Taylor, Angela

Abstract Background Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a prevalent form of dementia associated with neuronal alpha‐synuclein aggregates (Lewy bodies). Symptoms include cognitive impairment, fluctuations, neuropsychiatric features including psychosis, sleep disorders, and dysautonomia. DLB is the most expensive form of dementia, and there are currently no treatments approved by the US FDA. Given the advent of sensitive and specific in vivo biomarkers for synuclein aggregation, drug developers are increasingly interested in DLB. FDA instituted Patient‐Focused Drug Development (PFDD) meetings in 2012 with the purpose of ensuring that patients’ experiences, perspectives, needs, and preferences are captured and meaningfully incorporated into drug development and evaluation. Method In October 2024, the Lewy Body Dementia Association (LBDA) and the Alzheimer’s Association (ALZ) co‐hosted an externally‐led PFDD (EL‐PFDD) meeting on DLB. Thirty days before the event, LBDA solicited public comment on the lived experience of DLB, the current state of treatment, and what people with DLB value in potential future therapies. During the live meeting, people with DLB, care partners and family members described their experiences and responded to live polling questions. Result The EL‐PFDD was attended by 347 people with DLB and care partners, drug developers (both industry and academic), FDA staff, and NIH staff. Preliminary analysis of the discussion content and survey responses shows several themes emerging from the meeting. The most bothersome and impactful symptoms varied over the course of the disease, but included cognitive impairment and fluctuations, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and sleepiness. Concerns for the future included progressive decline in cognition, changes in behavior/mood, and cost of care. Limitations to current treatments included lack of FDA‐approved medications, and side effects and lack of efficacy associated with “off label” medications. Priorities for future treatments included symptomatic treatments that do not worsen other DLB symptoms, slowing disease progression, accessibility/insurance coverage, and avoiding side effects. Conclusion The EL‐PFDD on DLB provided valuable information for drug developers and regulators to understand the lived experience of people with DLB and care partners. The results will be documented in a “Voice of the Patient” report that will be hosted at www.lbda.org/el‐pfdd .

Background Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a common degenerative dementia, but no studies investigate bereaved caregiver experiences. Objective To investigate the experiences of caregivers three months after the death of persons with DLB using a mixed-methods approach. Methods Dyads of individuals with moderate-advanced DLB and their primary informal caregivers were followed prospectively every 6 months until the person with DLB died. Caregivers completed a study visit with questionnaires and a semi-structured interview ∼3 months later. Spearman correlation coefficients and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests evaluated the relationships of post-death measures with pre-death patient and caregiver variables. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the interviews. Results Seventy-three caregivers completed visits (mean 3.5 months post-death). Most of the caregivers were women (82.2%) and spouses (76.7%) or adult children (17.8%). Over 40% had scores indicating risk for clinical depression. Post-death caregiver experiences (depression, quality of life, grief, resilience) correlated with pre-death caregiver experiences. Post-death experiences did not associate with patient characteristics, disease-related symptoms, or healthcare services used in the last 6 months of life. Trajectories for caregiver measures from pre- to post-death visits varied widely. Interview themes included grief and sadness, anger, guilt and regret, relief, appreciation/gratitude, and adjusting to a new normal. Conclusions The finding that pre-death caregiving experiences have the strongest association with post-death experiences emphasizes the critical importance of accessible and evidence-based caregiver support before and after the death of a person with DLB. Research is needed to develop interventions for current and bereaved caregivers of individuals with DLB. Trial registration information NCT04829656 (submitted 2021-03-22).

