Armstrong, Melissa J.

Objective Positive α‐synuclein seed amplification assay (SAA) is a biomarker found in most people with Parkinson's disease (PD). We explored if free‐water (FW) imaging detects microstructural differences in the brains of patients with early PD with SAA+ or SAA– status. Methods We studied patients with PD with baseline diffusion imaging and α‐synuclein SAA data from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI). We compared FW, FW corrected fractional anisotropy (FA T ), and clinical characteristics between SAA+ and SAA– groups. We also applied the Automated Imaging Differentiation for Parkinsonism (AIDP) at baseline to classify PD versus atypical parkinsonism, stratified by SAA status. Results Among 462 participants (41 SAA– and 421 SAA+), individuals with SAA+ had hyposmia and shorter motor symptom duration before baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). AIDP identified PD in 92.4% (n = 427, 91.6% had SAA+) and classified 7.6% as atypical parkinsonism (n = 35, 85.7% had SAA+). At baseline, SAA+ individuals had lower FW in the superior cerebellar peduncle, compared to SAA– (pFDR < 0.05). No significant differences in FA T were found between groups. Interpretation Positive α‐synuclein SAA was associated with focal microstructural differences but did not distinguish broader diffusion MRI (dMRI) changes across FW and FA T metrics. These findings indicate that molecular confirmation of synuclein aggregation (via SAA) provides limited stratification of neurodegeneration detected by FW imaging in early PD. ANN NEUROL 2026;100:295–304

Abstract Background Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a prevalent form of dementia associated with neuronal alpha‐synuclein aggregates (Lewy bodies). Symptoms include cognitive impairment, fluctuations, neuropsychiatric features including psychosis, sleep disorders, and dysautonomia. DLB is the most expensive form of dementia, and there are currently no treatments approved by the US FDA. Given the advent of sensitive and specific in vivo biomarkers for synuclein aggregation, drug developers are increasingly interested in DLB. FDA instituted Patient‐Focused Drug Development (PFDD) meetings in 2012 with the purpose of ensuring that patients’ experiences, perspectives, needs, and preferences are captured and meaningfully incorporated into drug development and evaluation. Method In October 2024, the Lewy Body Dementia Association (LBDA) and the Alzheimer’s Association (ALZ) co‐hosted an externally‐led PFDD (EL‐PFDD) meeting on DLB. Thirty days before the event, LBDA solicited public comment on the lived experience of DLB, the current state of treatment, and what people with DLB value in potential future therapies. During the live meeting, people with DLB, care partners and family members described their experiences and responded to live polling questions. Result The EL‐PFDD was attended by 347 people with DLB and care partners, drug developers (both industry and academic), FDA staff, and NIH staff. Preliminary analysis of the discussion content and survey responses shows several themes emerging from the meeting. The most bothersome and impactful symptoms varied over the course of the disease, but included cognitive impairment and fluctuations, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and sleepiness. Concerns for the future included progressive decline in cognition, changes in behavior/mood, and cost of care. Limitations to current treatments included lack of FDA‐approved medications, and side effects and lack of efficacy associated with “off label” medications. Priorities for future treatments included symptomatic treatments that do not worsen other DLB symptoms, slowing disease progression, accessibility/insurance coverage, and avoiding side effects. Conclusion The EL‐PFDD on DLB provided valuable information for drug developers and regulators to understand the lived experience of people with DLB and care partners. The results will be documented in a “Voice of the Patient” report that will be hosted at www.lbda.org/el‐pfdd .

Background Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a common degenerative dementia, but no studies investigate bereaved caregiver experiences. Objective To investigate the experiences of caregivers three months after the death of persons with DLB using a mixed-methods approach. Methods Dyads of individuals with moderate-advanced DLB and their primary informal caregivers were followed prospectively every 6 months until the person with DLB died. Caregivers completed a study visit with questionnaires and a semi-structured interview ∼3 months later. Spearman correlation coefficients and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests evaluated the relationships of post-death measures with pre-death patient and caregiver variables. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the interviews. Results Seventy-three caregivers completed visits (mean 3.5 months post-death). Most of the caregivers were women (82.2%) and spouses (76.7%) or adult children (17.8%). Over 40% had scores indicating risk for clinical depression. Post-death caregiver experiences (depression, quality of life, grief, resilience) correlated with pre-death caregiver experiences. Post-death experiences did not associate with patient characteristics, disease-related symptoms, or healthcare services used in the last 6 months of life. Trajectories for caregiver measures from pre- to post-death visits varied widely. Interview themes included grief and sadness, anger, guilt and regret, relief, appreciation/gratitude, and adjusting to a new normal. Conclusions The finding that pre-death caregiving experiences have the strongest association with post-death experiences emphasizes the critical importance of accessible and evidence-based caregiver support before and after the death of a person with DLB. Research is needed to develop interventions for current and bereaved caregivers of individuals with DLB. Trial registration information NCT04829656 (submitted 2021-03-22).

AbstractINTRODUCTIONMales are disproportionately represented in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Little is known regarding sex differences in cognitive, neuropsychiatric, and motor features of the prodromal stage of DLB.METHODSWe used National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center longitudinal data to examine cognitive, neuropsychiatric, and motor features in 120 males and 23 females 2 years prior to a clinical diagnosis of DLB.RESULTSMales were more likely than females to present with two or more core DLB clinical features 2 years prior to obtaining a diagnosis of dementia. Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, cognitive fluctuations, bradykinesia, and rigidity were more common in males than females. Neuropsychological test performance was similar between groups.DISCUSSIONIn prodromal DLB, males exhibit a greater number of core features than females. Core DLB features may fall short in identifying females at risk. Additional work is needed to better understand the clinical profile of prodromal DLB in females.Highlights There are sex differences in the presentation and course of neurodegenerative disease. Findings from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set suggest there are sex differences in prodromal DLB symptoms. Females were less likely to demonstrate core clinical features of DLB prior to dementia diagnosis. This information can help inform clinical diagnostic criteria for prodromal DLB.

Objectives: Many individuals with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) die of disease-related complications, but predicting the end of life can be challenging. We identified a phenotype associated with approaching end of life. Methods: We present 4 exemplar cases where individuals with DLB experienced refractory psychosis before death. We reviewed codebooks and quotes from 3 studies regarding end-of-life experiences in DLB to identify experiences that aligned with this phenotype. Results: In addition to the 4 cases, family caregivers in prior studies described prominent worsening of psychosis before death in some individuals with DLB. The worsening often occurred several months before death and was sometimes associated with rapid deterioration. Worsening psychosis was the prominent symptom and was not initially accompanied by cognitive or physical decline. In many cases, the refractory psychosis resulted in inpatient psychiatric hospitalization or residential care, but these scenarios were challenging because of the individual’s behavior. Conclusion: Refractory psychosis in DLB, particularly out of proportion to other symptoms, may be a signal of approaching the end of life. More research is needed to understand this phenomenon and to develop effective and safe treatments for psychosis in DLB.