biomarkers, genetics, and clinical measures, ADNI provides a comprehensive research dataset for unraveling mechanisms underlying AD progression.

Abstract INTRODUCTION To examine the generalizability of Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker models in real‐world older adults, we examined AD biomarker relationships with cognition in two multicenter cohorts that differ with respect to recruitment approach and health risk factors but were matched on a variety of characteristics. METHODS We compared harmonized health and demographic data, AD and cerebrovascular biomarkers, and cognitive performance in the community‐recruited U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health Through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk (U.S. POINTER) Imaging substudy and a matched sample from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) which recruited primarily from academic specialty clinics. RESULTS Elevated β‐amyloid (Aβ) and tau were associated with cognitive performance in ADNI but not U.S. POINTER. Findings were consistent across different cohort matching schemes, and were not explained by discrepancies in vascular risk. DISCUSSION The role of Aβ and tau in cognitive performance may be reduced in real world samples compared to academic specialty clinics.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Remote neuropsychological testing can monitor brain health in individuals with or at risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We evaluated acceptability and validity of the Cogstate Brief Battery (CBB) for remote administration. METHODS Non‐demented adults from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) completed the CBB in‐clinic under supervision, then remotely every six months, with annual in‐clinic reassessments. Groups included cognitively unimpaired (CU) adults with normal amyloid (CU Aβ−) or elevated amyloid (CU Aβ+), and individuals with mild cognitive impairment with or without amyloid (MCI Aβ+, MCI Aβ−). Performance was compared across contexts and longitudinal changes were examined. RESULTS At baseline, MCI Aβ+ participants performed worse than CU Aβ−. CBB performance was similar across contexts, with consistent group differences. Over time, MCI Aβ+ participants showed greater decline on remote CBB measures than CU Aβ− adults. DISCUSSION Remote unsupervised CBB assessments are valid, reliable, and sensitive to AD‐related cognitive impairment.

Abstract Alzheimer's disease (AD) continues to pose a major public health challenge. Since its launch in 2004, the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) has played a pivotal role in advancing the field by providing a comprehensive, open‐access, longitudinal dataset that integrates neuroimaging, biomarker, genetic, and clinical data related to AD. We used standard literature search methods to identify ∼1830 publications from 2023 to mid‐2025 that used ADNI data or samples. This review highlights key ADNI studies with direct clinical applications. We describe how these have impacted the development and validation of plasma biomarkers, improved clinical trials, assessed AD therapies, and developed methods for diagnosis and prediction using clinical, fluid, and imaging biomarkers. These contributions are underlain by an improved understanding of biological mechanisms of disease progression in AD and highlight ADNI's central role in advancing translational research and accelerating progress toward more effective, individualized care for patients with AD.

Importance Sex differences are increasingly recognized as modifiers of Alzheimer disease and related dementias, with women exhibiting greater tau burden and faster cognitive decline than men. Even though α-synuclein copathology frequently occurs in Alzheimer disease, its contribution to sex differences in disease progression is unclear. Objective To test whether α-synuclein positivity, measured using cerebrospinal fluid seed amplification assay (SAA), is differentially associated with tau accumulation in women vs men across the Alzheimer disease continuum. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used longitudinal tau positron emission tomography from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative collected between 2015 and 2023, with a median (IQR) follow-up of 1.23 (0.00-3.84) years. Participants were stratified by cerebrospinal fluid α-synuclein seed amplification assay status and sex. Participants were cognitively unimpaired or cognitively impaired (mild cognitive impairment or dementia) at baseline. Exposure Cerebrospinal fluid α-synuclein status determined by SAA and dichotomized as SAA negative or SAA positive. Main Outcomes and Measures Tau burden was quantified as standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) in the medial temporal composite region of interest. Linear mixed-effects models tested SAA by sex by time interactions on longitudinal tau accumulation, adjusting for baseline age, baseline cognitive status, apolipoprotein E ε4 carrier status, and site. Sample size estimates were calculated to detect 25% and 50% treatment effects with 80% power in those with cognitive impairment. Results Among 415 participants (mean [SD] age, 72.3 [7.6] years; 220 women [53%]; 69 SAA positive [17%] and 346 SAA negative [83%]), there was a significant interaction between SAA status, sex, and time on tau accumulation (β, 0.061; 95% CI, 0.030-0.093; P < .001). Women with positive SAA results exhibited the fastest tau accumulation compared with other groups (0.066 SUVr per year; 95% CI, 0.043 to 0.089 SUVr per year; P < .001). Clinical trials targeting tau pathology in cognitively impaired individuals with 18-month follow-up would require 129 SAA-positive women to detect a 25% treatment effect with 80% power, compared with 518 SAA-negative women. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of participants across the Alzheimer disease continuum, α-synuclein copathology was associated with faster tau accumulation in women than men. These findings may inform sex-specific interpretation of α-synuclein biomarkers and trial design.

