Su, Leon L

The use of normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) over static cold storage in liver transplantation has been shown to reduce posttransplant risks of early allograft dysfunction, primary nonfunction, and ischemic cholangiopathy, and its increasing use has played a role in the expanded utilization of marginal livers. While studies have demonstrated improved clinical outcomes using NMP over static cold storage preservation, real-time intraoperative data reflecting the quality and viability of NMP livers is limited. This retrospective, single-center study compared NMP versus static cold storage livers in first-time recipients of liver transplants through the evaluation of synthetic coagulation function as measured by thromboelastography and conventional coagulation testing. Secondarily, transfusion utilization between the 2 cohorts was reviewed. One hundred eighty-six recipients of liver transplants receiving allografts from donors after circulatory death were included in the study, of which 99 (53%) allografts were preserved in static cold storage, and 87 (47%) allografts were placed on the TransMedics Organ Care System. Study findings showed NMP livers supported with the TransMedics Organ Care System were associated with increased synthetic coagulation function and less excess fibrinolysis in the postreperfusion period compared to static cold storage livers, and that these findings were better reflected in real-time with thromboelastography monitoring versus conventional coagulation testing. Following reperfusion, there was a significant decrease in the transfusion of blood products in the NMP group compared with that in the static cold storage group. Overall, we determined that the use of intraoperative thromboelastography can provide real-time data to assess one aspect of reperfusion liver quality and viability.

AbstractBackgroundChimeric antigen receptor T (CAR‐T) cell successes have encouraged continued clinical study. Apheresis collection of starting material for CAR‐T cell therapy product manufacturing is critical but described approaches suggest variability and clinical guidelines are currently lacking. The goal of this study was to gather and assess variability in apheresis collection descriptions in publicly available CAR T‐cell therapy clinical trials.Study designWe searched clinicaltrials.gov (a publicly available clinical trial database) for “chimeric antigen receptor T cells” on July 01, 2020 and studies accessed July 30, 2020‐August 15, 2020. Data collected included date posted, study characteristics, apheresis mentions (number, location, and context), laboratory parameters and transfusion allowances. Apheresis context was analyzed using a qualitative inductive approach of grounded theory method with open coding. Text was classified into 37 context codes, grouped into 12 categories, and then consolidated into patient, procedure, product, and miscellaneous themes.ResultsApheresis was mentioned 1044 times in 322 (51.9%) of 621 total studies. Laboratory parameters mentioned included white blood cells (100 studies), absolute neutrophil count (220 studies), absolute lymphocyte count (102 studies), CD3+ cell (38 studies), hemoglobin (233 studies, 54 studies specified transfusion allowance), and platelet (269 studies, 48 studies specified transfusion allowance).ConclusionsApheresis collection of CAR‐T cell products is not well‐defined in clinical study descriptions and the context is inconsistent. Laboratory parameters useful for apheresis collection are variably present and do not consistently align with current practices. Further exploration, and clinical guideline development will encourage alignment of apheresis collections for CAR‐T cell products.