Back to Authors

Wang, Wei‐en

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8555-9062

Mayo Clinic

University of Florida

Citations 7

Amyloid PET Quantitation and Centiloid Thresholds in the Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease
Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Chiotis, Konstantinos, Allen, Isabel E., Rabinovici, Gil D., Joie, Renaud La , Group, Meta-Centiloid Study, Apostolova, Liana G. , Asken, Breton M., Benzinger, Th., Betthauser, Tobey J., Bluma, Marina, Bombois, Stephanie, Bourgeat, Pierrick, Bouteloup, Vincent , Braskie, Meredith N., Brendel, Matthias, Brickman, Adam M., Bryant, Natalie, Bullich, Santiago , Carrillo, Maria C., Casaletto, Kaitlin, Cash, David M., Chang, Chiung-Chih, CHANG, H L, Chao, Yishu , Collij, Lyduine E., Corrada, Maria M., Craft, Suzanne , Dickerson, Bradford C., Dubois, Bruno, Dufouil, Carole, Fajardo, Alfonso, Farrar, Gill , Fortea, Juan, Frings, Lars , Frisoni, Giovanni B., Gardner, Raquel C., Gnörich, Johannes , Gordon, Brian A., Gu, Yuna , Guan, Yihui, Guo, Tengfei, Hanseeuw, Bernard J., Hansson, Oskar, Harrison, Theresa M., Huang, Qi, Huang, ST , Iaccarino, Leonardo, Ishii, Kazunari, Ishi, Kenji, Jagust, William J., Johnson, Sterling C., Kato, Takashi, Katsumi, Yuta, Kaye, Jeffrey, Kolinger, Guilherme D., Kramer, Joel H. , Landau, Susan M., Landeau, Brigitte, Lao, Patrick J., Lee, Sangwon, Lopresti, Brian J., Lowe, Val J. , Luchsinger, José A., Mao, Xiaoxie, March, Andrew, Masters, Colin L., Meyer, Philipp T., Mezenge, Florence, Mormino, Elizabeth C., Franquesa‐Mullerat, María , Nakamura, Akinori, Nordberg, Agneta, O’Brien, John T., O’Bryant, Sid E., Pappas, Ioannis, Peretti, Debora E., Rowe, Christopher C., Rowe, James B., Schwartz, Daniel L., Seo, Sang Won , Shekari, Mahnaz, Smith, Ruben, Snyder, Heather M. , Sokolowski, Andrzej, Sperling, Reisa A., Sun, Pan, Taggett, Jacinda Z., Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Vaillancourt, David E., Giessen, Elsmarieke van de, Vijverberg, Jort, Villemagne, Victor L. , Villeneuve, Sylvia , Wang, Wei-en, Weiner, Michael, Woodworth, Davis, Xiao, Cally , Xie, F, Yoon, Yeojun, Yun, Mijin, Severanc, A4, ABIDE, ADNI*, ADNI-DoD, AgeWell, AIBL, AMYPAD, BACS, BATON, BIOCARD, BLSA, BioFINDER-2, BrANCH, CPAS, DETECT-AD, GEMS, GHABS, HABS, HABS-HD, IDEAS, IMAP, INSIGHT-preAD, Insight46, K-ROAD, LEADS, MCSA, MULNIAD, MEMENTO, SCAN, PREVENT-AD, SPIN,, Corrada, María M. , La Joie, Renaud , Blazhenets, Ganna , Chiotis, Konstantinos , Allen, Isabel Elaine , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Asken, Breton M. , Bejanin, Alexandre , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Betthauser, Tobey J. , Blūma, Marina , Bombois, Stéphanie , Bourgeat, Pierrick , Braskie, Meredith N. , Brendel, Matthias , Brickman, Adam M. , Carrillo, María C. , Casaletto, Kaitlin B. , Cash, David M. , Chang, Chiung‐Chih , Chang, Hsin‐I , Chêne, Geneviève , Chételat, Gaël , Coath, William , Collij, Lyduine , Colmant, Lise , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Dubois, Bruno , Dufouil, Carole , Fortea, Juan , Garibotto, Valentina , Gordon, Brian A. , Guan, Yihui , Guo, Tengfei , Hanseeuw, Bernard , Hansson, Oskar , Harrison, Theresa M. , Iaccarino, Leonardo , Ishii, Kazunari , Ishii, Kenji, Jagust, William J. , Johnson, Sterling C. , Katsumi, Yuta , Kaye, Jeffrey , Koeppe, Robert A. , Kolinger, Guilherme Domingues , Landau, Susan , Landeau, Brigitte , Lao, Patrick , Lee, Sangwon, Lleó, Alberto , Lopresti, Brian J. , Malpetti, Maura , March, Andrew, Masters, Colin L. , Mézenge, Florence, Mormino, Elizabeth C. , Nakamura, Akinori , Nordberg, Agneta , O'Brien, John Tiernan , O’Bryant, Sid E. , Pappas, Ioannis , Quenon, Lisa , Rowe, Christopher Cleon , Rowe, James B. , Rudolph, Marc D. , Salvadó, Gemma , Schott, Jonathan M. , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Shekari, Mahnaz , Silbert, Lisa C. , Smith, Ruben, Sokolowski, Andrzej, Sperling, Reisa Anne , Sun, Pan , Taggett, Jacinda , Toga, Arthur W. , Vaillancourt, David E. , Giessen, Elsmarieke van de , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Villain, Nicolas , Wang, Wei‐en , Weiner, Michael W. , Xie, Fang , Young, Christina B. , Yun, M R

