Su, Leon

Context.— Complexity of ordering and transfusing blood is particularly evident in the pediatric population. Simplification, clarification, and standardization of blood orders can decrease complexity and improve patient safety. Objective.— To improve patient safety by optimizing electronic ordering of blood components in pediatrics through a collaborative process improvement initiative. Design.— A multidisciplinary working group, formed as part of a value stream analysis to improve transfusion safety at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta (Atlanta, Georgia), focused on decreasing variability and providing clarity when ordering, preparing, and transfusing blood using the electronic health record. Through benchmarking with other pediatric institutions and a collaborative design process with multiple local stakeholders, an extensive redesign in the existing orders and order sets occurred. Metrics were collected to determine if a change was an improvement. Results.— Nurse and laboratory informaticists, a pathology informaticist, and a transfusion medicine specialist built the new orders based on the design. The new orders focused on the following changes: standardization, introduction of logic, naming conventions, clarifying definitions, adding calculations, improving transparency of history and laboratory data, removing aliquots, clarifying communication, and implementing additional modules to inform the provider of necessary information about the patient. Metrics included a decrease in the number of orders changed within an hour, decreased calls from the blood bank to the provider to clarify the order, and an absence of overtransfusions and transfusion-related serious safety events for a year following implementation. Conclusions.— This collaborative initiative, using standard process improvement tools, resulted in standardized blood orders improving transfusion safety.

Purpose: Autologous serum tears (ASTs) are produced from serum obtained by blood draw and used to treat severe dry eye diseases. Multiple cases of failed AST production occurred due to serum becoming a solidified, gel-like substance after centrifugation. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors associated with inability to compound AST. Methods: From January 2019 to December 2022, 99 patients received AST produced at Mayo Clinic in Arizona. Patient demographics, medical diagnoses, medications, laboratory results, and events surrounding blood draws were obtained through an IRB-approved retrospective chart review. The laboratory and pharmacy protocol procedures were observed in person after the occurrence of the last production issue. Results: Ten total clotted serum episodes occurred in 4 patients, each with multiple occurrences. The indication for AST was chronic ocular graft-vs-host disease (n = 3) and Sjögren syndrome (n = 1). Eighty percent of episodes were associated with either a systemic infection (n = 7) or pulmonary embolism (n = 1) within the prior month. At the time of blood draw, all 4 patients were treated with antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation medications, including rivaroxaban, apixaban, aspirin, and low–molecular-weight heparin. Conclusions: The AST protocol was increased from 30 to 60 minutes of resting time to allow clotting before centrifugation. Inadequate clotting during this stasis period likely resulted in fibrinogen remaining suspended in the serum, leading to solidified plasma instead of liquid serum. We hypothesize risk of inadequate clotting would be increased in patients taking anticoagulation or antiplatelet medications. Our recommendations include ensuring 60-minute collection tube resting time for all patients, including those on anticoagulation medication.

The use of normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) over static cold storage in liver transplantation has been shown to reduce posttransplant risks of early allograft dysfunction, primary nonfunction, and ischemic cholangiopathy, and its increasing use has played a role in the expanded utilization of marginal livers. While studies have demonstrated improved clinical outcomes using NMP over static cold storage preservation, real-time intraoperative data reflecting the quality and viability of NMP livers is limited. This retrospective, single-center study compared NMP versus static cold storage livers in first-time recipients of liver transplants through the evaluation of synthetic coagulation function as measured by thromboelastography and conventional coagulation testing. Secondarily, transfusion utilization between the 2 cohorts was reviewed. One hundred eighty-six recipients of liver transplants receiving allografts from donors after circulatory death were included in the study, of which 99 (53%) allografts were preserved in static cold storage, and 87 (47%) allografts were placed on the TransMedics Organ Care System. Study findings showed NMP livers supported with the TransMedics Organ Care System were associated with increased synthetic coagulation function and less excess fibrinolysis in the postreperfusion period compared to static cold storage livers, and that these findings were better reflected in real-time with thromboelastography monitoring versus conventional coagulation testing. Following reperfusion, there was a significant decrease in the transfusion of blood products in the NMP group compared with that in the static cold storage group. Overall, we determined that the use of intraoperative thromboelastography can provide real-time data to assess one aspect of reperfusion liver quality and viability.

