Taylor, John‐Paul

Abstract Background Trials in Lewy body dementia (LBD) rely on scales and measurements created for Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Industry and regulatory authority stakeholders and LBD triallists have recognised the absence of an LBD‐specific scale as critical unmet need in the drug development pipeline. Heterogeneity in LBD trials design, particularly concerning outcome measures, precludes effective evidence synthesis and data harmonisation. We describe the development of the Lewy Body Dementia‐Domain Rating Scale (LBD‐DRS) and a proposed roadmap for adoption and validation. Method Led by a core working group and steering committee, a three‐round Delphi survey process was used to establish consensus around the conceptual framework and preliminary content of the LBD‐DRS among invited LBD researchers and clinicians. “Consensus” was established when ≥75% of respondents concurred on any survey statement or questions. Result Consensus around the need for an LBD‐specific scale, specifically for use in early LBD, was established. After feedback was received for two early versions of LBD, a third version of LBD‐DRS has been further developed. This third version, and the results of the second Delphi survey round will be presented. A pragmatic approach, favouring an inclusive scoring approach for symptoms has been adopted, recognising that further iterations will be required once field data becomes available. Conclusion After consensus on the conceptual framework and preliminary content is established, the authors will consult with a broader range of stakeholders, including people living with LBD and their care partners, will be required to further develop LBD‐DRS. Engagement with regulatory bodies and the pharmaceutical industry will guide further development before validation studies are pursued.

Abstract Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), a progressive neurodegenerative disease with heterogeneous clinical presentations, greatly impacts patients, caregivers, and society. Despite its frequency, diagnosing and treating DLB remains challenging. Advances in in vivo biomarker assays reflecting underlying pathology are improving disease identification, diagnostic accuracy, and therapeutic development for biologically targeted, disease‐modifying agents. Consequently, definitions of Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease (PD) have shifted to focus on pathological changes occurring before clinical features, with proposed frameworks for detecting pathological amyloid and tau, neurodegeneration, and other markers (National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer's Association) and alpha‐synucleinopathy and dopaminergic degeneration (Neuronal α‐synuclein Disease Integrated Staging System, SynNeurGe). The biological frameworks, particularly those related to alpha‐synuclein (α‐synuclein), have sparked debate about unifying DLB and PD under a single pathobiologic disease. This paper discusses the implications of these biological frameworks for the DLB community, addressing topics regarding multiple pathologies and neurochemical systems, clinical heterogeneity, and functional impairment, and exploring the potential impact on clinical trials and care. Highlights DLB is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with varied clinical presentations. Diagnosing and treating DLB remains challenging despite its frequency. Biological frameworks are reshaping Alzheimer's and Parkinson's definitions. In vivo biomarkers are improving DLB identification and diagnostic accuracy. Debate exists regarding unifying DLB and Parkinson's under one pathobiology.

AbstractDespite its high prevalence among dementias, Lewy body dementia (LBD) remains poorly understood with a limited, albeit growing, evidence base. The public‐health burden that LBD imposes is worsened by overlapping pathologies, which contribute to misdiagnosis, and lack of treatments. For this report, we gathered and analyzed public‐domain information on advocacy, funding, research outputs, and the therapeutic pipeline to identify gaps in each of these key elements. To further understand the current gaps, we also conducted interviews with leading experts in regulatory/governmental agencies, LBD advocacy, academic research, and biopharmaceutical research, as well as with funding sources. We identified wide gaps across the entire landscape, the most critical being in research. Many of the experts participated in a workshop to discuss the prioritization of research areas with a view to accelerating therapeutic development and improving patient care. This white paper outlines the opportunities for bridging the major LBD gaps and creates the framework for collaboration in that endeavor.Highlights A group representing academia, government, industry, and consulting expertise was convened to discuss current progress in Dementia with Lewy Body care and research. Consideration of expert opinion,natural language processing of the literature as well as publicly available data bases, and Delphi inspired discussion led to a proposed consensus document of priorities for the field.

