Nguyen, Michelle C

ABSTRACT Despite the annual increase in liver transplants, a persistent disparity between suitable donors and recipients continues to challenge the transplant community. The introduction of machine perfusion emerged as a novel approach to organ preservation. This technique, which utilizes extended criteria donor grafts, is expected to reduce rejection rates and expand the donor pool. Its principle, like that of any ex vivo machine perfusion, is based on the continuous supply of nutrients and oxygen to maintain cellular metabolism while interrupting anaerobic processes. This helps prevent conditions such as ischemia-reperfusion injury, early graft dysfunction, and ischemic cholangiopathy, which can lead to graft loss and the need for retransplantation. There are two main modes of ex vivo machine perfusion: hypothermic and normothermic, differentiated by the operating temperature. Utilizing ex situ perfusion machines presents a promising opportunity to increase liver graft usage and reduce waitlist times. However, it is crucial to evaluate how much this technology would raise the overall cost of transplants. In Brazil, implementing a machine perfusion program may encounter unique challenges not seen in other countries. These challenges include limited access to the healthcare system for high-risk liver transplant candidates, long waiting lists, inadequate support for organ donors, reliance solely on deceased brain-dead donors, since donation after cardiac death is not ethically accepted, and geographical barriers.

Objective: To determine whether normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) mitigates the historical survival disadvantage of donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation compared with donation after brain death (DBD) livers. Summary Background Data: NMP has improved outcomes in DCD LT compared with static cold storage (SCS), but whether it eliminates the historical disparity relative to DBD transplantation remains uncertain. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult LT at a high-volume US center between 2019 and 2024. Outcomes of DCD-NMP grafts were compared with DCD-SCS, DBD-SCS, and DBD-NMP grafts. Primary outcomes were 1-year graft and patient survival. Secondary outcomes included early allograft dysfunction (EAD), hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT), primary nonfunction (PNF), biliary anastomotic strictures (BAS), and ischemic cholangiopathy (IC). Results: Among 1338 liver transplants (DBD-SCS n=527; DBD-NMP n=142; DCD-SCS n=255; DCD-NMP n=414), DCD-NMP grafts had a significantly higher donor risk profile ( P <0.001) yet demonstrated survival comparable to DBD transplantation. One-year graft survival was 94% for DCD-NMP versus 93% for DBD grafts and 86% for DCD-SCS, and 1-year patient survival was 98% for DCD-NMP versus 94% to 95% for DBD grafts and 93% for DCD-SCS. In adjusted models, DCD-SCS was associated with increased hazards of graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.48; P <0.001) and death (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.39; P =0.004), whereas DBD groups did not differ from DCD-NMP. Incidence of EAD was lower with DCD-NMP (21.7%) than DCD-SCS (50.2%) and similar to DBD grafts (21.1%–26.4%); HAT and PNF were rare (≤1.3%). At 1 year, BAS occurred in 36% of DCD grafts versus 17% to 23% of DBD grafts. IC occurred in 7.7% of DCD-NMP compared with 22% of DCD-SCS and ≤1.5% of DBD grafts. Retransplantation due to IC was infrequent overall (1.3%), but more common in DCD-SCS (4.7%) than DCD-NMP (1.0%) and DBD grafts (≤0.4%). Conclusions: NMP enables safe utilization of DCD liver allografts and achieves graft and patient survival comparable to DBD LT, mitigating the historical disadvantage of DCD grafts. These findings support routine integration of NMP into clinical practice and efforts to standardize its implementation.

Background. Ex vivo machine perfusion (MP) has transformed organ preservation, offering significant benefits in liver transplantation (LT), particularly with high-risk donor grafts. However, adoption in the United States has been limited. We aimed to examine early adoption trends, surgeon perceptions, and barriers to implementing MP in the United States after Food and Drug Administration approval of MP platforms. Methods. A 23-question electronic survey was distributed to members of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons between October and November 2022, capturing attitudes and practices related to MP adoption. Responses from 96 surgeons representing 77 LT centers across 11 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network regions were analyzed. Results. Forty-four respondents (48%) reported having an MP program at their institution. Adoption of MP was significantly more common in high-volume centers and those performing ≥20 donation after circulatory death (DCD) transplants annually (P < 0.001). MP utilization received strong support, with 88% endorsing its use for DCD liver allografts and 82% for donation after brain death allografts. Respondents cited MP’s ability to reduce ischemic cholangiopathy, enable graft repair, and facilitate viability assessment as key benefits. Normothermic MP was preferred for high-risk donor profiles, including DCD grafts, older donors, and steatotic livers, and was associated with an increased willingness to accept medically complex grafts compared with static cold storage. Barriers to MP utilization included program costs, personnel demands, and logistical complexities. Centers with higher proportions of privately insured patients were more likely to adopt MP. Despite these challenges, 84% of respondents expressed interest in future MP adoption. Conclusions. MP enhances graft utilization and outcomes, particularly for complex and high-risk donor livers, but widespread US adoption requires addressing financial and logistical barriers. Future efforts should focus on refining cost-effectiveness analyses, collaboration with organ procurement organizations and device companies, and developing standardized training to optimize MP integration and maximize its clinical impact on LT.

