Thompson, Emily

Background: Whether robot-assisted cholecystectomy reduces bile duct injury compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains uncertain because prior studies have inadequately accounted for disease severity and have rarely classified injury severity using standardized criteria. This study compared perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted and laparoscopic cholecystectomy across a large healthcare system while adjusting for operative complexity. Study Design: Adults undergoing robot-assisted or laparoscopic cholecystectomy within the Mayo Clinic Enterprise (2014–2025) were retrospectively evaluated. Propensity score weighting adjusted for demographics, surgeon case volume, learning curve, and disease severity using the Tokyo Guidelines and Parkland grading system in patients with acute cholecystitis. The primary outcome was bile duct injury; secondary outcomes included general and procedure-specific complications. Results: Among 23,513 patients (19,998 laparoscopic; 3,515 robotic), robot-assisted cholecystectomy was used more frequently for Parkland grade ≥3 disease. Overall, 227 bile duct injuries occurred (204 laparoscopic; 23 robotic), corresponding to absolute risks of 1.02% and 0.65%, respectively (absolute risk difference −0.37%, 95% CI −0.72% to −0.02%; number needed to treat, 273). Robot-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with lower odds of conversion to open surgery, 30-day readmission, and mortality, shorter hospital stay (β −0.56, 95% CI −0.66 to −0.45; P<0.001), and a 5-minute longer median operative time. In acute cholecystitis, robot-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with lower adjusted odds of bile duct injury (aOR 0.29, 95% CI 0.07–0.78; P=0.011). Conclusions: After adjustment for disease severity and surgeon-related factors, robot-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with lower odds of bile duct injury in acute cholecystitis and improved perioperative outcomes, including shorter hospitalization and lower conversion rates, despite greater use in more complex cases.

ABSTRACT Background Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at risk for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP), yet how their clinical phenotype and outcomes compare with other immunocompromised patients without HIV remains poorly defined. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of adults with proven or probable PCP from 2017 to 2025, including 95 SOT recipients and 588 non‐SOT, non‐HIV immunocompromised patients. The primary outcome was 90‐day mortality, secondary outcomes included new renal failure requiring dialysis, and 30‐day mortality. Outcomes were analyzed using inverse probability weighting (IPW) with winsorization to adjust for baseline differences. Results In unadjusted analysis, SOT recipients had lower 90‐day mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.62, 95% CI 0.39–0.97, p = 0.037). After IPW with winsorization of extreme weights, SOT status remained associated with lower 90‐day mortality (HR: 0.32, 95% CI 0.13–0.76, p = 0.009), and 30‐day mortality (HR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.14–0.92, p = 0.034). SOT recipients had higher odds of renal failure requiring dialysis in unadjusted analysis (OR: 3.49, 95% CI 1.94–6.14, p < 0.001), which persisted after IPW adjustment (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.04–2.51, p = 0.032). Conclusions Despite higher rates of renal failure requiring dialysis, SOT recipients with PCP experienced significantly improved short‐ and intermediate‐term survival compared with other non‐HIV immunocompromised patients, underscoring the need for further investigation into transplant‐associated contributors to PCP outcomes.