AbstractBackgroundNo specific clinical rating scale currently exists for Lewy body dementia (LBD). Clinical rating scales developed for other diseases are therefore used instead for LBD clinical trials. However, these scales are not optimized for LBD and may not sufficiently reflect the complex array of LBD‐related phenomenology, making it more difficult to interpret outcome data from LBD clinical trials.MethodA working group comprised of 14 members bridging various international LBD‐focused research groups was convened to develop the first iteration of the LBD‐DRS with a focus on inclusion of key LBD related symptom domains, ensuring that any scale is mapped to regulatory expectations, and an emphasis on being patient‐centered. This draft was then subsequently presented to a broader stakeholder group (»50 participants) at the International Lewy body Dementia Conference in June 2022 for further feedback, leading to a further iteration of the scale.ResultThe LBD‐DRS has been designed to capture ratings of the frequency and severity of symptoms across the key domains relevant to LBD – cognitive, neuropsychiatric, motor, autonomic and sleep – as well as the functional impact and perceived burden of symptoms for patients and their care partners. An international Delphi exercise is now planned with many LBD‐relevant stakeholders, which will be coupled with workgroup engagement (for example, with patient‐caregiver groups) to further develop the scale with the resulting final draft anticipated for pilot use in the near future.ConclusionsIn this presentation we will elaborate on the development of the scale, key areas that it will cover as well as challenge points and next steps. Upon completion of the development and refinement of the LBD‐DRS, we propose that this scale will have utility as valid and LBD specific outcome measure in LBD clinical trials.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Sex influences neurodegeneration, but it has been poorly investigated in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). We investigated sex differences in brain atrophy in DLB using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS We included 436 patients from the European‐DLB consortium and the Mayo Clinic. Sex differences and sex‐by‐age interactions were assessed through visual atrophy rating scales ( n = 327; 73 ± 8 years, 62% males) and automated estimations of regional gray matter volume and cortical thickness ( n = 165; 69 ± 9 years, 72% males). RESULTS We found a higher likelihood of frontal atrophy and smaller volumes in six cortical regions in males and thinner olfactory cortices in females. There were significant sex‐by‐age interactions in volume (six regions) and cortical thickness (seven regions) across the entire cortex. DISCUSSION We demonstrate that males have more widespread cortical atrophy at younger ages, but differences tend to disappear with increasing age, with males and females converging around the age of 75. Highlights Male DLB patients had higher odds for frontal atrophy on radiological visual rating scales. Male DLB patients displayed a widespread pattern of cortical gray matter alterations on automated methods. Sex differences in gray matter measures in DLB tended to disappear with increasing age.

AbstractIn Lewy body dementia (LBD), disturbances of sleep and/or arousal including insomnia, excessive daytime sleepiness, rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder, obstructive sleep apnea, and restless leg syndrome are common. These disorders can each exert a significant negative impact on both patient and caregiver quality of life; however, their etiology is poorly understood. Little guidance is available for assessing and managing sleep disorders in LBD, and they remain under‐diagnosed and under‐treated. This review aims to (1) describe the specific sleep disorders which occur in LBD, considering their putative or potential mechanisms; (2) describe the history and diagnostic process for these disorders in LBD; and (3) summarize current evidence for their management in LBD and consider some of the ongoing and unanswered questions in this field and future research directions.

Introduction: Lewy body dementia (LBD) is common, yet under-recognized and under-researched. To plan studies with the highest impact, engagement of the community personally affected by these conditions is essential. Methods: A web-based survey of people living with LBD and current and former caregivers of people with LBD queried research priorities through forced ranking and exploration of burden of LBD symptoms. Specific caregiving needs in LBD and perceptions of research participation were also investigated. Results: Between April 7, 2021 and July 1, 2021, 984 responses were recorded. Top research priorities included disease-modifying therapies and improved disease detection and staging. People with LBD were interested in pathophysiology and more bothered by motor symptoms; caregivers were interested in risk factors and symptomatic therapies and more bothered by neuropsychiatric symptoms. Few available LBD treatments and resources were rated as helpful, and many valuable services were never received. Previous participation in LBD research was infrequent, but interest was high. Discussion: People with LBD and caregivers highlighted the need for research across all aspects of LBD, from pathophysiology and disease modification to prognosis, education, symptomatic treatments, and caregiver support. Funders should increase support for all aspects of LBD research to target the many needs identified by individuals and families living with LBD.

