Li, Shuang

Pancreatogenic or type 3c diabetes, which occurs as a consequence of pancreatitis, may have several mechanisms. Mechanisms overlapping with those of type 2 diabetes have been explored, including insulin resistance and insulin deficiency. However, autoimmune mechanisms in response to unmasking β-cell antigens, similar to those of type 1 diabetes (T1D), have not been thoroughly examined. We performed cross-sectional T1D autoantibody profiling in a large prospective cohort (N = 927) of adults with acute, recurrent acute, or chronic pancreatitis. We examined correlations of prevalence of autoantibodies against GAD (GAD antibody), IA-2 (IA-2 antibody), zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8; ZnT8 antibody), and insulin (insulin autoantibody [IAA]) with clinical and demographic features, including presence of diabetes, diabetes treatment, and family history of diabetes. Diabetes was present in 11 (12%) of 94 participants with acute pancreatitis, 69 (27%) of 273 with recurrent acute pancreatitis, and 235 (43%) of 560 with chronic pancreatitis. Among these groups, islet autoantibodies were respectively found in five (5.3%) of 94, 48 (17.6%) of 273, and 127 (22.6%) of 560. The proportions of individuals with diabetes who were autoantibody positive were 45%, 70%, and 54%, respectively (most commonly IAA, which may reflect exogenous insulin use). However, across the entire cohort, 27 participants (2.9%) had two, two (0.2%) had three, and one (0.1%) had four T1D-associated autoantibodies, respectively, suggesting a potential pathogenic link that should be further explored. ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS Type 1 diabetes–associated autoimmune mechanisms have not been thoroughly examined in pancreatitis-associated diabetes. We assessed the prevalence of four islet autoantibodies in serum from a large prospective cohort of patients with acute, recurrent acute, or chronic pancreatitis. Diabetes was present in 11 (12%) of 94 participants with acute pancreatitis, 69 (27%) of 273 with recurrent acute pancreatitis, and 235 (43%) of 560 with chronic pancreatitis. Excluding those with only insulin autoantibody positivity, which is confounded by insulin treatment, islet autoantibodies were identified in 51 (5.5%) of 927 participants, and 30 (3.2%) of 297 were positive for two or more autoantibodies. Our findings suggest pancreatitis may elicit islet autoimmunity in a subset of patients, necessitating prospective longitudinal follow-up.

Abstract Pain is common in chronic pancreatitis (CP) and profoundly reduces quality of life (QoL). Multiple underlying mechanisms contribute to a heterogenous pain experience and reduce efficacy of pain management. This study was designed to characterize the distribution of mechanism-based pain phenotypes in painful CP. The data analyzed were collected as part of the PROspective Evaluation of Chronic Pancreatitis for EpidEmiologic and Translational StuDies, an NCI/NIDDK-funded longitudinal study of the natural history of CP. The PROspective Evaluation of Chronic pancreatitis for EpidEmiologic and translational stuDies includes patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of pain, medication use, global health, and QoL. Of subjects (N = 681) with CP, 80% experienced abdominal pain within the year before enrollment. Subjects who experienced pain in the week before enrollment (N = 391) completed PROMIS Neuropathic and Nociceptive Pain Quality instruments which were then used to classify them by pain type: 40% had nociceptive, 5% had neuropathic-like, and 32% had both types of pain. The prevalence of having both types of pain was higher among women and subjects with diabetes mellitus, whereas nociceptive-only pain was more prevalent among men and those with pancreatic duct stricture. Other factors, including pain medication use and healthcare utilization, did not differ between groups based on pain type. Subjects in the Both group had significantly worse health and QoL scores relative to those with nociceptive-only pain, suggesting that using psychosocial pain surveys may be useful for understanding pain subtypes in patients with CP. Additional research is needed to identify biochemical and biophysical signatures that may associate with and predict responses to mechanism-specific interventions.