JAMA | July 13, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1001/jama.2026.13116 Get It

Importance Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly used in research and clinical settings to determine the etiology of cognitive decline and eligibility for amyloid-targeting therapies. To assist with amyloid PET evaluation and to guide clinical decision-making, images can be quantified in a standardized unit called Centiloid, the interpretation of which can vary according to the method and threshold used. Objective To collect Centiloid values from available studies and determine robust positivity cutoffs using data-driven methods and correspondence with visual reads. Data Sources PubMed search (October 2024) identified studies with Centiloid values. Corresponding authors were invited to share individual participant data. Additional data were obtained through access-controlled repositories and conference outreach (July 2024-July 2025). Study Selection Studies were included if they provided Centiloids, radiotracer, age, and sex. Data Extraction and Synthesis Each study was analyzed using a unified statistical pipeline; study estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) were fitted to Centiloid values for each study. In studies with a bimodal distribution (per integrated completed likelihood), single cutoffs for positivity were set as mean plus 2 SDs of the lower gaussian component. Using GMMs, a double-cutoff approach defined a lower certainty range using a 90% posterior probability cutoff for assignment to the low (amyloid-negative) vs high (amyloid-positive) component. An alternative Centiloid cutoff was derived from maximizing the correspondence (Cohen κ) with the binary visual reads when available. Results This meta-analysis included cross-sectional amyloid PET scans acquired with 5 radiotracers from 49 227 participants across 53 studies from 15 countries (mean age, 71 years; 54% female, 62% cognitively impaired). The data-driven GMM approach identified a bimodal distribution in 51 studies (n = 48 786), resulting in a single cutoff for positivity of 18 Centiloids (95% CI,16-19; I 2 = 97%). The double-cutoff approach revealed high confidence for interpreting scans as negative when Centiloid values were lower than 11 (95% CI, 9-13; I 2 = 95%) and interpreting scans as positive if Centiloid values were higher than 26 (95% CI, 24-28; I 2 = 95%). In analyses of correspondence with binary (positive or negative) visual reads of amyloid PET scans (n = 35 045; 36 studies), Centiloids were highly predictive of visual positivity (Cohen κ, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.83-0.89; I 2 = 96%) with a cutoff of 27 Centiloids (95% CI, 24-30; I 2 = 80%). Conclusions and Relevance In this individual participant data meta-analysis, positivity cutoffs converged around 18 Centiloids (data-driven) and 27 Centiloids (visual reads). Findings from a double-cutoff analysis suggest that scans in the 11 to 26 Centiloid range should be interpreted with caution depending on the context of use.
Reply to “Methodological Challenges in Interpreting SAA ‐Defined Imaging Subgroups in Parkinson's Disease”
Chiu, Shannon , Wang, Wei‐en , Chen, Robin , Adler, Charles H., Mehta, Shyamal H. , Dresler, Sara R. , Armstrong, Melissa J., McFarland, Nikolaus, Okun, Michael S., Vaillancourt, David E., Chiu, Shannon Y , Dresler, Sara R , DeSimone, Jesse C. , Archer, Derek B. , Adler, Charles H. , Armstrong, Melissa J. , McFarland, Nikolaus R. , Okun, Michael S. , Vaillancourt, David E.

