Sinha, Shirshendu

Background: Religious affiliation has traditionally served as a coping strategy during stressful events such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Pregnant women faced heightened stress during the pandemic due to concerns about their health as well as that of their fetus. This study examined the prevalence of self-reported religious affiliation among SARS-CoV-2-positive pregnant women and investigated differences in psychiatric diagnoses and pregnancy outcomes based on religious affiliation. Methods: The study included all asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic SARS-CoV-2-positive pregnant women who received care at the Mayo Health System from March 2020 through October 2021 and completed the routine religious affiliation questionnaire. Those selecting “none” were categorized as having no religious affiliation (RA−), whereas those selecting a specific religion were categorized as religiously affiliated (RA+). Results: Among 609 women, 49.6% were RA+ and 50.4% were RA−. RA+ women were more likely to be white, married, college-educated, and have fewer prior abortions. There were no significant differences in rates of depression, anxiety, psychotropic medication use, substance use, or pregnancy and labor complications between RA+ and RA− groups. Conclusions: Half of the women in this cohort reported no religious affiliation. Previously reported protective associations between religiosity and mental health were not observed when religious affiliation alone was examined.

Purpose of review This review highlights the salient data of the psychosocial concerns that influence outcomes of bariatric surgery and organ transplantation. Recent findings Bariatric surgery has emerged as an important intervention with data supporting substantial and sustained weight loss, enhanced quality of life, remission of obesity-related medical comorbidities, and improved long-term patient and graft survival in transplant patients. Depression, suicide, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder, alcohol use, adherence, and psychopharmacology considerations can influence outcomes of both these surgeries. Summary Obesity is increasingly prevalent among patients pursuing transplantation surgery, and it is often a factor in why a patient needs a transplant. However, obesity can be a barrier to receiving a transplant, with many centers implementing BMI criteria for surgery. Furthermore, obesity and obesity-related comorbidities after transplant can cause poor outcomes. In this context, many transplant centers have created programs that incorporate interventions (such as bariatric surgery) that target obesity in transplant candidates. A presurgery psychosocial assessment is an integral (and required) part of the process towards receiving a bariatric surgery and/or a transplantation surgery. When conducting a dual (bariatric and transplantation surgery) psychosocial assessment, it is prudent to understand the overlap and differentiation of specific psychosocial components that influence outcomes in these procedures.

Treatment resistant restless legs syndrome (RLS) in the setting of psychiatric comorbidities can be difficult to manage. Our patient is a 69-year-old Caucasian gentleman with bipolar disorder type I, unspecified anxiety disorder, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and treatment-refractory RLS. At initial presentation, the patient’s prescribed medication regimen included fluoxetine 40 mg daily, gabapentin 800 mg in the morning and 3200 mg at bedtime, pramipexole 0.375 mg daily, lamotrigine 200 mg daily, trazodone 200 mg at bedtime, and temazepam 15 to 30 mg as needed for insomnia and RLS. Over the course of nearly 4 years, treatment interventions for this patient’s RLS included: cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, discontinuation of exacerbating medications, switching dopamine agonists, use of pregabalin and iron supplement. This report demonstrates a challenging case of RLS in the setting of psychiatric comorbidities, development of augmentation, and polypharmacy.