ABSTRACT Introduction Donation after circulatory death (DCD) allografts are underutilized in liver transplantation (LT) due to increased risk of complications. These risks stem from ischemic injury sustained during the total donor warm ischemia time (tDWIT), historically limited to 30 min. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) can mitigate these risks and facilitate LT of DCD grafts with extended tDWIT. We aimed to compare outcomes of DCD allografts with extended tDWIT preserved on NMP versus static cold storage (SCS). Methods This single‐center study included adult DCD LT with tDWIT ≥ 30 from 2019 to 2023. Outcomes of NMP and SCS were compared including EAD, IC, graft survival, and patient survival. Results Among 68 DCD LT with tDWIT ≥ 30, 64.7% ( n = 44) were preserved with NMP and 35.3% ( n = 24) with SCS. No differences in donor or recipient demographics were observed. The median tDWIT was 33 min for NMP and 30.5 min for SCS ( p < 0.01). Despite longer tDWIT, the NMP group had lower rates of EAD (4.5% vs. 66.7%, p < 0.01) and IC (2.3% vs. 29.2%, p < 0.01). One‐year graft survival was higher in NMP ( p < 0.01), and 1‐year patient survival was comparable between groups ( p = 0.18). Conclusion NMP challenges traditional tDWIT constraints and can increase the pool of viable DCD allografts for transplantation.

The use of normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) over static cold storage in liver transplantation has been shown to reduce posttransplant risks of early allograft dysfunction, primary nonfunction, and ischemic cholangiopathy, and its increasing use has played a role in the expanded utilization of marginal livers. While studies have demonstrated improved clinical outcomes using NMP over static cold storage preservation, real-time intraoperative data reflecting the quality and viability of NMP livers is limited. This retrospective, single-center study compared NMP versus static cold storage livers in first-time recipients of liver transplants through the evaluation of synthetic coagulation function as measured by thromboelastography and conventional coagulation testing. Secondarily, transfusion utilization between the 2 cohorts was reviewed. One hundred eighty-six recipients of liver transplants receiving allografts from donors after circulatory death were included in the study, of which 99 (53%) allografts were preserved in static cold storage, and 87 (47%) allografts were placed on the TransMedics Organ Care System. Study findings showed NMP livers supported with the TransMedics Organ Care System were associated with increased synthetic coagulation function and less excess fibrinolysis in the postreperfusion period compared to static cold storage livers, and that these findings were better reflected in real-time with thromboelastography monitoring versus conventional coagulation testing. Following reperfusion, there was a significant decrease in the transfusion of blood products in the NMP group compared with that in the static cold storage group. Overall, we determined that the use of intraoperative thromboelastography can provide real-time data to assess one aspect of reperfusion liver quality and viability.

Ex-situ machine perfusion of the liver has surmounted traditional limitations associated with static cold storage in the context of organ preservation. This innovative technology has changed the landscape of liver transplantation by mitigating ischemia perfusion injury, offering a platform for continuous assessment of organ quality, and providing an avenue for optimizing the use of traditionally marginal allografts. This review summarizes the contemporary clinical applications of machine perfusion devices and discusses potential future strategies for real-time viability assessment, therapeutic interventions, and modulation of organ function after recovery.

AbstractDual kidney transplantation (DKT), utilizing two adult kidneys from the same donor for one recipient, has been used as a way to expand the available donor pool. These kidneys often come from high Kidney Donor Profile Index donors (KDPI > 85%). Data comparing outcomes between high KDPI DKT and single kidney transplants (SKT) remain limited. We assessed outcomes of 336 high KDPI kidney transplants performed at our center; 11.0% (n = 37) were DKT. Recipients of DKT were older (P = .02) and donors had a higher KDPI score (median 96% vs. 91%, P < .0001). DKT operative time was higher compared to SKT (+1.4 hours, P < .0001). There were no differences in delayed graft function (54.1% vs. 51.5%, P = .77) and hospital length of stay (median 4.0 vs. 3.0 days, P = .21) between DKT and SKT. Grade I Clavien‐Dindo complications occurred in 8.1% of DKT and 13.7% of SKT (P = .008). There were no grade IVa, IVb, or V complications in either group. DKT had more glomerulosclerosis (P = .04), interstitial fibrosis (P = .02), tubular atrophy (P = .01), and arterial thickening (P = .03) on 1‐year protocol biopsies. Estimated glomerular filtration was higher for DKT at 1‐ (P = .004) and 2‐years post‐transplant (P = .01). There were no differences in patient (HR 1.3, 95% CI .5‐3.3, P = .58) or graft (HR 1.1, 95% CI .5‐2.3, P = .83) survival. Good outcomes can be achieved with DKT using high KDPI kidneys with moderate chronic changes. DKT is a good option to help further utilize high KDPI kidneys and minimize discard.