Nabavizadeh, Ali

Abstract Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) is an international working group dedicated to developing standardized recommendations for response assessment in children with central nervous system tumors enrolled on clinical trials. This standardization facilitates easier and more reliable comparison of responses across trials. Since the first RAPNO publication in 2013, response guidelines have been issued for medulloblastoma (MB), low-grade glioma (LGG), high-grade glioma (HGG), diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, ependymoma, and craniopharyngioma. Many of these guidelines have already been incorporated into clinical trials to evaluate their effectiveness and accuracy. RAPNO has always been predicated on the idea that these consensus recommendations will require updates over time as they are applied in practice given technological advancements, evolving treatment approaches, and growing knowledge of disease pathology. A half-day RAPNO symposium sponsored by the Society of Neuro-Oncology was held in San Diego, California, United States, on May 15, 2025. This event coincided with the 8th Biennial Pediatric Society of Neuro-Oncology meeting. The main objectives were to identify ongoing RAPNO challenges, discuss potential updates, and plan future initiatives across 3 specific groups: (1) LGG/Craniopharyngioma, (2) HGG/diffuse midline glioma (DMG)/Ependymoma, and (3) MB and other seeding tumors. This manuscript reviews the symposium proceedings and highlights key topics and challenges discussed, as well as outlining future RAPNO initiatives.

Pediatric central nervous system tumors are the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in children. The five-year survival rate for high-grade glioma in children is less than 20%. The development of new treatments is dependent upon multi-institutional collaborative clinical trials requiring reproducible and accurate centralized response assessment. We present the results of the BraTS-PEDs 2023 challenge, the first Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge focused on pediatric brain tumors. This challenge utilized data acquired from multiple international consortia dedicated to pediatric neuro-oncology and clinical trials. BraTS-PEDs 2023 aimed to evaluate volumetric segmentation algorithms for pediatric brain gliomas from magnetic resonance imaging using standardized quantitative performance evaluation metrics employed across the BraTS 2023 challenges. The top-performing AI approaches for pediatric tumor analysis included ensembles of nnU-Net and Swin UNETR, Auto3DSeg, or nnU-Net with a self-supervised framework. The BraTS-PEDs 2023 challenge fostered collaboration between clinicians (neuro-oncologists, neuroradiologists) and AI/imaging scientists, promoting faster data sharing and the development of automated volumetric analysis techniques. These advancements could significantly benefit clinical trials and improve the care of children with brain tumors.

Abstract Background Although response in pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) includes volumetric assessment, more simplified 2D-based methods are often used in clinical trials. The study’s purpose was to compare volumetric to 2D methods. Methods An expert neuroradiologist performed solid and whole tumor (including cyst and edema) volumetric measurements on MR images using a PACS-based manual segmentation tool in 43 pLGG participants (213 total follow-up images) from the Pacific Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Consortium (PNOC-001) trial. Classification based on changes in volumetric and 2D measurements of solid tumor were compared to neuroradiologist visual response assessment using the Brain Tumor Reporting and Data System (BT-RADS) criteria for a subset of 65 images using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Longitudinal modeling of solid tumor volume was used to predict BT-RADS classification in 54 of the 65 images. Results There was a significant difference in ROC area under the curve between 3D solid tumor volume and 2D area (0.96 vs 0.78, P = .005) and between 3D solid and 3D whole volume (0.96 vs 0.84, P = .006) when classifying BT-RADS progressive disease (PD). Thresholds of 15–25% increase in 3D solid tumor volume had an 80% sensitivity in classifying BT-RADS PD included in their 95% confidence intervals. The longitudinal model of solid volume response had a sensitivity of 82% and a positive predictive value of 67% for detecting BT-RADS PD. Conclusions Volumetric analysis of solid tumor was significantly better than 2D measurements in classifying tumor progression as determined by BT-RADS criteria and will enable more comprehensive clinical management.