8603 Background: Steroids, primarily dexamethasone (Dex), remains an integral part of the therapy for myeloma. Prior to the advent of novel agents, Dex as a single agent was demonstrated to produce overall response rates of around 50%. The toxicity associated with pulsed high dose Dex has led to this approach being abandoned. This study investigates whether responsiveness to Dex correlates with biological qualities of the plasma cell clone that predicts outcome. Methods: We identified from our prospectively maintained database, patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, who were seen at Mayo Clinic within 30 days of diagnosis and were treated with single agent Dex. The M-protein measurements and responses were assessed using the IMWG criteria. Results: 182 patients seen between March 1998 and June 2007, initially treated with single agent Dex for at least 4 weeks, were included in the analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 63 (range; 39–81) and 59% were male. The actuarial median survival for the entire group was 55 months. The median duration of Dex therapy was 15 weeks (range; 4–193). Ninety one (50%) had a partial response or better and 11 (6%) were not evaluable, with the remaining patients (44%) having less than PR or progression. 10 patients (5%) achieved a VGPR or CR. The median overall survival from diagnosis for the 91 responders was 75 months compared to 71 months for the remaining patients; p = 0.6. There was no correlation between baseline disease characteristics and Dex responsiveness. One hundred thirty (70%) patients proceeded to an autologous SCT after a median of 15 weeks (range 1–46 months) of Dex. While the median overall survival was longer among the group of patients who underwent SCT, among either group, there were no survival benefit between those with a PR or better to Dex compared to the rest. Conclusions: Among this group of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma treated with single agent Dex, failure to respond to Dex induction therapy did not impact overall survival. Failure to respond to single agent steroid does not have an adverse impact on outcome in newly diagnosed myeloma. [Table: see text]

Abstract Abstract 4228 Background Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are the preferred graft type for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and mobilization is typically done using growth factor (GF) alone or a combination of chemotherapy (CTX) and GF. The success of mobilization is influenced by several factors such as prior therapy, mobilization strategy, underlying disease, among others. Patients (Pts) failing to mobilize successfully often have GF dose increased and if unsuccessful, mobilization is reattempted with chemotherapy + GF or G-CSF (Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating factor) + GM-CSF (Granulocyte–Macrophage Colony-Stimulating factor). More recently, plerixafor, a CXCR4 inhibitor, has been found to enhance G-CSF based collection allowing potential early intervention in poor mobilizers. However, this approach requires valid cut-points for peripheral CD34 counts (pCD34) for cost efficient use. Methods We studied 656 first time, G-CSF based PBSC mobilizers with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (562; 86%), or Hodgkin's Disease (94; 14%). Salvage attempts were excluded, as were first attempts using CTX+GCSF, plerixafor or GF combinations. Sensitivity-specificity analysis (Receiver operating characteristic) was used to define ideal cut-points for predefined outcomes. We used a CD34 yield of 2 million/kg as the minimum required collection and 5 million/kg as the ideal collection for the current analysis. Our current practice is to initiate collection at a pCD34 of 10/uL. Results We first determined the best day 1 pCD34 cutoff for being able to collect at least 2 million/kg PBSC to be 9/uL. Among those with ≥9/uL, only 6.6 % failed to collect at least 2 million compared to 55% among the rest (P < 0.001). These numbers were 6.3% and 50% respectively using the traditional cutoff of 10/uL. We then examined how the pCD34 on day 2 predicted collection, among those failing to reach the current threshold of 10/uL. Among this group, a pCD34 on day 2 of 9.1/uL was the best cutoff to predict a collection of 2 million/kg. Among those with >=9.1/uL, only 22% failed to collect at least 2 million compared to 79% among the rest (P < 0.001). Among those with day 1 pCD34 < 10, 49% achieved a count of 9.1/uL on day 2. We then examined what pCD34 on day 1 can best predict a pCD34 ≥ 9.1 on day 2 and found this to be 5.2/uL. Among