Villanueva-Meyer, Javier E.

The translation of AI-generated brain metastases (BM) segmentation into clinical practice relies heavily on diverse, high-quality annotated medical imaging datasets. The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge has gained momentum for testing and benchmarking algorithms using rigorously annotated internationally compiled real-world datasets. This study presents the results of the segmentation challenge and characterizes the challenging cases that impacted the performance of the winning algorithms. Untreated brain metastases on standard anatomic MRI sequences (T1, T2, FLAIR, T1PG) from eight contributed international datasets were annotated in stepwise method: published UNET algorithms, student, neuroradiologist, final approver neuroradiologist. Segmentations were ranked based on lesion-wise Dice and Hausdorff distance (HD95) scores. False positives (FP) and false negatives (FN) were rigorously penalized, receiving a score of 0 for Dice and a fixed penalty of 374 for HD95. The mean scores for the teams were calculated. Eight datasets comprising 1303 studies were annotated, with 402 studies (3076 lesions) released on Synapse as publicly available datasets to challenge competitors. Additionally, 31 studies (139 lesions) were held out for validation, and 59 studies (218 lesions) were used for testing. Segmentation accuracy was measured as rank across subjects, with the winning team achieving a LesionWise mean score of 7.9. The Dice score for the winning team was 0.65 ± 0.25. Common errors among the leading teams included false negatives for small lesions and misregistration of masks in space. The Dice scores and lesion detection rates of all algorithms diminished with decreasing tumor size, particularly for tumors smaller than 100 mm3. In conclusion, algorithms for BM segmentation require further refinement to balance high sensitivity in lesion detection with the minimization of false positives and negatives. The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge successfully curated well- annotated, diverse datasets and identified common errors, facilitating the translation of BM segmentation across varied environments and providing the tools for future development of personalized volumetric reports to patients undergoing BM treatment.

We describe the design and results from the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge. The BraTS Meningioma Challenge differed from prior BraTS Glioma challenges in that it focused on meningiomas, which are typically benign extra-axial tumors with diverse radiologic and anatomical presentation and a propensity for multiplicity. Nine participating teams each developed deep-learning automated segmentation models using image data from the largest multi-institutional systematically expert annotated multilabel multi-sequence meningioma MRI dataset to date, which included 1000 training set cases, 141 validation set cases, and 283 hidden test set cases. Each case included T2, FLAIR, T1, and T1Gd brain MRI sequences with associated tumor compartment labels delineating enhancing tumor, non-enhancing tumor, and surrounding non-enhancing FLAIR hyperintensity. Participant automated segmentation models were evaluated and ranked based on a scoring system evaluating lesion-wise metrics including dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff Distance. The top ranked team had a lesion-wise median dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.976, 0.976, and 0.964 for enhancing tumor, tumor core, and whole tumor, respectively and a corresponding average DSC of 0.899, 0.904, and 0.871, respectively. These results serve as state-of-the-art benchmarks for future pre-operative meningioma automated segmentation algorithms. Additionally, we found that 1286 of 1424 cases (90.3%) had at least 1 compartment voxel abutting the edge of the skull-stripped image edge, which requires further investigation into optimal pre-processing face anonymization steps.

