Harrington, M.

Purpose: Autologous serum tears (ASTs) are produced from serum obtained by blood draw and used to treat severe dry eye diseases. Multiple cases of failed AST production occurred due to serum becoming a solidified, gel-like substance after centrifugation. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors associated with inability to compound AST. Methods: From January 2019 to December 2022, 99 patients received AST produced at Mayo Clinic in Arizona. Patient demographics, medical diagnoses, medications, laboratory results, and events surrounding blood draws were obtained through an IRB-approved retrospective chart review. The laboratory and pharmacy protocol procedures were observed in person after the occurrence of the last production issue. Results: Ten total clotted serum episodes occurred in 4 patients, each with multiple occurrences. The indication for AST was chronic ocular graft-vs-host disease (n = 3) and Sjögren syndrome (n = 1). Eighty percent of episodes were associated with either a systemic infection (n = 7) or pulmonary embolism (n = 1) within the prior month. At the time of blood draw, all 4 patients were treated with antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation medications, including rivaroxaban, apixaban, aspirin, and low–molecular-weight heparin. Conclusions: The AST protocol was increased from 30 to 60 minutes of resting time to allow clotting before centrifugation. Inadequate clotting during this stasis period likely resulted in fibrinogen remaining suspended in the serum, leading to solidified plasma instead of liquid serum. We hypothesize risk of inadequate clotting would be increased in patients taking anticoagulation or antiplatelet medications. Our recommendations include ensuring 60-minute collection tube resting time for all patients, including those on anticoagulation medication.

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate monetary trends in Medicare reimbursement rates for 30 abdominal wall reconstruction surgical procedures over a 20-year period (2000 to 2020). Methods: The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services was used for each of the 30 included current CPT codes, and reimbursement data were extracted. Monetary data were adjusted for inflation to 2020 U.S. dollars using changes to the United States consumer price index. The R2 values for the average annual percentage change and the average total percentage change in reimbursement were calculated based on these adjusted trends for all included procedures. Results: After adjusting for inflation, the average reimbursement for all procedures decreased by 17.1% from 2000 to 2020. The greatest mean decrease was observed for CPT code 49568 (the implantation of mesh or other prosthesis for open incisional or ventral hernia repair or mesh for closure of débridement for necrotizing soft-tissue infection, −34.4%). The only procedure with an increased adjusted reimbursement rate throughout the study period was CPT code 20680 (+3.9%). From 2000 to 2020, the adjusted reimbursement rate for all included procedures decreased by an average of 0.85% each year, with an average R2 value of 0.78, indicating a stable decline throughout the study period. Conclusions: Reimbursement rates are declining when adjusted for inflation. Increased awareness of these trends is helpful to maintain access to optimal abdominal reconstruction care in the United States.

ImportanceThere was a shift in patient volume from in-person to video telemedicine visits during the COVID-19 pandemic.ObjectiveTo determine the concordance of provisional diagnoses established at a video telemedicine visit with diagnoses established at an in-person visit for patients presenting with a new clinical problem.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis is a diagnostic study of patients who underwent a video telemedicine consultation followed by an in-person outpatient visit for the same clinical problem in the same specialty within a 90-day window. The provisional diagnosis made during the video telemedicine visit was compared with the reference standard diagnosis by 2 blinded, independent medical reviewers. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine factors significantly related to diagnostic concordance. The study was conducted at a large academic integrated multispecialty health care institution (Mayo Clinic locations in Rochester, Minnesota; Scottsdale and Phoenix, Arizona; and Jacksonville, Florida; and Mayo Clinic Health System locations in Iowa, Wisconsin, and Minnesota) between March 24 and June 24, 2020. Participants included Mayo Clinic patients residing in the US without age restriction. Data analysis was performed from December 2020 to June 2021.ExposuresNew clinical problem assessed via video telemedicine visit to home using Zoom Care Anyplace integrated into Epic.Main Outcomes and MeasuresConcordance of provisional diagnoses established over video telemedicine visits compared against a reference standard diagnosis.ResultsThere were 2393 participants in the analysis. The median (IQR) age of patients was 53 (37-64) years; 1381 (57.7%) identified as female, and 1012 (42.3%) identified as male. Overall, the provisional diagnosis established over video telemedicine visit was concordant with the in-person reference standard diagnosis in 2080 of 2393 cases (86.9%; 95% CI, 85.6%-88.3%). Diagnostic concordance by International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision chapter ranged from 64.7% (95% CI, 42.0%-87.4%) for diseases of the ear and mastoid process to 96.8% (95% CI, 94.7%-98.8%) for neoplasms. Diagnostic concordance by medical specialty ranged from 77.3% (95% CI, 64.9%-89.7%) for otorhinolaryngology to 96.0% (92.1%-99.8%) for psychiatry. Specialty care was found to be significantly more likely than primary care to result in video telemedicine diagnoses concordant with a subsequent in-person visit (odds ratio, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.24-2.30; P < .001).Conclusions and RelevanceThis diagnostic study of video telemedicine visits yielded a high degree of diagnostic concordance compared with in-person visits for most new clinical concerns. Some specific clinical circumstances over video telemedicine were associated with a lower diagnostic concordance, and these patients may benefit from timely in-person follow-up.