those with day 1 pCD34 ≥ 5.2/uL, 79% reached day 2 pCD34 ≥ 9.1 compared to 24% among the rest (P < 0.001). We then determined cutoffs based on ideal targets using only those patients achieving pCD34 count > 10/uL by day 2, since these patients would have started collection without any change in the mobilization technique. We used a maximum of 5 collections to achieve the goal as being ideal, taking into account the most commonly used practice of collecting during weekdays. We examined cutoffs for a target of 5 million/kg for one transplant. The best day 1 or day 2 pCD34 predicting a 5 million/kg yield in 5 collections was 17/uL. Among those with day 1or 2 pCD34 ≥ 17/uL, 4% failed to reach 5 million in ≤ 5 days compared to 96% among the rest (P < 0.001). Conclusions This study provides an estimate of optimal pCD34 count thresholds for early identification of patients with lymphoma at high risk of collection failure. It is reasonable to use the first or second day pCD34 count, since a substantial proportion of patients will achieve the threshold value by day 2 and these patients appear to have similar outcome as those reaching the threshold by day 1. Based on the results here, interventions such as addition of plerixafor can be considered if pCD34 count is < 6/uL on day 1 or < 10/uL by day 2, to achieve the minimum collection of 2 million/kg. However, in order to achieve the ideal targets, a higher threshold should be considered and the recommendation based on the current study would be 17/uL for a target of 5 million. Such a target-adapted strategy may be more appropriate. Disclosures: Kumar: Celgene,Genzyme,Millenium,Novartis,Bayer,: Honoraria, Research Funding. Gertz:Genzyme: Research Funding. Micallef:Genzyme: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 2253 Background: Lenalidomide based combinations are among the most common initial therapies for myeloma. Previous studies have suggested that lenalidomide therapy can result in suboptimal stem cell collection in patients eligible to undergo autologous stem cell transplantation, especially older patients after prolonged exposure to the drug. Many salvage approaches are used when attempting repeat stem cell collection in this patient group. Patients and Methods: Two hundred twenty four patients who underwent stem cell collection following lenalidomide-dexamethasone induction from July 2004 and December 2009 were included in the current analysis. Data pertaining to the duration of lenalidomide therapy, stem cell mobilization regimen, and the collection yields were collected from the medical records. Results: The median age at mobilization was 60.6 years (range; 29, 76) and 136 (60%) were male. There were a total of 245 collection attempts from among 224 patients, 21 (9.8%) patients attempting to remobilize after failing to collect the desired numbers of stem cells at the first attempt. We first analyzed the results of the initial collection attempt. The median duration of lenalidomide therapy prior to stem cell collection was 4 months (range; 1, 26). The mobilization strategies were GCSF (Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor) alone in 151 (67%) patients, cyclophosphamide (CTX) followed by GCSF in 29 (13%) patients, and GCSF plus AMD3100 in 44 (20%) patients. Among those receiving AMD3100, it was added either due to peripheral blood CD34 cell count not reaching the threshold for initiation of harvest or for poor first day CD34 cells collection in 34 patients and given in a planned fashion in 10 patients. Overall 15 patients (7%) failed to reach the peripheral CD34 cell counts required to initiate apheresis, and among those starting apheresis 6 patients failed to collect at least 2 million CD34 cells/kg; a cumulative failure rate of 9%. Another 18 (8%) patients failed to collect at least 4 million CD34 cells /kg. The CD34 cells yield on day 1, the total yield, number of collections, the average daily yield and the percentage of the targeted cells collected for each mobilization strategy including failure rates are detailed in the table. Twenty-one patients reattempted stem cell mobilization; including 14 that failed a first attempt and 7 did who not achieve the intended goal even though they collected more than 2 million CD34 cells/kg. The mobilization regimens were GCSF alone, CTX + GCSF, GCSF + GM-CSF (Granulocyte Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor) and GCSF + AMD in 5, 8, 3, and 4 patients respectively. All patients collected at least 2 million CD34 cells /kg and 14 patients (70%) collected more than 4 million CD34 cells /kg. The median CD34 cells collected with