Rehman, Nisha

Background: Whether robot-assisted cholecystectomy reduces bile duct injury compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains uncertain because prior studies have inadequately accounted for disease severity and have rarely classified injury severity using standardized criteria. This study compared perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted and laparoscopic cholecystectomy across a large healthcare system while adjusting for operative complexity. Study Design: Adults undergoing robot-assisted or laparoscopic cholecystectomy within the Mayo Clinic Enterprise (2014–2025) were retrospectively evaluated. Propensity score weighting adjusted for demographics, surgeon case volume, learning curve, and disease severity using the Tokyo Guidelines and Parkland grading system in patients with acute cholecystitis. The primary outcome was bile duct injury; secondary outcomes included general and procedure-specific complications. Results: Among 23,513 patients (19,998 laparoscopic; 3,515 robotic), robot-assisted cholecystectomy was used more frequently for Parkland grade ≥3 disease. Overall, 227 bile duct injuries occurred (204 laparoscopic; 23 robotic), corresponding to absolute risks of 1.02% and 0.65%, respectively (absolute risk difference −0.37%, 95% CI −0.72% to −0.02%; number needed to treat, 273). Robot-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with lower odds of conversion to open surgery, 30-day readmission, and mortality, shorter hospital stay (β −0.56, 95% CI −0.66 to −0.45; P<0.001), and a 5-minute longer median operative time. In acute cholecystitis, robot-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with lower adjusted odds of bile duct injury (aOR 0.29, 95% CI 0.07–0.78; P=0.011). Conclusions: After adjustment for disease severity and surgeon-related factors, robot-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with lower odds of bile duct injury in acute cholecystitis and improved perioperative outcomes, including shorter hospitalization and lower conversion rates, despite greater use in more complex cases.

The patient is a male in his 60s with morbid obesity and end-stage renal disease secondary to hypertension and diabetes. After a lifelong struggle with weight management, he was approved for bariatric surgery. Following completion of the bariatric clinic courses, he underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. There were no intraoperative complications nor divergences from our routine practice. Postoperatively, the patient resumed peritoneal dialysis (PD) on postoperative day zero. He tolerated the operation and dialysis well, noting that the drained abdominal fluid remained serosanguinous for 5 days after surgery. While the traditional practice after intra-abdominal surgery is to temporarily transition to haemodialysis in patients who require dialysis, we demonstrate that immediate resumption of PD may be safe and efficacious. However, patients should be educated regarding the temporary change in colour of the drained intra-abdominal fluid. More robust data is required for further research and future practice guideline development.