AbstractPurpose has often been proposed as a quantitative imaging biomarker for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response assessment for various tumors. None of the many software tools for quantification are standardized. The ISMRM Open Science Initiative for Perfusion Imaging–Dynamic Contrast‐Enhanced (OSIPI‐DCE) challenge was designed to benchmark methods to better help the efforts to standardize measurement.MethodsA framework was created to evaluate values produced by DCE‐MRI analysis pipelines to enable benchmarking. The perfusion MRI community was invited to apply their pipelines for quantification in glioblastoma from clinical and synthetic patients. Submissions were required to include the entrants' values, the applied software, and a standard operating procedure. These were evaluated using the proposed score defined with accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility components.ResultsAcross the 10 received submissions, the score ranged from 28% to 78% with a 59% median. The accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility scores ranged from 0.54 to 0.92, 0.64 to 0.86, and 0.65 to 1.00, respectively (0–1 = lowest–highest). Manual arterial input function selection markedly affected the reproducibility and showed greater variability in analysis than automated methods. Furthermore, provision of a detailed standard operating procedure was critical for higher reproducibility.ConclusionsThis study reports results from the OSIPI‐DCE challenge and highlights the high inter‐software variability within estimation, providing a framework for ongoing benchmarking against the scores presented. Through this challenge, the participating teams were ranked based on the performance of their software tools in the particular setting of this challenge. In a real‐world clinical setting, many of these tools may perform differently with different benchmarking methodology.

Abstract Radiographic response assessment in neuro-oncology is critical in clinical practice and trials. Conventional criteria, such as the MacDonald and response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria, rely on bidimensional (2D) measurements of a single tumor cross-section. Although RANO criteria are established for response assessment in clinical trials, there is a critical need to address the complexity of brain tumor treatment response with multiple new approaches being proposed. These include volumetric analysis of tumor compartments, structured MRI reporting systems like the Brain Tumor Reporting and Data System, and standardized approaches to advanced imaging techniques to distinguish tumor response from treatment effects. In this review, we discuss the strengths and limitations of different neuro-oncology response criteria and summarize current research findings on the role of novel response methods in neuro-oncology clinical trials and practice.

Abstract BACKGROUND Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumour progression after radiation therapy (RT) for brain metastases (BM) remains clinically challenging, and accurate imaging is crucial to prevent unnecessary surgery or unwarranted changes in therapy. 18F-Fluciclovine is a PET radiopharmaceutical with low background uptake in the brain and increased uptake in BM. The PURSUE study (NCT04410367) aimed to establish image interpretation criteria (IIC) for detecting suspected recurrent BM after RT using 18F-fluciclovine PET, based on several measures of lesion uptake. MATERIAL AND METHODS Across 7 US sites, 23 patients with solid tumour BM and a previously irradiated ‘reference’ lesion equivocal for recurrence on MRI who were scheduled for craniotomy underwent 18F-fluciclovine PET (185 MBq) <42 days post-MRI and 1-21 days pre-craniotomy. Three independent, blinded readers qualitatively rated lesion 18F-fluciclovine uptake as ‘mild’ (up to blood pool), ‘moderate’ (above blood pool to parotid gland), or ‘marked’ (above parotid gland). The primary endpoint was the diagnostic performance of different thresholds of lesion uptake on qualitative (visual) reads vs central histopathology. Secondary endpoints included diagnostic performance, based on different thresholds, of quantitative (e.g., lesion standardized uptake value [SUV]), and dynamic measures. A committee, including two independent imaging physicians, reviewed all data to establish the IIC, which were subsequently used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine. RESULTS All 23 reference lesions underwent histopathological analysis, with 10 (43%) being pathologically confirmed BM recurrence. The highest performing qualitative measure of 18F-fluciclovine lesion uptake was ‘marked’, rendering 92-100% and variable (40-80%) across readers. SUVmax was a reader-independent, high-performing quantitative metric (AUC 0.87, SUVmax threshold 4.8, 80% sensitivity, 85% specificity). Dynamic measures did not add diagnostic value. Thus, the committee established IIC as: "Lesions with 18F-fluciclovine uptake of a SUVmax equal to or greater than 4.8, or visually greater than the parotid gland, should be considered suspicious for recurrence. Otherwise, recurrence should be considered unlikely." Application of these IIC resulted in 80% sensitivity, 77-85% specificity, 73-80% positive predictive value, and 83-85% negative predictive value across readers. CONCLUSION PURSUE is the first prospective, multicentre study to define IIC for 18F-fluciclovine PET for accurate identification of suspected recurrent BM after RT, verified by histopathology. In this initial cohort, the IIC convey excellent diagnostic performance for 18F-fluciclovine and will help evaluate 18F-fluciclovine PET in future studies. This study was sponsored by Blue Earth Diagnostics Ltd.