the second attempt was 5.4 million/kg (rang; 2, 19.5) bringing the median total collection for these 21 patients to 9.6 million/kg (2.6-19.6). Overall, of the 224 patients studied, all but the 6 patients who failed initially and did not attempt a second collection collected at least 2 million CD34 cells /kg and 197 (88%) collected at least 4 million CD34 cells/kg. Conclusion: While the overall failure rate of stem cell collection in patients receiving initial therapy with lenalidomide is 10%, a risk adapted approach of adding AMD3100 appear to decrease the risk of failure. However, majority of patients failing a stem cell harvest attempt can be salvaged with a second collection allowing these patients to proceed to a stem cell transplant if desired. Disclosures: Gertz: Celgene: Honoraria; Millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genzyme: Research Funding. Lacy: Celgene: Research Funding. Dispenzieri: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Binding Site: Honoraria. Micallef: Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kumar: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 1965 Background: Pomalidomide is an immunomodulatory compound to be used for heavily pre-treated patients with relapse and refractory multiple myeloma and has shown considerable efficacy in recent clinical trials. It is not clear how patients may respond to other therapies, once the disease becomes refractory to pomalidomide. We examined this question among a cohort of patients receiving pomalidomide therapy in phase 2 clinical trials. Methods: Patients enrolled in an ongoing phase 2 clinical trial of pomalidomide (2-4 mg daily) along with dexamethasone (40 mg weekly), in relapsed myeloma, form the study population. Several cohorts of patients (>= 3 prior therapies not specified, lenalidomide refractory, and lenalidomide and bortezomib refractory patients were enrolled sequentially in this trial (Lacy, M.Q., et al., J Clin Oncol, 2009. 27(30): p.5008–14). Only those patients who have gone off study for disease progression were included in the current analysis. Details of subsequent therapies and survival data were obtained from the medical records. Results: Forty-seven patients from among 142 patients enrolled on the clinical trial between November, 2007 and April, 2010 were included in the study. The median (range) duration of pomalidomide therapy was 4 (0.6-16) months. 15 (32%) patients were lenalidomide refractory and 11 (23%) were refractory to both lenalidomide and bortezomib at the time of study entry. The best confirmed response to pomalidomide was MR (Minimal Response) or better in 23 patients (52%). Various regimens were employed following relapse on pomalidomide. The response to the first regimen following relapse in the 34 patients where salvage therapy was initiated is as shown in Table 1. Overall, 81 regimens were employed across 34 patients; median (range) number of regimens per patients was 1 (0-8). The response rates to the different regimens were as shown in the Table 1. The median overall survival (OS) from the time of progression on pomalidomide was 14.7 months (95% CI; 4, NR). The OS was similar between those patients who had a response to pomalidomide (MR or better) and those who did not. However the OS was shorter for patients who were refractory to lenalidomide and bortezomib (2.1 months) compared to those who were lenalidomide refractory only (6.5 months), and the non-refractory group (NR), P=0.06. Conclusions: This study confirms poor outcome of the patients relapsing after all available therapies. It also gives interesting insights into the activity of different regimens among patients who have relapsed after pomalidomide. The findings once again highlight the incurable nature of the disease and warrant further investigation to develop newer effective treatment regimens for this group of patients who presently do not have effective therapeutic options especially in the relapsed setting. Regimens: ASCT: Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation, Bz: Bortezomib, Mel=Melphalan, Dex: Dexamethasone, CRD: Cyclophosphamide, Revlimid (Lenalidomide), Dexamethasone, CTX; Cyclophosphamide, Len; Lenalidomide, Sor: Sorafenib, VDT-PACE: Velcade (Bortezomib), Dexamethasone, Thalidomide, Cisplatin, Adriamycin, Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide. Response: SD; Stable Disease; Prog; Progression MR: Minimal Response; PR: Partial Response. Disclosures: Kumar: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding. Mikhael:Celgene: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Binding Site: Honoraria.

