Saleeb, Andrew G.

Background: Whether robot-assisted cholecystectomy reduces bile duct injury compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains uncertain because prior studies have inadequately accounted for disease severity and have rarely classified injury severity using standardized criteria. This study compared perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted and laparoscopic cholecystectomy across a large healthcare system while adjusting for operative complexity. Study Design: Adults undergoing robot-assisted or laparoscopic cholecystectomy within the Mayo Clinic Enterprise (2014–2025) were retrospectively evaluated. Propensity score weighting adjusted for demographics, surgeon case volume, learning curve, and disease severity using the Tokyo Guidelines and Parkland grading system in patients with acute cholecystitis. The primary outcome was bile duct injury; secondary outcomes included general and procedure-specific complications. Results: Among 23,513 patients (19,998 laparoscopic; 3,515 robotic), robot-assisted cholecystectomy was used more frequently for Parkland grade ≥3 disease. Overall, 227 bile duct injuries occurred (204 laparoscopic; 23 robotic), corresponding to absolute risks of 1.02% and 0.65%, respectively (absolute risk difference −0.37%, 95% CI −0.72% to −0.02%; number needed to treat, 273). Robot-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with lower odds of conversion to open surgery, 30-day readmission, and mortality, shorter hospital stay (β −0.56, 95% CI −0.66 to −0.45; P<0.001), and a 5-minute longer median operative time. In acute cholecystitis, robot-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with lower adjusted odds of bile duct injury (aOR 0.29, 95% CI 0.07–0.78; P=0.011). Conclusions: After adjustment for disease severity and surgeon-related factors, robot-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with lower odds of bile duct injury in acute cholecystitis and improved perioperative outcomes, including shorter hospitalization and lower conversion rates, despite greater use in more complex cases.

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives NCCN guidelines recommend right hemicolectomy (RHC) for appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors (aNETs) > 2 cm and observation for < 1 cm. However, optimal surgical management of 1–2 cm tumors remains controversial. This study compared long‐term survival and recurrence between patients undergoing RHC versus appendectomy (APY) for 1–2 cm aNETs. Methods Patients with pathologically confirmed 1–2 cm aNETs treated at three Mayo Clinic sites (1972–2024) were included. Primary outcomes were recurrence and all‐cause mortality after resection. Associations with lymph node (LN) metastasis were assessed in patients with lymphadenectomy. Results Sixty‐five patients were identified: 29 (45%) underwent APY, 35 (54%) RHC, and one ileocecectomy. Median age at diagnosis was 39 years; 71% were female and 94% white. LN positivity was 15.2% for tumors with nodes examined. Tumor size > 1.5 cm, stage T3/T4, and lymphovascular invasion were not associated with nodal metastasis. No survival differences were observed between APY and RHC. LN positivity did not impact survival. No recurrences occurred during a median follow‐up of 6.25 years (IQR 2.44–12.63). Conclusions Among patients with 1–2 cm aNETs, RHC conferred no survival benefit over APY. Absence of recurrence and the limited prognostic value of nodal disease suggest APY alone may suffice for this population.

Abstract Aim Rectal prolapse is a full‐thickness intussusception of the rectum beyond the anal canal. It is often mistaken for other anorectal pathologies, leading to inaccurate referrals to colorectal surgeons and inappropriate management. However, the frequency of misdiagnosis is not well characterized. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of rectal prolapse referrals to three tertiary medical centres. Methods This is a retrospective study of patients referred for rectal prolapse to colorectal surgeons at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Jacksonville, and Phoenix from 2020 to 2024. The primary outcome is the accuracy of rectal prolapse diagnosis. The secondary outcomes are factors that correlate with diagnostic accuracy. Results Rectal prolapse was inaccurately diagnosed in 38.7% (186/480) of patients. Among misdiagnosed patients, the correct diagnosis was haemorrhoids (68.0%, n = 134), pelvic floor dysfunction (24.3%, n = 48) and rectocele (18.7%, n = 37). A diagnosis of rectal cancer was found in 3 patients (1.5%). The most common presenting symptoms were protrusion (66.3%, n = 345) and bleeding (33.6%, n = 175). Among the referring physicians, only 50.5% ( n = 227) performed an anorectal examination. Overall, there was significant variability in diagnostic accuracy across different specialties, with the highest accuracy from colorectal practices (84.0%) and the lowest from urologists (50.0%). Internal medicine physicians had a lower diagnostic accuracy with anorectal examination than without, though it did not reach statistical significance (44.0% vs. 59.5%, p = 0.2). Conclusion Over one‐third of rectal prolapse referrals were incorrectly diagnosed. This study highlights the opportunity for further training of referring providers on anorectal pathologies to improve diagnostic accuracy which could reduce treatment delays and optimize clinical outcomes.