Abstract INTRODUCTION The Centiloid scale is the standard for amyloid (Aβ) PET quantification in research and clinical settings. However, variability between tracers and scanners remains a challenge. METHODS This study introduces DeepSUVR, a deep learning method to correct Centiloid quantification, by penalizing implausible longitudinal trajectories during training. The model was trained using data from 2,129 participants (7,149 Aβ positron emission tomography [PET] scans) in the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle Study of ageing (AIBL)/Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and validated using 15,807 Aβ PET scans from 10,543 participants across 10 external datasets. RESULTS DeepSUVR increased correlation between tracers, and reduced variability in the Aß‐negatives. It showed significantly stronger association with cognition, visual reads, neuropathology, and increased longitudinal consistency between studies. DeepSUVR also increased the effect size for detecting small treatment related slowing of amyloid accumulation in the A4 study. DISCUSSION DeepSUVR substantially advances Aβ PET quantification, outperforming all standard approaches, which is particularly important for clinical decision making and to detect subtle or early changes in Aβ. Highlights Novel artificial intelligence (AI)‐method that penalizes biologically implausible longitudinal trajectories, enabling the model to learn standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) correction factors without requiring longitudinal data at inference time. Improves Centiloid consistency across tracers and studies, significantly enhancing cross‐sectional and longitudinal amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) quantification. DeepSUVR‐derived Centiloids show stronger associations with cognition, visual reads, and neuropathology. Longitudinal variability is reduced three‐ to five‐fold, enabling more reliable tracking of amyloid accumulation and better detection of treatment effects. Novel reference and target masks derived from DeepSUVR replicate most of the model's performance, offering a practical alternative for integration into existing pipelines.

Abstract Background Ten years after the original publication, the Centiloid framework is now broadly used to harmonize amyloid‐PET quantification, facilitate data sharing and comparison across cohorts, and even assist visual interpretation in clinical settings. We evaluated the global implementation of Centiloids by comparing their distribution and corresponding positivity thresholds across cohorts. Methods We gathered data from publicly available cohorts and reached out to investigators across the world to collect cross‐sectional Centiloids, demographic and clinical information, and visual read data. Gaussian mixture models (GMM, k=2) were fitted to Centiloid values for each cohort and cutoffs were calculated as mean + 2SD of the lower Gaussian. When visual reads were available, we determined Centiloid cutoffs that maximized correspondence with visual reads (Cohen's kappa). Data was combined across cohorts using random effects meta‐analyses. Results As of January 2025, we included 37 cohorts ( n = 41,678 participants) with heterogeneous pipelines, radiotracers, and clinical and demographic characteristics (Table‐1). The low Gaussian peaks ranged from ‐9 to 10CL; the meta‐analysis identified a common peak at 1CL. The second peaks were more heterogeneous (range=38‐102CL; meta‐analysis outcome=64CL). Across cohorts, the proportion of cognitively unimpaired versus impaired participants impacted the position of both peaks, with better separation in cohorts enriched in impaired individuals (Figure 1C). The meta‐analysis indicated a GMM‐based cutoff of 19CL (95%CI: 16‐21CL, Figure 1B); subgroup analyses showed no evidence of significant effect between single versus multicenter settings (17 versus 20CL, p = 0.30), MRI‐based or PET‐only processing (18 versus 19CL, p = 0.88), and no evidence of difference across radiotracers (Flutemetamol: 16CL; PIB: 17CL, Flutafuranol: 18CL, Florbetaben: 19CL, Florbetapir: 20CL, p = 0.78). In a subset of 29,496 participants with visual reads available, binary visual reads corresponded well to Centiloids (common kappa=0.86, Figure 2A). The visual read‐based cutoff of 24CL (95%CI: 21‐27CL, Figure 2B) maximized correspondence between visual read and quantification and was slightly higher than the GMM‐based cutoff. All meta‐analysis models showed high non‐random heterogeneity (I 2 >80%) across studies, suggesting non‐random differences in peaks and cutoffs. Conclusions Meta‐analysis‐based cutoffs align well with thresholds from the existing literature. High heterogeneity among studies underscores the need to investigate contributing factors, raising concerns about applying common cutoffs.