Abstract Current standard of care for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (GBM) includes maximal safe resection, adjuvant radiation, and chemotherapy with the alkylating agent temozolomide. A subset of gliomas treated with temozolomide develop somatic hypermutation with a predominance of C>T transitions due to the alkylation effects on DNA. However, the frequency of occurrence, clinical ramifications, and predictive biomarkers for developing temozolomide-induced hypermutation (TMZ-HM) in GBM are unknown. Here we performed comprehensive histopathologic, genomic, and epigenomic evaluation of paired initial and recurrent GBM from 106 patients. Seven patients (7%) developed hypermutation at time of first recurrence, while an additional five patients (5%) developed hypermutation at a subsequent recurrence. Patients who developed TMZ-HM had a significantly longer interval between initial surgery and first recurrence (27.8 vs. 9.9 months, p<0.001). In contrast to IDH-mutant gliomas where TMZ-HM is associated with poor prognosis, those patients with IDH-wildtype GBM who developed TMZ-HM had significantly longer overall survival from both initial surgery (67.9 vs. 20.3 months, p<0.001) and from time of recurrence after development of hypermutation (30.9 vs. 9.5 months, p=0.001). There was no difference in oncogenic alteration frequency in initial GBM that subsequently developed TMZ-HM. However, 4 specific CpG sites out of 12 total interrogated sites in the promoter region of MGMT (a DNA repair enzyme) and 5 specific CpG sites in the promoter region of KCNQ1DN (a negative regulator of c-Myc) were significantly more hypermethylated in those GBM that developed TMZ-HM. We then generated a weighted risk score across these CpG sites that can be used to prospectively identify GBM likely to develop TMZ-HM associated with favorable survival. In summary, patients with GBM that develop TMZ-HM follow a more favorable clinical course, and specific MGMT and KCNQ1DN promoter hypermethylation patterns could serve as a biomarker to identify these patients who may potentially benefit from extended alkylating chemotherapy treatment.

PURPOSE The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria for high-grade gliomas (RANO-HGG) and low-grade gliomas (RANO-LGG) were developed to improve reliability of response assessment in glioma trials. Over time, some limitations of these criteria were identified, and challenges emerged regarding integrating features of the modified RANO (mRANO) or the immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) criteria. METHODS Informed by data from studies evaluating the different criteria, updates to the RANO criteria are proposed (RANO 2.0). RESULTS We recommend a standard set of criteria for both high- and low-grade gliomas, to be used for all trials regardless of the treatment modalities being evaluated. In the newly diagnosed setting, the postradiotherapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), rather than the postsurgical MRI, will be used as the baseline for comparison with subsequent scans. Since the incidence of pseudoprogression is high in the 12 weeks after radiotherapy, continuation of treatment and confirmation of progression during this period with a repeat MRI, or histopathologic evidence of unequivocal recurrent tumor, are required to define tumor progression. However, confirmation scans are not mandatory after this period nor for the evaluation of treatment for recurrent tumors. For treatments with a high likelihood of pseudoprogression, mandatory confirmation of progression with a repeat MRI is highly recommended. The primary measurement remains the maximum cross-sectional area of tumor (two-dimensional) but volumetric measurements are an option. For IDH wild-type glioblastoma, the nonenhancing disease will no longer be evaluated except when assessing response to antiangiogenic agents. In IDH-mutated tumors with a significant nonenhancing component, clinical trials may require evaluating both the enhancing and nonenhancing tumor components for response assessment. CONCLUSION The revised RANO 2.0 criteria refine response assessment in gliomas.

Abstract BACKGROUND The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria for high-grade gliomas (RANO-HGG) and low-grade gliomas (RANO-LGG) were developed to improve reliability of response assessment in glioma trials. Over time some limitations of these criteria were identified, and uncertainty emerged regarding integrating features of the modified RANO (mRANO) or the immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) criteria. MATERIAL AND METHODS Informed by data from a cohort of glioblastoma patients and other evaluations of RANO criteria that allowed evaluation of features of the different criteria, the RANO working group developed updates to the RANO criteria (RANO 2.0). RESULTS Based on the 2021 WHO classification of gliomas, we recommend a standard set of criteria for both high and low-grade gliomas, to be used for all trials regardless of the treatment modalities being evaluated. In the newly diagnosed setting, the post-radiotherapy MRI, rather than the post-surgical MRI, will be used as the baseline for future comparison. Since the incidence of pseudoprogression is high in the 12 weeks following radiotherapy, continuation of treatment and confirmation of progression during this period with a repeat MRI, or histopathologic evidence of unequivocal recurrent tumor, is required to define tumor progression. However, confirmation scans are not mandatory after this period nor for recurrent tumors. For treatments with a high likelihood of pseudoprogression, mandatory confirmation of progression with a repeat MRI is highly recommended. The primary measurement remains the maximum cross-sectional area of tumor (2-dimensional) but volumetric measurements are an option. For IDH-wildtype glioblastoma, the non-enhancing disease will no longer be evaluated. In IDH-mutated tumors with a significant non-enhancing component, clinical trials may require evaluating both the enhancing and non-enhancing tumor components for response assessment. CONCLUSION These criteria represent a work in progress that will hopefully improve the assessment of response in glioma trials. Future updates will incorporate novel developments, advanced imaging techniques, and endpoints as they become validated.