Annals of Neurology | June 29, 2026 | Volume: 100 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 440-441

10.1002/ana.78292 Get It

Diffusion MRI and α‐Synuclein Seed Amplification Status in Parkinson's Disease
Chiu, Shannon , Wang, Wei‐en , Chen, Robin , Adler, Charles H., Mehta, Shyamal H. , Dresler, Sara R. , Armstrong, Melissa J., McFarland, Nikolaus, Okun, Michael, Vaillancourt, David E., Initiative, Parkinson's Progression Markers, Chiu, Shannon Y , Dresler, Sara R , DeSimone, Jesse C. , Archer, Derek B. , Adler, Charles H. , Armstrong, Melissa J. , McFarland, Nikolaus R. , Okun, Michael S. , Vaillancourt, David E.

Annals of Neurology | May 7, 2026 | Volume: 100 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 295-304

10.1002/ana.78252 Get It

Objective Positive α‐synuclein seed amplification assay (SAA) is a biomarker found in most people with Parkinson's disease (PD). We explored if free‐water (FW) imaging detects microstructural differences in the brains of patients with early PD with SAA+ or SAA– status. Methods We studied patients with PD with baseline diffusion imaging and α‐synuclein SAA data from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI). We compared FW, FW corrected fractional anisotropy (FA T ), and clinical characteristics between SAA+ and SAA– groups. We also applied the Automated Imaging Differentiation for Parkinsonism (AIDP) at baseline to classify PD versus atypical parkinsonism, stratified by SAA status. Results Among 462 participants (41 SAA– and 421 SAA+), individuals with SAA+ had hyposmia and shorter motor symptom duration before baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). AIDP identified PD in 92.4% (n = 427, 91.6% had SAA+) and classified 7.6% as atypical parkinsonism (n = 35, 85.7% had SAA+). At baseline, SAA+ individuals had lower FW in the superior cerebellar peduncle, compared to SAA– (pFDR < 0.05). No significant differences in FA T were found between groups. Interpretation Positive α‐synuclein SAA was associated with focal microstructural differences but did not distinguish broader diffusion MRI (dMRI) changes across FW and FA T metrics. These findings indicate that molecular confirmation of synuclein aggregation (via SAA) provides limited stratification of neurodegeneration detected by FW imaging in early PD. ANN NEUROL 2026;100:295–304
Every Centiloid, from Everywhere, All at Once
Snyder, Heather M. , Apostolova, Liana G., Bombois, Stéphanie, Bourgeat, Pierrick, Braskie, Meredith N. , Carrillo, Maria, Casaletto, Kaitlin B, Chang, C. -C., Chang, Hsin‐I., Chao, Yishu , Chetelat, Gaël, Collij, Lyduine E., Dickerson, Brad C., Dubois, Bruno, Valdez, Alfonso Fajardo, Farrar, Gill , Fortea, Juan M., Frisoni, Giovanni B, Gu, Yuna , Guo, Tengfei, Hansson, Oskar H., Huang, Q., Huang, Shu‐Hua , Ishii, Kenji, Jagust, William J., Kato, Takashi , Koeppe, R. A., Kramer, Joel H, Landau, Susan M., Landeau, Brigitte, Lee, Sangwon, Lopresti, Brian J. , Lowe, Val J. , Mao, Xiaoxie, March, Andrew, Masters, Colin L., Mézenge, Florence, Mormino, Elizabeth C. , Franquesa‐Mullerat, María , Nakamura, Akinori, O'Bryant, Sid E., Pappas, Ioannis G., Rowe, C. C., Schott, Jonathan M, Schwartz, Daniel L. , Schwarz, Christopher G, Seo, Sang Won, Shekari, Mahnaz, Smith, Ruben, Sokołowski, Andrzej , Soleimani‐Meigooni, David, Sperling, Reisa A., Sun, Pan , Toga, Arthur W., Vaillancourt, David E. , Flier, Wiesje M. van der, Vemuri, Prashanthi, Villain, Nicolas , Villemagne, Victor L., Villeneuve, Sylvia , Wang, Wei‐En, Weiner, Michael S. W., Xiao, Cally , Xie, Fang, Yoon, Yeojun, Yun, M R , Rabinovici, Gil D., Wang, Wei‐en , Blazhenets, Ganna , Apostolova, Liana G. , Asken, Breton M. , Bejanin, Alexandre , Bombois, Stéphanie , Bourgeat, Pierrick , Casaletto, Kaitlin B. , Cash, David M. , Chang, Hsin‐I , Chételat, Gaël , Coath, William , Collij, Lyduine , Colmant, Lise , Dickerson, Brad C., Dubois, Bruno , Fortea, Juan , Frisoni, Giovanni B. , Gardner, Raquel C. , Garibotto, Valentina , Guo, Tengfei , Hanseeuw, Bernard , Hansson, Oskar , Harrison, Theresa M. , Ishii, Kazunari , Jagust, William J. , Kramer, Joel H. , Landau, Susan, Landeau, Brigitte , Masters, Colin L. , Mézenge, Florence, Nakamura, Akinori , O’Bryant, Sid E. , Peretti, Débora Elisa , Quenon, Lisa , Salvadó, Gemma , Schott, Jonathan M. , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Seo, Sang Won , Shekari, Mahnaz , Silbert, Lisa C. , Sokolowski, Andrzej, Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Sperling, Reisa Anne , Sun, Pan , Toga, Arthur W. , Giessen, Elsmarieke van de , Flier, Wiesje M. van der , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Villemagne, Victor L. , Weiner, Michael W. , Xie, Fang , Young, Christina B. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Joie, Renaud La