Abstract BACKGROUND After radiation therapy (RT) for brain metastases (BM), differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence remains challenging. PURSUE (NCT04410367) evaluated various measures of lesion 18F-fluciclovine uptake to establish image interpretation criteria (IIC) for 18F-fluciclovine-PET to accurately diagnose recurrent BM. METHODS Patients with solid tumor BM and a previously irradiated ‘reference’ lesion equivocal for recurrence on MRI who were scheduled for craniotomy underwent 18F-fluciclovine-PET (185 MBq) <42 days post-MRI and 1-21 days pre-craniotomy. Lesion 18F-fluciclovine uptake was qualitatively rated as ‘mild’ (up to blood pool), ‘moderate’ (above blood pool to parotid gland), or ‘marked’ (above parotid gland) by three independent blinded readers. The primary endpoint was diagnostic performance of different uptake thresholds on qualitative reads vs central histopathology. Secondary endpoints included diagnostic performance, based on different thresholds, of quantitative (e.g., lesion standardized uptake value [SUV]) and dynamic measures. IIC were determined by committee and subsequently used to assess the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine. RESULTS All 23 reference lesions from 23 enrolled patients underwent histopathological analysis; 10 (43%) were pathologically-confirmed BM recurrence. The highest performing qualitative measure was ‘marked’, rendering 92-100% sensitivity and 40-80% specificity across readers. SUVmax was a reader-independent, high-performing quantitative metric (AUC 0.87, SUVmax threshold 4.8, 80% sensitivity, 85% specificity). Dynamic measures did not add diagnostic value. Thus, IIC was established as: “Lesions with 18F-fluciclovine uptake of SUVmax equal to or greater than 4.8, or visually greater than the parotid gland, should be considered suspicious for recurrence. Otherwise, recurrence should be considered unlikely.” Application of the IIC resulted in 80% sensitivity, 77-85% specificity, 73-80% PPV, and 83-85% NPV across the readers. CONCLUSIONS PURSUE is the first prospective, multicenter trial to establish IIC for 18F-fluciclovine-PET for suspected recurrent BM after RT, verified by histopathology. Finalized IIC demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for 18F-fluciclovine and will help evaluate 18F-fluciclovine-PET in future studies.

2001 Background: Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression remains one of the most commonly encountered and clinically challenging scenarios after radiation therapy (RT) for brain metastases (BM). PURSUE (NCT04410367) evaluated the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine, an amino acid PET radiopharmaceutical, based on various lesion metrics, to establish image interpretation criteria (IIC) for suspected recurrent BM after RT. Methods: Patients with solid tumor BM were enrolled across 7 US sites if they had a previously irradiated ‘reference’ lesion equivocal on MRI for recurrence and were planned for craniotomy. 18F-Fluciclovine PET (185 MBq) took place <42 days post-MRI and 1-21 days pre-craniotomy. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive-, and negative-predictive value [PPV/NPV]) of different thresholds of lesion 18F-fluciclovine uptake on qualitative, visual reads vs central histopathological analysis. Lesion 18F-fluciclovine uptake was assessed qualitatively by 3 independent blinded readers who visually rated the uptake as ‘mild’ (up to blood pool), ‘moderate’ (above blood pool to parotid), or ‘marked’ (above parotid). Secondary endpoints included the diagnostic performance based on different thresholds of quantitative (e.g., lesion SUV) and dynamic measures of uptake. A committee, including 2 expert imaging physicians independent to PURSUE, reviewed all data in round-table meetings to establish the IIC, which were subsequently used to assess diagnostic performance. Results: All 23 reference lesions in 23 subjects underwent histopathological analysis, with 10 (43%) confirmed as recurrent tumor. The highest performing qualitative measure was ‘marked’, rendering a sensitivity of 92-100%, with variable specificity of 40-80% across readers. SUVmax was a reader-independent, high-performing quantitative metric on ROC analysis (AUC 0.87, SUVmax threshold 4.8 conferring a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 85%). Dynamic measures did not provide added diagnostic value. After analyzing these metrics, the committee established IIC as: Lesions with 18F-fluciclovine uptake of a SUVmax equal to or greater than 4.8, or visually greater than the parotid gland, should be considered suspicious for recurrence. Otherwise, recurrence should be considered unlikely. Application of the IIC resulted in a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 77-85%, PPV of 73-80%, and NPV of 83-85% across the readers. Conclusions: This is the first prospective multicenter trial to evaluate PET characteristics of suspected recurrent BM after RT, verified by histopathology. Qualitative and quantitative IIC show 18F-fluciclovine to be a high-performing diagnostic tool. These IIC will help evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine PET in future trials. Clinical trial information: NCT04410367 .