Objectives: Many individuals with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) die of disease-related complications, but predicting the end of life can be challenging. We identified a phenotype associated with approaching end of life. Methods: We present 4 exemplar cases where individuals with DLB experienced refractory psychosis before death. We reviewed codebooks and quotes from 3 studies regarding end-of-life experiences in DLB to identify experiences that aligned with this phenotype. Results: In addition to the 4 cases, family caregivers in prior studies described prominent worsening of psychosis before death in some individuals with DLB. The worsening often occurred several months before death and was sometimes associated with rapid deterioration. Worsening psychosis was the prominent symptom and was not initially accompanied by cognitive or physical decline. In many cases, the refractory psychosis resulted in inpatient psychiatric hospitalization or residential care, but these scenarios were challenging because of the individual’s behavior. Conclusion: Refractory psychosis in DLB, particularly out of proportion to other symptoms, may be a signal of approaching the end of life. More research is needed to understand this phenomenon and to develop effective and safe treatments for psychosis in DLB.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONLittle is known regarding quality of life (QoL) in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), particularly in advanced stages.METHODSDyads of individuals with moderate–advanced DLB and their primary caregivers were recruited from specialty clinics, advocacy organizations, and research registries. The study collected demographics, disease‐related measures, and measures of patient/caregiver experiences.RESULTSThe Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QoL‐AD) was completed by the person with DLB and the caregiver (proxy) in 61 dyads; 85 dyads had only a proxy‐completed QoL‐AD. Patient‐ and proxy‐reported scores were moderately correlated (r = 0.57, P < 0.0001). Worse patient‐reported QoL correlated with daytime sleepiness, autonomic symptom burden, and behavioral symptoms. Proxy ratings correlated with dementia severity, daytime sleepiness, behavioral symptoms, dependence in activities of daily living, and caregiver experience measures.DISCUSSIONPatient‐ and proxy‐reported quality of life (QoL) should be assessed separately in advanced DLB. Some symptoms associated with QoL have available therapeutic options. Research is needed regarding strategies to optimally improve QoL in DLB.Highlights Patient and proxy quality of life (QoL) ratings had moderate correlation in advanced dementia with Lewy bodies. Daytime sleepiness affected patient‐ and proxy‐reported QoL. Behavioral symptoms affected patient‐ and proxy‐reported QoL. Autonomic symptom burden affected patient‐reported QoL. Dementia severity, dependence, and caregiver experiences affected proxy ratings.

AbstractBackgroundNo specific clinical rating scale currently exists for Lewy body dementia (LBD). Clinical rating scales developed for other diseases are therefore used instead for LBD clinical trials. However, these scales are not optimized for LBD and may not sufficiently reflect the complex array of LBD‐related phenomenology, making it more difficult to interpret outcome data from LBD clinical trials.MethodA working group comprised of 14 members bridging various international LBD‐focused research groups was convened to develop the first iteration of the LBD‐DRS with a focus on inclusion of key LBD related symptom domains, ensuring that any scale is mapped to regulatory expectations, and an emphasis on being patient‐centered. This draft was then subsequently presented to a broader stakeholder group (»50 participants) at the International Lewy body Dementia Conference in June 2022 for further feedback, leading to a further iteration of the scale.ResultThe LBD‐DRS has been designed to capture ratings of the frequency and severity of symptoms across the key domains relevant to LBD – cognitive, neuropsychiatric, motor, autonomic and sleep – as well as the functional impact and perceived burden of symptoms for patients and their care partners. An international Delphi exercise is now planned with many LBD‐relevant stakeholders, which will be coupled with workgroup engagement (for example, with patient‐caregiver groups) to further develop the scale with the resulting final draft anticipated for pilot use in the near future.ConclusionsIn this presentation we will elaborate on the development of the scale, key areas that it will cover as well as challenge points and next steps. Upon completion of the development and refinement of the LBD‐DRS, we propose that this scale will have utility as valid and LBD specific outcome measure in LBD clinical trials.

