Abstract Purpose: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common aggressive primary malignant brain tumor in adults with a median age of onset of 68 to 70 years old. Although advanced age is often associated with poorer GBM patient survival, the predominant source(s) of maladaptive aging effects remains to be established. Here, we studied intratumoral and extratumoral relationships between adult patients with GBM and mice with brain tumors across the lifespan. Experimental Design: Electronic health records at Northwestern Medicine and the NCI SEER databases were evaluated for GBM patient age and overall survival. The commercial Tempus and Caris databases, as well as The Cancer Genome Atlas were profiled for gene expression, DNA methylation, and mutational changes with varying GBM patient age. In addition, gene expression analysis was performed on the extratumoral brain of younger and older adult mice with or without a brain tumor. The survival of young and old wild-type or transgenic (INK-ATTAC) mice with a brain tumor was evaluated after treatment with or without senolytics and/or immunotherapy. Results: Human patients with GBM ≥65 years of age had a significantly decreased survival compared with their younger counterparts. While the intra-GBM molecular profiles were similar between younger and older patients with GBM, non-tumor brain tissue had a significantly different gene expression profile between young and old mice with a brain tumor and the eradication of senescent cells improved immunotherapy-dependent survival of old but not young mice. Conclusions: This work suggests a potential benefit for combining senolytics with immunotherapy in older patients with GBM.
Targeted gene expression profiling predicts meningioma outcomes and radiotherapy responses
Abstract Background Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for meningioma, the most common primary intracranial tumor, but improvements in meningioma risk stratification are needed and current indications for postoperative radiotherapy are controversial. Recent studies have proposed prognostic meningioma classification systems using DNA methylation profiling, copy number variants, DNA sequencing, RNA sequencing, histology, or integrated models based on multiple combined features. Targeted gene expression profiling has generated robust biomarkers integrating multiple molecular features for other cancers, but is understudied for meningiomas. Methods Targeted gene expression profiling was performed on 173 meningiomas and an optimized gene expression biomarker (34 genes) and risk score (0 to 1) was developed to predict clinical outcomes. Clinical and analytical validation was performed on independent meningiomas from 12 institutions across 3 continents (N = 1856), including 103 meningiomas from a prospective clinical trial. Gene expression biomarker performance was compared to 9 other classification systems. Results The gene expression biomarker improved discrimination of postoperative meningioma outcomes compared to all other classification systems tested in the independent clinical validation cohort for local recurrence (5-year area under the curve [AUC] 0.81) and overall survival (5-year AUC 0.80). The increase in area under the curve compared to the current standard of care, World Health Organization 2021 grade, was 0.11 for local recurrence (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07–0.17, P < 0.001). The gene expression biomarker identified meningiomas benefiting from postoperative radiotherapy (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.37–0.78, P = 0.0001) and re-classified up to 52.0% meningiomas compared to conventional clinical criteria, suggesting postoperative management could be refined for 29.8% of patients. Conclusions A targeted gene expression biomarker improves discrimination of meningioma outcomes compared to recent classification systems and predicts postoperative radiotherapy responses.
LGG-52. Volumetry-based response characterization of recurrent pediatric low-grade gliomas in PNOC clinical Neuro-oncology trials
Abstract BACKGROUND: Endpoints in clinical trials using novel treatments are evaluated by RANO criteria, which provide an estimate of tumor size from two-dimensional measurements along the most prominent axial slice. However, pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGG) commonly have variegated shapes with solid and cystic components, potentially resulting in misevaluation of true tumor volume and thus, ultimately, trial outcome. OBJECTIVES: We aim to characterize treatment response through volumetric assessment of progressive/recurrent pLGGs treated with single-agent everolimus on PNOC001 clinical trial. We seek to identify clinically relevant criteria that provide added value to response assessment beyond 2D measurements. METHODS: In a cohort of 44 patients we performed 3D-segmentation of solid, cystic and whole tumor within our PACS-framework and compared results to previously carried-out central imaging review by RANO criteria which had yielded 15 PD, 27 SD, 2 PR and 0 CR. RESULTS: 8 tumors were solid only and 36 had a mixed solid-cystic appearance. When evaluating the entire tumor (i.e. solid and cystic components combined) and using the same RANO cutoff criteria, one case changed from PR to SD, one changed from SD to PR, 3 changed from SD to PD, and 7 changed from PD to SD, resulting in an overall discordance of 27% of cases. CONCLUSION: We propose that incorporation of volumetrics into response assessment provides additional and potentially more accurate information beyond RANO-based measurements. It is crucial to note that the above-reported changes represent numerical discrepancies as opposed to true-to-reality changes in clinical outcome. Determining representative thresholds for the deployment of volumetric measures in clinical trials will be critical. Future work will include data from the PNOC002 clinical trial and evaluate inter-reader agreement and reader discordance. With the availability of PACS-based 3D-tools in neuroradiology practice, well-defined volumetric criteria could be incorporated prospectively into treatment response analysis in clinical trials.
THER-01. PRECLINICAL DEVELOPMENT OF EO1001, A NOVEL IRREVERSIBLE BRAIN PENETRATING PAN-ErbB INHIBITOR
Abstract Dysregulation of ErbB-mediated signaling is observed in up to 90% of solid tumors. ErbB family cross-talk is implicated in the development of resistance and metastasis, including CNS metastases. Inhibition of multiple ErbB receptors may result in improved patient outcomes. EO1001 is a novel, patented, oral, brain-penetrating, irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor targeting EGFR (ErbB1), HER2 (ErbB2) and HER4 (ErbB4). METHODS: (1) In vitro testing. EO1001 demonstrates high specificity for the ErbB family of receptors with excellent, balanced equipotent activity against EGFR, HER2 and HER4 (0.4 to 7.4 nM). EO1001 inhibits signaling downstream of wild type EGFR, mutant EGFR (T790M, L858R and d746-750) and HER2. (2) PK and toxicity. In rodent studies in vivo, EO1001 exhibited a half-life of 16–20 hours. EO1001 rapidly enters the CNS and penetrates tumor tissue at higher concentrations relative to plasma. Safety of EO1001 was evaluated by repeat-dosing studies in SD rats and beagle dogs. Toxicities typical of the ErbB inhibitor class, including gastro-intestinal effects, weight loss and decreased activity were observed at higher dose groups in both species. Mortality was observed in SD rats at higher dose groups. (3) In vivo efficacy studies. EO1001 was studied following oral administration in several erbB-positive mouse xenograft models including N87 (Her2+), H1975 (EGFR/T790M), GBM12 (EGFR+), GBM39 (EGVRvIII+). Following oral administration, treatment with EO1001 resulted in a statistically significant improvement in outcomes compared to positive and negative controls in both CNS and systemic tumor models. EO1001 was well-tolerated with no gastrointestinal side effects observed at efficacious doses in these models. CONCLUSION: Based on research to date, EO1001 has the potential to be a best-in-class CNS-penetrating pan-ErbB inhibitor with a safety and pharmacokinetic profile amenable for use as a single agent and in combination with other agents. EO1001 is poised to enter phase 1-2a clinical testing in the second-half of 2019.
NT113, a Pan-ERBB Inhibitor with High Brain Penetrance, Inhibits the Growth of Glioblastoma Xenografts with
EGFR
Amplification