Moassefi, Mana

Abstract Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (GBM), and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) are two aggressive brain tumors with distinct treatment strategies but overlapping imaging features on MRI. Accurate preoperative differentiation remains a clinical challenge, due to their overlapping imaging features, even when advanced MRI techniques are employed. This study explored deep learning approaches leveraging multi-sequence MRI to distinguish GBM from PCNSL. Models were developed utilizing 146 PCNSL cases, which were matched to146 GBM by age, sex and year of diagnosis. A 3D-DenseNet121 convolutional neural network was trained using two analytical strategies: (i) loss-based model selection and (ii) ensemble prediction using five-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated on an independent validation set of 256 GBM and 37 PCNSL from the same institution as well as 36 PCNSL cases from an external institution. All MRIs were preprocessed using the FeTS pipeline. Using the independent validation cohort, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed overall and stratified by demographic characteristics. Using both T1 post-contrast (T1Gd) and T2-weighted images, the loss-based model achieved AUC=0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.88) and the ensemble model yielded an AUC=0.82 (95% CI: 0.76-0.89). Model performance was similar across males and females; however, model performance was better for subjects older than 50 years of age versus younger than 50. When using only T1Gd images, the loss-based model dropped to AUC=0.55 (95% CI: 0.48-0.63), whereas the ensemble model had AUC=0.79 (95% CI: 0.72-0.85). Models trained with only T2 images achieved AUCs of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.60-0.73) (loss-based) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.69-0.82) (ensemble). These results highlight the added value of the multi-sequence input. Our results confirm the feasibility of using automated deep learning models to differentiate GBM from PCNSL. Notably, the model generalized well to external MRI data, emphasizing its potential utility as a diagnostic aid in real-world clinical workflows.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Glioblastoma is the most common malignant adult brain tumor with poor prognosis, largely due to its heterogeneous landscape. The AI-RANO and RANO-RGP groups organized the BraTS-Pathology 2024 challenge, providing a publicly-available dataset and a benchmarking environment for AI models to automatically identify six clinically-relevant histopathologic sub-regions in H&E-stained whole slide images (WSIs). METHODS We reclassified the TCGA-GBM and TCGA-LGG data according to the WHO 2021 criteria and identified diagnostic WSIs of 188 glioblastoma (IDH-wt, CNS WHO Gr.4) patients. A well-defined annotation protocol was communicated to eight neuropathologists, across eight institutions, who created “ground truth” annotations for Cellular Tumor (CT), Geographic Necrosis, Cortical Infiltration, Pseudopalisading Necrosis (PN), Microvascular Proliferation, and Penetration into White Matter (PWM). Comprehensive WSI curation for elimination of artifactual content and follow up partitioning resulted in approximately 300,000 data samples/patches. FINDINGS Inter-observer variability assessment highlighted difficulties in establishing a “gold standard”. The least annotated sub-regions (PWM and PN) were the most challenging to the participating methods, whereas all methods achieved their highest accuracy in the most annotated sub-region (CT). The highest average performance across sub-regions was obtained by a foundation model-based method. However, this top-ranked solution achieved an F1 score of 0.51 (Accuracy=0.65, Sensitivity=0.56, Specificity=0.93). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that achieving state-of-the-art performance, in automatically identifying clinically-relevant glioblastoma sub-regions, remains an unsolved research problem. Analysis of the ground-truth annotations underscores the critical need for more precisely defined and neuropathologically standardized annotation protocol. Current AI algorithms are facing difficulties in addressing glioblastoma’s heterogeneous histologic landscape in the absence of large, comprehensively, and consistently annotated data. Building upon these findings, and towards developing more accurate AI algorithms, the 2025 iteration of the BraTS-Path challenge is currently on-going by leveraging two million data samples, aiming to enhance our disease understanding and improve diagnostic accuracy, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes.