Introduction Social media platforms, particularly X (formerly Twitter), play an influential role in professional networking and information dissemination. This study aimed to examine X usage trends among faculty in a single department of surgery at a large academic institution. Methods Faculty X accounts were analyzed from January to June 2022. Metrics such as follower count, number of accounts followed, and post (formerly: tweets) types (original/quoted reposts) were studied. Themes of posts were categorized as personal, promotional, educational, or related to academic events/conferences. Associations between faculty rank, division, gender, and post metrics were explored using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results Of 133 faculty members, 53 (39.85%) had X accounts, with 3 excluded due to privacy settings. A total of 3476 posts were analyzed, averaging 0-34 posts/month per faculty. Categories included professional (63%, n = 2174), educational (19%, n = 653), and personal (13%, n = 436). No significant associations were found between faculty gender/division and posting rates. However, faculty rank correlated significantly with primary post categories ( P < 0.01). Associate professors, and professors posted more about academic events (2% and 1%) than instructors or assistant professors (1%). The most followed faculty actively promoted colleagues’ work through reposting. Conclusion Less than half the faculty in a single department of surgery engaged with X. Those active predominantly used it for promotion, followed by education and personal use. Adoption remains limited, highlighting opportunities for growth in utilizing X for academic dissemination.

Summary Caustic esophageal injury can cause severe morbidity and mortality. Despite the need for emergent treatment, individual experience in diagnosis and management can be limited. Computed tomography (CT) has emerged as a promising non-invasive modality for assessing injury severity, but the clinical utility of both CT and endoscopy should be investigated. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of the PubMed database identified relevant articles published from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies investigating the use of CT and/or endoscopy in diagnosing and managing caustic esophageal injury. Twelve articles were selected from a pool of 931 studies. Findings suggested that CT was superior in diagnostic capability to endoscopy in high-grade injury and stricture formation, but less so for low grade injuries. Diagnostic algorithms incorporating imaging with laboratory studies have emerged in the literature, which are promising pending additional validation. CT can serve as a valuable, non-invasive tool in the initial evaluation of caustic esophageal injury and is postulated to accurately predict both the need for emergent surgery and the risk of stricture formation. However, CT should not replace but rather complement the use of endoscopy to comprehensively evaluate these potentially highly morbid situations.

Mitral regurgitation (MR) in lung transplant (LTx) recipients is a rare but complex cardiopulmonary phenomenon. The overlap between symptoms of MR and post-LTx complications, such as primary graft dysfunction, complicates its diagnosis and management. This systematic review aims to characterize the incidence, pathophysiology, presentation, and management of MR in LTx patients. We conducted a literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase. The search yielded 133 studies, of which 11 were included. Data regarding MR development, clinical presentation, echocardiographic findings, and management strategies were extracted and analyzed. Perioperative MR, occurring during or immediately post-LTx, was frequently attributed to the systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve (MV) occurring in the setting of hypovolemia and/or inotrope usage. Later postoperative MR, on the other hand, was associated with reverse ventricular remodeling and mitral annular dilation, although some variability in the literature was present. Preexisting MR or ventricular dysfunction, elongated MV leaflets, and bilateral LTx procedure appeared to be risk factors for MR development. Management was dependent on the timing of MR and its pathophysiology, where systolic anterior motion–related MR was treated with medical therapy, whereas postoperative MR often required MV interventions. In conclusion, the diagnosis of MR in LTx patients is complicated by its symptomatic overlap with other post-LTx complications. Echocardiographic monitoring in patients with preexisting MR, regardless of severity, is essential for early identification and management. Further research is needed to better understand the underlying mechanisms and refine management strategies for MR in this population.