AbstractBackgroundQuality of life (QOL) for individuals with sinonasal malignancy (SNM) is significantly under‐studied, yet it is critical for counseling and may impact treatment. In this study we evaluated how patient, treatment, and disease factors impact sinonasal‐specific and generalized QOL using validated metrics in a large cohort over a 5‐year posttreatment time frame.MethodsPatients with SNM who underwent definitive treatment with curative intent were enrolled in a prospective, multisite, longitudinal observational study. QOL was assessed using the 22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22) and University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UWQOL) instruments at pretreatment baseline and multiple follow‐ups through 5 years posttreatment. Multivariable modeling was used to determine demographic, disease, and treatment factors associated with disease‐specific and generalized physical and social/emotional function QOL.ResultsOne hundred ninety‐four patients with SNM were analyzed. All QOL indices were impaired at pretreatment baseline and improved after treatment. SNOT‐22 scores improved 3 months and UWQOL scores improved 6 to 9 months posttreatment. Patients who underwent open compared with endoscopic tumor resection had worse generalized QOL (p < 0.001), adjusted for factors including T stage. Pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) involvement was associated with worse QOL (SNOT‐22, p < 0.001; UWQOL Physical dimension, p = 0.02). Adjuvant radiation was associated with worse disease‐specific QOL (p = 0.03). Neck dissection was associated with worse generalized physical function QOL (p = 0.01). Positive margins were associated with worse generalized social/emotional function QOL (p = 0.01).ConclusionDisease‐specific and generalized QOL is impaired at baseline in patients with SNM and improves after treatment. Endoscopic resection is associated with better QOL. PPF involvement, adjuvant radiation, neck dissection, and positive margins were associated with worse QOL posttreatment.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Endpoints in clinical trials using novel treatments are evaluated by RANO criteria, which provide an estimate of tumor size from two-dimensional measurements along the most prominent axial slice. However, pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGG) commonly have variegated shapes with solid and cystic components, potentially resulting in misevaluation of true tumor volume and thus, ultimately, trial outcome. OBJECTIVES: We aim to characterize treatment response through volumetric assessment of progressive/recurrent pLGGs treated with single-agent everolimus on PNOC001 clinical trial. We seek to identify clinically relevant criteria that provide added value to response assessment beyond 2D measurements. METHODS: In a cohort of 44 patients we performed 3D-segmentation of solid, cystic and whole tumor within our PACS-framework and compared results to previously carried-out central imaging review by RANO criteria which had yielded 15 PD, 27 SD, 2 PR and 0 CR. RESULTS: 8 tumors were solid only and 36 had a mixed solid-cystic appearance. When evaluating the entire tumor (i.e. solid and cystic components combined) and using the same RANO cutoff criteria, one case changed from PR to SD, one changed from SD to PR, 3 changed from SD to PD, and 7 changed from PD to SD, resulting in an overall discordance of 27% of cases. CONCLUSION: We propose that incorporation of volumetrics into response assessment provides additional and potentially more accurate information beyond RANO-based measurements. It is crucial to note that the above-reported changes represent numerical discrepancies as opposed to true-to-reality changes in clinical outcome. Determining representative thresholds for the deployment of volumetric measures in clinical trials will be critical. Future work will include data from the PNOC002 clinical trial and evaluate inter-reader agreement and reader discordance. With the availability of PACS-based 3D-tools in neuroradiology practice, well-defined volumetric criteria could be incorporated prospectively into treatment response analysis in clinical trials.