Abstract The 2021 WHO classification redefined glioblastoma IDH-wildtype (GBM), integrating histopathological and tumor molecular features. Diffuse astrocytic glioma lacking histologic features of necrosis and microvascular proliferation are classified as (molecular) GBM if the tumor is IDH- and H3-wildtype and has one or more additional tumor molecular alterations: TERT promoter mutation, EGFR amplification, or +7/-10. Due to the absence of histopathological features of classic GBM and presentation without enhancement on MRI in approximately 50% of cases, molecular GBM frequently resemble low-grade IDH-mutant gliomas. We hypothesized that MRI-based deep learning models could distinguish IDH-mutant glioma from molecular GBM. We retrospectively identified 97 individuals with molecular GBM, who were matched to 97 individuals with IDH-mutant glioma by age, sex, year of diagnosis, and enhancement on MRI. Of the 97 IDH-mutant gliomas, 51% were 1p/19q codeleted, 42% grade 2, 47% grade 3, and 10% grade 4. Preoperative postcontrast T1-weighted (T1C) and T2-weighted (T2) MRI sequences were used to train a 3D-DenseNet121 model. The model was validated on an independent prospective set of 150 IDH-mutant gliomas and 71 molecular GBM. The MRI-based deep learning model achieved an area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.68-0.82) in the prospective validation set. Sex-stratified AUCs were 0.72 (95% CI: 0.59-0.85) for females and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.68-0.85) for males. Age stratified AUCs were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.60-0.83) for patients under 55 years of age and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.50-0.79) for patients older than 55. These results suggest that discriminative MRI features of IDH-mutant glioma and molecular GBM exist and can be identified from deep learning models. However, radiographic ambiguity exists and underscores the need for further optimization of the deep learning architecture or by integrating additional non-invasive modalities. For example, future work entails integrating germline variants into the model, including rs55705857, which is a causal variant for IDH-mutant glioma. With further validation and integration of multi-modal data, a noninvasive tool may support more personalized decision-making.

Purpose Spine-related pain disorders commonly require interventions such as spinal injections, which are often image-guided and increase in demand as populations age. This study investigates the impact of lifestyle changes following retirement on the incidence of these procedures, hypothesizing that retirement significantly influences the requirement for such treatments. Methods A review of medical records from XXX County between 2000 and 2023 was conducted, focusing on patients who received spinal injections, including epidural steroid, facet, and sacroiliac joint injections. Data were stratified by age, employment status pre- and post-procedure, and type of injection. Statistical analysis, including segmental linear regression and t-tests, was used to assess changes in incidence rates over time and across demographic subsets. Results Out of 134,318 patients analyzed, a total of 359,224 spinal injections were performed. There was a significant ( p -value <.01) increase in the frequency of procedures among individuals around the age of 60, which coincides with the typical retirement age in the United States. The study also highlighted a subsequent decline in the incidence of these procedures between the ages of 70 and 74, suggesting potential adaptation to chronic conditions or the effectiveness of earlier treatments. Conclusion The findings of this study confirm the hypothesis that retirement significantly impacts the demand for spinal injections, as evidenced by the marked increase in procedures at typical retirement ages. This underscores the importance of integrating preventive care and personalized medical guidance into healthcare strategies for individuals nearing retirement to effectively manage spine-related pain disorders and reduce the necessity for invasive treatments.

We describe the design and results from the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge. The BraTS Meningioma Challenge differed from prior BraTS Glioma challenges in that it focused on meningiomas, which are typically benign extra-axial tumors with diverse radiologic and anatomical presentation and a propensity for multiplicity. Nine participating teams each developed deep-learning automated segmentation models using image data from the largest multi-institutional systematically expert annotated multilabel multi-sequence meningioma MRI dataset to date, which included 1000 training set cases, 141 validation set cases, and 283 hidden test set cases. Each case included T2, FLAIR, T1, and T1Gd brain MRI sequences with associated tumor compartment labels delineating enhancing tumor, non-enhancing tumor, and surrounding non-enhancing FLAIR hyperintensity. Participant automated segmentation models were evaluated and ranked based on a scoring system evaluating lesion-wise metrics including dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff Distance. The top ranked team had a lesion-wise median dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.976, 0.976, and 0.964 for enhancing tumor, tumor core, and whole tumor, respectively and a corresponding average DSC of 0.899, 0.904, and 0.871, respectively. These results serve as state-of-the-art benchmarks for future pre-operative meningioma automated segmentation algorithms. Additionally, we found that 1286 of 1424 cases (90.3%) had at least 1 compartment voxel abutting the edge of the skull-stripped image edge, which requires further investigation into optimal pre-processing face anonymization steps.