Abstract Abstract 3231 Poster Board III-168 Background Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are the preferred graft type for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and mobilization is typically done using growth factor (GF) alone or a combination of chemotherapy (CTX) and GF. The success of mobilization is influenced by several factors such as prior therapy and mobilization strategy. Patients (Pts) failing to mobilize successfully often have GF dose increased and if unsuccessful, mobilization reattempted with chemotherapy + GF or G-CSF (Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor) + GM-CSF (Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor). More recently, plerixafor, a CXCR4 inhibitor, has been found to enhance G-CSF based collection allowing potential early intervention in poor mobilizers. However, this approach requires valid cut-points for peripheral CD34 counts (pCD34) for cost efficient use. Methods We studied 910 first time, G-CSF based PBSC mobilizers with MM (565; 62%), or light chain amyloidosis (345; 38%). Salvage attempts were excluded, as were first attempts using CTX+GCSF, plerixafor or GF combinations. Sensitivity-specificity analysis (ROC) was used to define ideal cut-points for predefined outcomes. We used a CD34 yield of 2 million/kg as the minimum required collection and 4 million/kg as the ideal collection for this analysis. Our current practice is to initiate collection at a pCD34 of 10/uL. Results We first determined the best day 1 pCD34 cutoff for being able to collect at least 2 million/kg PBSC to be 9.2/uL. Among those with ≥9.2/uL, only 1.6% failed to collect at least 2 million compared to 27% among the rest (P < 0.001). These numbers were 1.7% and 25% respectively using the traditional cutoff of 10/uL. We then examined how the pCD34 on day 2 predicted collection, among those failing to reach the current threshold of 10/uL. Among this group, a pCD34 on day 2 of 8/uL was the best cutoff to predict a collection of 2 million/kg. Among those with >8/uL, only 9% failed to collect at least 2 million compared to 48% among the rest (P < 0.001). Among those with day 1 pCD34 < 10, 65% achieved a count of 8/uL on day 2. We then examined what pCD34 on day 1 can best predict a pCD34 ≥ 8 on day 2 and found this to be 5/uL. Among those with day 1 pCD34 ≥ 5/uL, 92% reached day 2 pCD34 ≥ 8 compared to 36% among the rest (P < 0.001).We then determined cutoffs based on ideal targets using only those patients achieving pCD34 count > 10/uL by day 2, since these patients would have started collection without any change in the mobilization technique. We used a maximum of 5 collections to achieve the goal as being ideal, taking into account the most commonly used practice of collecting during weekdays. We examined cutoffs both for a target of 4, 8 and 12 million/kg for one, two or three transplants respectively. Among those with a day 1 or day 2 pCD34 > 10/uL 98% collected 4 million/kg in 5 collections. The best day 1 or day 2 pCD34 predicting a 8 million/kg yield in 5 collections was 21.4/uL and a 12 million/kg yield was 27.9/uL. Among those with day 1or 2 pCD34 ≥ 21.4/uL, 90% collected 8 million compared to 54% among those with pCD34 < 21.4/uL. Similarly, among those with day 1 or 2 pCD34 ≥ 27.9/uL, 79% reached 12 million in ≤ 5 days compared to 17% among those with pCD34 < 27.9/uL (P < 0.001).Finally we examined if poor collection on first day, despite a pCD34 > 10 predicts for poor overall yield. A ratio of day 1 collection (million/kg) to pCD34 day 1 or 2 < 5×104 was highly predictive of failure to get eventual yield of 2 million/kg, with 38% below the cutoff failing to reach the goal compared to 2% for those above the cutoff. Conclusions This study provides an estimate of optimal pCD34 count thresholds for early identification of patients at high risk of collection failure. It is reasonable to use the first or second day pCD34 count, since a substantial proportion of patients will achieve the threshold value by day 2 and have similar outcome as those reaching the threshold by day 1. Based on the results here, interventions such as plerixafor can be considered if pCD34 count is < 5/uL on day 1 or < 9/uL by day 2, to achieve the minimum collection of 2 million/kg. However, in order to achieve the ideal targets, a higher threshold should be considered and the recommendation would be 17/uL, and 28/uL for target of 8 or 12 million respectively. Finally, identification of poor mobilizers after start of collection potentially provides another time point for early intervention, and this needs to be prospectively studied. Disclosures Micallef: Genzyme: Research Funding. Gertz:Genzyme: Research Funding. Kumar:Celgene,Genzyme,Millenium,Novartis,Bayer,: Honoraria, Research Funding.