Back to Authors

Reddy, K. Sudhakar

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic in Arizona

Citations 3

Overall Outcomes of Liver Transplantation Using Upfront Normothermic Machine Perfusion: A Real-World Single-Center Experience
Nguyen, Michelle , Ohara, Stephanie Y., Barnhill, Michele , Madisetty, Alekhya, Zhang, Nan, Wiederkehr, Henrique, Jayasekera, Channa R. , Aqel, Bashar A., Reddy, K.R., Mathur, Amit K., Nguyen, Michelle C , Reddy, K. Sudhakar, Ohara, Stephanie , Barnhill, Michele , Wiederkehr, Henrique de Aguiar , Aqel, Bashar A. , Mathur, Amit K.

Annals of Surgery | July 22, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1097/sla.0000000000007155 Get It

Objective: To determine whether normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) mitigates the historical survival disadvantage of donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation compared with donation after brain death (DBD) livers. Summary Background Data: NMP has improved outcomes in DCD LT compared with static cold storage (SCS), but whether it eliminates the historical disparity relative to DBD transplantation remains uncertain. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult LT at a high-volume US center between 2019 and 2024. Outcomes of DCD-NMP grafts were compared with DCD-SCS, DBD-SCS, and DBD-NMP grafts. Primary outcomes were 1-year graft and patient survival. Secondary outcomes included early allograft dysfunction (EAD), hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT), primary nonfunction (PNF), biliary anastomotic strictures (BAS), and ischemic cholangiopathy (IC). Results: Among 1338 liver transplants (DBD-SCS n=527; DBD-NMP n=142; DCD-SCS n=255; DCD-NMP n=414), DCD-NMP grafts had a significantly higher donor risk profile ( P <0.001) yet demonstrated survival comparable to DBD transplantation. One-year graft survival was 94% for DCD-NMP versus 93% for DBD grafts and 86% for DCD-SCS, and 1-year patient survival was 98% for DCD-NMP versus 94% to 95% for DBD grafts and 93% for DCD-SCS. In adjusted models, DCD-SCS was associated with increased hazards of graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.48; P <0.001) and death (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.39; P =0.004), whereas DBD groups did not differ from DCD-NMP. Incidence of EAD was lower with DCD-NMP (21.7%) than DCD-SCS (50.2%) and similar to DBD grafts (21.1%–26.4%); HAT and PNF were rare (≤1.3%). At 1 year, BAS occurred in 36% of DCD grafts versus 17% to 23% of DBD grafts. IC occurred in 7.7% of DCD-NMP compared with 22% of DCD-SCS and ≤1.5% of DBD grafts. Retransplantation due to IC was infrequent overall (1.3%), but more common in DCD-SCS (4.7%) than DCD-NMP (1.0%) and DBD grafts (≤0.4%). Conclusions: NMP enables safe utilization of DCD liver allografts and achieves graft and patient survival comparable to DBD LT, mitigating the historical disadvantage of DCD grafts. These findings support routine integration of NMP into clinical practice and efforts to standardize its implementation.
Solid Organ Transplantation From SARS-CoV-2–infected Donors to Uninfected Recipients: A Single-center Experience
Jayasekera, Channa R., Vikram, Holenarasipur R., Rifat, Zeeshan, Wagler, Josiah, Okubo, Keita, Braaksma, Brandon R., Harbell, Jack W., Jadlowiec, Caroline C., Katariya, Nitin N., Mathur, Amit K., Moss, Adyr, Reddy, K. Sudhakar, Singer, Andrew, Orenstein, Robert, Saling, Christopher F., Seville, Maria T., Mour, Girish K., Vargas, Hugo E., Byrne, Thomas J., Hewitt, Winston R., Aqel, Bashar A., Vargas, Hugo E. , Vikram, Holenarasipur R. , Katariya, Nitin , Vikram, Holenarasipur R. , Vargas, Hugo E , Katariya, Nitin N , Jayasekera, Channa R., Rifat, Zeeshan, Wagler, Josiah, Okubo, Keita, Braaksma, Brandon R., Harbell, Jack W., Jadlowiec, Caroline C., Mathur, Amit K., Moss, Adyr, Reddy, K. Sudhakar, Singer, Andrew, Orenstein, Robert, Saling, Christopher F., Seville, Maria T., Mour, Girish K., Byrne, Thomas J., Hewitt, Winston R., Aqel, Bashar A., Okubo, Keita

Transplantation Direct | January 13, 2022 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 2 | Pages: e1286

10.1097/txd.0000000000001286 Get It

Background. The risk of donor-derived severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in solid organ (heart, lung, liver, kidney, pancreas, and intestine) transplant recipients is poorly understood. Since hematogenous transmission of SARS-CoV-2 has not been documented to date, nonlung solid organs might be suitable for transplantation since they likely portend a low risk of viral transmission. Methods. Abdominal solid organs from SARS-CoV-2–infected donors were transplanted into uninfected recipients. Results. Between April 18, 2021, and October 30, 2021, we performed transplants of 2 livers, 1 simultaneous liver and kidney, 1 kidney, and 1 simultaneous kidney and pancreas from SARS-CoV-2–infected donors into 5 uninfected recipients. None of the recipients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection or coronavirus disease 2019, and when tested, allograft biopsies showed no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Conclusions. Transplanting nonlung organs from SARS-CoV-2–infected donors into uninfected recipients demonstrated no evidence of virus transmission.
Using the Virtual Crossmatch to Allow for Safer and More Efficient Kidney Transplantation of Highly Sensitized Patients
Jaramillo, Andrés , Reddy, Kunam S. , Heilman, Raymond L. , Reddy, K. Sudhakar, Jaramillo, Andres

Transplantation | August 24, 2019 | Volume: 104 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1121-1122

10.1097/tp.0000000000002925 Get It