Abstract Clinical management of IDH wildtype glioblastoma (GBM) and tumefactive multiple sclerosis (tMS) is drastically different. GBM requires maximal safe resection followed by chemoradiation, while tMS outcome is worsened by surgery and radiotherapy. Noninvasive methods are needed to help with accurate diagnosis of tumor and non-tumor etiologies. To develop an MRI-based classification model, tMS subjects diagnosed prior to January 1, 2020, were matched to tMS by age at diagnosis, sex, index MRI date, and 2D/3D acquisition. Inclusion criteria included one cm minimal lesion size and pre-operative post-contrast T1 and T2 images available for analysis. A 3D-DenseNet121 was used to develop a classification model using prespecified parameters: 650 epochs, batch size 16, learning rate 10-3, cross-entropy loss, and AdamW optimizer. The stopping rule was defined as three sequential differences in epoch cross-entropy loss &lt;0.02. Models were developed using both T1gd and T2, as well as from only T1gd and only T2. Training included 220 subjects (110 GBM, 110 tMS). A 2-stage validation design was used, which included both retrospective and prospective cohorts. Stage 1 consisted of 272 retrospective GBM (diagnosed prior to January 1, 2020). Stage 2 consisted of 69 and 34 prospective (diagnosed after January 1, 2020) GBM and tMS, respectively. External validation on the 272 retrospective GBM demonstrated accuracy of 91%, 84%, and 78% for T1gd+T2, T1gd only, and T2 only, respectively. External validation on the 69 prospective GBM demonstrated an accuracy of 87%, 64%, and 67% for T1gd+T2, T1gd only, and T2 only, respectively. The 34 prospective tMS demonstrated accuracy of 76%, 76%, and 82% for T1gd+T2, T1gd only, and T2 only, respectively. This shows the feasibility of deep learning to aid in differential diagnosis of brain lesions. Future work entails the integration of germline variants into the classification model, including variants associated with the risk of glioma or MS.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Prior to 2021, (classic) glioblastoma (GBM) required absence of IDH mutation and histologic features of hypercellularity, nuclear atypia, microvascular proliferation (MVP), and necrosis. Absence of histologic features can be a result of undersampling, with molecular, radiologic, and clinical features consistent with GBM. Accordingly, WHO 2021 defined molecular glioblastoma as diffuse glioma IDHwt, H3wt, with one or more of MVP, necrosis, TERT promoter mutation, EGFR gene amplification (EGFRamp), and/or +7/−10. We hypothesized that there is clinical and radiographic heterogeneity among tumors defined as molecular GBM. METHODS We identified 121 patients that met the criteria for molecular GBM. 121 Classic GBM, defined as IDHwt with hypercellularity, MVP or necrosis, were matched to molecular GBM cases by age, sex, and diagnosis date. All cases were reviewed for relevant histologic features and molecular features. Examined clinical variables included: first symptom, time from first symptom to date of pathological diagnosis, date of first MRI, tumor location, radiographic features of enhancement, diffusion or mass effect, time to progression and overall survival. Clinical, radiologic, and molecular features were compared between classic and molecular GBM. RESULTS Currently,160 cases have been reviewed. Preliminary results show that there is a longer time from first symptom to diagnosis for molecular GBM. Molecular GBM is significantly more likely to be discovered coincidentally, and without enhancement or radiographic necrosis. Classic GBM is significantly more likely to present with focal neurologic deficit as first symptom, regional mass effect on index imaging and have monosomy 10. CONCLUSION While pathologic undersampling accounts for a significant proportion of molecular GBM, our data suggest that there are significant clinical, radiographic, and outcome differences between classical and molecular GBM. Final analysis of the entire cohort will help better define this clinical spectrum.

Abstract There have been several attempts to predict the MGMT promoter methylation status of gliomas using deep learning (DL), with mixed results. These studies did not account for IDH mutation status and did not utilize a uniform methylation assay, introducing potential confounders in the experimental design. We assessed the performance of DL applied to brain MRI to predict the MGMT promoter methylation status of IDH-wildtype gliomas tested with a standardized assay. We included 539 IDH-wildtype gliomas tested with real-time methylation-specific PCR from 2017-2022; 205 (38%) were MGMT promoter methylated. The assay targets 8 downstream MGMT CpG sites using ACTB as control; methylation status is determined based on the difference of PCR crossing-point values: methylated if difference &lt; 5, unmethylated if difference &gt; 7, indeterminate otherwise. We used post-contrast T1 and T2 MRIs as inputs for our models trained using stratified 5-fold cross-validation, 400 epochs, batch size of 16, a learning rate scheduler starting at 10-3, weighted binary cross-entropy loss, and AdamW optimizer. We repeated the experiments using two 3D DL architectures (DenseNet121 and EfficientNetB0) and two image preprocessing pipelines: the BraTS protocol and one that uses padding instead of registration to an MRI atlas, keeping constant other experimental variables. For Densenet121, the best cross-validation AUROCC and F1-score (median, median absolute deviation) were 0.67 (0.06), 0.59 (0.02) using the BraTS protocol, and 0.67 (0.06), 0.58 (0.01) using padding. For EfficientNetB0, were 0.67 (0.02), 0.66 (0.01) using the BraTS protocol and 0.67 (0.01), 0.68 (0.01) using padding. Our findings suggest that it is unlikely that DL models trained on brain MRI can predict the MGMT promoter methylation of IDH-wildtype gliomas. Importantly, our study is the first to focus on an IDH-wildtype adult diffuse glioma cohort tested with a single, standardized MGMT methylation assay, eliminating the variability introduced by different assays and IDH status.