Abstract The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria for high-grade gliomas (RANO-HGG) and low-grade gliomas (RANO-LGG) were developed to improve the reliability of response assessment in glioma trials. Over time some limitations of these criteria were identified, and uncertainty emerged regarding integrating features of the modified RANO (mRANO) or the immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) criteria. Informed by data from a cohort of glioblastoma patients and other evaluations of RANO criteria that allowed evaluation of features of the different criteria, we propose updates to the RANO criteria (RANO 2.0). Based on the 2021 WHO classification of gliomas, we recommend a standard set of criteria for both high and low-grade gliomas, to be used for all trials regardless of the treatment modalities being evaluated. In the newly diagnosed setting, the post-radiotherapy MRI, rather than the post-surgical MRI, will be used as the baseline for future comparison. Since the incidence of pseudoprogression is high in the 12 weeks following radiotherapy, continuation of treatment and confirmation of progression during this period with a repeat MRI, or histopathologic evidence of unequivocal recurrent tumor, is required to define tumor progression. However, confirmation scans are not mandatory after this period nor for recurrent tumors. For treatments with a high likelihood of pseudoprogression, mandatory confirmation of progression with a repeat MRI is an option. The primary measurement remains the maximum cross-sectional area of tumor (2-dimensional) but volumetric measurements are an option. For IDH-wildtype glioblastoma, the non-enhancing disease will no longer be evaluated. In IDH-mutated tumors with a significant non-enhancing component, clinical trials may require evaluating both the enhancing and non-enhancing tumor components for response assessment.

Abstract Background Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for meningioma, the most common primary intracranial tumor, but improvements in meningioma risk stratification are needed and current indications for postoperative radiotherapy are controversial. Recent studies have proposed prognostic meningioma classification systems using DNA methylation profiling, copy number variants, DNA sequencing, RNA sequencing, histology, or integrated models based on multiple combined features. Targeted gene expression profiling has generated robust biomarkers integrating multiple molecular features for other cancers, but is understudied for meningiomas. Methods Targeted gene expression profiling was performed on 173 meningiomas and an optimized gene expression biomarker (34 genes) and risk score (0 to 1) was developed to predict clinical outcomes. Clinical and analytical validation was performed on independent meningiomas from 12 institutions across 3 continents (N = 1856), including 103 meningiomas from a prospective clinical trial. Gene expression biomarker performance was compared to 9 other classification systems. Results The gene expression biomarker improved discrimination of postoperative meningioma outcomes compared to all other classification systems tested in the independent clinical validation cohort for local recurrence (5-year area under the curve [AUC] 0.81) and overall survival (5-year AUC 0.80). The increase in area under the curve compared to the current standard of care, World Health Organization 2021 grade, was 0.11 for local recurrence (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07–0.17, P < 0.001). The gene expression biomarker identified meningiomas benefiting from postoperative radiotherapy (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.37–0.78, P = 0.0001) and re-classified up to 52.0% meningiomas compared to conventional clinical criteria, suggesting postoperative management could be refined for 29.8% of patients. Conclusions A targeted gene expression biomarker improves discrimination of meningioma outcomes compared to recent classification systems and predicts postoperative radiotherapy responses.