Abstract Background Prior studies of Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker disclosure have answered important questions about individuals’ experiences learning amyloid results. In comparison, the experiences of individuals performing AD biomarker disclosure have been under characterized. The present study examines the clinician experience disclosing amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) results within the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative's ADNI‐4 study. Methods The ADNI‐4 longitudinal cohort study includes a pragmatic process for amyloid PET disclosure for participants across the cognitive spectrum. Disclosing clinicians complete a short questionnaire after each disclosure session, reporting on the visit length, the clinician's rating of participant and study partner understanding and emotional reactions, topics discussed, challenges, assessment of the visit overall, and any feedback about the process. Results Across the first 100 disclosures (48 cognitively normal, 35 Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), 17 dementia) in ADNI‐4, visits lasted an average of 29.4 minutes (SD 13.9, range 10‐90). Most cognitively impaired participants had a loved one present at the disclosure visit (dementia 94%, MCI 80%) but the majority of cognitively normal participants (73%) did not. Clinicians rated understanding of the result as adequate for all study partners and the vast majority (94%) of participants. Clinicians reported feeling “very confident” in their ability to assess readiness to receive result (70%), disclose (73%), and answer questions (77%). Clinicians rated all visits as “good” or better, with two‐thirds (65%) rated as “excellent.” Frequently discussed topics included meaning of result (99%), other risk factors (72%), and emotional impact of result (49%). Stigma and discrimination were rarely discussed, coming up in 12% and 3% of disclosure sessions, respectively. Challenges were infrequent (7%) and primarily included desire for additional information and challenges related to the participant's impairment. Clinicians provided the study team feedback about the disclosure process for 25% of disclosure visits. Comments included the desire for additional information or resources, positive feedback, and the importance of the study partner. Conclusions Clinicians disclosing amyloid PET results in ADNI‐4 report high confidence, adequate participant and study partner understanding, and few challenges. These data from clinicians, in combination with participant data, will inform future disclosure practices in both research and care.

Abstract Background Ten years after the original publication, the Centiloid framework is now broadly used to harmonize amyloid‐PET quantification, facilitate data sharing and comparison across cohorts, and even assist visual interpretation in clinical settings. We evaluated the global implementation of Centiloids by comparing their distribution and corresponding positivity thresholds across cohorts. Methods We gathered data from publicly available cohorts and reached out to investigators across the world to collect cross‐sectional Centiloids, demographic and clinical information, and visual read data. Gaussian mixture models (GMM, k=2) were fitted to Centiloid values for each cohort and cutoffs were calculated as mean + 2SD of the lower Gaussian. When visual reads were available, we determined Centiloid cutoffs that maximized correspondence with visual reads (Cohen’s kappa). Data was combined across cohorts using random effects meta‐analyses. Results As of January 2025, we included 37 cohorts ( n = 41,678 participants) with heterogeneous pipelines, radiotracers, and clinical and demographic characteristics (Table‐1). The low Gaussian peaks ranged from ‐9 to 10CL; the meta‐analysis identified a common peak at 1CL. The second peaks were more heterogeneous (range=38‐102CL; meta‐analysis outcome=64CL). Across cohorts, the proportion of cognitively unimpaired versus impaired participants impacted the position of both peaks, with better separation in cohorts enriched in impaired individuals (Figure‐1C). The meta‐analysis indicated a GMM‐based cutoff of 19CL (95%CI: 16‐21CL, Figure‐1B); subgroup analyses showed no evidence of significant effect between single versus multicenter settings (17 versus 20CL, p = 0.30), MRI‐based or PET‐only processing (18 versus 19CL, p = 0.88), and no evidence of difference across radiotracers (Flutemetamol: 16CL; PIB: 17CL, Flutafuranol: 18CL, Florbetaben: 19CL, Florbetapir: 20CL, p = 0.78). In a subset of 29,496 participants with visual reads available, binary visual reads corresponded well to Centiloids (common kappa=0.86, Figure‐2A). The visual read‐based cutoff of 24CL (95%CI: 21‐27CL, Figure‐2B) maximized correspondence between visual read and quantification and was slightly higher than the GMM‐based cutoff. All meta‐analysis models showed high non‐random heterogeneity (I 2 >80%) across studies, suggesting non‐random differences in peaks and cutoffs. Conclusions Meta‐analysis‐based cutoffs align well with thresholds from the existing literature. High heterogeneity among studies underscores the need to investigate contributing factors, raising concerns about applying common cutoffs.