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 23, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S8 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70862_110011 Get It

Abstract Background Ten years after the original publication, the Centiloid framework is now broadly used to harmonize amyloid‐PET quantification, facilitate data sharing and comparison across cohorts, and even assist visual interpretation in clinical settings. We evaluated the global implementation of Centiloids by comparing their distribution and corresponding positivity thresholds across cohorts. Methods We gathered data from publicly available cohorts and reached out to investigators across the world to collect cross‐sectional Centiloids, demographic and clinical information, and visual read data. Gaussian mixture models (GMM, k=2) were fitted to Centiloid values for each cohort and cutoffs were calculated as mean + 2SD of the lower Gaussian. When visual reads were available, we determined Centiloid cutoffs that maximized correspondence with visual reads (Cohen’s kappa). Data was combined across cohorts using random effects meta‐analyses. Results As of January 2025, we included 37 cohorts ( n = 41,678 participants) with heterogeneous pipelines, radiotracers, and clinical and demographic characteristics (Table‐1). The low Gaussian peaks ranged from ‐9 to 10CL; the meta‐analysis identified a common peak at 1CL. The second peaks were more heterogeneous (range=38‐102CL; meta‐analysis outcome=64CL). Across cohorts, the proportion of cognitively unimpaired versus impaired participants impacted the position of both peaks, with better separation in cohorts enriched in impaired individuals (Figure‐1C). The meta‐analysis indicated a GMM‐based cutoff of 19CL (95%CI: 16‐21CL, Figure‐1B); subgroup analyses showed no evidence of significant effect between single versus multicenter settings (17 versus 20CL, p = 0.30), MRI‐based or PET‐only processing (18 versus 19CL, p = 0.88), and no evidence of difference across radiotracers (Flutemetamol: 16CL; PIB: 17CL, Flutafuranol: 18CL, Florbetaben: 19CL, Florbetapir: 20CL, p = 0.78). In a subset of 29,496 participants with visual reads available, binary visual reads corresponded well to Centiloids (common kappa=0.86, Figure‐2A). The visual read‐based cutoff of 24CL (95%CI: 21‐27CL, Figure‐2B) maximized correspondence between visual read and quantification and was slightly higher than the GMM‐based cutoff. All meta‐analysis models showed high non‐random heterogeneity (I 2 >80%) across studies, suggesting non‐random differences in peaks and cutoffs. Conclusions Meta‐analysis‐based cutoffs align well with thresholds from the existing literature. High heterogeneity among studies underscores the need to investigate contributing factors, raising concerns about applying common cutoffs.
Longitudinal Free‐Water Changes in Dementia with Lewy Bodies
Chiu, Shannon , Chen, Robin , Wang, Wei‐en , Armstrong, Melissa J. , Savica, Rodolfo , Fields, Julie A. , Graff‐Radford, Neill R., Ferman, Tanis J. , Kantarci, Kejal , Vaillancourt, David E. , Initiative, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging, Chiu, Shannon Y , Savica, Rodolfo , Kantarci, Kejal , Ferman, Tanis J , Armstrong, Melissa J , Boeve, Bradley F. , Ramanan, Vijay K. , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Initiative, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging

Movement Disorders | March 13, 2024 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 836-846

10.1002/mds.29763 Get It

AbstractBackgroundDiffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) examines tissue microstructure integrity in vivo. Prior dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) diffusion tensor imaging studies yielded mixed results.ObjectiveWe employed free‐water (FW) imaging to assess DLB progression and correlate with clinical decline in DLB.MethodsBaseline and follow‐up MRIs were obtained at 12 and/or 24 months for 27 individuals with DLB or mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI‐LB). FW was analyzed using the Mayo Clinic Adult Lifespan Template. Primary outcomes were FW differences between baseline and 12 or 24 months. To compare FW change longitudinally, we included 20 cognitively unimpaired individuals from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.ResultsWe followed 23 participants to 12 months and 16 participants to 24 months. Both groups had worsening in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Movement Disorder Society‐Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS‐UPDRS) scores. We found significant FW increases at both time points compared to baseline in the insula, amygdala, posterior cingulum, parahippocampal, entorhinal, supramarginal, fusiform, retrosplenial, and Rolandic operculum regions. At 24 months, we found more widespread microstructural changes in regions implicated in visuospatial processing, motor, and cholinergic functions. Between‐group analyses (DLB vs. controls) confirmed significant FW changes over 24 months in most of these regions. FW changes were associated with longitudinal worsening of MDS‐UPDRS and MoCA scores.ConclusionsFW increased in gray and white matter regions in DLB, likely due to neurodegenerative pathology associated with disease progression. FW change was associated with clinical decline. The findings support dMRI as a promising tool to track disease progression in DLB. © 2024 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Longitudinal free‐water changes in dementia with Lewy bodies
Chiu, Shannon , Chen, Robin , Wang, Wei‐en , Armstrong, Melissa J. , Vaillancourt, David E. , Armstrong, Melissa J , Boeve, Bradley F. , Kantarci, Kejal

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 25, 2023 | Volume: 19 | Issue: S17 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.072638 Get It

AbstractBackgroundDiffusion‐weighted MRI (dMRI) examines tissue microstructure integrity and white matter pathways in vivo. Prior dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) studies focused on white matter or voxel‐based techniques. Less is known about longitudinal white and grey matter microstructural changes in DLB. We aimed to characterize longitudinal diffusion microstructural changes in individuals with DLB.MethoddMRI scans were collected on individuals with DLB from the Mayo Clinic Longitudinal Imaging Biomarkers of DLB Program. Demographics, clinical evaluations and MRI were collected at baseline, and 12‐ or 24‐months. Free water (FW) and FW‐corrected fractional anisotropy (FAT) were analyzed in grey and white matter using 122 bilateral template regions and tracts of interest from the Mayo Clinic Adult Lifespan Template. Primary outcomes were differences in FW and FAT between baseline and 12‐ or 24‐months.ResultWe identified 23 individuals with DLB or mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI‐LB) from baseline to 12‐months [mean age 69.3 years (SD 9.5); 95.8% male], and 16 individuals from baseline to 24‐months [mean age 67.5 years (SD 9.3); 100% male]. Participants at both time‐points showed worsening in Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale motor scores (p<0.05). We found significant differences in FW, but not FAT, from baseline to 12‐months. Significant increases in FW at both time‐points compared to baseline were observed in the insula, putamen, parahippocampal, and rolandic operculum regions (pfdr<0.05). We found additional more widespread microstructural changes from baseline to 24‐months, with increased FW in the amygdala, entorhinal, mid and posterior cingulum, inferior frontal, hippocampal, pallidum, precuneus and retrosplenial regions (pfdr<0.05). We found decreased FAT from baseline to 24‐months in the cerebellar and superior occipital regions (pfdr<0.01).ConclusionLonger follow‐up at 24‐months identified broader networks of free water changes in individuals with DLB. Results support dMRI as a promising, non‐invasive tool to track disease progression in DLB. More investigation is needed to evaluate the relationship of microstructural changes with clinical progression in DLB.
Longitudinal free-water changes in dementia with Lewy bodies (P8-11.007)
Chiu, Shannon , Chen, Robin , Wang, Wei‐en , Kantarci, Kejal , Vaillancourt, David E. , Kantarci, Kejal , Armstrong, Melissa J. , Boeve, Bradley F.

Neurology | April 28, 2023 | Volume: 100 | Issue: 17_supplement_2 | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.0000000000202058 Get It