Abstract INTRODUCTION In patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma, rapid early progression (REP) refers to tumour regrowth between surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis appraised published data on REP to better characterise and understand it. METHODS Systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database from inception to 21/10/21. Studies describing the incidence of REP – tumour growth between the postoperative MRI scan and pre-radiotherapy MRI scan in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma, were included. The primary outcome was REP incidence. RESULTS From 1590 search results, 9 studies were included with 716 patients. The median age was 56.9 years (IQR 54.0-58.8 years). There was a male predominance with a median male-to-female ratio of 1.4 (IQR 1.1-1.5). The median number of days between MRI scans was 34 days (IQR 18-45 days). The mean incidence rate of REP was 45.9% (range 19.3%-72.0%) and significantly lower in studies employing functional imaging to define REP (p&lt; 0.001). REP/non-REP groups were comparable with respect to age (p=0.99), gender (p=0.33) and time between scans (p=0.81). REP was associated with shortened overall survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30-2.43, p&lt; 0.001), shortened progression-free survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30-2.43, p&lt; 0.001), subtotal resection (OR 6.96, 95% CI 4-51-10.73, p&lt; 0.001) and IDH wildtype versus mutant tumours (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.02-0.38, p=0.03). MGMT promoter methylation was not associated with REP (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72-2.28, p=0.39). CONCLUSIONS REP occurs in almost half of patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma and has a strongly negative prognostic effect. Future studies should investigate its biology and effective treatment strategies.

Abstract AIMS In patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma, rapid early progression (REP) refers to tumour regrowth between surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to appraise published data on REP to better characterise and understand this phenomenon. METHOD Systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database from inception to 21/10/21. Studies describing the incidence of REP – tumour growth between the postoperative MRI scan and pre-radiotherapy MRI scan in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma, were included. The primary outcome was REP incidence. RESULTS From 1590 search results, 9 studies were included with 716 patients. The median age was 56.9 years (IQR 54.0- 58.8 years). There was a male predominance with a median male-to-female ratio of 1.4 (IQR 1.1-1.5). The median number of days between MRI scans was 34 days (IQR 18-45 days). The mean incidence rate of REP was 45.9% (range 19.3%-72.0%) and significantly lower in studies employing functional imaging to define REP (p&lt;0.001). REP/non-REP groups were comparable with respect to age (p=0.99), gender (p=0.33) and time between scans (p=0.81). REP was associated with shortened overall survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30-2.43, p&lt;0.001), shortened progression-free survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30-2.43, p&lt;0.001), subtotal resection (OR 6.96, 95% CI 4-51-10.73, p&lt;0.001) and IDH wildtype versus mutant tumours (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.02-0.38, p=0.03). MGMT promoter methylation was not associated with REP (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72-2.28, p=0.39). CONCLUSION REP occurs in almost half of patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma and has a strongly negative prognostic effect. Future studies should investigate its biology and effective treatment strategies.

Abstract Background In patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, rapid early progression (REP) refers to tumor regrowth between surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis appraised previously published data on REP to better characterize and understand it. Methods Systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database from inception to October 21, 2021. Studies describing the incidence of REP—tumor growth between the postoperative MRI scan and pre-radiotherapy MRI scan in newly diagnosed glioblastoma were included. The primary outcome was REP incidence. Results From 1590 search results, 9 studies were included with 716 patients. The median age was 56.9 years (IQR 54.0–58.8 y). There was a male predominance with a median male-to-female ratio of 1.4 (IQR 1.1–1.5). The median number of days between MRI scans was 34 days (IQR 18–45 days). The mean incidence rate of REP was 45.9% (range 19.3%–72.0%) and significantly lower in studies employing functional imaging to define REP (P &lt; .001). REP/non-REP groups were comparable with respect to age (P = .99), gender (P = .33) and time between scans (P = .81). REP was associated with shortened overall survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30–2.43, P &lt; .001), shortened progression-free survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30–2.43, P &lt; .001), subtotal resection (OR 6.96, 95% CI 4.51–10.73, P &lt; .001) and IDH wild-type versus mutant tumors (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.02–0.38, P = .03). MGMT promoter methylation was not associated with REP (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72–2.28, P = .39). Conclusions REP occurs in almost half of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and has a strongly negative prognostic effect. Future studies should investigate its biology and effective treatment strategies.