Abstract Missing MRI sequences are common in radiology due to differences in protocols, time constraints, and image artifacts. Missing sequences are a nuisance for subsequent algorithms, such as automated segmentation algorithms requiring multiple MRI sequences (e.g., HD-GLIO, which requires T2, T1, post-contrast T1 (T1c), and FLAIR). Accurate tumor segmentation is a fundamental step in extracting radiomics analysis to use, for example, to predict the IDH status of glioma or their overall survival. We validated a conditional (pix2pix) and super-resolution GAN (SOUP-GAN) for imputing MRI sequences on 285 adult glioma with complete MRI sequences available. We simulated missing T1 sequences and subsequently imputed them from T1c using pix2pix and from sagittal T1 using SOUP-GAN. Using HD-GLIO, we obtained the true segmentations from the complete MRI sequences. HD-GLIO was also used after replacing the original T1 sequence with the one imputed with pix2pix and SOUP-GAN. Thus, there were three sets of segmentations for each subject. We compared T2 and T1c radiomics features extracted with Pyradiomics using segmentations obtained with complete data with features extracted from segmentation obtained with the imputed T1 sequences using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman (BA) analysis. Median (interquartile range) ICC for shape features extracted from T2 and T1c were 0.82(0.76-0.92) using pix2pix and 0.89(0.86-0.94) using SOUP-GAN. Median ICC for first-order-statistics features were 0.90(0.83-0.93) for T2 and 0.90(0.88-0.92) for T1c using pix2pix, and 0.61(0.22-0.82) for T2 and 0.42(0.34-0.57) for T1c using SOUP-GAN. Median ICC for texture features were 0.86(0.82-0.87) for T2 and 0.87(0.79-0.90) for T1c using pix2pix, and 0.69(0.47-0.81) for T2 and 0.76(0.65-0.83) for T1c using SOUP-GAN. We show that T2 and T1c shape features (e.g., volumetric analysis) can be adequately extracted from segmentations obtained with an algorithm requiring multiple MRI sequences using T1 sequences imputed with GANs; however, the effect of imputation differed for first-order-statistics and texture features.

Abstract GBM is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults. O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status is an important prognostic biomarker that predicts the response to temozolomide and guides the treatment decisions. At present, the only reliable way to determine MGMT promoter methylation status is through the analysis of tumor tissues. Given the limitations and complications of histology-based methods, an imaging-based approach for non-invasively MGMT promoter methylation status prediction is beneficial. This study aimed to develop and compare three different deep-learning-based approaches for predicting MGMT promoter methylation status non-invasively. We obtained 576 T2 weighted images (T2WIs) with their corresponding tumor masks and MGMT promoter methylation status from, The Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) 2021 datasets. Dataset was split into five folds at the patient's level stratified by MGMT promoter methylation status to perform a 5-fold cross-validation. We developed three different models: voxel-wise, slice-wise, and whole-brain. For voxel-wise classification, methylated and unmethylated MGMT tumor masks were made into 1 and 2 with 0 background, respectively. We converted each T2WI into 32x32x32 patches. We trained a 3D-Vnet model for tumor segmentation. After inference, we constructed the whole brain volume based on the patch's coordinates. The final prediction of MGMT methylation status was made by majority voting between the predicted voxel values of the biggest connected component. For slice-wise classification, we trained an object detection model for tumor detection and MGMT methylation status prediction; then, we used majority voting for the final prediction. For the whole-brain approach, we trained a 3D Densenet121 for prediction. Whole-brain, slice-wise, voxel-wise, accuracy was 65.42%(SD 3.97%), 61.37%(SD 1.48%), and 56.84%(SD 4.38%) respectively. We found that across the whole-brain, slice-wise, and voxel-wise deep learning approaches, the whole-brain approach is the most effective approach for MGMT methylation status prediction on the BraTS 2021 dataset.