ImportanceNomenclature in the field of neurodegenerative diseases presents a challenging problem. Inconsistent use of terms such as Alzheimer disease and dementia has compromised progress in clinical care, research, and development of therapeutics. Dementia-associated stigma further contributes to inconsistent and imprecise language. The result is a lack of clarity that produces confusion with patients and the general public and presents communication challenges among researchers. Therefore, the Advisory Council on Research, Care, and Services of the National Plan to Address Alzheimer’s Disease authorized a committee to make recommendations for improvement.ObjectiveTo establish a systematic neurodegenerative disease framework for information collection and communication to standardize language usage for research, clinical, and public health purposes.Evidence ReviewThe Dementia Nomenclature Initiative organized into 3 major stakeholder working groups: clinicians, researchers, and the public (including individuals living with dementia and family caregivers). To inform the work, the initiative completed a narrative literature review of dementia nomenclature evolution over the last century across the PubMed, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Scopus databases (January 1, 2000, through July 31, 2020). Initiative working groups used the results as a foundation for understanding current challenges with dementia nomenclature and implications for research, clinical practice, and public understanding. The initiative obtained additional input via focus groups with individuals living with dementia and caregivers, with separate groups for race and ethnicity (American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian or Pacific Islander, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino, and White) as an initial assessment of the meaning of dementia-related terms to these groups.FindingsFrom working group deliberations, the literature review, and focus group input, the initiative developed a framework clearly separating the clinical syndromic presentation experienced by affected individuals from possible underlying pathophysiologies. In the framework, domains of clinical impairment, such as cognitive, behavioral, motor, and other neurologic features, are graded by level of impairment between none and severe. Next, biomarker information describes underlying disease processes, explains the syndrome, and identifies possible disease labels: Alzheimer disease, frontotemporal degeneration, dementia with Lewy bodies, or vascular cognitive impairment dementia.Conclusions and RelevanceThe Dementia Nomenclature Initiative established a framework to guide communication about cognitive impairment among older adults. Wider testing and refinement of the framework will subsequently improve the information used in communicating about cognitive impairment and the way in which the information is used in clinical, research, and public settings.

Introduction: Lewy body dementia (LBD) is common, yet under-recognized and under-researched. To plan studies with the highest impact, engagement of the community personally affected by these conditions is essential. Methods: A web-based survey of people living with LBD and current and former caregivers of people with LBD queried research priorities through forced ranking and exploration of burden of LBD symptoms. Specific caregiving needs in LBD and perceptions of research participation were also investigated. Results: Between April 7, 2021 and July 1, 2021, 984 responses were recorded. Top research priorities included disease-modifying therapies and improved disease detection and staging. People with LBD were interested in pathophysiology and more bothered by motor symptoms; caregivers were interested in risk factors and symptomatic therapies and more bothered by neuropsychiatric symptoms. Few available LBD treatments and resources were rated as helpful, and many valuable services were never received. Previous participation in LBD research was infrequent, but interest was high. Discussion: People with LBD and caregivers highlighted the need for research across all aspects of LBD, from pathophysiology and disease modification to prognosis, education, symptomatic treatments, and caregiver support. Funders should increase support for all aspects of LBD research to target the many needs identified by individuals and families living with LBD.

Abstract The regulatory path for drug approval is increasingly well defined. Drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer disease (AD) need to show statistically significant benefit over placebo with respect to cognitive and functional measures, with the Clinical Dementia Rating scale and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale being among the most often used instruments in AD clinical trials. In contrast, there are no validated instruments for use in clinical trials of drugs for the treatment of dementia with Lewy bodies. This poses challenges for drug development because the regulatory pathway to drug approval requires demonstrable efficacy measures. In December 2021, the Lewy Body Dementia Association advisory group met with representatives from the US Food and Drug Administration to discuss the lack of approved drugs and treatments, discernment of efficacy measures, and identification of biomarkers. Highlights The Lewy Body with Dementia Association convened a listening session with the US Food and Drug Administration on dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and clinical trial design. Gaps include DLB‐specific measures, alpha synuclein biomarkers, and coexisting pathologies. DLB clinical trial design should focus on clinical value and disease specificity.