Background: Plastic surgeons regularly perform injections for both cosmetic and functional purposes. This article examines the most common injections utilized by plastic surgeons under Medicare and how their usage and billing has changed between 2012 and 2019. Methods: Using the earliest and latest data available on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ Provider Utilization and Payment Data File, we first determined Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System injection codes most billed to Medicare in 2012 and 2019. The number of services, amount of Medicare beneficiaries, and reimbursement rates were collected and analyzed for each Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System code from the Provider Utilization and Payment Data File for years 2012 and 2019. We compared the change in reimbursement rate for each injection to the rate of inflation in US dollars over the same period. Results: The unadjusted Medicare reimbursement rate for eight included injection types increased an average of 31.63% during the study period. This was not significantly different from the rate of inflation during the same period (+11.33%, P = 0.311). When all Medicare reimbursement data were adjusted for inflation to 2019 dollars, the average percentage change in reimbursement for all included injections in this study increased by 17.58% from 2012 to 2019. Conclusions: The findings from our study suggest that injections administered by plastic surgeons appear to be unique in their general stability in reimbursement rates as compared to rates in other fields. Further research should be performed to better understand the driving factors for usage and reimbursement changes.

Abstract BACKGROUND Trends in Medicare billing and procedural reimbursement for outpatient office visits remain unclear within the field of neurosurgery. OBJECTIVE To analyze financial trends of neurosurgeon reimbursement for Medicare office visits in 2010 compared to 2018. METHODS The 2010 and 2018 physician/supplier files from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services website were utilized. All payments submitted by neurosurgeons (provider ID 14) were included. Trends in office visit Current Procedural Terminology codes 99201 to 99205 and 99211 to 99215 were analyzed. RESULTS Neurosurgeons billed for 1 109 979 office visits (463 611 h) in 2010 and Medicare denied 63 704 payments (totaling $11 205 283). Neurosurgeons billed for 1 189 046 office visits (508 526 h) in 2018 and Medicare denied 57 048 payments (totaling $15 103 879). This is a 7.1% increase in total neurosurgery office visits billed to Medicare, 9.7% increase in total office hours, and 34.8% increase in the payment amounts denied over 8 yr. Furthermore, after adjusting for inflation, the average amount paid to physicians by Medicare decreased by 8.3% per office visit. Additionally, Medicare paid 36.1% of the total neurosurgeon submitted charge amount for all office visits in 2010 but paid only 27.8% in 2018 (−8.3%). CONCLUSION Neurosurgeons are performing more office visits and billing for more time with patients. Meanwhile, Medicare has been paying physicians less per office visit, denying higher amounts of payments and reimbursing a decreasing percentage of submitted charges for office visits. An understanding of these trends is necessary to ensure continued equity and quality access to neurosurgical care in the United States.