The patient is a male in his 60s with morbid obesity and end-stage renal disease secondary to hypertension and diabetes. After a lifelong struggle with weight management, he was approved for bariatric surgery. Following completion of the bariatric clinic courses, he underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. There were no intraoperative complications nor divergences from our routine practice. Postoperatively, the patient resumed peritoneal dialysis (PD) on postoperative day zero. He tolerated the operation and dialysis well, noting that the drained abdominal fluid remained serosanguinous for 5 days after surgery. While the traditional practice after intra-abdominal surgery is to temporarily transition to haemodialysis in patients who require dialysis, we demonstrate that immediate resumption of PD may be safe and efficacious. However, patients should be educated regarding the temporary change in colour of the drained intra-abdominal fluid. More robust data is required for further research and future practice guideline development.
A 20-Year Analysis of Medicare Reimbursement for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction (2000 to 2020)
Objective To evaluate the extent to which silicone rubber mandibular implant (Silastic; Dow Corning, Midland, Mich) pressure and placement (supraperiosteal or subperiosteal) affect underlying mandibular resorption. Design A randomized, controlled animal trial. Subjects Ten mixed-breed adult hounds. Interventions Each animal's mandible was implanted with 6 Silastic blocks, 3 inserted supraperiosteally and 3 subperiosteally. Within each grouping of 3 implants, pressure was varied from "minimum" to "moderate" to "maximum" by compressing the implant with titanium miniplates. After 4 months, the animals were killed and their mandibles sectioned for microscopic examination. Results Mandibular resorption occurred in varying degrees beneath all implants by the end of the study period. The extent of resorption was consistent with retrospective studies in humans. No statistically significant difference was found between supraperiosteal or subperiosteal placement of the implants. However, higher-pressure implants tended to produce less resorption than lower-pressure implants. Conclusions While some bone resorption seems inevitable with Silastic mandibular implants, these results would seem to suggest that the placement of implants above or below the periosteum need not be a concern for the surgeon attempting to minimize this consequence. On the other hand, increased pressure may actually decrease resorption, contrary to current assumptions.