Abstract Background and objectives. Sex is an important contributing factor to neuroimaging phenotypes in brain disorders. However, little is known about the contribution of sex differences to the neurodegeneration in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). We investigated sex differences in probable DLB patients by using both visual rating scales of lobar atrophy and automated estimations of regional atrophy. Methods. We included 442 probable DLB patients from the European-DLB consortium and the Mayo Clinic who have magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data available. We assessed sex differences and the sex-by-age interaction in two largely independent samples through visual rating scales of lobar atrophy (n = 333; mean age 73 ± 8 years, 62% males) and automated regional estimations of gray matter (GM) volume and mean cortical thickness (CTh) (n = 165; mean age 69 ± 9 years, 72% males). We used binary logistic regression and ANOVA for statistical analysis. Results. We found a statistically significantly higher likelihood of frontal atrophy measured by the global cortical atrophy-frontal subscale (GCA-F) in males (40% of males had an abnormal GCA-F score versus 29% of females, P-value = 0.006). Using automated estimations, we found smaller GM volumes in 6 cortical regions in males compared with females, as well as smaller GM volume in the entorhinal cortex and thinner olfactory cortices in females, compared with males. The sex-by-age interaction showed statistically significant results in 6 cortical volumes and 7 mean CTh estimations (P-value ≤ 0.05), accentuated in the right middle frontal gyrus (FDR-adjusted P-value = 0.047). These cross-sectional interactions indicated that while females have statistically significantly less atrophy than males at younger ages, differences become non-significant at older ages, with females showing the same level of atrophy than males around the age of 75. Conclusions. This study demonstrates sex differences on brain atrophy in probable DLB. While male DLB patients have a more widespread pattern of cortical atrophy at younger ages, these sex differences tend to disappear with increasing age. Longitudinal studies will help establish these cross-sectional findings and inform on sex and age considerations to the use of MRI in clinical routine, as the field moves towards precision medicine.

Abstract Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is clinically defined by the presence of visual hallucinations, fluctuations, rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavioral disorder, and parkinsonism. Neuropathologically, it is characterized by the presence of Lewy pathology. However, neuropathological studies have demonstrated the high prevalence of coexistent Alzheimer's disease, TAR DNA‐binding protein 43 (TDP‐43), and cerebrovascular pathologic cases. Due to their high prevalence and clinical impact on DLB individuals, clinical trials should account for these co‐pathologies in their design and selection and the interpretation of biomarkers values and outcomes. Here we discuss the frequency of the different co‐pathologies in DLB and their cross‐sectional and longitudinal clinical impact. We then evaluate the utility and possible applications of disease‐specific and disease‐nonspecific biomarkers and how co‐pathologies can impact these biomarkers. We propose a framework for integrating multi‐modal biomarker fingerprints and step‐wise selection and assessment of DLB individuals for clinical trials, monitoring target engagement, and interpreting outcomes in the setting of co‐pathologies.

Abstract Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is neuropathologically defined by the presence of α-synuclein aggregates, but many DLB cases show concurrent Alzheimer’s disease pathology in the form of amyloid-β plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles. The first objective of this study was to investigate the effect of Alzheimer’s disease co-pathology on functional network changes within the default mode network (DMN) in DLB. Second, we studied how the distribution of tau pathology measured with PET relates to functional connectivity in DLB. Twenty-seven DLB, 26 Alzheimer’s disease and 99 cognitively unimpaired participants (balanced on age and sex to the DLB group) underwent tau-PET with AV-1451 (flortaucipir), amyloid-β-PET with Pittsburgh compound-B (PiB) and resting-state functional MRI scans. The resing-state functional MRI data were used to assess functional connectivity within the posterior DMN. This was then correlated with overall cortical flortaucipir PET and PiB PET standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr). The strength of interregional functional connectivity was assessed using the Schaefer atlas. Tau-PET covariance was measured as the correlation in flortaucipir SUVr between any two regions across participants. The association between region-to-region functional connectivity and tau-PET covariance was assessed using linear regression. Additionally, we identified the region with highest and the region with lowest tau SUVrs (tau hot- and cold spots) and tested whether tau SUVr in all other brain regions was associated with the strength of functional connectivity to these tau hot and cold spots. A reduction in posterior DMN connectivity correlated with overall higher cortical tau- (r = −0.39, P = 0.04) and amyloid-PET uptake (r = −0.41, P = 0.03) in the DLB group, i.e. patients with DLB who have more concurrent Alzheimer’s disease pathology showed a more severe loss of DMN connectivity. Higher functional connectivity between regions was associated with higher tau covariance in cognitively unimpaired, Alzheimer’s disease and DLB. Furthermore, higher functional connectivity of a target region to the tau hotspot (i.e. inferior/medial temporal cortex) was related to higher flortaucipir SUVrs in the target region, whereas higher functional connectivity to the tau cold spot (i.e. sensory-motor cortex) was related to lower flortaucipir SUVr in the target region. Our findings suggest that a higher burden of Alzheimer’s disease co-pathology in patients with DLB is associated with more Alzheimer’s disease-like changes in functional connectivity. Furthermore, we found an association between the brain’s functional network architecture and the distribution of tau pathology that has recently been described in Alzheimer’s disease. We show that this relationship also exists in patients with DLB, indicating that similar mechanisms of connectivity-dependent occurrence of tau pathology might be at work in both diseases.