Abstract This manuscript describes a novel approach for treating patients with long‐term sequelae from hemoglobin Evans (Hb Evans). After instituting conservative therapies for approximately 2 years, our patient's symptoms continually worsened. Therefore, we performed red blood cell exchange (RBCx) to reduce his Hb Evans percentage and his co‐existing elevation of methemoglobin. Our assumptions of clinical benefit were based on our collective experience performing RBCx for patients with sickle cell disease. After the first exchange, pre‐ and post‐laboratory results supported our approach and the patient experienced marked improvement in his clinical signs and symptoms. This report provides preliminary proof of principle for the use of RBCx to treat Hb Evans and other non‐Hb S hemoglobinopathies.

AbstractBackgroundChimeric antigen receptor T (CAR‐T) cell successes have encouraged continued clinical study. Apheresis collection of starting material for CAR‐T cell therapy product manufacturing is critical but described approaches suggest variability and clinical guidelines are currently lacking. The goal of this study was to gather and assess variability in apheresis collection descriptions in publicly available CAR T‐cell therapy clinical trials.Study designWe searched clinicaltrials.gov (a publicly available clinical trial database) for “chimeric antigen receptor T cells” on July 01, 2020 and studies accessed July 30, 2020‐August 15, 2020. Data collected included date posted, study characteristics, apheresis mentions (number, location, and context), laboratory parameters and transfusion allowances. Apheresis context was analyzed using a qualitative inductive approach of grounded theory method with open coding. Text was classified into 37 context codes, grouped into 12 categories, and then consolidated into patient, procedure, product, and miscellaneous themes.ResultsApheresis was mentioned 1044 times in 322 (51.9%) of 621 total studies. Laboratory parameters mentioned included white blood cells (100 studies), absolute neutrophil count (220 studies), absolute lymphocyte count (102 studies), CD3+ cell (38 studies), hemoglobin (233 studies, 54 studies specified transfusion allowance), and platelet (269 studies, 48 studies specified transfusion allowance).ConclusionsApheresis collection of CAR‐T cell products is not well‐defined in clinical study descriptions and the context is inconsistent. Laboratory parameters useful for apheresis collection are variably present and do not consistently align with current practices. Further exploration, and clinical guideline development will encourage alignment of apheresis collections for CAR‐T cell products.

BACKGROUND After hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a known and fairly common complication. It is often refractory to conventional therapies including corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, splenectomy, and the more recently described use of monoclonal antibodies. The high morbidity associated with these severe persistent cases elucidates the gaps in alternative therapies available for treatment. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We described the successful use of abatacept for severe refractory AIHA after HSCT in three patients. RESULTS Three pediatric patients with refractory AIHA after allogeneic stem cell transplantation were observed to be unresponsive to multitude immunosuppressive therapies, resulting in persistent transfusion dependency. Treatment with abatacept, a fusion protein that inhibits T‐cell activation by binding to CD80/CD86 on antigen‐presenting cells (APCs), thus blocking the required CD28 interaction between APCs and T cells, resulted in the resolution of hemolysis. CONCLUSION Abatacept may provide significant clinical benefit in the management of AIHA after HSCT.

AbstractBackgroundAlthough many apheresis centers offer extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), little is known about current treatment practices.MethodsAn electronic survey was distributed to assess ECP practice internationally.ResultsOf 251 responses, 137 met criteria for analysis. Most respondents were from North America (80%). Nurses perform ECP at most centers (84%) and the majority of centers treat adults only (52%). Most centers treat fewer than 50 patients/year (83%) and perform fewer than 300 procedures/year (70%). Closed system devices (XTS and/or Cellex) are used to perform ECP at most centers (96%). The most common indications for ECP are acute/chronic skin graft versus host disease (89%) and cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma (63%). The typical wait time for ECP treatment is less than 2 weeks (91%). Most centers do not routinely perform quality control assessment of the collected product (66%). There are device‐specific differences in treatment parameters. For example, XTS users more frequently have a minimum weight limit (P = 0.003) and use laboratory parameters to determine eligibility for treatment (P = 0.03). Regardless of device used, the majority of centers assess the clinical status of the patient before each procedure. Greater than 50% of respondents would defer treatment for hemodynamic instability due to active sepsis or heart failure, positive blood culture in the past 24 h or current fever.ConclusionThis survey based study describes current ECP practices. Further research to provide evidence for optimal standardization of patient qualifications, procedure parameters and product quality assessment is recommended.